The United States is not in a recession. But the crew of the "Today" show does not care about the facts. On the July 11 edition, the NBC morning program focused on McCain adviser Phil Gramm’s "mental recession" and "nation of whiners" comment.
Instead of actually examining the facts behind Senator Gramm’s opinion, "Today" instead chose to focus on the "damage" to the McCain campaign. Lauer opened the show with the cliche phrase "with friends like these," and noting McCain is "distancing himself from his friend" and proceded to ask "has the damage been done?" Lauer then introduced the story claiming the remarks "could spell problems for Senator John McCain’s campaign."
Perhaps a fair story would examine whether Senator Gramm’s statements ring true or not. While the "nation of whiners" comment is Mr. Gramm’s opinion, his remark that we are not in a recession is a fact.
The economic definition of a recession is "a period of economic decline; specifically a decline in GDP for two or more consecutive quarters."
According to Bloomberg News, the economy grew at a slow rate, but nevertheless grew in the last two quarters.
"The economy probably grew 1.5 percent in the second quarter, as growing exports helped counter weakness in manufacturing and construction, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists taken the first week of July. The economy grew 1 percent in the first quarter, when net exports contributed 0.8 percentage point to the expansion."
The entire transcript, including opening teasers, is below.
MATT LAUER: Good morning. With friends like these: One of John McCain's closest advisors has harsh words for Americans calling us a nation from whiners when it comes to the economy. McCain is distancing himself from his friend, but has the damage been done?
[...]
MEREDITH VIEIRA: I'm Meredith Vieira. We talked about the high cost of gas and food and the housing crisis for months now. But apparently one of John McCain's top economic advisors sees things a little bit differently.
LAUER: Quite a bit differently. In an interview with "The Washington Times," former Senator Phil Gramm said that the country is in a mental recession and not a real one. This is Phil Gramm who has a long and some would say impressive resume when it comes to the economy. But Democrats were quick to jump on his remarks and it didn't take John McCain very long to distance himself from them as well. So just ahead, the impact his Gramm's comments could have on the presidential race. We're going to get Jim Cramer's take on this topic as well.
VIEIRA: And he always has a take.
[...]
LAUER: Let's start though this morning with the election and the economy in remarks that could spell problems for Senator John McCain's campaign. NBC's Andrea Mitchell has more on this. Andrea, good morning to you.
ANDREA MITCHELL: Good morning, Matt. As you've been discussing, John McCain is now running as fast as he can to get away from one of his closest economic advisor who called Americans a nation of whiners when it comes to the bad economy. In Michigan, a battleground state where the economy is on everybody's mind, John McCain wasted no time throwing his economic advisor, Phil Gramm, under the bus.
SENATOR JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ): Phil Gramm does not speak for me. I speak for me. So I strongly disagree.
MITCHELL: Gramm, a former senator and PhD. economist told "The Washington Times" Americans are suffering from a mental recess recession, not a real one.
FORMER SENATOR PHIL GRAMM (R-TX): You've heard a mental depression, this is a mental recession. We've never had more natural advantages as we had today. We've sort of become a nation of whiners.
MITCHELL: McCain's problem, he and Gramm have been friends for decades, ever since Gramm co-sponsored landmark legislation to control federal spending and this year Gramm has been a top McCain economic advisor.
McCAIN: There is no one in America that is more respected on the issue of economics than Senator Phil Gramm. So I'm honored you are here, Phil.
MITCHELL: Barack Obama saw the opening and pounced.
SENATOR BARACK OBAMA (D-IL): America already has one Dr. Phil. We don't need another one.
MITCHELL: And McCain was so eager to distance himself from Gramm, he said his old friend would no longer be a candidate for Treasury secretary in a McCain administration.
McCAIN: I think Senator Gramm would be in serious consideration for ambassador to Belarus. Although I'm not sure the citizens of Minsk could welcome that.
MITCHELL: Belarus, an outlaw state, is far worse than Siberia in the old days. But even Minsk might not be far enough to control the political damage.
CHUCK TODD: McCain was already seen as somebody that was struggling to show that he was in touch on the issue of the economy. This just made his job that much harder.
MITCHELL: Today McCain will go to another battle ground state, Wisconsin and try again to get back on message about how much he cares about the economy.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Does McCain intend to
July 11, 2008 - 13:19 ET by ConservativeRexDoes McCain intend to distance himself from every Conservative who says something publicly? Gramm happens to be correct, and McCain disavows himself from it. I have a few words for McCain and his followers: you distance yourselves from Conservatives at your own peril. If you think democrats will get you elected, you had better think again. The MSM hates you John, they really do.
Conservatives are the Republicans bread and butter. We really don't need you McCain (we'll own 2012), but you sure as hell need us. This is a promise, stop your BS before you find yourself on the outside looking in again.
I agree. Sen. Gramm
July 11, 2008 - 14:46 ET by motherbeltI agree. Sen. Gramm mentioned many positive things about the economy and McCain should have jumped to his defense and reiterated them, and agreed that the reason everyone thinks it is so bad is because the media keep telling them that it is, and ignoring anything positive!
I've said it before, the media's polls are more like "damage assessments" than anything resembling a sampling of opinion for legitimate reasons.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
The more McLame runs
July 11, 2008 - 13:32 ET by fitzfongThe more McLame runs against his own party, the less I care that he's going to lose in November. I couldn't be bothered what effect Gramm's comments have on McLame's campaign. If this is the way he plans on running the country, I don't want him as President.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
THE MAVERICK...
July 11, 2008 - 14:16 ET by danybhoyfitzy,
McCain does'nt know anything except running against his party. What is sad is that he is considered a conservative, since the center has been pulled way to the left. He will lose the election, & he can join Bob Dole a VFW bar somewhere, talking about their past lives on the Hill & in war trying to figure out why they got beat in a Presidential election.
Depending how quick the GOP gets it's head out of it's @$$, can bounce back once Americans see how bad Obama is as President. I believe the backlash to the right will be shocking, but at what cost to the nation? Long term, maybe it would be worth it. But man, he could eff things up big time in just 2 or 4 years.
Maybe we will get lucky & both McCain & Obama/Sotero can be disqualified because they don't meet the constitutional requirements to be President. Then we could get at least 1 good candidate on the ballet.
Oh BTW, Gramm is correct. Just thought I would mention that.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
I agree, danybhoy. It
July 11, 2008 - 16:36 ET by fitzfongI agree, danybhoy. It seems to me that winning Congress is far more important this November than winning the White House. And with Congress' current 9% approval rating, why isn't the Party ditching Dead Weight McCain and concentrating on undoing the damage this pathetic Congress has done? It seems to me that if the party concentrated its money and efforts on supporting conservative candidates running against those first-term "Blue Dogs" on the principle that they've become Nancy Pelosi's drones, we might be able to stop the bleeding a lot faster than if we elected McLame and conceded Congress to Reid and Pelosi.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
What housing crisis?
July 11, 2008 - 13:41 ET by mvfreemanHouses were ridiculously over valued because everybody and their brother was getting approved for a home loan they coudnt afford.
If anything homes are more affordable now that the bubble finally burst.
Every election brings out the same fear-mongering coverage about the economy. Same game plan, same anchors.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/15/AR2008011502864.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/05/AR2008020502876.html
I'd love to see them do a story on how exactly the president controls the economy. I want them to explicitly enumerate what he can do to magically turn it around. I mean if it was that easy wouldnt every president do it and be done with recessions?
These people aren't reporting news. They are doing nothing more than speculating and feeding a false perception.
99% Reporters, 1% News
July 11, 2008 - 14:18 ET by deerjerkydaveI get tired of watching the news when the reporter stands in front of the camera for 99% of the news story. I hardly even know what Gramm said and the liberal media is already jumping to the conclusion that it is bad for McCain's campaign. Isn't Gramm a seasoned politician? Why would he make damaging comments? Is it just a gaffe?
I can't help but wonder if the liberal media made the same predictions for Obama after Rev. Jackson made his vulger comments...
The Best Government Is LESS Government
July 11, 2008 - 15:26 ET by thoridfly"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases : If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." - Ronald Reagan
Great quote. Here's a few more ...
“A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.” - George Bernard Shaw, 1944
“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.” - Thomas Jefferson
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.” - Gerald Ford
"Surely then … the more power we give the government the more corrupt it will become.” - Ronald Reagan
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15." - Ronald Reagan
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
“There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government … and when government fails, they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power.” - Ronald Reagan
"The less government we have the better." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"The happiness of society is the end of government." - John Adams, 2nd U.S. President
"The government is best which governs least." - Thomas Jefferson
And let's not forget this
July 11, 2008 - 19:50 ET by motherbeltAnd let's not forget this oldie but goodie, which actually may be the basis for most of the modern-day ones:
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." -- Thomas Paine
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson