Networks Ignore Occupy Demands for 'Socialist' Revolution
The Occupy Wall Street protests marked off a full month of occupation Oct. 17, and the network news media continue to gloss over protesters calls for "revolution" as well as the socialistic mentality espoused by many of the protesters.
One protest speaker was videotaped saying, "Long live the revolution! Long live socialism!" Others in Chicago and Philadelphia marched with Communist flags. And Oakland, Calif. occupiers articulated their desire for income equality, a new political system and disgust for the bourgeoisie (whether they be landlords or hot dog stand owners.)
Socialists, communists and Marxists roam the Occupy Wall Street rallies, yet zero network news stories since the protests began used any of those three words to label protesters or their goals. Network reporters won't even explain that protesters are calling for a revolutionary-style change.
Business & Media Institute analyzed 115 news reports, briefs and anchor reads that mentioned the Occupy protests. BMI found that only 6 percent (seven stories out of 115) have even mentioned the word "revolution" in stories about the protests. In one of those instances, the word was actually describing the violent Middle East uprisings that supposedly inspired the occupiers. The other mentions were in passing and none stories explained what "revolution" means to the occupiers.
In their own words it means the overthrow of capitalism, potentially through violence. The Occupy L.A. speaker who cheered "Long live socialism!" advocated using violence, as in the French revolution, because it "made fundamental transformation, but it was bloody." He went on to advocate such a bloody revolution here in the U.S. saying: "So ultimately bourgeoisie won't go without violent means. We'll have the revolution yes, revolution that is led by working class. Long live revolution. Long live socialism." He was cheered on by members of the crowd.
According to former Clinton pollster Douglas Schoen 31 percent of the protesters "would support violence to advance their agenda," he wrote in the Oct. 18 Wall Street Journal.
ABC, CBS and NBC network news stories have ignored this aspect of the protests, focusing instead on non-controversial things like 'complimentary' breakfasts and yoga. Bigad Shaban did that on CBS Oct. 11 saying, "This isn't your average protest. Yoga classes are taught in the off time. A makeshift library has been set up with at least fifteen hundred books…"
Yoga and libraries are much more innocuous to Americans than video of protesters waving signs that read: "Socialism is the alternative."
After "Occupy" protesters in Italy vandalized property and caused 2 millions Euros worth of damage some news outlets downplayed it by claiming that anarchists "hijacked" the protest. As for the revolutionary calls of protesters in Europe, National Journal correspondent Major Garrett told CBS, "I don't think there's anyone in America talking about revolution."
Garrett was wrong. These protesters are talking about real revolution in cities across the U.S. by comparing themselves to Middle Eastern protesters who overthrew their governments and calling for people to rise up against bankers and the rich. Even the OWS website it titled "NYC for American Revolution." Radicals with the "anti-consumerism" Canadian group Adbusters and the anti-American hackers Anonymous were promoting these protests long before they began to occupy Zuccotti Park. The live feed of the NYC protests calls itself "global revolution."
In New York City, an Occupy Wall Street protester led the crowd in a screaming chant: "What do we want? Revolution! When do we want it? Now!," according to video from the anti-American state-sponsored program Russia Today. One sign from that same protest declared: "A Job is a Right. Capitalism Doesn't Work."
Extremist Support for Occupy Wall Street
The list of extremist groups that support OWS has grown to include the Socialist Party USA and The Nazi Party of America. In its view, the group is willing to partner with "open communists" to defeat who they called "judeo-capitalist banksters."
Marchers at Occupy Chicago proudly carried red flags to show their support for communism, while one of them wore a CPUSA (Communist Party USA) t-shirt. But in the past month, ABC, CBS or NBC news programs have ignored such connections.
Fox Business senior correspondent Charles Gasparino wrote in The New York Post, "It's not an overstatement to describe Zuccotti Park as New York's Marxist epicenter."
He described the scene at the park: "Flags with the iconic face of the Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara are everywhere; the only American flag I saw was hanging upside down. The 'occupiers' openly refer to each other as 'comrade,' and just about every piece of literature on offer (free or for sale) advocated socialism in the Marxist tradition as a cure-all for the inequalities of the American economic system."
Here in the U.S., Obama and other politicians are embracing the protesters. But in Rome, after the Occupy movement spread to other countries, violence broke out. The Italian government condemned the acts and called the participants "urban guerrillas."
Protesters Don't Want Jobs, They Want 'Socialism'
Networks have interviewed some protesters with legitimate economic worries. Many are angry that the banks were bailed out, but they would likely attack the banks rather than the government for doing the bailing. News programs have aired footage of protesters demanding to know "where are the jobs?"
But if the Occupy protesters were just upset about the very high unemployment rate, then why have people actually quit their jobs to go protest the banks? It would make sense for the long-term unemployed to protest the bad economy, but they aren't the only ones in Zuccotti Park and in cities across the country.
Brian Phillips was working for Google as a consultant "managing a $4 million dollar complex," according to an Inter Press Service report by Christian Papesch. The article was entitled: "Occupy Wall Street: It Is a Revolution." "Like many others" the 25-year-old Phillips quit his job and hitchhiked to NYC from Washington State to "help these guys."
Mediaite found another who quit his job to protest. That was Robert Daros, from Florida. The Fightback.org talked to Jason McGauhey, a 26-year-old who worked with people with developmental disabilities before leaving to join the protests. Clearly, in those cases the greedy banks hadn't stopped them from being employed yet each decided to quit their jobs at a time of prolonged 9.1 percent unemployment.
In fact, what many of the protesters want is not a fair shot at a job. Or even a job. They want to be paid regardless of whether they work or not and they want their "fair" share of the evil bankers' profits. According to polling of the protesters, 85 percent are already employed.
An unofficial, user submitted list of demands revealed the socialistic utopian fantasy held by some proponents of Occupy Wall Street. Here are just a few of that person's demands:
- "…raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr."
- "Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment"
- "Free college education."
- "Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans!"
While that may sound farfetched such wishes are prevalent among the occupiers. Video interviews with protesters and speakers have called for the end of "money." One girl who claimed to be one of "the 99" said "knowledge should be free." In context, she meant that college should be free.
Comments from the Occupy Oakland protesters back this up. One woman said, "We're here to build a movement for economic justice." Later she clarified that meant "equitable distribution." Another woman said she had no "sympathy for people with obscene amounts of money." In her definition, anything more than $200,000 was obscene. She also called her landlord rich so "I say 'Eat her.'"
Another anti-capitalist occupier called capitalism "A total bogus system based on slavery and genocide."
The protesters are very willing to describe the socialist (or communist) system they want. They wear pictures of Marxist revolution Che Guevara on their shirts. But the networks so far, have been unwilling to admit that the Occupy Wall Street movement isn't simply a bunch of angry young people who want to hang out in a park and eat free food and do yoga. They want a radical change to the American political and economic system.
- Julia A. Seymour's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Oh no! Talk of SOCIALISM!
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 10:59am.
Oh no! Talk of SOCIALISM! Men, hide your women!
There is always this kind of talk around these events, but it doesn't really amount to anything or indicate the actual position of the the majority of democrats. It's just a lot of posturing, really.
Bal
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:32am.
Majority of democrats? What's that got to do with anything? The OWS crowd is largely, if almost entirely Socialist/Communist in it's ideology, even though most of them aren't actually intelligent enough to realize it.
More.
Bkeyser, AND Obama, Nancy
Submitted by Liberallies on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:53am.
Bkeyser,
AND Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the current Democratic Party leadership came out supporting the OWS crowd. Hmmm....what does that tell us about the current Democratic party.
Violence, rape, assaults, going to the bathroom on police cars, people's front yards, freedom of speech being taken away from the followers of OWS by OWS organizers, taxes being levied on OWS participants by organizers. it is crazy, dangeorus, ironic, moronic, Orwellian what is happening in OWS, yet the Democratic leadership endorsed them.
But Balboa says....nope, nothing to see there.
Funny, when was the last time we heard of rapes, assualts, individuals going number 2 in public on cars, front loans during the Tea Party protests? when did we see or hear anti-American slogans, communist flags in Tea Party protests? yet, the Democratic leadership attacked the Tea Party, but supports the communist, anti-American, sick, dangerous OWS.
Well the next step is to say
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:02pm.
Well the next step is to say OWS represents what all Democrats are for.
Again, really?
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 3:13pm.
First of all, there are probably very few real democrats left anymore, and those that are have been effectively silenced by the radical progressives that now run your party. No, I don't think the remaining rank and file democrats have much, if anything in common with the OWS crowd. In fact, few Americans at all -outside of academia- have anything in common with these nutjobs.
I think you'd be better served not apologizing for them and consider what they're actually saying. These folks are un-American. They don't agree with our traditional way of life. I think we've opened up travel to Cuba again; maybe these protestors would find the perfect existence in the land of their fallen hero, Che. Besides, it'll be getting cold in NYC soon and I hear it's nice this time of year in Santa Clara.
Well that's nice to hear.
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 5:39pm.
Well that's nice to hear. Usually people are quick to lump OWS with Democrats. There are well-spoken people that have concrete ideas, and there are -- without a doubt -- absolute looney tunes.
If you saw Jon Oliver's piece on OWS, it was hysterical and pitch-perfect.
Balboa, Again, the
Submitted by Liberallies on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 5:02pm.
Balboa,
Again, the Democratic Party leadership has come out in favor of OWS. You do know what it means to be the leadership of a political party in the USA, right?
It means that your voters, that Democrats voted you in to represent your values, beliefs, etc.
So, you tell us, Balboa, what it means when the Democratic party leadership comes out in support of a radical, wacked out, crazy, insane group of individuals.
Why did Obama, if he is going to take a political hit from the majority of Democrats, during a Presidential election cycle come out in support of OWS? Explain this and you have a point. If you can't, you are just saying silly things to feel better about the radical, wacked out, crazy, fringe majority that now makes part of the Democratic party.
and it was not only the top leader of the Democratic Party who has come out in full support of OWS, but Nancy Pelosi and pretty much every other single Democratic party politician and political pundit. Thus, if most Democrats disagree with OWS no doubt that Democrats will flee from the politicians who have supported the radical, wacked out, communist, socialist, fringes who make up OWS.
It is nice that you can make statements, now, back up what you are saying.
Hmmm...
Submitted by IrateNate on Sun, 10/23/2011 - 6:36pm.
Funny, I don't remember ever voting for Steele as head of the RNC...
Hmmm....the leader of your
Submitted by Liberallies on Sun, 10/23/2011 - 7:46pm.
Hmmm....the leader of your party is considered the politician occupying the highest political seat. In this case, Barack Hussein Obama, Nancy Pelosi are considered the leaders of the Democratic Party. The DNC chair person is just a puppet of these two. No different in the Republican party.
But the Democrat leadership
Submitted by BD on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 10:14am.
But the Democrat leadership has embraced OWS. Therefore they own the nutcases that it consists of....
Being The Best.
Submitted by Buck_1 on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 10:21pm.
It's not all that easy being number one.
You Girls should be fine.
Balboa's right!
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:37am.
...now move along, folks.... Nothing to see here. Just a plane crash with bloody corpses, and... whoa! A PLANE CRASH??? Hey, look folks! A plane crash! gather around, check out the plane crash!
Of course, I'm paraphrasing Chief Clancy Wiggum of the Springfield Police department.
See, blaboa? I can be sarcastic too!
Now stop trying to lull us back to sleep and start smelling the coffee already.
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Balboa, Really? just
Submitted by Liberallies on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:48am.
Balboa,
Really? just nothing to look at, nothing. Why don't you do this. Why don't you go visit one of these so called protest.
About a week ago my wife and I, with our two kids went to downtown Chicago. We were minding our own business when we decided to go to Chicago's Art Museum. As we got closer to the museum we saw people with weird signs, communist flags, anti-banking signs, anti-american signs. We also saw hundreds of police officers, very large paddy wagons. I told my wife that we should turn around and leave the area after we saw screaming, yelling, anger, hatred coming out of the OWS group.
I have to tell you, i was shocked when I heared President Obama support these people. A friend of mine who was praising Obama for supporting the OWS, etc quickly changed her mind after she also ran into an OWS protest.
Go stand in the middle of one of these protests and then come back and tell us all that they are nothing to see, that it is just posturing.
I am sure you have read and heard about rapes, stealing, assaults, etc in these OWS. No doubt you have also read the irony of what is going on inside of OWS. Taxes are being levied, protesters are being forced not to talk to the media.
The head of the Democratic Party, President Obama, endoresed these. In fact, all of the Democratic leadership have endorsed these OWS wackos. Yet, supposedly the majority of Democrats are not like these? So why did Obama and the leadership endorse it and support it? If they thought the majority of Democrats would not support their enndorsement since according to you most Democrats do not think like this, why did Obama endorse it and support it?
Yeah the Libs in congress and
Submitted by BD on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 10:19am.
Yeah the Libs in congress and White house are soooo desperate for some sort of emotion on the part of the left, emotion they hope to ride to another victory in a years time. They see the conservatives with righteous anger in the tea party fueling a devastating return to power for real conservatism. T
THey feel they need their own righteous anger and they have grabbed the proverbial anchor as it has been thrown overboard and are holding on for dear life....
...it hasn't hit the water yet, but thats coming.
Sooner or later, these useful idiots
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:07am.
will be shunned by the media which will act as though they never showed support for them in the first place. The media has only two choices here and since straight reporting goes against their very nature, they're left to either support or reject the movement. Surely they support the socialist aspects of it; they just aren't likely to report on them since open support of socialism is taboo -that end must be achieved through covert means.
The real problem involves the inevitable violence. There are indications that some is already occurring, but the ingredients are there and they've already been mixed; they're simply awaiting the flame that starts the cooking. I posted a link earlier today in the Ann Coulter thread about rifts developing within the Zuccotti Park group between the self-appointed rulers and those whose stated goal is abject rejection of authority. The incessent drumming is causing fractions not only among the protesters and local residents, but among the useful idiots themselves. And the General Assembly (as they call their ridiculous gathering of pinheads) is now taking money from the various muscians who've collected change from passers-by. A couple thousand loose cannons living in squalor, by choice, unable to sleep properly due to the non-stop banging of drums, and in increasingly filthy conditions are ripe for violence.
It's coming. And to be aligned with a group that commits violence against persons or property is akin to condoning such behavior. If the media is seen as promoting this eventual outcome, they're finished in their current form. The latest accusations of sexual abuse, mild inter-species dust-ups, and violent outbursts at OWS Oakland will have the media re-thinking their approach to this story. And once the media abandons them, the movement dies.
BK, You are correct, throw
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 12:56pm.
BK,
You are correct, throw in the colder weather, a lack of discipline and no idea of what they really want, some will drift away but other will turn to violence and lash out like the spoiled children they are.