Blogger Michelle Malkin has an excellent item today at RealClearPolitics.com about how the media have a lack of interest in stories about Christian missionaries kidnapped, brutalized, and tortured at the hands of Islamist terrorists. Here's an excerpt, after which I share my thoughts on what we could expect to see from the biased media should some of the South Korean missionaries make it back alive and find themselves interviewed on say "Dateline NBC":
The blood of innocent Christian missionaries spills on Afghan sands. The world watches and yawns. The United Nations offers nothing more than a formal expression of "concern." Where is the global uproar over the human rights abuses unfolding before our eyes?
For two weeks, a group of South Korean Christians has been held hostage by Taliban thugs in Afghanistan. This is the largest group of foreign hostages taken in Afghanistan since Operation Enduring Freedom began in 2001. What was their offense? Were they smuggling arms into the country? No. Inciting violence? No. They were peaceful believers in Christ on short-term medical and humanitarian missions. Seventeen of the 23 hostages are females. Most of them are nurses who provide social services and relief.
[...]
I noted the media shoulder-shrugging about jihadist targeting of Christian missionaries five years ago during the kidnapping and murder of American Christian missionaries Martin and Gracia Burnham in the Philippines. The silence is rooted in viewing committed Christians as alien others. At best, there is a collective callousness. At worst, there is outright contempt -- from Ted Turner's reference to Catholics as "Jesus freaks" to CBS producer Roxanne Russell's casual insult of former GOP presidential candidate Gary Bauer as "the little nut from the Christian group" to the mockery of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's Mormon faith.
Curiously, those who argue that we need to "understand" Islamic terrorists demonstrate little effort to "understand" the Christian evangelical missionaries who risk their lives to spread the gospel -- not by sword, but through acts of compassion, healing and education. An estimated 16,000 Korean mission workers risk their lives across the globe -- from Africa to the Middle East, China and North Korea.
Michelle is right about the media disinterest in Christian martyrs. Of course, if some of them come out of the ordeal alive and the media interviewed them, what could we expect?
Sadly, I think we need look no further than the case of Dayna Curry and Heather Mercer, who were practically given the third degree in the media months after their rescue from an Afghan prison in Operation Enduring Freedom.
Take the June 11, 2002 edition of "Dateline NBC" in which reporter John Larson gave the missionaries and their pastor Jimmy Seibert the third degree for evangelizing in Afghanistan, questioning the "ethics" of the missionary work being covert, insinuating and that their missionary work was akin to "spying."
Portions in bold are my emphasis:
LARSON: Might a Muslim say the people of Afghanistan have lost everything and the only thing they have left if their faith.
Ms. MERCER: Mm-hmm.
LARSON: And a missionary or an aid worker comes in and tries to take away the one thing they have left.
Ms. MERCER: Mm-hmm.
LARSON: What do you say to them?
Ms. MERCER: For them to hear, 'God loves you. There is hope for your country. We believe that God wants to rebuild Afghanistan.' It actually doesn't take anything away, but it gives them what they're longing for.
LARSON: (Voiceover) Christian evangelists face almost impossible obstacles. In most conservative Muslim countries, evangelism is against the law. And that poses a defining challenge: Should Christians conceal their real agenda? Many Christian aid workers say no. Seibert, however, is not so sure.
(Seibert)
LARSON: Should a Christian be covert?
Mr. SEIBERT: That's a great question, isn't it?
LARSON: I mean, it's an ethics question.
Mr. SEIBERT: Yeah, yeah. It's an ethics question. I think that you're--you're getting into a whole semantics deal. I believe that people can be, quote, unquote, covert and be doing the will of God from their heart.
LARSON: Do you wind up having to teach, to instruct your people to--the nice way to say it would be discreet?
Mr. SEIBERT: Mm-hmm.
LARSON: The mean way to say it would be deceptive.
Mr. SEIBERT: Right. Yeah.
LARSON: It's like are you training spies for Jesus?
Mr. SEIBERT: Right. Yeah. I would say no. We're training spies. We're telling people, 'Hey, be wise in all your relationships.'
LARSON: Be smart about it.
Mr. SEIBERT: Yeah, be smart about it, but don't be deceptive.
LARSON: (Voiceover) Easy to say, but for Mercer and the Antioch team, apparently difficult to do.
(Mercer and Curry at press conference)
LARSON: Is that something that's hard for you to say? Can you say, 'Well, yes, we were there to plant churches in Afghanistan'?
Ms. MERCER: No. I mean, I was there to share the love of Jesus and to serve the poor.
LARSON: (Voiceover) Yet Heather's own business card, handed out before leaving for Afghanistan, seems to clearly state what she planned to do: church planting in Central Asia
Opening the program, Larson told viewers that Curry and Mercer had been deceptive in defense of their work and gave critics the chance to smack around Curry and Mercer for sharing their faith rather than merely distributing food and performing charitable work. (portions in bold are my emphasis):
JOHN LARSON reporting:
(Voiceover) It was one story from September 11th with a storybook ending. The American aid workers, Heather Mercer and Dayna Curry, escaping the clutch of the Taliban who'd unjustly arrested them, charging them with trying to spread Christianity. After their terrifying ordeal, the two women received presidential praise at the White House.
(Heather Mercer and Dayna Curry being reunited with family members; Mercer and Curry with family at White House)
President GEORGE W. BUSH: They had a calling to serve the poorest of the poor. And Afghanistan is where that calling took them.
LARSON: (Voiceover) But behind the president was the mother of one of the women who says the president, and even the nation, had been misled by the aid workers.
(Mercer and Curry with family at White House)
Ms. DEB ODDY: They realized that they were in there breaking the law.
[...]
LARSON: (Voiceover) A Christian herself, Oddy says she pleaded with the church to cancel the trip. She even wrote to her congressman and the State Department, urging them to stop what she called Antioch's unconscionable, ill-fated mission before we watch their executions on the 6:00 news. But she got nowhere.
(Oddy typing on computer; documents; excerpt from document)
Ms. ODDY: Basically, there was nothing that they could do because they were not breaking any US laws.
I have some more newsletters.
LARSON: (Voiceover) But Oddy says there was something else which made her fear even more for her daughter's safety. She saw growing proof that the Antioch team was not being up front about what they were doing. First, there was a flyer which her daughter gave friends, urging them, by Oddy's description, to use secret code words in their letters.
(Oddy looking at papers)
Ms. ODDY: (Reading) Be creative. Instead of Jesus, say "the carpenter." Instead of Christians, say "believers." Instead of the Bible, say "the book."
LARSON: (Voiceover) And, she says, Antioch Ministries got another organization already working in Afghanistan to sponsor them. Shelter Now International, a humanitarian relief effort based in Germany.
[...]
Ms. ODDY: Convert souls to Christianity, those who had not heard the word before. And they had hoped to build a church.
LARSON: So basically the humanitarian aid story is essentially a cover story.
Ms. ODDY: It was certainly secondary to their mission.
LARSON: (Voiceover) Her daughter sent family members this videotape of her home, luxurious by Afghan standards. Inside a cabinet in the living room, something banned by the Taliban.
(Home video of Mercer's home)
Ms. MERCER: (From videotape) We keep our viewing machine, our vision machine in there. Can't really say the real word.
LARSON: (Voiceover) It was a VCR, smuggled into the country. Why? Oddy found the answer in an e-mail.
(Home video of Mercer's home; Oddy reading)
Ms. ODDY: (Reading) Please pray that we will have many opportunities to have people over to watch the film.
LARSON: (Voiceover) What they were talking about was the "Jesus" film. In Afghanistan, under arguably one of the world's most repressive regimes, it was not only illegal to show it; anyone who watched it might be arrested or executed. According to a Taliban edict, "the death penalty for anyone who converts from Islam to another religion." But to Oddy's distress, she read that her daughter was showing the film anyway.
(Excerpt from "Jesus"; edict; excerpt from edict; excerpt from "Jesus")
Ms. ODDY: (Reading) One of my teammates and I were able to share the J film with several families who live in a nearby neighborhood.
LARSON: (Voiceover) And there was the radio, Christian stations outside the country where they suggested Afghans hear the word.
(Radio tower; radio dial)
Ms. ODDY: (Reading) The radio program is an incredible way to learn about him. We distributed several in the last two weeks.
LARSON: (Voiceover) In her heart, Oddy says she knew what was coming.
(Oddy reading)
Unidentified Man #2: Their purpose was to invite people of Afghanistan and all over the world to accept Christianity.
LARSON: (Voiceover) On August 3rd, the Taliban's religious police arrested Mercer and Dayna Curry in a local home. Word of the arrest reached Oddy a day later.
(Taliban police with Christian materials)
Ms. ODDY: August 4th...
LARSON: Mrs.--Mrs...
Ms. ODDY: Just let me recover.
LARSON: Yes, of course.
(Voiceover) Her worst fears were now a reality. Her daughter was in prison facing the death penalty for deliberately breaking the law in a country with which the United States had no diplomatic relations. The US Army, of course, came to the rescue, and one day after Heather Mercer and Dayna Curry were set free, they told the world that 80 percent of the Taliban's charges against them were incorrect.
(Mercer being arrested; prison; Afghan citizens; US Army helicopters; Mercer and Curry at press conference)
Offscreen Voice #2: What were the 20 percent which were?
LARSON: (Voiceover) It seemed they were not exactly prepared for the question. They admitted they'd been in an Afghan home, that they'd given a child a book about Jesus.
(Mercer and Curry at press conference)
Ms. DAYNA CURRY: Also, we had shown them part of the "Jesus" film, and that was true, so.
LARSON: (Voiceover) But not a word about secretly trying to convert Muslims to Christianity. In fact, just the opposite, suggesting that any religious conversations had happened almost by accident.
(Mercer and Curry at press conference)
Ms. MERCER: So it was very natural for them to share with us, and often they would ask us questions about our own faith.
LARSON: (Voiceover) In the weeks to come, sharing appeared to be the operative phrase.
(Mercer and Curry with Katie Couric)
Ms. MERCER: We just shared who we are, and live life with the Afghans.
Ms. CURRY: It was such a joy to get to share and to share how Jesus has changed my life and share how he has given me hope.
Ms. [sic] THOR ARMSTRONG: You know, you cannot go into a situation without a hidden agenda. You just can't.
LARSON: (Voiceover) Thor Armstrong is the founder and former director of Shelter Now International, the aid organization which helped get Mercer and the Antioch team into Afghanistan. He says if the workers were proselytizing, he believes they were doing more harm than good.
(Thor Armstrong; Afghan citizens)
Mr. ARMSTRONG: People then, they realize, 'Oh, you're not really here to help me. You're here to fulfill your agenda. You're here because, you know, you have some quota that you have to reach, some number of souls, perhaps, that you have to save.'
LARSON: (Voiceover) Armstrong, a devout Christian, says proselytizing, especially as a secret agenda, not only demeans people in need but threatens the safety and success of relief efforts around the world. In fact, he felt so strongly about that, that in 1990, Armstrong took a stand.
(Armstrong; aid workers with people)
Mr. ARMSTRONG: Proselytizing is out. You can't do that, period.
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Yeah, I commented on this
August 1, 2007 - 10:25 ET by drillanwrYeah, I commented on this yesterday on Pat Dollard's site ... Where I can use more colorful language to express opinion.
Here, I'll just say I am praying for these wonderful people ... and also pray a small but lethal group of our Special Forces is danger close to finding these folks and blowing the motherfudging $#!+ out of their &*%^&@ captors ...
If any building in New York should hit the ground, it should be the UN.
drill.. Well friend you
August 1, 2007 - 18:10 ET by bigtimerdrill..
Well friend you said it all for me.
I too have prayed for thse people adn hope they are going to end up okay after all of this.
...the lack of attention to this has been despicable.
I have heard the Afghani army is dropping leaflets in the area implying they are going to go in (or someone is with some plan)...I heard this early today on Fox...I haven't heard anything since.
That's scary
August 1, 2007 - 10:40 ET by exLibIt's scary how people are so illiterate about what the Bible teaches. And how easily liberal Christians are so willing to give up key commands of God to "do good".
By trying to save someone's soul for eternity instead of giving them a piece of bread that will save them for a day at most is doing more harm than good? A "devout" Christian this man is NOT.
Clearly there are many stories in both Old and New Testament how believers concealed their faith and used code words in times of severe persecution, knowing that the end goal was evangelism.
Jesus will say to Armstong, "go away you evildoer, I never knew you".
Yet here you have the news media, who can't stand it that our President is a practicing Christian, and would rather see Islam brutally praciticed than have some Christians spread the word.
Oh, no we can't deprive a terrorist of his Q'ran or some special food.
In the states these same people are "afraid" that because Bush gives a few bucks to some christian charity and actually believes in Jesus, for real, that we are under some kind of "theocracy".
At the same time, we have to "protect" the right of Muslims to stay the way they are and kill others who try to convert.
As I have mocked some liberals to their face. They say Saddam was a brutal man, but at least he killed his "own" people. In invading Iraq we have killed "innocent civilians" which we shouldn't do, we should leave that to Saddam who had a soveriegn right to do it himself.
I can't help but notice
August 1, 2007 - 10:40 ET by c5thenThe media always focus on the christian missionaries and their mission of spreading the gospel and possibly converting some who hear it. Yet never seem to even mention the anti-conversion laws in the islamic countries. A religion that has a tenent of forced conversion is so insecure as to make the choice of conversion away from islam a crime punishable by death. Why not hold up the two religions and contrast them? Christianity, a religion of personal choice and sincerity, against Islam, a religion of mass regimentation and group appearance.
The media seem not to care at all, but rather revil in the opportunity to portray Christians in a bad light, even if it is a stretch.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
They can't allow the hated
August 1, 2007 - 10:49 ET by mattmThey can't allow the hated Christian to be sympathized with...especially if their assailant is an Islamofascist terrorist which they regard as a poor, misunderstood victim of Western imperialism, which was born out of the Judeo-Christian world-view of historical Europe. I wouldn't be surprised if they secretly cheer when Christians are killed.
"...the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." - John 16:2
I'm not so sure their
August 1, 2007 - 10:52 ET by HelenSI'm not so sure their cheering is even so secret.
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
Talibastards in Ashcanistan.
August 1, 2007 - 11:08 ET by Dave RKen,
Thanks for posting this, as I have been wondering where all the bleeding-heart libs, who have been whining and crying about Gitmo and Darfur ad nauseam, have been hiding recently.
Then again, the hostages being held and systematically murdered by the Afghan talibastards are Christians and probably do not hate America to a sufficient degree to attract the interest of the liberal dimtwits in the MSM.
Help Fred defeat everybody.
BREAKING:
August 1, 2007 - 11:09 ET by drillanwrThis, from over at patdollard.com ...
Breaking: Operation Underway To Rescue Korean Hostages
August 1st, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.
http://patdollard.com/2007/08/01/breaking-operation-underway-to-rescue-korean-hostages-3/
Conflicting reports are coming in. Some Afghan government sources deny the operation…this may be due to security concerns, especially because the operation is particularly complex and it may require staggered strikes, due to the fact that the hostages are believed to be scattered in multiple locations. Developing…
Here’s Reuters’ Take:
GHAZNI, Afghanistan (Reuters) - A military operation to rescue the remaining 21 Korean hostages held by Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan began on Wednesday, hours after a Taliban deadline expired, a provincial official said.
“The operation has started,” said Khowja Seddiqi, the district chief of Ghazni’s Qarabagh district, where the Taliban kidnapped 23 Korean Christian volunteers nearly two weeks ago.
He did not give more details or say which forces were involved.
Any attempt to rescue the hostages is fraught with risk, as the kidnappers have split the 18 women and three men into small groups and are holding them in different locations across the mainly flat terrain.
The Taliban could not be immediately be contacted, but spokesmen for the radical Islamist movement have repeatedly said any use of force would jeopardize the lives of the hostages.
Earlier the army had dropped leaflets warning civilians of an assault.
“The national army has dropped leaflets from helicopters telling people in several districts to evacuate their houses because it wants to launch an operation,” said Khowja Seddiqi, district chief of Qarabagh, in Ghazni province.
The Taliban have killed two male hostages after the Afghan government refused to bow to rebel demands to free jailed insurgents.
The defense ministry said earlier that the Afghan National Army had launched an operation in Ghazni, but insisted it was “routine” and was not linked with the kidnapping.
Earlier in the day, a Taliban spokesman said the group was expecting to hear from Afghan mediators over its demand for the government to release rebel prisoners, but insisted some of the hostages would be killed if that demand was not met by 3:30 a.m. EST.
The Afghan government has said that giving in to rebel demands would only encourage more kidnapping.
Koreans sould not be there - LA Times
August 1, 2007 - 11:23 ET by Gary HallBack on July 26, the LA Times did actually invest it's resources in a story (lately, it's passing along AP wire bits), however, the pitch was more on, "..criticize them for taking the trip in the first place," as was highlighted in the bi-line. While the July 26th piece passed along (buried in the text) the position from the group was that it "had no religious motives," it remained fixed on the projected problem being that these innocent brave souls should not have been in Afghanistan, should not have been where they were in Afghanistan and on the troubles of the Karzai government. Highlights included:
Perhaps the Taliban is at fault?
The lack of outrage over the brutal actions of the Taliban is stunning. Contrasted that to those daily stories on issues in which journalists are deeply moved and the norm is to find a spokesperson from some activist group to expound on the outrage. .."Mr. Care of the activist group, Nomore.com, said that, "their members are working around the clock to bring worldwide attention upon these terrorist thugs." He added, "how can we not speak out? Tomorrow, a million will be marching in front of the United Nations demanding action from the world body." Sound familiar?
Here, as is the case in most terrorist related events, we never seem to hear from the human rights groups, or the civil rights groups, or the "peace" groups, or the woman's rights groups, or the child protection groups. It's that these people should not be there.
Ken, you quoted, "The world watches and yawns.." No kidding. Back in the mid to late 1990's (under Clinton and Annan's watch), when the Taliban made their move to force their brand of intolerant oppressive religion on a suffering society killing more than 60,000 innocents in the process, the world did little more than "watched and yawned."
I suppose ...
August 1, 2007 - 11:33 ET by drillanwr... human shields or antiwar activists from South Korea would have the right to be there if they were there to protest American military forces.
End Times
August 1, 2007 - 11:42 ET by Maverick313These are the End Times folks... the persecution of Christians is going to get worse and worse. It has been slowly building up over the past 15 years. If you don't believe me start reading the few last chapters of the Bible. Scary but true.
If you don't stand behind our troops; please feel free to stand in front of them!
Um the last few chapters of
August 1, 2007 - 11:43 ET by LeonUm the last few chapters of the Bible were about the Romans.
What does that have to do with us?
ROTFLMAO
August 1, 2007 - 11:46 ET by LionKingWow!!! Thanks for the insight. ROTFLAMO!!!
Uhh, Leon,
August 1, 2007 - 11:50 ET by Dave RLMAO-You have to read it all the way to the end.
Help Fred defeat everybody.
A classic
August 1, 2007 - 11:57 ET by exLibThis is a classic
Just wondering . .
August 1, 2007 - 11:47 ET by FastEdAre these hostages being tortured like the folks in Gitmo? Are they being allowed to exercise or pray? Clean clothes? Bibles? I guess the religion of hate is just practicing what they preach.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Well I did hear that the
August 1, 2007 - 14:20 ET by SQL_SamWell I did hear that the muslim captors were going to flush the Bibles in the toilet, but found out that they couldn't bring the bibles into the country to begin with (damn) and also that they dont have toilets either - double blow </sarc>
I read Malkin's column on
August 1, 2007 - 15:01 ET by TheConservativeChemistI read Malkin's column on townhall.com today...she's totally correct. In the West, only whites, Christians and Jews, straights, and men are fair game for demeaning ridicule and insulting. Everyone else is "protected......." and it's a "hate crime"
So some Christian missionaries were murdered..."yawn" wake me up when we lose in Iraq...this is probabaly the conversation that goes on in newsrooms across the US.
Yet it is Christianity and Judaism that have brought (mostly)everything that is good to Western society, from science and medicine to democracy and the laws and way we are supposed to treat people...as she says, the true religions of peace. If you haven't read the full article, you should. It's a great piece of writing. As for the attitude of the lefties in the transcript underneath, sadly I'm not surprised. Yep, it's always the victims fault...unless the victim is in a "protected class", then it's the USA/white straight christian man's fault.
You know, I wouldn't have such a problem with those on the left (the Democrats, etc) if they were honest...just come out and say "You know, yes, I hate this country, I hate the military, I want us to lose in Iraq, I think everyday Americans are idiots and I'm so much smarter, I hate religion, the flag, patriotism, the borders, free markets, free choices (whether it be insurance, what to eat, how much gas to use, etc)...I don't think babies are worth saving and think abortion is great, I want this country to be a totalitarian communist/fascist dictatorship with us Democrats in the lead because we know what's better for you than you poor stupid middle and working class Americans do...etc"
If they came out and said this and were HONEST, I could at least have a modicum of respect for them, just for being honest about it....but since they try to hide behind a phony veil of being "just as patriotic" as everyone else, not to mention their famous "tolerance" I can't take them seriously (among other reasons)...
Wow sorry for my tangential rant, everyone!
"Yesterday's Communists are Today's Democrats....
Yesterday's Democrats are Today's Republicans..." - An analogy made by *ME*