Could the media be turning on Hillary?

I'm uncertain whether Matthews was ever a big Hillary supporter. Was he?

Crissy practically thinks Barack is the Second Coming. He doesn't like Hillary because he knows that she can't win and Matthews (along with the rest of the media) really wants a Democrat to win the White House.

"women and minorities hardest hit"

The question is not in the correct form as the media which is controlled by the Rockefeller cartel in the stories and candidates it pushes has only been for "what they are told to be for".

Hillary was an appendage of their picked globalist son Bill Clinton. Her senatorial position was payback for the Clinton regime funnelling billions out of Saddam into banking coffers.
Hillary simply won the seat because the alternative was a Republican.

So the media has never been for Hillary. They just were trained to keep their hands off her as she was chiseling the Bush Administration which the cartel was furious over as Al Gore was supposed to be president.

The cartel runs a great deal of the world, but they still mess up in loosing to Bush but make him pay in other ways to get him on board.

Hillary though is off board. Matthews is auditioning for his role as White House Press Secretary and with Edwards has been the thrust of the Hillary public coup.

I blogged here last night that people have to LISTEN to Hillary in the sound of her voice in speeches. As she was not very pleased last night in winning. Her voice was troubled at winning as she knows she is not the chosen candidate and that the cartel will sink her if she wins too much.

She was given the later primary states like Michigan to save face in the "legacy", but that was in exchange for her loosing so all the criminal action would not be filed on her.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

The MSM has treated the Clintons (particularly Hillary) with unabated fawning adulation for years, despite their slimey history.  They sit there shocked that anyone (e.g Russert, Matthews, etc.) would dare ask her or him a difficult question.  Then, after being placed on a pedestal,  they act with indignation that somehow she, a candidate for President no less, is being treated unfairly.  What man, running for President, would we tolerate this nonsense from.  Enter Chris Matthews with his diatribe, for which you can't say it didn't hit the nail right on the head.  What did he say that was inaccurate, or incorrect?  Memo to the press: White House papers still under lock and key; travelgate; library donations; conflicts of interest with foreign countries.  She's running for President of the US and Chris Matthews and the press have every right to vett her, and recount her history and emergence from first lady, to carpet bagger senator, and now as presidential candidate even thru her tears and phoney emotional outbursts.

But it was about the humilation of Bill Clinton."

No, it was about humiliation BY Bill Clinton. If ever there was a "pity vote" that was it.

If HRC hadn't married Clinton and gone to Arkansas, she would probably now be a Department Chair at Wellesley and President of that national association for Women Professors (name escapes me).

I doubt she would have made it very far as a lawyer; she would have switched to academia.

Better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you are a Fool, than open it and Prove it beyond a doubt.

The Clintons are good actors. She only appeared to be the
humilated wife. she was used to his girlfriends and he was used
to her girlfriends as well. She played the part very nicely. Bill
played his part good too. The husband with his head held low,
clutching his bible, holding hands with Chelsea and Hillary on the
other side. GIVE ME A BREAK. The people that voted for her
in New York deserve what they got. A senator that does nothing,
unemployment high crime high, cost of living toooo high. Cry me a
river

mom

by the way, cute haircut, Kathleen......Mom in Texas

BRAVO Chris . Tell the truth and it may begin to set us free.
Let's see the coverage of --her FALSE direct mail piece about Obama and partial birth abortion--their FALSE rumour of a Fed lobbyist who happens to be only a state lobbyist--where is the exposure of her slam of MLK, Bill's invective[ public and private] of Obama. How about manditory sentencing for crack and her flip flop. AF communtiy would be outraged that once again the clinton's betrayed them.

Who is really coddled -- not clinton

i think it is because the MSM consensus is that she cannot win the general election, but obama possibly could ... i think their coverage is nothing more than a grand scheme to get the most electable person as the democrat candidate ... and with all the gentle coverage of huckabee ... they aim to sway republicans into nominating a beatable candidate.