UPC

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Re-Pentacostal  

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

 See only the unlearned think that using the word "F" is the same as using the expletive that begins with that word. Secondly, only the "factually challenged" of which I know, there are many, think that the "F" word is "profane".  In fact, if I asked you to explain why the word "F" is profane but the word that you think it originates from, "Fornicate" is not, you wouldn't be able to.  Same for penis and vagina and their alternative descriptions. Thankfully the Lord isn't as confused as you are. The problem is that you don't understand either the biblical prohibition against cursing, NOR the origin of the "F" word. There were two armies, at war, I know which but I'm not gonna tell you, LOOK IT UP.  After orders were given to remove the middle fingers of all enemy archers , the proof that one's middle finger remained became a badge of honor. In it's inception the term known as the "f" word, was oringinally "pluck" as in what an archer does with his bow.  After which time those who were in rebellion would hold up their middle fingers at the Kings men and say "I can still PLUCK you", seeing as their fingers remained intact. Which became shortened to "PLUCK YOU"  which devolved into , well, you know.  Just as in biblical days when your "profession" was your statement of "Faith" and had nothing to do with your JOB, which was merely a MAN'S NAME , the word "pluck" has morphed into the "f" word.  In the bible words that were CURSES are not what you think they are and a curse didn't have to have certain "taboo" words in it. A "curse" was an "imprecation of doom" an oath in which the petitioner asked God to "damn" someone, or kill their enemies or so on. This is the reason that many churches that actually have the Holy Spirit, will tell you that there are some PSALMS that it wouldn't be right to pray "at" someone, since they contain imprecations of doom. Most of the words your silly world has "tabooed" were never "curses" to begin with. "Bitch"is a female dog ,a "Ass" is an animal and a "bastard" is a child of dubious parentage. The only one that actually remains would be (G.D.) because obviously if you ask "God" to "Damn" someone, that would be the textbook definition of an "imprecation of doom". 

 **Your attitude is not the attitude that Jesus displayed here on earth.**

Like most things you write about the bible, they are ill informed and poorly researched. It's okay for a Christian to be angry, did you know that?

Ephesians 4:26
Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:

You made me angry and I expressed that without once asking God to damn you, sooo where's the "sin"? When you speak of Jesus' "attitude" did you mean the attitude He had when He went into the temple, overturned their tables and THREW THEM OUT BODILY?  That attitude? 

MaRK 11

5And they come to Jerusalem: and Jesus went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves;

 16And would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple.

 17And he taught, saying unto them, Is it not written, My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer? but ye have made it a den of thieves. 

Now I wonder what Jesus would do with a "church" that baptized differently than he DIRECTED through His APOSTLES AND which claims it's adherents to have received the Holy Spirit in a DIFFERENT MANNER than the way HE SAID IT WAS COMING? Serious food for thought there dude. All these folks were doing was selling pies and stuff~! 

See Jesus never had any intention for His followers to be a bunch of half queer pantywaist handwringers. Such aren't fit for battle. And just like you don't have a clue about Jesus' "attitude" neither do you understand WHY He came in the first place. Unlearned folk like yourself generally swallow the "He came to bring PEACE ON EARTH", garbage of the Catholic Church. Like most of their doctrine, this is the exact OPPOSITE of Christ's purpose, for He came NOT to bring PEACE but to bring TURMOIL and UPHEAVAL. MATTHEW 10: 34-36

 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

 36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.  

Notice that Christ came to set a man at "variance" against his own father! And that man's ENEMIES will be FAMILY! That "variance" by the way is the convicted feeling that those who are fake with their religion feel, when they are exposed to the unvarnished truth. And by "fake" I mean NOT baptized properly and NOT filled with the true Holy Ghost ( glossalalia, not a "good feeling") See how angry you get? I know it's my "snark" but that's my "pinache", I'm not here to be "liked".  And God has used both the meek and the strong and IRRITATING to make his point, LOL. He used those "wise" as doves and also those who "CRY LOUD AND SPARE NOT", it's depends on the audience. If you were dumber than you are, I would have hit you with the old "sweetness and light" but since your posts against the libs who were likening Christianity to Islam, were full of "piss and vinegar" I adjusted my approach. I figured that you would at the very least, DO WHAT YOU DID, meaning , you'd actually LOOK UP THE SCRIPTURES I reprinted! Just to make sure this numbnutz screamin' on a blog, wasn't lying. And you now know, DESPITE how you feel about me, that you are NOT baptized properly and that BEING baptized properly is of paramount importance to Jesus. Mark 16:15-17, see how far we've come? Anywhoo, if you could be this WRONG about even the purpose for which Christ came, and the "attitude" He brought with Him, what can you really be relied on for at this point? Jesus whipping the money changers and cursing a tree who's fruit he didn't like, hardly fits with your "refined" understanding, huh? See, if you weren't so quick to try and disparage someone who is trying to teach you something that can save you , you might just profit by it. Profit for your soul that is.

 And what was my original crime? I came into a chat where you and Candance and Airforce were all LYING on JESUS and claiming to be Christian! YOU were the ones writing for millions to be misled by, that JESUS would be "OKAY" with someone naming a TEDDY BEAR "Jesus". Using a "P.C. skull full of mush" understanding of Jesus, that sounds fine, until one actually reads a little thing called the TEN COMMANDMENTS! And here comes the bad guy, ME! With the sheer temerity, the UNMITIGATED GALL, to tell this room full of Christians that it was JESUS who SAID NOT TO TAKE HIS NAME IN VAIN, in the first place!!!! When God spoke to Moses, WHAT'D HE USE, "Christian"!??? Huh, big mouth, what'd HE USE? Did He use "WORDS"???? And what HAPPENED to the WORD OF GOD , oh bible scholar?

JOHN 1:1,14 

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 

14And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

So GOD'S WORD that he used WHEN HE TOLD MOSES NOT TO TAKE HIS NAME IN VAIN, became FLESH and it is the WORD of GOD that YOU WORSHIP AS THE EMBODIMENT OF THE GODHEAD (COL2:8,9) KNOWN AS CHRIST JESUS.  Which would make a "Christian" who thinks that Jesus would be at "variance" with HIS OWN WORDS, pretty silly wouldn't it, silly rabbit?