As the Sarah Palin smears continue in the media, Judge Judy joined the debate spreading an internet rumor about the Alaska governor. Appearing on the September 9 edition of "The View," arguably America’s most famous judge when prodded by Barbara Walters to express her concerns about Palin, Judy expressed discomfort with "the teaching of creationism in public schools."
The judge has nothing to fear because Governor Palin does not want to push creationism in Alaska’s public schools as the non-partisan site FactCheck.org explains in its debunkment.
"Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to ‘debate both sides’ of the evolution question, but she also said creationism ‘doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.’"
No one on the panel corrected this falsehood.
Judge Judy also expressed her concern with Palin’s opposition to federally funded embryonic stem cell research. Judy respected the vice presidential nominee’s right to oppose it, but applied the straw man that she has no right to impose her values on everyone else. The judge must have missed that the debate is not about banning this research or "imposing a belief," but the use of federal funds that many are morally opposed to.
The daytime TV courtroom icon also expressed differences with Governor Palin on abortion, but added she opposes late term abortions. Before Barbara Walters steered her in another direction, Judge Judy did offer many compliments towards the Alaska governor praising Palin’s leadership in raising a family and fighting corruption.
The transcript follows.
JOY BEHAR: Would any man be scared to run against you? No.
JUDGE JUDY: Would any man be scared to run against me?
BEHAR: We were talking you have to walk on eggs with a woman, not you.
JUDY: No, no I don’t think so.
BEHAR: They’d be scared.
JUDY: I don’t think so. I think that we have a bunch of powerful women sitting here at this, at this table today. And I think that powerful women are in vogue.
BEHAR: Yes.
JUDY: I think that we’ve had a powerful woman who, for two years, ran a valiant race. And I don’t think that anybody can say that there was a retiring bone among her supporters. And now we have a new lady who’s, you know-
BARBARA WALTERS: Weigh in. What do you think?
JUDY: Well- about Sarah Palin?
WALTERS: Yeah.
JUDY: I thin- I don’t know a lot about her, but I certainly know that she’s a dynamic lady. I mean, we may have certain differences of opinion with some very core issues. But I think that the fact that she has raised a family-
WALTERS: You had five kids.
JUDY: We have five kids among us, raised a family, got to be governor of the state of Alaska. You may say it’s not- it doesn’t have a lot of people. It’s the governor of a state! That’s a big job. And she took on some people, according to both parties, she took on some Republicans, her own party, and she said "listen, I’m going to get rid of corruption. I don’t care who you are."
WALTERS: Anything that you don’t feel comfortable with?
JUDY: Well, I’m not comfortable with the teaching of creationism in our schools. I’m not- I am, while this womb isn’t being used for anything currently or for the future, I do believe that a woman has the right to choose as long as she makes that choice- [applause] - as long as she makes that choice in a responsible way, which means don’t wait until you’re seven and a half months pregnant and say "I think that this was a mistake." That I don’t believe in. I think that you have to act responsibly. And, the- I haven’t heard her express her opinion about federally funded stem cell research. Because while the womb is not going to be used, I may need a new liver or a new cornia.
WALTERS: I believe that she is against it. I don’t like to speak for her because I don’t-
BEHAR: Well, she’s against embryonic.
WALTERS: She’s against embryonic stem cell research.
JUDY: Now, if she’s against embryonic stem cell research, and she would force that upon the rest of the country, because you can hold a religious belief on something and then say, as Joe Biden did, "I’m a Catholic and I believe that life begins at the moment of conception, but I would never impose that on anybody else because legislatively because that’s not my role." So if Sarah Palin does not believe in stem cell research, in embryonic stem cell research, herself personally, but she knows that the rest of the country, through their legislators, who they’ve elected through their legistors, support it, and it’s the wave of the future, then what does her personal belief have to do with me?




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"No one on the panel
September 9, 2008 - 13:49 ET by Chris Norman"No one on the panel corrected this falsehood."
Not surprising. These witches are too busy spreading foolish falsehoods about conservatives themselves. Was Hasselbeck there? No matter - she can't think fast enough to respond - which is probably why they keep her around.
McNotObama '08
over the top falsehoods
September 9, 2008 - 13:53 ET by UndercoverConservativeso, at what point do these deliberate falsehoods, repeated ad nauseum even after they've been disproved, become slander and/or libel and are criminal acts to be dealt with as such?
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"
Oh, I think that point was
September 9, 2008 - 13:58 ET by Chris NormanOh, I think that point was passed so long ago that it's been passed again. Now, on the MSM and especially The Phew, anything goes.
McNotObama '08
Judge Judy? Oh, please...
September 9, 2008 - 14:22 ET by jazboWho shall we listen to next? Mickey and Goofy?
Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.
Judge Judy was a hoot when
September 9, 2008 - 16:03 ET by motherbeltJudge Judy was a hoot when she first started out, and was something new. As she got more famous, she got louder and ruder. Now she is just plain obnoxious.
Motherbelt, you just hit the nail on the head...
September 9, 2008 - 16:23 ET by goldenthroatJudge Judy has gotten increasingly cynical and callous recently and this faux pas has just shown that she is also very uninformed about the issues facing Americans.
She is now the highest paid jurist in America and it appears that has gone to her head. It's funny that she wants to hear the truth in her courtroom but apparently doesn't check it out herself before shooting off her mouth with such a wreckless statement.
"The sun's not going down, the horizon's moving up!" - Firesign Theatre
Truth in a courtroom? Now
September 10, 2008 - 07:46 ET by dscottTruth in a courtroom? Now there's an oxymoron. Where do you think liberals learned the art of dissembling? Who taught them? You need look no further than Judge Judy to see why the court system is failing. Yes, she is a faux TV judge now but she didn't use to be, she is a former New York family court judge .
IMO, she was one of many morons running the so called judicial system at that time who made socialism the standard of merit to decide a case. Judy Sheindlin is basically a mini-me version of Ruth Baden Ginsberg. You can thank the socialists of her ilk for laying the foundation for abortion and single parenthood by insisting on fatherlessness and the rewarding irresponsible behavior of having children for an income stream via welfare and child support. To think of all the children who have been tortured, killed or mistreated as a result of the Orwellian family law system is beyond any human's capacity to bear.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
She may be not
September 9, 2008 - 15:29 ET by docbpushing creationism in public but we all know that politics is done in private and or the dark!!!!
Quit using her name---call her Mccains running mate!
When does Bobbie Flay and
September 9, 2008 - 13:51 ET by Roger the ShrubberWhen does Bobbie Flay and Clinton and Stacy come on to tell us who to vote for?
Who not to vote for
September 9, 2008 - 13:59 ET by nkviking75I can see it now: Clinton and Stacy host Who Not to Vote For.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Maybe, if they have the
September 9, 2008 - 14:01 ET by Chris NormanMaybe, if they have the time, Clinton and Stacy will appear to criticize Palin's personal style. Clinton and Stacy are awfully busy, you know, saving the world and all.:)
McNotObama '08
The crew of The View are not aware of most things
September 9, 2008 - 14:03 ET by c5thenThey do not know about FactCheck.org. They probably don't know about most things on the Al Gore Internet that don't appear on the front page of Yahoo! or MSN.
I'm surprised Hassleback didn't correct the misconception (sorry) about any Christian supporting the federal funding of abortion. No Christian can support it for moral reasons. That's not saying that abortion can't be legal and just be one more surgical proceedure available to a woman with the consultation of her doctor. But, damnit! Don't take my money by force through taxes and then spend it on the murder of another human being against my will.
The same goes for embryonic stem cell research. The embryo is a person so you have to kill it to get the stem cells to maybe help someone else. So here we are killing one person to help another. Seem morally sound to anyone?
And Biden's a hypocrit for stating the view that he holds. Why? Because if he really believes that life begins at conception, then he is allowing someone to make a 'choice' about killing another person. That is a sin in the Catholic Church. So either he doesn't really believe what he says, or he should change religions to one that agrees with his views. But you can not be a catholic and hold that abortion is OK for others even if you don't agree with it. Otherwise it's OK to say that murder is a choice and rape is a choice, etc.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Assault
September 9, 2008 - 14:26 ET by iveseenitallThe "liberals" are continuing their all-out assault on Sarah. But it's backfiring--bigtime! The more they search for "facts", the more they lie, the more popular she becomes. Last night I heard Al Colmes try to associate her with a "right-wing" reverend in her church. He's making a complete fool of himself, once again. Keep it up, you creeps. But it will do you no good. You've met your Waterloo! Custer's Last Stand has nothing on you! You're surrounded by middle-class Americans who'll now have THEIR day! Just surrender, "elites", before you are completely lost.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
iveseenitail
September 9, 2008 - 14:40 ET by MrShyNice! :)
Obama... a total fraud. Palin... a total hottie.
whats the big deal?
September 9, 2008 - 14:12 ET by political mavenWhat's so bad about teching that some people think that all the complex systems in the universe aren;t random chance?What are they scared of?
"discomfort"they feel
September 9, 2008 - 14:48 ET by TruthMonger"discomfort"
they feel discomfort:(
painful swelling, itching ears...
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Because to them the path to
September 9, 2008 - 14:37 ET by dscottBecause to them the path to heaven is via an Equality of Outcome argument, victims have no personal responsibility for the consequences of their actions. There can be no morality without personal responsibility. If there is no morality then there can be no sin. No personal responsibility, no morality, no sin, no Hell...
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
"What's so bad about
September 9, 2008 - 14:45 ET by Killgrave"What's so bad about teching that some people think that all the complex systems in the universe aren;t random chance?"
Because this is the job of a priest or a minister, not a science teacher. I don't expect my mailman to teach me about Jesus. Why should I expect a public school teacher?
Science is about proving something. Faith is about believing something.
which is why evolution
September 9, 2008 - 14:49 ET by TruthMongerwhich is why evolution belongs in the religious section:)
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
"...There will be
September 9, 2008 - 15:04 ET by mattm"...There will be well-testable theories, hardly testable theories, and non-testable theories. Those which are non-testable are of no interest to empirical scientists. They may be described as metaphysical." - Popper, Karl, Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Basic Books, 1963), p. 257.
"...I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme*a possible framework for testable scientific theories." -Popper, Karl, Unended Quest (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Pub. Co., 1976), p. 168.
*a "metaphysical" thing is of a religious nature.
Nice quotes from the guy
September 9, 2008 - 15:37 ET by dscottNice quotes from the guy who tried to elevate science via the falsification test.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Science is about proving
September 9, 2008 - 14:51 ET by dscottScience is about proving something. Faith is about believing something.
What is truth? Belief in the sum of the facts.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
"I don't expect my mailman
September 9, 2008 - 15:28 ET by ckc1227"I don't expect my mailman to teach me about Jesus. Why should I expect a public school teacher?"
You don't expect your mailman to teach you about science either, making your point moot. And frankly, much of the science that is taught, such as man-made global warming, is based on believing something, not proving something.
and strangely enough i
September 9, 2008 - 15:38 ET by TruthMongerand strangely enough i expect my "science teachers" to NOT PUSH LEFTWING POLITICS
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
Killgrave, "Science is
September 9, 2008 - 21:07 ET by hydrodynDMKillgrave,
"Science is about proving something. Faith is about believing something."
Well, technically, scientific theories are never "proven". They are accepted once a sufficient amount of empirical evidence supports them (and even then, at some later date, they might be shown to be flawed or be replaced with a better theory).
polical maven, There's
September 9, 2008 - 21:09 ET by hydrodynDMpolitical maven,
There's nothing bad with teaching Creationism or ID in school - the argument is about whether it should be taught in a science class.
The judge must have
September 9, 2008 - 14:17 ET by motherbeltThe judge
must have missed that the debate is not about banning this research or
"imposing a belief," but the use of federal funds that many are morally
opposed to.
This is an excellent point, Justin. I am tired of its proponents saying that the government has banned embryonic stem cell research.
Is the government required to fund, using taxpayer dollars, any kind of research or any scientific project that anyone can dream up? If ESR is so promising, why aren't private entities pouring money into what could be their gazillion-dollar discovery? If the government doesn't want to invest in wind power, does that mean T. Boone Pickens is forbidden from doing what he's doing?
I never liked Judy
September 9, 2008 - 14:21 ET by HeavyChevynow I got a reason to REALLY not like her. Idiot.
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
I agree, and, to brag a
September 9, 2008 - 18:11 ET by RukusI agree, and, to brag a little, I've thought she was and IDIOT and ARROGANT for years! My little 'ol self is just sayin'...
BTW HC, I really like your posts.
So does my wife (she can't stand JJ either!).
"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"
Rukus...
September 9, 2008 - 21:09 ET by HeavyChevyIf one thing I would like to see before I meet my maker is for the network to finally cancel Judy, she gives real judges a bad name!
Glad you like my posts by the way! :-)
-Later!
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
So if Sarah Palin does not
September 9, 2008 - 14:29 ET by dscottSo if Sarah Palin does not believe in stem cell research, in embryonic stem cell research, herself personally, but she knows that the rest of the country, through their legislators, who they’ve elected through their legistors, support it, and it’s the wave of the future, then what does her personal belief have to do with me?
Talk about dissembling, hey judy, where did Palin say she didn't believe in stem cell research? Are you so ignorant and uninformed as to believe there is one only line of stem cell research??? Please don't insult our intelligence by implying as a college educated person you are uniformed about such a divisive issue. Embryonic Stem Cell research has yet to produce even one viable medical treatment, adult and cord blood stem cell research has created hundreds of medical treatments. If you are this deceptive about the issues and Palin then clearly the so called made for TV judgements on your show are probably equally defective.
Given your dissembling on the evolution issue as well you betray liberal angst over the idea of debating it. Just like Al Gore saying the debate is over on AGW, you are against even debating evolution. Sounds to me like you're really afraid of people not buying your assertions as truth instead of having firm grounds for what you believe. Evolution is a belief system no differently than Creationism, each is based on a point of view. But then, this is how the legal system works, an unchallenged assertion is truth and as long as you can keep people from challenging it via debate it remains so. It's called truth by obfuscation & omission.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Think
September 9, 2008 - 14:52 ET by iveseenitallSarah Palin wants both sides of the creation/evolution controversy discussed in schools. How dare she! Does she want students to debate, consider, and express their point of view? Does she want students to actually THINK? Talk about heresy. Next thing you know they'll be doubting the Global Warming mania. Elect Obama and stop this before it gets out of hand.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
umm,
September 9, 2008 - 15:13 ET by voodoodaddy"Evolution is a belief system no differently than Creationism, each is based on a point of view."
Um, NOT!
And your point of view
September 9, 2008 - 15:38 ET by dscottAnd your point of view is...
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
come on - he articulates
September 9, 2008 - 15:41 ET by TruthMongercome on - he articulates his point very well don't you think?!?!?
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
I'm feeling a bit peckishly
September 9, 2008 - 15:45 ET by dscottI'm feeling a bit peckishly sarcastic today. ;-)
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
dscott, I think maybe his
September 9, 2008 - 21:15 ET by hydrodynDMdscott,
I think maybe his point was that evolutionary theory doesn't incorporate supernatural agents whereas creationism does.
Evolution is by no means "proven" (no scientific theory ever is), but there certainly are important epistemological differences between the two approaches to explaining the origin of life.
But on a certain level, you are correct. Both approaches are predicated on a set of beliefs which are accepted on faith as true.
Hey Judy
September 9, 2008 - 14:40 ET by Mica the MagnificentShut up and judge!
But did not Jesus say Judge
September 9, 2008 - 15:21 ET by Dan The Man 2But did not Jesus say Judge not, lest ye be judged? hehehe
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
DTM2
September 9, 2008 - 18:14 ET by RukusOoooooh, right on the money! A+ for you!
"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"
Judge Judy..threatened by Middle America ?
September 9, 2008 - 14:45 ET by JayTeeSorta demo's how "OUT OF TOUCH" the drive by Media is with Mom, apple pie, and small town America.
What we have here, is a Failure to communicate.
We correct the Lies, and the MSM doesn't notice .... hence the "Drive by Media" description fits.....no research, no analysis, just pass thru drivel made up on the Daily KOS site.
Americans do not look to these un-informed idots for Truth. I think McCain/Palin just picked up another Point in the Polls.
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
First of all, does anybody
September 9, 2008 - 14:54 ET by Free ThinkerFirst of all, does anybody else think that picture of Judge Judy looks exactly like Dana Carvey playing the church lady on SNL? Isn't that special?
Second, the lies and smears don't seem to be sticking. Last night's msm theme seemed to be attacking Sarah Palin's church that advocates, get ready for this, that God is in control! The left is in complete meltdown right now.
No one on the panel corrected this falsehood....
September 9, 2008 - 14:55 ET by cest moi...and that's because the gals on the panel collectively share one brain. And I'm being generous.
When will Rachael Ray weigh in on this?
When will Rachael Ray weigh
September 9, 2008 - 15:35 ET by Dan The Man 2When will Rachael Ray weigh in on this - Now I like that girl, seems down to earth and has some meat on her bones - Unlike Ann coulter.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
And stupid enough
September 9, 2008 - 18:26 ET by Calypso Jonesto wear the arafat scarf or at the very least to let her assistant put her in it.
Justin - another great blog
September 9, 2008 - 14:59 ET by whatajoyJustin - another great blog about The View! I didn't know about FactCheck, thanks for that site. They also have a great FAQ page that has info on all the candidates on multiple pages and such.
The more Behar talks, the stupider she sounds. She's going to be on Larry King Live tonight. She's on that show way too much. She has her funny moments, but her IQ is smaller than her shoe size. She knows nothing about politics, how America is run or how our taxes are spent. She even said before that President Bush can write a check using our tax dollars for anything he wants. What color is the sky in her world? Joy is such an idiot. A funny idiot, but an idiot nonetheless.
I bet Judge Judy didn't realize she was going to praise Palin on her guest spot today on The View! You can't help but praise Palin. Palin knows her stuff and she can hold her own, which is more than I can say for Bahwah. ::rolls.eyes::
-------------------------------------------------------------
Take it easy! We're not making a western here.
~ Uncle Junior (The Sopranos)
Here come da judge
September 9, 2008 - 15:21 ET by pocomocoJudge Judy is far below Sarah Palin’s pay grade.
The judge needs to go back to doing what she does best, running a phony TV court for Jerry Springer rejects.
Ouch!
September 9, 2008 - 18:24 ET by RukusOuch! Correct but, OUCH! Spot on!
"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"
"Because while the womb is
September 9, 2008 - 15:23 ET by SickofLibs"Because while the womb is not going to be used, I may need a new liver..."
Please turn in your unused wombs, they may be needed for the judge's new liver.
You could try laying off the sauce tho, Judy. As an avid Law & Order fan, I know you judges and DAs always hit the scotch hard after the big trial.
Especially that Fred Thompson guy, altho he liked Kentucky whiskey.
If I want the opinion of a
September 9, 2008 - 15:43 ET by Clear thinkerIf I want the opinion of a Judge, I'll ask Clarence Thomas!
Moron’s On Parade
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
I'll ask Clarence Thomas.
September 9, 2008 - 16:06 ET by Calypso Jonesgood one.
I don't watch Judge Judy but I know some who do and i'm forced to see part of it. If she can't discern the truth from a lie in this instance then she is no better than the people who desire to be publicly humiliated by going on her show.
Mearline...
September 9, 2008 - 16:10 ET by Clear thinkerJudge Judy has always been something of a media whore, so I can't take her seriously, especially as a Judge.
Moron’s On Parade
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Judge Judy has always been something of a media whore,
September 9, 2008 - 18:28 ET by Rukus"Judge Judy has always been something of a media whore,"
And I'd pay, uh, well, no, I wouldn't.
"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"
I'm Catholic and according
September 9, 2008 - 16:19 ET by TEI'm Catholic and according to Catholic teaching it would be immoral to stick a catheter into the "brain" of so-called "Judge" Judy and remove her "brain" and thus kill her. However, I will not impose my morality on others and thus people should be allowed to kill her by that method. I'm certain that so-called "Judge" Judy agrees. Also, why would an abortion enthusiast like "Judge" Judy be opposed to abortion at seven and a half months? What is the basis for her opposition? Did her earth goddess declare to her that such abortions should not be performed? Does "Judge" Judy want to "impose that on [everybody] else"?
Judge Judy reminds me of
September 9, 2008 - 17:47 ET by jkwtradingJudge Judy reminds me of Jerry Springer with a robe, for god's sakes she is a TV personality is all.. and a bad one at that.