The media were quick to jump on the story of an emergency airplane landing in Manila, Philippines due to a hole in the fuselage of a Qantas flight. And they were quick to sensationalize the story without mentioning Qantas' impressive safety record.
"Well, nobody's saying that we should be covering up a huge hole in the side of an airplane. But it's important for the media to not sensationalize cases like this, which they are already doing," Business & Media Institute Assistant Editor Nathan Burchfiel told Fox Business Network host Stuart Varney on the July 25 "Fox Business."
Burchfiel noted that British tabloids have already speculated that a bomb in the cargo hold may have blown a hole in the fuselage, even though there was no indication that's the case.
"This morning in the American media on ABC, David Muir said that the plane ‘instantly plummeted' 20,000 feet, which is not true," Burchfiel said. "The pilot descended 20,000 feet, rather sharply, but that was his decision, he did it under full control to normalize cabin pressure."
Varney defended the media coverage, however. "Those Europeans and those folks at ABC, I can't answer for them," he said. "But I can tell you that it's my job to put on the air the video that we've got and when we see a hole in the side of an airliner or when we talk to passengers who've been stranded on the tarmac for hours and hours and hours in dreadful conditions, I don't think we're overplaying the story. We're not sensationalizing the story."
But even the cell phone video from inside the cabin has been over-hyped by journalists, said Burchfiel.
"It's being described as ‘dramatic' and ‘terrifying,' but if you really look at the video, other than the shakiness from the cell phone camera, the people are sitting in their seats, they've got their oxygen masks, there's even a flight attendant who's kind of calmly walking up and down the aisle just checking on people," Burchfiel said.
"Obviously it's a scary situation and nobody's saying that it's not," Burchfiel said. "But part of the problem comes with the fact that this is news because it's so rare. Dramatic events like this don't happen that often and we never heard about things like the NTSB report that showed that in 2007 in this country there were zero fatalities on commercial airlines. That's a big number and we heard nothing about it."
Burchfiel said the incident was a "great opportunity for them [Qantas] to kind of fight back and say, ‘Hey, this is one incident. Nobody was even injured so cut us some slack here. But they will be attacked."
"The airlines are a pretty big target for an anti-business sentiment among a lot of the mainstream media," Burchfiel said, "and that's a problem."—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
That gives 'damage control'
July 25, 2008 - 16:02 ET by SickofLibsThat gives 'damage control' a whole new perspective.
Yea it is dramatic and
July 25, 2008 - 16:18 ET by Delsatotally what is supposed to happen in this type of situation.
Everyone of importance onboard that Qantas flight were trained to do exactly what was done.
Oxygen masks drop, pressure reading low, masks auto drop, plane goes to safe altitude, safe landing, and all is well.
It happened when I flew and this crew was GREAT and Qantas is the best.
The news media should get over it.
And when they interview the passengers who say the masks did not work or there was no air, Forget it.
The airflow is very week. Just enought to keep someone from passing out.
Passing out is almost impossible because the plane will reach a safe altitude in under 15 seconds.
And another thing
July 25, 2008 - 16:21 ET by DelsaBurchfiel is correct.
Having gone through
July 25, 2008 - 16:59 ET by BuffNBoneHaving gone through numerous rapid decompressions they can be quite disorienting. And fortunately they were in the controlled environment of an altitude chamber.
In the BUFF we would practice actual rapid descents, they bunches of fun but I can imagine riding in the back of an airliner it would be a different story.
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
I only had one in flight decomp
July 25, 2008 - 19:08 ET by bigpapaand that was a C-141, and it wasn't rapid.
But the one we did in physiological training was extra fun...
NOBAMA 08 !!!
I always hated doing
July 25, 2008 - 19:21 ET by NL207I always hated doing explosive drills. My ears don't equalize particularly quickly and it always caused me considerable discomfort. Even knowing what was coming doesn't help you prepare for that aspect of explosive decompression.
As for rapid descents ... as you frequently point out, fighters are fun. And I might add that rapid ascents are even MORE exciting, especially rolling out on top.
I was in Flight Test
July 25, 2008 - 21:08 ET by bigpapain New Mexico... Holloman,,
We tested Nav units that AF was looking to buy..
We had a 141A model and our pilots loved to do the rapid decents almost as much as us in the back at the racks..
About every other flight... Capt Bombardi was nuts...
Great fun,, my last flight out of there was a T-38,,, mach 1.3 baby!!!!
NOBAMA 08 !!!
I always thought the AF had
July 25, 2008 - 22:41 ET by NL207I always thought the AF had better advanced flight trainers. The T-38 has SS capabilities. Our best Advanced trainer was the TA-4J, a terrific bird in all respects, but it was not capable of supersonic flight.
Then again, our standard shipboard fighter in the late 60's to early 70's was the F-4, which was no slouch regardless of which version you were flying, N or J.
mmmmmmm F-4 sexy....
July 25, 2008 - 23:13 ET by bigpapaOne of my favorites since I was a kid...
I worked with a civilian named Rex Stage that worked on the F-4 during the Southeast Asian conflict...
Taught me all about F-4 tape and constantly asked me "what have you done for you country today?"... good man
F-4 is a big bad sexy aircraft even today...
We had a test program with F-15's I tried my best to get a ride but since I wasn't a zero.. it was a no go...
NOBAMA 08 !!!
Ah! F-4 tape, the secret
July 25, 2008 - 23:47 ET by NL207Ah! F-4 tape, the secret of how our brown shirts kept the damn things in the air.
The F-15 is simply the premier air superiority machine ever produced in quantity. If the F-22 ever gets manufactured in sufficent numbers it will eclipse the 15, but until then ...
I never got a ride in any AF equipment. Strictly USN.
NL207...
July 25, 2008 - 23:57 ET by Clear thinkerIf Obama becomes CIC we can forget ever seeing the F-22's. He will disarm us. Watch the trailer when you get a chnace for the new movie "HYPE". Pay close attention to what he says between the 3:33 and 3:41 minute mark.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
I saw a couple of F-22's in
July 26, 2008 - 10:24 ET by general companyI saw a couple of F-22's in Va Beach a few weeks ago.
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
F-15 of course
July 26, 2008 - 00:26 ET by bigpapaBut who doesn't love the F-14?????beat the crap out of the Soviets and with the Phoenix missle...mmmmmm
Two very capable cold warrior fighters that would roll your socks down to your ankles. :P
F-22 is above all but will never be a work horse like the 15 and 14 or even the 18....
Gotta respect those naval aviators ....
NOBAMA 08 !!!
Gimmee a C-17
July 26, 2008 - 03:13 ET by UnsaneBeing a loggie, I long loved the C-17, but especially after flying in them a few times this year.
Rapid descents suck.
Whoever casts a vote for Barack Obama is nothing more than a common thief. Whoever fails to vote against him is nothing more than a moral coward.
While I have every
July 25, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Eileen RightWhile I have every confidence in air travel as safe, I have to agree that this is news. A gaping hole in the side of a commercial jet that effects the passenger cabin is not a common occurrence, at least not that I'm aware of.
By virtue of their profession and experience, flight crews may not view this as an ordinary or first time air traveler would.
Besides, some of the "Flight Attendants" I've seen lately could plug that hole and allow the aircraft to re-pressurize and continue on it's way.
(just a joke, don't get all bent)
Eileen
July 25, 2008 - 21:20 ET by Delsaboy do you have the plugging the hole thing right.
Unions do that with non discrimination clauses.
When I was flying we were weighed every month and off line if we were over by three pounds.
I got out of flying after 21 years and before we started flying the unwashed on buses.
Also the hole in the photo looked to be below floor level or below the bottom of the door.
By the photos from the inside of the plane, this was no "rapid" decompression.
Hopefully when you fly the flight attendants are good at what they are supposed to be good at. ie: preforming emergency proceedures
servitude was always and added attraction
When I first spotted this
July 25, 2008 - 22:23 ET by Eileen RightWhen I first spotted this on Drudge Eyewitness account of luggage coming UP through the floor...
Appears it was luggage hanging out of the fuselage, my bad.
Also, I don't expect servitude, just some common courtesy, no offense intended. Seems I say Thank You as a customer more then I receive these days.
Delsa, I'm with you. A hole in a pressurized aircraft...
July 25, 2008 - 22:25 ET by R D Helm...particularly one of the passenger-carrying kind, ain't nothing to sneeze at.
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
yes, it's news
July 25, 2008 - 22:05 ET by GrannyGrump42It's news, but it was presented in some outlets with far more drama than the situation warranted.
Idiot Press
July 25, 2008 - 19:54 ET by Steve08080The rapid D did not cause the loss of altitude. The pilot did exactly what he was suppose to do and that was to descend to 10,000 feet. 10,000 feet is the altitude where you do not require supplemental oxygen. All crewmembers know this. As usual the press sensationalized it. Hey BigPappa, were you part of the C-141 T-Tail Mafia?
God Bless Our Troops!!!!!
Steve
Retired C-141B Flight Engineer
T-Tail Mafia??????
July 25, 2008 - 23:23 ET by bigpapaI'm going to have to assume since I don't know the phrase I wasn't... We were in flight test and had a C-141A model not the stretched B model that did our flight tests... It was tons of fun for a young man at the time... Lots of rapid descents and some fairly serious ascents for a big plane... Any commercial airline passenger would be surprised what their plane can actually do.. Flight Test 6585th Test Group...
NOBAMA 08 !!!
T-Tail Mafia
July 27, 2008 - 08:12 ET by Steve08080Hey BigPappa,
That was a nickname I heard picked up by the T-tail flying aircraft (C-141, C5). I was a flight engineer from 1987-2002. Also had some fun with the rapid descents. I flew with a pilot that loved to demonstrate the C-141's capabilities. I had many great times back then. Wouldn't trade it for anything.