Joy Behar took up Media Matters talking points on her "View" forum and Whoopi Goldberg and Sherri Shepherd, whom Barbara Walters calls "very conservative," backed Behar up. On discussing Barack Obama and whether his African American race helps or hurts him, Joy Behar brought up the far left Media Matters smear of Bill O’Reilly.
JOY BEHAR: Well, remember the Bill O’Reilly thing when they went up to Sylvia’s and he was so astounded-
WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Yes he was astounded.
BEHAR: -that black people use forks or something when they eat?
GOLDBERG: Yeah, I mean, you know, what kind-
BEHAR: It’s Bill O’Reilly.
In reality, Bill O’Reilly was using his experience to note that African-American culture is not as profane and coarse as stereotyped by many white Americans. Barbara Walters very timidly defended O’Reilly before Sherri Shepherd and Whoopi Goldberg continued.
BARBARA WALTERS: No, he didn’t say that.
BEHAR: What did he say?
SHERRI SHEPHERD: He said that they were so well mannered and they didn’t curse.
GOLDBERG: Yeah, they didn’t cuss.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Dear Justin,
December 11, 2007 - 15:54 ET by OldSailor88I don't know what they pay you for sitting around and watching the View, but unless it has eight zeros before the decimal point, you're underpaid, my friend.
I, myself, couldn't take
December 11, 2007 - 16:07 ET by kgI, myself, couldn't take more than a few seconds of listening Behar. Just reading a few comments of hers gives me the creeps.
Not only sniping at Bill
December 11, 2007 - 16:12 ET by drillanwrNot only sniping at Bill O`Reilly, but misquoting him and misrepresenting the situation.
Oh, I get it. You're pampered NYCity ego needs to hear your name heard on tonite's "Talking Points", eh?
Hey, Joy, as a kid did you poke sharp sticks at hornets' nests and then run home screaming and crying to mommy when they swarmed you?
These women
December 11, 2007 - 16:29 ET by cvgbuckeyeThese women are nothing but well paid prostitutes that are performing for a group of slovenish house women who need to get jobs. They are of no account and no one should pay them any attention and they might possibly crawl back under their rocks.
Well, remember the Bill
December 11, 2007 - 16:39 ET by motherbeltWell, remember the Bill O’Reilly thing when they went up to Sylvia’s and he was so astounded...[...]... that black people use forks or something when they eat?
What the hell, Joy, that's close enough: "astounded that black people use forks or something"....you don't remember exactly what he said, but you know it was "something" insulting and racist.....
That's so far from what BOR did say that there's no way that's an
accident...that is a deliberate attempt to put hateful words into his
mouth, by implication.
Just get the smear out there...it doesn't matter if it's right. Just toss it out there; you can "correct" it in a couple of days if anyone has a fit over it. If not, score one for your side.
Behar
December 11, 2007 - 16:35 ET by well99This is for Joy
http://www.youtube.c...
As my mother used to say:
December 11, 2007 - 16:37 ET by motherbeltAs my mother used to say: If she had a brain, she'd be dangerous.
MB
December 11, 2007 - 19:19 ET by well99So that makes Joy harmless.Joy should be the poster child for lobotomies.
Justin, its just the way
December 11, 2007 - 17:01 ET by charlietexasJustin, its just the way the liberal womens uterus works. they ear
only what they want to hear. its filtered through their uterus's. Joy's
and Whoopie's is pretty old. Give the old ladies a break.
mom
Wouldn't that be uteri
December 11, 2007 - 17:41 ET by drillanwrWouldn't that be uteri ...? : -)
I thought about that and
December 11, 2007 - 17:45 ET by charlietexasI thought about that and wasn't sure. maybe just utter's, ?????
mom
This is.....
December 11, 2007 - 17:46 ET by Prester John....utter nonsense.
Ass backwards
December 11, 2007 - 18:16 ET by dboI think it is uteri but that reminds me....Why is bra singular and panties plural?
Damn good question ... and
December 11, 2007 - 18:32 ET by drillanwrDamn good question ... and I, for one, demand an answer to it.
CNN, I have a question for the next democrat debate you hold.
Excellent question! Let's
December 12, 2007 - 05:10 ET by TeamcheeserExcellent question! Let's defer to an expert. President Clinton?
This just proves
December 11, 2007 - 18:23 ET by c5thenthat sarcasm takes intelligence to understand and appreciate. "The View" is very short on intelligence and very long on partisanship.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
new suggestion for NB
December 11, 2007 - 19:02 ET by candanceI move that this song be played in the background every time we show footage of Joy Behar.
You sure?
December 11, 2007 - 19:12 ET by drillanwrI was thinking more along the lines of this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Uvxb1GY2hm8
Ahhh, The Spew . I cringe
December 11, 2007 - 20:04 ET by BlazerAhhh, The Spew . I cringe to think of what type of single celled couch fungus allow's itself to be entertained by this total vexation of the soul on a daily basis.
The spare change, stale potato chips, and old popcorn trapped behind the sofa cushion's have more intellect than anyone who would watch this crap.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
I say pick any three of
December 11, 2007 - 22:12 ET by Chris NormanI say pick any three of these crones and put them in MacBeth. "Double double toil and trouble. Fire burn and cauldron bubble." They'd be perfect!
" Bill O’Reilly was
December 11, 2007 - 22:51 ET by Keith" Bill O’Reilly was using his experience to note that African-American culture is not as profane and coarse as stereotyped by many white Americans. "
In a word.....BULLPUCKEY! Bill O'Reilly was surprised by the civility of blacks in a restaurant, in 2007. If that were not the case BOR would have just said, "Hey I've been socializing with blacks for years and I don't know what these white dummies are talkin' about!" He would have spoken from already "internalized experience" of long standing. But by saying that on THIS trip to SYLVIA'S I was so surprised by the civility of blacks that I needed my audience of knuckle dragging morons to be similarly persuaded, is shall we say, problematic?
Only a complete idiot would not see that as bigotted! Is it racist...no. Because I don't believe that O'Reilly "hates blacks", to the contrary I believe in his own backwards way he thought that he was doing something good. That is the objective view, because I don't believe that he "hates blacks". That said, it was in the subjective sense, "bigotted, because the view's that he believed he was disspelling were negative assumptions that shouldn't have existed in todays world, in the first place! Don't you think some guy who says, "Hey look the blacks AREN'T animals, you can even eat with them now", is a little behind the times?
Some people so stupid on race that they can't see it unless you put it in different terms, this way their denial reflex can be temporarily supressed. So here goes. If I told friends that I just came back from dinner at YOUR HOUSE and said that I was "SURPRISED" that YOUR WIFE didn't offer to BLOW ME once! How would you feel then? Clearly I'm saying to the world that YOUR WIFE is NOT a WHORE, right? And in your silly universe your wife NOT being a whore and me stating that, is a "good thing", right? lol, And just as clearly the fact that I was SURPRISED by that discovery makes me a guy who thought your wife was a whore! Ya kool aid drinkin' 'tards!
The logic is unassailable, so please don't make yourself look even stupider by trying. Just repent for your thoughts and moveON.
Typing every few words in
December 11, 2007 - 23:36 ET by Chris NormanTyping every few words in bold face doesn't really help your disingenuous interpretation of O'Reilly's words and motivations. It just looks pretentious and silly. Really. Now, MoveOn along.
Hey Keith...
December 12, 2007 - 00:19 ET by tomchris...or should I write "Keith." Now that you've shown us "knuckle-dragging morons" your complete mastery at hitting the bold button to illustrate your vein-popping rants, I have a few things...
Yes, O'Reilly observation was crudely put but his point was valid- that sadly, in today's supposedly racially entlightened age, the image of urbane, civil, middle class black folks out for an evening of fine dinning is the exception, not the rule. This exception is instilled by blacks as well as whites. Look around. Hip hop culture rules the roost. The foul-mouthed, baggy-panted, sexually charged, "keepin' it real" rapper has insidiously taken over as some sort of acceptable model of how blacks should look and behave. Education, articulation, middle class assimilation, is considered odd from both ends of the racial spectrum. Just ask another Bill. Cosby, that is.
And as far as your claim that Bill O'Reilly is somehow "bigoted" but not racist, you reminded me of a lib on talk radio who when asked if they considered a particular person a liar said "no, just "loose with the facts." If you're as smart as you claim (which I gather from the repeated insults you hurl at anyone who dares disagree with you) it doesn't bode well that you have to split hairs in order to frame your argument.
Also, just how "bigotted" can O'Reilly be when the person he was having dinner with was none other than Al Sharpton? Not actually your typical "kool aid drinkin' 'tard, huh Keith?
ah ha
December 12, 2007 - 00:28 ET by candance*grabs a bucket of popcorn and gets a good seat for Keith's next explosion.*
Get ready Chris. You'll be scraping "stupid butt non-baptised illiterate blapheming no-good **** Christian hater" off your possessions for the next two weeks.
WOW CanTdance, not only
December 12, 2007 - 06:22 ET by KeithWOW CanTdance, not only are you biblically illiterate but a slanderer and rumormonger to boot, huh? Nothing on this thread had anything to do with religion. So why on earth would your lying tongue slander me ? Don't worry pal, I KNOW why, I'm not mad. It's because deep inside you know I'm RIGHT. And you HATE IT. You hate the fact that some numbnutz on a blog, knows what your "so called" Pastor doesn't! Because YOU'VE actually LOOKED UP the scriptures I've been printing and the answers from your "preacher" have seemed tinny and far away amidst the roar of truth. I know that's why you hate me, people like you would hate ANYONE who is telling it like it's WRITTEN.
John 15:18
If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
Why would you tell Chris that I would say these things to him? ""stupid butt non-baptised illiterate blapheming no-good **** Christian hater"
I don't know Chris, nor do I know how he is baptized, I knew how YOU were though. The stupid p.c garbage that you spewed concerning Christ, none of which was biblical, told me all I need to know about YOU. What about my offer LYING SLANDERER? I offered you TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS for everyone in the bible baptized falsely like YOU, in the TITLES of the "FATHER, SON & HOLY GHOST", AFTER the DAY OF PENTECOST! I wait with baited breath for your reply...NOT! I can't hear you, what's that you say? Speak up son! Do ya want the dough or not? Perhaps you now know that you couldn't win it because there IS no one in the bible baptized like YOU in the ENTIRE FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH otherwise known as "THE BOOK OF ACTS", huh? I gave you countless scriptures SHOWING you beyond all reasonable doubt that the dipping you received was "in error". I ALSO showed you that contrary to your churches assertions that these things "don't matter" or are "of faith and we don't need to get legalistic blah blah blah" that the APOSTLES felt that it WAS IMPORTANT. In fact, I showed you how not only was it of "importance" but it was IMPORTANT enough for Paul to interrupt his journey to found the Ephesian church, to CHANGE THE BAPTISM of some people who were BAPTIZED INCORRECTLY! AND I showed you how he changed that incorrect baptism to baptism in the name of JESUS CHRIST. Not Father Son Holy Ghost. Jesus' name. But all I get back is lies and slander. What happened Oh, bible scholar, cat got your tongue? You so flush you don't need money? Ten G'S for every fool you find that got wet like you after the day of Pentecost. See, pal, I don't just "talk", I SHOW AND PROVE what I'm saying. As Jesus said...
John 5:39
Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
You got an opinon, well, opinons are like buttholes and yours is worth about as much. But there IS an Author and finisher of your faith whose "opinion" you'd do well to consider. Do the people in your church know what a "deed" is? Not the property kind mind you but "Deed"as in
1.
something that is done, performed, or accomplished; an act: Do a good deed every day.
2.
an exploit or achievement; feat: brave deeds.
3.
Often, deeds. an act or gesture, esp. as illustrative of intentions, one's character, or the like: Her deeds speak for themselves.
See, that's the kind of "deed" we're talking about, oh, bible scholar who CANTDANCE. Would the "scholar", I think this is how you shall henceforth be known, as "the scholar", consider the ACT of BAPTISM to be a DEED? Or something that one "does"? If you have ANY intellectual honesty, (doubtful but we'll slog on anyway) you would have to admit that the ACT of getting baptized is in fact, a DEED.
Colossians 3:17 (King James Version)
17 And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.
OOPS. See Scholar? There's a reason that after the HolyGhost was shed forth on the Day of Pentecost, the "baptism of John" CHANGED to JESUS NAME. You followers of John are so silly, didn't he TELL you to worship the one that came AFTER Him and not HIM? Obviously JOHN didn't know WHO JESUS was until he was SHOWN it when he baptized Jesus! Now, obviously John used the empty TITLES "Father, Son and Holy Ghost" because he didn't know the NAME that God would assume when HE was made FLESH (John 1:1, 1:14) But even when John was baptizing he told the people that it was ONLY TEMPORARY, silly rabbit! When Jesus told the to baptize the people in the "Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost" He also told that HE was the EMBODIMENT of the GODHEAD and that the NAME (singular) of the Father, On and Holy Ghost is JESUS! Colossians 2:8,9, John 14 7-11, 26, John 15:26, John 10:30, etc. Thats why JOHN told them that HIS baptism which you have, was ONLY TEMPORARY!
MATTHEW 3:11-12
11 .I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
See John wasn't a glory hog. He told them "I'm just an apertif, something to wet the whistle" lol. Seriously, he baptized for repentance to soften them up for the prospect. Man's heart was "hard" which is decried countless times throughout your bible. When JESUS came to be baptized, John said that he needed to be baptized BY JESUS instead of the other way around! But Jesus told him to do it for an example to YOU, Candance! An example you have yet to follow, because John SAID that his baptism was TEMPORARY! A fact that I laboriously chronicled for you out of Acts 19:1-7
Acts 19
1And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples,
2He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. (remember I told you that everyone has to be able to answer this question, contrary to the false teaching that reception of the Holy Ghost is "automatic upon belief"?
3And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. ( remember I told you that you people say it doesn't matter how one is baptized but that that was stupid if you see an APOSTLE risking his life to RE-BAPTIZE some people properly? This was during the persecution of the church you know? Paul was "on the lamb". But he took time out to REBAPTIZE some people who hadn't "heard the latest".) Note to Candance: Don't be them.
4Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. ( See, John was the SALAD but Jesus well, there's your meal, baby, there's your meal!)
5When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. ( how were they baptized again? Oh, not like you, huh?) seriously dude, any apostolic church will baptize you properly as will 60% or so of Pentecostal denominations all you have to do is ask them how they do it. When you find a church that says in JESUS name, GO THERE.)
6. And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied. ( now a lot of fake churches won't go this far with you pally because they mistakenly believe you to be saved and filled with the Holy Ghost, "when" you "believe", contrary to this apostle and all scripture. )
7And all the men were about twelve.
I'm workin' hard for you dude, pay attention. God has at many times given MANY names for himself, to ADAM he was "The LORD GOD". To Jacob he was "the God oF Bethel" to Moses he was I AM, THE LORD and JEALOUS, yes Jealous is a NAME.
Exodus 34:14
14 Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. ( had to print it cause I know you'd never seen it and wouldn't have believed it!)
Yahweh, Jehova, Jehova Jireh, are ALL NAMES that GOD gave to his PROPHETS. Now all of that was in the dispensation of the LAW, law which would culminate in the messiah whose NAME is JESUS. Because the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, the lamb slain before the foundation of the world, was the GREATEST sacrifice of GOD for MAN, God's earthly incarnation, was given a name which is ABOVE every name, oh bible prophet.
Philippians 2:8-10 (King James , )
8. And , found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
9. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
10. That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
Jesus is the one who hung between heaven and hell. Jesus is the one who freed the captives from satan and gave your sould access to eternity. This is why ALL that you DO in WORD or DEED should be done in his matchless name, scholar.
See when God gave various prophets, various names for himself, these names suited the "occasion" if you will. When the He came freeing the Jews He was "I AM", get it yet, genius? WHEN HE CAME OFFERING SALVATION HE CAME AS JESUS CHRIST and baptism is an acknowledement in the belief of THAT FACT, understanding that if we are baptized in the image or likeness of HIS DEATH we shall also take part in the likeness of His RESURRECTION! Which is why it'd be pretty darned stupid to do it in ANY OTHER NAME! As Paul said...
Romans 6:3-5
3. Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? (why no, Paul, CanDance didn't know that, he didn't know WHY he was baptized!)
4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. ( oh, I see Paul so it's like "all about Jesus now, huh"? Gee, I wish old cantdance could see that Paul! Now, Canny if you're buried "WITH HIM IN Baptism" wouldn't it have to be in HIS NAME?
5. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: ( how is it that the empty titles of Father or Holy Ghost died for you? Did they say "Son" who calls himself "king of the jews as he hung on the cross or did they call Him JESUS?)
See, silly condescending rabbit who can't read the scriptures for himself, the NAME which is ABOVE every NAME, is the ONLY name that GOD gave for himself to be used in SALVATION.
ACTS 4:10-12
10Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
WHAT PART OF "NO OTHER NAME",DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND CANNY?
There, I've taken my time and used another batch of scriptures that show you that you haven't a clue as to what you're talking about. God bless you to understand man, God bless you.
yay for me!
December 12, 2007 - 15:35 ET by candanceKeith called me can't dance (haven't heard that one before) and Canny in the same post. Nice to know I still got the touch.
Please Keith, I beg you, take it upon yourself to decide that I have a reprobate mind and am a lost cause so I don't have to read your preaching anymore.
Wow, Candance. I think
December 12, 2007 - 15:58 ET by MrShyWow, Candance.
I think The Preaching Actor has redefined "bully pulpit".
What an angry, ugly S.O.B. he is. NB certainly gives people a lot of rope on this site, I'll give them that.
"No wonder I turned out so amazingly amazing."
-- Leon (Robin to Professor TP&C's Batman)
It really amazes me
December 12, 2007 - 16:42 ET by candancePeople like Keith have this idea they're bringing up something new I've never heard before. I have several people in my family who believe like him and I get it screamed at me every time I go home. I've also been to many churches across the country and met dozens of people who believe his teaching - and they are the most militant, the most hateful, the most likely to fly into a preaching rage.
Conversion doesn't come through human intellect or debate. It comes by conviction and God moving on your heart. So you persuade people with the fruit you bear and praying for their hearts to be softened - not by screaming and posting the same passages over and over.
I really want Keith to stop wasting time on me because I will never - ever - ever believe his teaching.
Kieth
December 12, 2007 - 16:16 ET by Airforce_5_O“It's because deep inside you know I'm RIGHT.”
What a freaking ego maniac!
Deep down inside we all know you’re a nut. Good grief Preacher you must look in the mirror and say “Man I am Awesome!” And blow yourself a kiss. What pride you have in yourself and being the Bible authority you know what it says on pride.
Yep I want you to know that DEEP DOWN INSIDE you haven’t a clue.
"When you men get home and face an anti-war protester, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend, because she knows she's dating a wussy."
Attributed to General Tommy Franks
Keith, I have little doubt
December 12, 2007 - 16:50 ET by dvdaughtryKeith, I have little doubt you have studied and your salvation is in hand, but there are better ways to do this.
Everyone else:
Please don't make him do that again.
Well, for once, the rich white man is in control. --Montgomery Burns
sorry dave
December 12, 2007 - 16:57 ET by candanceWe can't help it. He's like a hurricane: one minute you're sitting around having a quiet conversation, and the next, with no warning, Keith blows in with a sermon. I admit I made a little jab at him above, but he'd have gone off with or without that.
If you poke him a little harder, he'll start using profanity and calling you even worse than you see above.
If you poke him a little
December 12, 2007 - 17:41 ET by dvdaughtryIf you poke him a little harder, he'll start using profanity and calling you even worse than you see above.
LOL, and BTW, but my name is not Dave--It's Drew.
I can't get on to him to much. I have done the same thing.
Well, for once, the rich white man is in control. --Montgomery Burns
Dear TomChris "And as far
December 12, 2007 - 03:38 ET by KeithDear TomChris
"And as far as your claim that Bill O'Reilly is somehow "bigoted" but not racist, you reminded me of a lib on talk radio who when asked if they considered a particular person a liar said "no, just "loose with the facts." If you're as smart as you claim (which I gather from the repeated insults you hurl at anyone who dares disagree with you) it doesn't bode well that you have to split hairs in order to frame your argument."
I didn't call O'Reilly "bigotted" I referenced a specific viewpoint of his, the surprise at finding black civilization and I called that, "bigotted". I wasn't splitting hairs, I was giving BOR the benefit of the doubt. It is possible to have an attitude that is insulting, through IGNORANCE as opposed to MALICE. A racist is malicious a bigot may just be misinformed. If you're a white person who gets their SELECTIVE views of blacks from t.v then you're a blithering idiot. It reminds me of a talk show once where a racist was justifying his hatred of blacks by telling the audience that a black man killed someone in his family once. He said that this was why he wanted to "kill all blacks". When the host brought out some statistics that showed that while Black on Black crime was through the roof, his white relative was statistically more likely to have been killed by a member of their own race. He then asked if that would make him hate all whites...The guy said "of course not". The "assumption" at the heart of O'reilly's dialog was RIDICULOUS, in 2007 and I don't care how many rapvideos you look at. Funny how the white people who make these judgments about blacks based on t.v don't do the same with whites huh? How come nobody thinks all white guys are "Kid Rock"? Or any of the Rockers that have been writhing across the t.v since the mtv generation began?
I've been playing upstanding members of the black community on t.v and in movies for twenty three years. My refusal to play the "stereotypical" roles is the reason I'm not a household name! I was on the most famous sitcom in television history where the black folks were all upstanding people, "The Cosby Show", since you mentioned Bill. There is no doubt that Bill is right by the way. But there are millions of images on t.v, not all of them, even of blacks, are negative.
Funny how racists don't look at the positive images and think all black people are that. Speaking of Cos you may not know this but our show was ATTACKED by WHITES who said that this uplifting portrayal of black family was "UNREALISTIC". Based on the plethora of black homes they'd been in, no doubt. Let's see there were decent black characters on Drew Carey, the Captain on NYPD Blue, or any of a thousand other decent upstanding black characters! Selective prosecution, I believe the defense would cry. What about the cast of "A different World"? That was only on for like 8 years! Seems like white people "seeing" what they want to see to me.
"Also, just how "bigotted" can O'Reilly be when the person he was having dinner with was none other than Al Sharpton? Not actually your typical "kool aid drinkin' 'tard, huh Keith"
If I was really into "vein popping" rants, I would point out that you have failed to glean the distinction I was making by calling one of BOR's views "bigotted" but not "racist". Bigotry is largely due to ignorance, "All blacks eat chicken" ( my dad doesn't) could be considered a "bigotted" statement. But what if you really thought that "all blacks eat chicken" and that there's "nothing wrong with eating Chicken"!?? This same person might meet a black guy who hate chicken, realize what a stupid thing that was to think and NEVER go down that dumb road again! Because THAT white guy is not a racist! He doesn't "hate" anyone, he's just been conditioned by society as you allege and I agree, or by his own environment. That is the distinction I was making. See? NO bold!
Joy Behar gives cleavage a bad name
December 11, 2007 - 23:38 ET by Lame CherryI absolutley love women. I love auburns. I love cleavage. I love silky looking blouses housing curvy broads, but criminey to the finger lakes region............Joy Behar is ruining my taste for hot old chics like drinking too much good booze and puking it up sour.
Behar is like getting that 70 Mach I Mustang at age 40 from your dad and then going out and finding some cat pee'd on the seat and when you start it up the belts got this annoying squeek squeek squeek squeek squeek squeek.............
I imagine Behar was pretty good looking as a chica, but imagine her poor husband looking at that package and love is deaf.........then he gets home after the honeymoon and that old squeeky belts starts in day after day after day after day.........
If I were prone to lawsuits with Denny Crane, I would hire Bill Shatner to sue ABC and Joy Behar for ruining one of my numerous lustful fetishes in a good way for women of all kinds..........because this cranky, moronic old broad is just ruining it for me in old auburns with cleavage in silky blouses...........almost enough to swear it off.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
O'Reilly's antics make him a fool. Why does
December 12, 2007 - 00:18 ET by professor truthanyone need to smear what is known as damaged goods?
I love it when people try
December 12, 2007 - 04:42 ET by TeamcheeserI love it when people try to use phrases like "what is known as" in their opinions, thereby trying to make it LOOK like fact.
And I really love it when they use phrases like "O'Reilly's antics make him a fool." What specific antics? Who cares! O'Reilly is a fool! That's the point!
Try something like this: "Bill Clinton's philandering and inappropriate oral sex in the Oval Office are incredibly foolish antics. Hillary's willingness to put up with it, stay with Bill, and smear every woman that goes public with her husband's misbehavior makes her, in my opinion, damaged goods."
Lame Cherry, I couldn't
December 12, 2007 - 04:01 ET by jdhawkLame Cherry,
I couldn't have said it better myself! lol
the women on the view
December 12, 2007 - 13:38 ET by patrckmthe women on the view make me believe that maybe abortion is a good thing...is it to late term to abort joy behar?