Live-blogging the August 9 White House Press Conference

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Overall all the tax questions pushed Bush towards hiking taxes. Notice the first question out of the gate was on raising the gasoline tax, not about oh, how the gas tax funds are perpetually raided by Congress for non-infrastructure spending. The question on corporate tax rates and carried interest also come from the left, pushing Bush on the matter of tax "fairness." I particulary find the questions in bold obnoxious vis-a-vis fiscal policy.

11:18: president concludes news conference.

11:14, unid'd reporter: Given the decision to commute Libby, is it fair for people to ask about your commitment to accountability?

11:13, unid'd reporter, citing Libby pardon, Al Gonzales hearings: Can you give clear examples of how you've held people accountable during your presidency?

11:12, Ann, followup: So you're confident you can continue to sustain the level of spending in Iraq?

11:10, Ann [Compton?, ABC Radio] : Can you do justice to the kinds of programs the government needs for bridges, housing, and also spend what you are for the war in Iraq?

11:09, unid'd reporter: What about carried interest, is taxing that as capital gains fair? Many people think it's not?

11:06, unidentified reporter: "Are you considering cutting corporate taxes, do you think America's corporations are not making enough money these days?"

11:04, Jim ?? : have you been confident that he shares your view on Iraq [sic]?

11:00, Jim ?? : Reports out of Iran today have Iran saying Maliki told Ahmadinejad that he appreciated Iran's stance. The images seemed very warm. Do you and your Iraqi counterpart see eye to eye on Iran. What message do those images send?

10:58, unid'd reporter: What do you think about report that says procedures tantamount to torture have been used in CIA prisons? You promised to close down Guantanamo Bay but nothing has progressed on that, will we see progress on that?

10:57, Holly Rosencrantz, Bloomberg: Should Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac be allowed to buy more mortgages above their current limits?

10:56, Mike Emanuel, Fox News: Do you have a message to the regime in Iran about their weapons ending up in Iraq and harming US citizens?

10:55, Gregory, NBC :What's going on in the housing market? Is it a correction or a crisis in your view?

10:54, Gregory, NBC : You weren't this circumspect when you were talking to reporters yesterday.

10:52, David Gregory, NBC : Do you think that housing prices will continue to fall? Do you think that the inability of people to borrow will spill out to the general economy? Are you considering a government bailout for people who might lose their homes?

10:46, Jim Axelrod, CBS : Given the premise of the surge is to give the Iraqi govt. breathing space to get things done and they'r enot getting things done, don't the American people deserve to hear more than you're telling the Iraqis to do better?

10:46, Cochran, ABC: Can we assume CIA is in Pakistan?

10:44, John Cochran, ABC : You were asked if you had actionable intelligence about Pakistan, would you act, and you said, if we had good actionable intel, we'd get it done. Who is we? Would you do it unilaterally? And about Barack Obama, some in your party comparing him to Dr. Strangelove? Do you agree with that?

10:43 Henry, CNN: Can you tell us when you found out it was't enemy fire, that it was friendly fire?

10:42, Ed Henry, CNN, noting some still believe Cpl. Pat Tillman was murdered: "now you have a chance to pledge to the family that your government, your administration will get to the bottom of" Pat Tillman's death. Will he pledge to get to the bottom of the cause of Tillman's death

10:40, unidentified reporter :question about concern over stability of Pervez Musharraf's regime in Pakistan.

10:38, Terence Hunt, AP: Would you be willing to go along with an increase in gasoline tax of 5 cents or more?

10:35: Bush rattles off list of initiatives he's proposed for encouraging education, technology developments.

10:34: President notes $1.9 trillion economic expansion since tax cuts.

10:33 EDT: The President is holding a press conference in a few moments. I'll be live-blogging the questions here. Please keep in mind my transcript of the questions are on the fly and not necessarily verbatim. I'll update later with a link to the White House transcript.

Update: White House transcript available here.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

 Ken, make sure to ask

 Ken, make sure to ask about the recent events in Iraq reported on http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=category&sectionid=1&id=4&Itemid=128 

specifically: http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13246&Itemid=21

and http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13240&Itemid=21

and http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13244&Itemid=21

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

Odd isn't it dscott, that

Odd isn't it dscott, that the msm don't seem to have access to such websites. One can only speculate on why this would be. ????? Or do you think it's simply a matter of poor reading comprehension?

We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. - Queen Victoria

I think we both know the

I think we both know the answer to that, it does not involve a lack of education or lack of mental ability, it just doesn't fit their politcal view of the world hence the possibility and conceivability doesn't exist. It's kind of strange but here is a group of people who define themselves not by what they know but by what they choose to ignore.  Going through life with one's fingers in their ears and saying lalalala, lalalala to drown out dissent/alternate possibilities is key to a person who's life is based on dogma to achieve inner security.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

Did that nit-wit David

Did that nit-wit David Gregory actually ask if the government should bail people out if they are threatened with losing their homes?  I swear, these people literally have NO IDEA of how an economy actually works, or how to follow a hare-brained idea like that to it's inevitable conclusion.

What next, assume people's car payments if they over-extend themselves????

"10:46, Cochran, ABC: Can

"10:46, Cochran, ABC: Can we assume CIA is in Pakistan?"

You can assume whatever you want. You're going to do that anyway.

*****

"Some people have a way with words. Other people, er, I don't know. Not have way, I guess." - Steve Martin

Bush - follow up to "bailout talk"

Bush - follow up to "bailout talk" 

Ken.. On this one, "Are you considering a government bailout for people who might lose their homes," it's too bad he didn't have a follow Q to Gregory. Perhaps, you can phrase a Q around these concepts:

1. The president could have stated.  You know we have passed legislation and funded an average of $85,000 each, in Federal grants (that's tax free hand-outs), to some 200,000 folks who either lost their homes or suffered tremendous damage from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita - have you ever reported on that David?

2. Back in the 2000, following the historic crash of the late 90's economic bubble, when hundreds of companies were collapsing; the result being that millions of Americans lost their jobs, their life savings and their kids college education funds, I don't remember you hounding that occupant of the White House for bailouts?

I saw the press conference

I saw the press conference and can't believe how disrespectful, slanted and demeaning some of the press treats our president.  Those guys and gals live in another world.  If this is the case, what can we believe from the media?  It seems they will only accept a response that fits their agenda.

Orlin

Orlin. Actually, in my view, it was rather mild mannered compared to many that this press corps puts President Bush through, but yes, they are consistenly insulting and agenda driven. It seems that there is seldom anything good that they wish to be on the same page with this administration - quite a bit different from the last one.

Seriously, a fair question which should have been asked of the President several times over during these past few years would go like this:

Mr. President. Whew. You really got handed a load when you took this job. We were in the midst of an historic correction in the markets. The corporate atmosphere was contaminated with fraud and corruption (Enron, Anderson Accounting, WorldCom, Adelpia, etc.). We were in the midst of loosing $10 trillion of value (hyped up overvaluation) in the equity markets. Millions of Americans were loosing their jobs and health insurance, as so many companies went out of business or were forced to downsize as this ran rampant through the economy. And now, we have seen for years that you turned all of this around and we have had rather exceptional growth and rehiring. We think that the American people ought to be just a tad proud that you helped turned it around. Oh, did I mention that you have done this with the load of 9/11, 2 wars, historic destruction from hurricanes, etc?

David Gregory - Clinton Shill

10:52, David Gregory, NBC : Do you think that housing prices will continue to fall? Do you think that the inability of people to borrow will spill out to the general economy? Are you considering a government bailout for people who might lose their homes?

This is almost funny if it wasn't so deliciously corrupt and disgusting really. David frackin' Gregory expressing concern for homeowners.

Get this... David Gregory’s wife is Beth Wilkinson, Executive vice president and the general counsel for Fannie Mae.

Which is one massive link to Jamey Gorelick – who is also a personal friend of Hillary Clinton!

You see, Gorelick used to be Vice Chairman of Fannie Mae, until she bailed as it was going under to join the main law firm representing Fannie Mae.

They would be the world's largest law firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

In fact, Gorelick and Wilkerson have a long history together that goes back to the Clinton Justice department, and the wall between the FBI and the CIA fully erected by Gorelick.

Beth Wilkerson was Gorelick's coverup queen (fronting for Clinton, of course) on the Timothy McVeigh prosecution team, when she told Judge Matsch and denied on the record that the federal government had any evidence that anyone other than McVeigh had planned and carried out the worst terrorist attack on American soil.

So, she’s married to Gregory; Gee, d’ya think they share a similar political philosophy of COVERING FOR THE CLINTONS?

Okay some Fannie Mae facts. You can read the whole thing here at..

But here's a taster

It’s a familiar story. An enormous company reveals its “accounting problems.” The problems are found to be far worse than anyone realized. The CEO is forced to resign. Other high-ranking executives follow. The stock price begins to drop. Billions of dollars might be lost. The politically savvy CEO even has direct connections to a presidential administration.

If the word “Enron” has formed in your mind, you’d be close, but wrong. Welcome to Fannie Mae, the nation’s second-largest financial company. Only Fannie Mae, officially known as the Federal National Mortgage Association, isn’t like any standard Wall Street business. It was founded by Congress to increase the amount of capital available for the secondary mortgage market. Fannie Mae is a Government Sponsored Entity (GSE) and enjoys a congressional charter, limited oversight, and a strongly implied government commitment to cover any losses.

This billion-dollar scandal has highlighted questionable practices by the lender and the response from America’s broadcast media has been almost complete silence.


Look at how an Oct. 4, 2004, Wall Street Journal editorial referred to the crisis at Fannie Mae:

“For years, mortgage giant Fannie Mae has produced smoothly growing earnings. And for years, observers have wondered how Fannie could manage its inherently risky portfolio without a whiff of volatility. Now, thanks to Fannie's regulator, we know the answer. The company was cooking the books. Big time.”

Analysts are predicting that Fannie Mae will have to compensate for $11 billion in accounting errors. To put this in perspective, Enron overstated its earnings by $567 million: 5 percent of Fannie Mae’s fiasco. Since February 2004, Fannie Mae’s stock has plummeted from a high of about $80 a share to roughly $55 per share. That’s a decline of 31 percent, or a loss of more than $20 billion in value to stockholders. Despite these incredible losses and errors, as well as three separate investigations, the broadcast media have ignored Fannie’s decline.

 

Check out my latest YouTube...but only if you support the troops and their mission: Better Men Than Me/The Battle For Fallujah