Why does Anderson Cooper hate black people?

WHY?!

The left are never satisfied, they have to keep pounding away with their agenda...the Fairness Doctrine/Rush and others, division of the races purposely, on and on it goes....they are never satisfied, they have to keep up the hate, Divide and Conquer.

Anderson is nothing but a leftist political whore, just another pawn in the game 24/7 for the leftist agenda.

More to come, much more on down the road, this is just recycled old news...the left have no intentions for one second when reporting this all, who started this all and wrote what where for the Rush/Shanklin parody to come from in the first place...we must keep up the bull, it's our job, it's what we do. 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

That is the role that Obama played, the role of the "Magic Negro".

Obama had script writers like Jon Favreau write his many screenplays, which he then read from the teleprompter like some Disney animatronic gasbag.

Then David Axlefraud directed the whole charade and used various locations and historic articles as props the way all good directors and set designers do.

Then the American populace at large, behaving like the ADD aflicted morons many of them are (along with alot of help along the way from the Obamedia hacks at ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, MessNBC, CNN Washington Post and NYT), behaved like they were participating in a season long episode of "American Idol", rather than a Presidential election, while choosing the fabled, mythical, Obama.

*btw, I thought felons were prohibited from seeking the Presidency, so why is it that Obama, who bragged about comitting the felony of cocaine possesion, is allowed to be President?

If the intent is to lay this matter at the feet of Anderson Cooper, it should also be fair to note the following:

a.  In Cooper's short, four-paragraph blog note, two of the paragraphs were devoted to Mr. Saltsman defending his actions in sending out the CD containing the parody and explaining his intent and motives for doing so;

b.  True, Cooper does not link the LA Times article, but he does make it clear the Times piece was the original source and even provided a brief synopsis of the central thesis of the article, and

c.  Finally, Cooper makes no editorial comment about the parody or the CD other than a brief reference to the subject-matter.

So, if this is a rekindling of a controversial issue, one should consider the recent actions of Saltsman, the RNC chairmanship candidate, and not just the reporting of same by The Hill and Anderson Cooper.

Jer

Anderson Cooper is the textbook definition of self-loathing, guilt-ridden, lilly-white liberal.

I could probably take him to some night spots around the south side of Atlanta I have been known to frequent that would cause him to soil himself should I venture off to retrieve a beer and leave him by himself.

LOL-I have often done that with lilly-white, holier than-thou lib relatives and friends when they come to visit, particularly from up north. Its always fun to see their reaction.  :-)

So, basically saying that Obama is non threatening, unlike most black men, without a past to be afraid of...

And that is just it. Obama is spending God only knows how much money to keep his past hidden from view.

You have to wonder why. 

-Dave

Kathleen McKinley should have examined the blog a bit more before she published this. The 360 blog has a lot of contributors. When Anderson blogs they include his name in the title of the post and he signs it. This post was just written by someone on the CNN or 360 staff, maybe an intern since the correspondents and producers identify themselves in their posts. Whoever is stuck working in the office over Christmas, I suppose.

David Ehrenstein is black. Asking why it is acceptable for him to say some racial remarks in a article that can become offensive when a white man uses them as a basis for a mocking song about a black man is like asking why it's acceptable for blacks to use the N word but not for whites to use it.

Regardless, something becomes "controversial" simply by causing controversy. The original column was noticed (and it was actually referred to on 360 once or twice in analysis sessions) and some people didn't seem entirely thrilled by it, but it didn't actually stir up controversy thus it is not and was not controversial. If the song is stirring controversy, it is by definition controversial. In the determination of whether something qualifies as controversial it doesn't matter if the thing is actually offensive, since the concepts and questions are separate. For instance, if a group of whites put on a black minstrel show it's an offensive act, but if nobody who would be offended finds out it happened or for some reason no complaints are raised then the show isn't controversial despite being offensive.

By obfuscating the source, leaving out details, and generally sort of warping the whole circumstances, Cooper has attempted to pull a tried and true media stunt - to strip away the "joke", leaving what's left to look literally racist - shades of Trent Lott's comments regarding Strom Thurmond. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

I wonder how Bobby the Magic Punjab feels about this?