Does the First Amendment guarantee a television host’s job security? Former Boston CN8 anchor Barry Nolan suggests just that.
Right of center Fox News host Bill O’Reilly recently received the Governors’ Award at the Boston/New England Chapter Emmy Awards. The local CN8 anchor objected to O’Reilly’s honor and passed out the public details of O’Reilly’s sexual harassment lawsuit. CN8 subsequently fired Mr. Nolan.
Nolan aired his protest on the left-wing website ThinkProgress.org claiming free speech has become a "myth" adding "in today’s America, speech is only ‘free’ when you are talking down to someone less powerful than you."
Unless Mr. Nolan is penning this letter from a prison cell, his free speech rights have not been violated. As an American, he certainly has the right to speak out against Bill O’Reilly. However, anchoring a news show is a privilege, not a right. CN8 had the right to fire Barry Nolan for his actions.
Nolan continued airing typical leftist talking points that journalists are intimidated from reporting the "truth" on Iraq and the War on Terror.
"We are called traitors if we simply speak the truth about the absence of WMD’s" [This journalist is not looking hard enough, that was all over the news] "the way the war is going" [He’s correct on this account. News coverage of Iraq has declined as the situation in Iraq improved] "the disgraces of Abu Ghraib" [32 consecutive front page stories in "The New York Times" wasn’t enough?] "of Gitmo, of waterboarding. Shut up."
Nolan concluded his article with a clever "if anyone needs any lawn work or his or her car detailed-give me a call." Perhaps Mr. Nolan, while searching for his next job, can research the First Amendment and know for the future, hosting a television show is not a right.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Nolan apparently is
June 2, 2008 - 14:43 ET by SickofLibsNolan apparently is confused. The concept of tenure only applies to teachers, a career which he is now free to pursue.
And regarding lawnwork or car detailing, we already have several million 'guests' in the USA handling that.
Hmmm... Always wondered
June 2, 2008 - 14:51 ET by MassConservHmmm... Always wondered what happened to him.
I remember watching him on "Evening Magazine", a Boston area 'news' show, in the early 80's. Never imagined him to be a moonbat though. Oh well.
Consequence sucks, eh Barry?
Wait a minute
June 2, 2008 - 14:58 ET by Prester JohnI thought free speech was the right only liberals had wherein they could say whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, to whomever they wanted, without even being criticized.
This right, of course, is not extended to conservatives since whatever comes from conservatives' lips is by definition racist, sexist, bigoted, offensive or otherwise unacceptable to any civilized secular society.
PAINT MY HOUSE
June 2, 2008 - 15:46 ET by SgthulkaThis dweeb is going to find out that lawn maintainence and news-anchoring are both on the same level.
Thats kind of insults the
June 2, 2008 - 16:51 ET by PeevedGuyThats kind of insults the lawn maintainence folks, they actually DO something (other than sit on their arse and read from a teleprompter).
Nolan
June 2, 2008 - 16:13 ET by okiehawk44Let's go through this again.
It's action-reaction.
You can practice free speech or civil disobedience as your action, but others can fire you or put you in jail as the reaction.
You don't necessarily get it both ways no matter what your professor told you.
He's right; free speech is a myth.
June 2, 2008 - 16:19 ET by mattmJust try praying over your lunch in the public school system.
Just try writing an op-ed opposing gay marriage.
Just try giving a pro-Israel speech at a college.
Just try questioning APGW....and see how far you get.
It is the 'Left' which hates free-speech.
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 2, 2008 - 18:56 ET by danybhoymattm,
You are dead on, you speak against the politically correct/progressive/liberal agenda at your own risk. The left does not tollerate the opposing viewpoint very often any longer.
You see the difference between the right & the left when they fight speech they don't like. The right will boycott wht they don't like, free market, so to speak. The left will use strong arm legislation to squelch what they don't like hearing, gov't control, so to speak.
The book "Liberal Facism" covers this topic, among others. Get your copy BEFORE the book burnings.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
mattm, you get the cookie for the post of the day.
June 2, 2008 - 22:26 ET by R D HelmThat was about as dead-on as it gets.
LOL-Split the arrow, you did.
There is no England anymore.
Yeah, that's pretty much it.
June 3, 2008 - 13:13 ET by greenfairieYeah, that's pretty much it.
Nothing against Bill
June 2, 2008 - 18:32 ET by Biff McCainNothing against Bill O'Reilly, I never watch him, but what's he doing getting a Boston award?
When the Gretchen Carlson Show is over, I'm pretty much done watching news.
O'Reilly and Boston
June 2, 2008 - 18:43 ET by BobAnthonyWell I think Bill used to work in Boston...or went to college there. As for Barry Nolan, I wouldn't necessarily put down hosting Hard Copy on my resume. Hard Copy was the flashy tabloid-like news program that put any ideas about journalistic integrity into the sewer!
A perfect job for him would perhaps have something to do with manure...anyone else on this board...take it from there!
Does everyone know that Mclellan is on O'Reilly in a few minutes
June 2, 2008 - 18:55 ET by Dee BunkI know this is off topic but wanted to make sure people know. I don't normally watch but did watch O'Reilly after the news broke and he was pretty hard on him. I'm sure he'll be soft on him in person, but still it's probably the hardest interview he'll get.
LOL-Dee darlin', I am working on a late dinner here.
June 2, 2008 - 19:10 ET by R D Helm(Pasta and my killer marinara sauce, along with my killer garlic bread and a nice glass of Itallian red.)
I think I'll skip BOR, IYDM. :-)
There is no England anymore.
Watching the interview on
June 2, 2008 - 19:31 ET by ckc1227Watching the interview on O'reilly right now, and it's pretty funny. I mean, McClellan keeps saying he wants to end the partisanship of Washington, so what does he do? Write a partisan hit piece attacking President Bush, lol.
ckc... I watched it all
June 2, 2008 - 19:42 ET by bigtimerckc...
I watched it all too...BOR did a great job...one thing I want to stress as much as possible and I only mentioned once before since all the Scotty news has erupted....he sure has NO problem with stammering and stuttering when it comes to ANY of the msm now does he?
Mole...plain and simple.
Phony treasonous sell-out ba$t*rd.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
BT and CKC - I was shocked at how well O'Reilly did
June 2, 2008 - 20:34 ET by Dee BunkI may have to start watching him again. Anyone who missed it should watch the repeat.
McClellen is a complete slime bag. Like ckc said, it's unbelievable that he could mention that he was trying to change the partisanship. What a joke. I thought it was best at the end when O'Reilly asked him if he was upset by how he was being used and then said "you don't look too upset" McClellen had a smug smile the whole time.
Yep Dee... It was one of
June 2, 2008 - 20:45 ET by bigtimerYep Dee...
It was one of BOR's better interviews in my opinion...this POS Scott has lost all pretense of the stammering bumbling idiot he portrayed before the Washington press daily...he is a phony POS and always has been..you truly sometimes never know who your friends really are in life.
He has proved that.
He is one of the few guys that makes me want to take a shower after listening/watching him...pure greasy sleaze.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
I agree BT - and he seemed so rehearsed
June 2, 2008 - 21:13 ET by Dee BunkHe's way sleazier than Richard Clarke and Clarke is pretty darn sleazy.
The first thing you learn in
June 2, 2008 - 20:12 ET by mostlymoderateThe first thing you learn in law school is that you have a 1st Amendment right to free speech against the government, not private entities. This moron was fired by a business, not the government.
absolutely right
June 2, 2008 - 21:16 ET by lunaticcringeradiofree speech against the government is protected by the first amendment, it has nothing to do with everyday life, the best example is you can't run around making slanderous claims against people without running the risk of being punished legally and financially.
lunaticcringeradio
I was hoping....
June 2, 2008 - 21:21 ET by dmntd1I was hoping someone might quote the First Amendment, and this is as close as I've seen yet..... Thanks!
Yeup, no mention that some private entity (or, for that matter, a government sub-unit) must allow anyone to say whatever they wish....
Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his imminent relationship with a superior law and with an objective will that transcends the particular individual - Mussolini
i'm wonder if this reporter was on the fire trent lott bandwagon
June 2, 2008 - 21:13 ET by lunaticcringeradioi'll just bet he thought trent lott should had been removed from his position even though his job required him to speak for a living. i'm just sure this reporter was very upset and screaming to the sky that it's so unfair trent lott was booted for exercizing his right to free speech. i wonder if anyone can dig up some his old reports and see if he was critical of trent lott, i'll bet he was all a twitter in glee at to trent lotts fate? i just wonder. i'm sure the hipocracy is just oozing from this guy. oh by the way, he posts on liberal websites but the media has no bias, waaahahahahahaha.
you lost you're job because you do a lousey job. now go get a real job.
just using trent lott as an example here, not that i really liked trent lott, i'm tired of all the sissy, cowardly, spineless psuedo republicans that are in office and are run in fear anytime a liberals points a finger at them. where are the good republicans like reagan?
lunaticcringeradio
where are the good
June 2, 2008 - 21:23 ET by bigtimerwhere are the good republicans like reagan?
They are there luna...thy just don't get much msm attention...unfortunately...people like Sessions and Inhofe do, but is is minuscule...you never hear sound bites from Bunning, Cornyn either...on and on it goes.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Editorial content is owned by the TV station, not the employee
June 2, 2008 - 21:19 ET by wdhorningSince the TV station owns editorial content, it has every right to fire someone who steps outside the limits of its guidelines. This reporter's free speech would only be violated if he owned the station and the government shut him down for saying what he said.
In short, the reporter is using twisted, "sour grapes" logic (or should I say "illogic"?)
Free speech never gives you the right to just any forum (ever tried free speech in a court room?), to say absolutely anything you want (conspiracy to commit murder with others is not free speech, for example), and certainly when you work for others your speech is limited to their policies as a condition of employment (you give up free speech rights in exchange for compensation -- ever try to give away trade secrets in the name of free speech; bet you find yourself in jail).
You are totally
June 3, 2008 - 08:28 ET by ricklailYou are totally correct about the use of "free speech." The First Amendment only protects political speech. One case is Martin v. Parrish where you are not allowed to say just anything.
“A debate is a conflict which clarifies a position. A dialogue is a conversation which compromises a position.” –John E. Ashbrook, The New Neutralism II, P. 7
To quote myself from a
June 2, 2008 - 23:45 ET by lnthompTo quote myself from a previous thread, "If the Bush administration is so intent on silencing its enemies as
these idiots would like us to believe, how come I can't escape hearing
at least one idiot EVERY DAY declaiming that the Bush adminstration is silencing its enemies? WHERE'S THE SILENCE????????????"
Lee T.
U.S. Navy (ret.) / Vancouver, Washington
The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain