You'd think it was the news media that "got a raise" last week for all the cheering. The federal minimum wage was increased on July 24 by 70 cents to $5.85 an hour and will go up by the same amount in 2008 and 2009.
CNN's Ali Velshi gleefully greeted the change on "American Morning" July 24. He called it "unmitigated good news."
ABC's Claire Shipman also called it "good news for thousands of low-paid workers," on "Good Morning America" the same day.
Media merriment over the 13.5 percent increase was to be expected since CNN, PBS, ABC, USA Today and The Washington Post all showed support for an increase when it was on the Democrats “100 hour” agenda.
While some politicians and members of the media have said this is good news for America, most economists say just the opposite. Their arguments that the increase will hurt businesses and the economy and slow job creation were left out of many reports.
CNN's Lou Dobbs even got confused about how much he makes on July 24.
The increase turns out to be “just about a 10 percent raise for those folks on minimum wage, about two million of us,” said Dobbs in his commentary during “The Early Show” on CBS.
Since when is Dobbs a minimum wage earner? According to Salary.com, he makes millions each year from his anchor job at CNN. And that's not even including his book, "The War on the Middle Class" and his financial newsletter.Dobbs was also wrong about the number of people making the minimum wage. 2005 data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics put the number of minimum wage earners at 479,000 hourly workers "earning exactly $5.15.""Lou Dobbs Tonight" reporter and "Your $$$$$" co-host Christine Romans was "sorry" for minimum wage workers on July 28.
“[W]e found out if you’re earning the federal minimum wage and you’re working full-time in this country, we’re still sorry,” said Romans on CNN’s “Your $$$$$ [Money].”
Many reports completely left out the dissenting opinion from many economists -- that increasing the minimum wage will actually harm the economy and low-skilled workers particularly.In fact, a survey of the American Economic Association found that “over 73 percent of AEA labor economists believe that a significant increase [in the minimum wage] will lead to employment losses and 68 percent think these employment losses fall disproportionately on the least skilled.”
Dr. Gary Wolfram, a Hillsdale College professor and adviser to the Business & Media Institute, explained that minimum wage hikes “[raise] the cost of doing stuff where low-skilled labor is involved and increased the price of things that would require low-skilled labor – hotels, fast food.”
Walter Williams, an economist and BMI adviser, has written: “if higher minimum wages could cure poverty, we could easily end worldwide poverty simply by telling poor nations to legislate higher minimum wages.”
—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Ok, who really works at
August 1, 2007 - 16:23 ET by dscottOk, who really works at minimum wage???? hotels and fast food here in Florida are starting at $7 or $7.50 an hour, none of those people will see any wage increase as a result of the legislation nor in the years to come. Any takers on where less than 1% of the working population gets actual minimum wage? Last I heard farmers were paying higher than that for picking crops. I can only imagine part time workers and day laborers getting such a low wage. Anyone working "less than minimum wage" hourly gets tip income thus they make far more than minimum wage. This is so bogus.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius
Stupid economist types...
August 1, 2007 - 16:57 ET by sarcasmoAlways mitigating all that "good" news, eh Ali?? And here's one top secret that probably won't be spilled anytime soon on CNN: Velshi's own salary, which I'm pretty sure has very little to do with the minimum wage.
JMR
Democrats do not care about minimum wage earners.
August 1, 2007 - 22:19 ET by Dave RIt continues to amaze me that more people (including some contributors to this site-no, not you Julia) have not caught on to this.
The only reason dimwhitocrats support increases in the MW is not because they are concerned about people raising families who are only earning the minimum wage (very few are, and the dims know it).
The dims are only doing the bidding of their union-goon supporters, whose wages are indexed to the minimum wage.
Classic vote-buying scheme here, nothing more.
Help Fred defeat everybody.
Minimum Wage and jobs
August 2, 2007 - 08:28 ET by DanSOn my day off, I logged on to the internet and bought a dvd player. I drove to a gas station, payed at the pump, went to Home Depot and used the self checkout, and went to the library and did the self checkout. Will an increase in the minimum wage cause more jobs to be automated?
}}}----> Yes, DanS
August 2, 2007 - 08:41 ET by Cool ArrowThe mother of invention will kick into high gear once again and what can't be automated will go south.
Can't we just replace Quirky Perky Couric with one of those annoying IT help desk voices from Pakistan?
Max Headroom
August 2, 2007 - 11:38 ET by dscottMax Headroom anyone? http://www.squidoo.com/maxheadroom/ The MSM could save millions of dollars by just replacing the current talking heads with a computer generated graphic image. Who would care if it was Katie or her likeness? It's not like they don't read the teleprompter anyway. Add some inflection to the voice and facial expression at the appropriate times and walla! Automated news reader. Not only would it reduce staff significantly, you wouldn't need build and maintain a set or pay those enormous electric bills for all those lights!
So MSM execs. if you believe in AGW, here's your chance to prove you are planet friendly by reducing your actual greenhouse emissions.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius
I love jabbing my DimLib
August 2, 2007 - 14:18 ET by SoftRightI love jabbing my DimLib friends with a simple question..... Why don't we just make the minimum wage $50/hr?????? Then all of us will make at least 6 figures per year....right? right? right? C'mon, if a stroke of a pen can make the minimum wage $7 or $8/hour...why not $50? Taada! No more poor, everyone is a successful, wealthy productive member of society instantly.... right? right?????
Sooner or later they begin to realize the absurdity of mandated values for someone's productivity..... but it can take some of them a very long time and they have usually called me a number of hateful terms by then.... The truth really stings when you are stupid.
Then I break in to my solution for expensive medical care.... we just mandate that doctors and healthcare workers only make $10/hr, medicines can cost no more than $1/day, MRI machines shall have their price set at $100, etc..... This price controls thing is EASY!!! That should cut the costs down to where even the poorest can afford any medical care they desire.....
Some of them eventually learn something, most don't..... and somehow they manage to blame it on me being successful or hateful, or both.....
Productivity Has A Price Tag
August 2, 2007 - 16:34 ET by deerjerkydaveExcellent point. And productivity is closely tied to a worker's skill level. What minimum wage really says is: if your skill/productivity level is below this minimum, we'd prefer you stay unemployed! It hurts the very people it is supposed to help, including immigrants who don't speak English. Taking a low paying job gives you skills and experience that can be used to acquire the next job that pays even better. I have a friend who in high school took a job at a fast food joint. Within only a short period of time he became manager because he was the only person who could speak English.
You mean one eyed Jacks
August 3, 2007 - 07:41 ET by dscottYou mean one eyed Jacks really are Kings in the land of the blind?
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius
}}---> Leon Russel?
August 3, 2007 - 07:50 ET by Cool ArrowStray dogs that live on the highway walk on three legs.
Never mind, but I like the verse.