Since the current financial crisis is taking place under a Republican administration it is easy for people to automatically blame Republicans. The media have happily pushed this misconception too. Facts the media ignore are things such as the very groundwork for today’s problems being rooted in legislation created by Jimmy Carter , or that in 2003 President Bush proposed “the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis that was blocked by Democrats on party lines. However, the media don’t report these very important and significant facts and so it is no wonder that the GOP takes the brunt of the blame in this recent CNN poll.
A new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll suggests that by a 2-to-1 margin, Americans blame Republicans over Democrats for the financial crisis that has swept across the country the past few weeks — one factor that may have contributed to an apparent increase in Barack Obama’s edge over John McCain in the race for the White House.
In the new survey, released Monday afternoon, 47 percent of registered voters questioned say Republicans are more responsible for the problems currently facing financial institutions and the stock market, with 24 percent saying Democrats are more responsible. One in five of those polled blame both parties equally, and 8 percent say neither party is to blame.
Is it possible that these registered voters are basing their opinions without the full facts? Well, I’m sure the polls would not reflect so favorably for Barack Obama if the American people were properly informed that Fannie and Freddie co-opted over $120,000 to Barack Obama over less than four years.
Throughout his political career, Obama has gotten more than $125,000 in campaign contributions from employees and political action committees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, second only to Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman, who received more than $165,000.
Perhaps the polls wouldn't reflect so negatively for Senator John McCain if the public were informed that during the same timeframe Obama was pocketing money from these corrupted institutions, John McCain was fighting to reform them.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
Ed Morrissey explains why this is important, and why John McCain needs to push back against the way the media has painted this.
We can play blame games for the next several months and years, but what would be the point? In this case, there is a point, and it couldn’t be more clear or important. We have two candidates running for President who would bring much different styles to executive authority over regulatory responsibility. Barack Obama and his allies took the money and stayed on the sidelines rather than take proactive action to resolve the credit crisis. McCain and his co-sponsors of this bill had the right idea and instincts, but could not get any cooperation from Clinton, Schumer, or Obama.
In simple summary, Republicans including John McCain tried to prevent this crisis back in 2005, and Democrats like Barack Obama chose self interest over doing so. Can we expect the media to report these facts? Of course not. Pesky facts only get in the way of agendas.
—John Stephenson is editor of Stop The ACLU.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
But Poptech said it was Bush
September 22, 2008 - 19:14 ET by JWFBush did it between planning the Iraq war and personally killing over 52 people, and Katrina when Bush personally drowned 17 people.
Now come on, he had links and charts and graphs with pretty colors. Dintja see them?
Blame???
September 22, 2008 - 20:09 ET by bpjamExactly, the media IS placing blame for the financial crisis. They are blaming BUSH and 'deregulation' (which has very little to do with this).
They don't want to mention Raines, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Jim Johnson, Jimmah Carter, Bill Clinton or anybody else who isn't in the GOP.
There are plenty of Republicans who screwed up to get us where we are today. But I'll guarantee that the solution to this problem will be damaged, mangled and tied up by Democrats. They view the 'fix' as a pork train and they are waiting to load up the cars....
see my other attack on MSM else where in this thread
September 22, 2008 - 21:17 ET by wdhorningIn Communist countries, lies are spread via the controlled press. In the USA, the communists already control the press with their lies about Bush & Iraq (instead of blaming Clinton-Tenet for their "lies"), and now blaming the financial crisis on McCain, Bush and Republicans, when it was Democrats who tried see that hundreds of billions were lent to those who could never possibly pay it back, which is in otherwords, a Democrat "hand-out" program gone haywire. And in 2005 refused to let the McCain co-sponsored bill reign in these institutions, because the Democrats voted against it.
The next one to really destroy the economy even more could be medical plans that cannot be paid for. But being communists, Democrats do not understand that capitalism grows capital and makes jobs with medical benefits for everyone, but instead believe in the communist method of stealing from the rich until it is gone and then what, where will the money come from then, morons? Do you think anyone will continue to work for millions in compensation just to have someone take it all away, and without the smart people at the top, we will all starve as corporations crumble and jobs disappear. It has to be a communist plot, as there is no other rational explanation.
Then Democrats feed us the line that illegal aliens do the work no one wants to do (a lie, since they are doing it, and also it takes jobs away from those aliens who are now legal or even citizens) and then without medical insurance, taxpayers have to pay for illegals' medical care to the tune of 12-15 million illegal aliens.
Isn't it nice how Democrats like to spend someone else's money?
Poor kids...
September 23, 2008 - 06:42 ET by Red JeepThis bailout will cost as much or more than the War in Iraq. Stunning. Just think of all the poor kids the libs could have fed here and around the world with that money!
It began with Nixon
September 23, 2008 - 12:00 ET by docbremoving the Gold standard and allowing the banks to lower their reserves. Then we had a series of meltdowns that were bailed out..Chrysler, Citibank by the Saudi's @Nixons behest, Mexican peso in 82', RTC'/Keating 5, Drexel Burnham and there are three more that I can not recall. The derivitive markets began pushing the new instruments --reverse repo- tigers- investment agreements-swaps- interest rate swaps- and the like in the mid 1990's......All followed on the heels of the REPEAL of Glass-Steagall in 1999 which allowed leverage to the extent of in some cases 1000/1. Then came the sub prime mortgage fraud...NONE OF THESE HAD ONE OUNCE OF COLLATERAL BEHIND/UNDER THEM...All the result of no regulation --oversight- honor....
Now Paulsen and Barnecke are pegging this to sub prime mortgages which is scaring the hell out of Congress...This is the Fox in the Henhouse...
Call your Congress-1.202.224.3121 and say NO NO NO blank check, or bailout of the culpable greedy guts on Wall Street...They have to count and record the yes or no's...
Oh capital # 1.800.828.0498--this will not get reported to the elected officals till tomorrow
I said Bush is part of the problem
September 23, 2008 - 07:55 ET by PopularTechObviously this includes FDR, Barney Frank and other players but Bush's reckless spend your way out of a recession policies brought this ultimately on. Then there is this legislation:
Bush's 'American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003' (Lew Rockwell)
Bovard: Bush to End Scarcity (Ludwig Von Mises Institute)
"Bush is determined to end the bias against people who want to buy a home but don't have any money."
- A White House Fact Sheet issued June 17, 2002, declared that Bush's agenda "will help tear down the barriers to homeownership that stand in the way of our nation's African-American, Hispanic and other minority
families. ... The single biggest barrier to homeownership is
accumulating funds for a down payment."
- Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher said in January 2004 that "the White House doesn't think those who can afford the monthly payment but have been unable to save for a down payment should be deprived from owning a home," National Mortgage News reported.
- While zero-downpayment mortgages have long been considered profoundly unsafe (especially for borrowers with dubious credit history), Weicher confidently asserted: "We do not anticipate any costs to taxpayers."
The reason I am unloading on Bush is he has been acting like a Fiscal Socialist NOT a conservative:
How Big Is Bush's Big Government? (Ludwig Von Mises Institute)
»→ Fiscal socialist
September 23, 2008 - 08:08 ET by Cool ArrowI'd say more like a drunken sailor on liberty.
There is/wasw no excuse for the LIAR loans and the NINJA loans that have crippled us.
Some of us had to dust off and start over after a foreclosure, realizing it was our own fault and lots of us who paid our mortgages off early.
I fall into both of those categories (in that order, thank God). I lost equity on my foreclosure, unlike those crybabies who got a "rent to own" mortgage and were shocked to find out ARM means Adjustable Rate Mortgage.
I don't want to bail out the banks or those who got suckered in by them. That includes the Russians and the Chinese.
"Don't taze me bro" - Joe Biden
Letting the good times roll
September 22, 2008 - 19:47 ET by sinz52Folks,
there is a great deal of blame to go around to both political parties. The bottom line is that when one party runs the Congress, it's incumbent on that party to at least try to solve problems before they snowball into huge crises. They may be stopped by an obstructionist opposition party. But they should at least try.
In this case, when the Republicans controlled Congress, they did absolutely nothing to discourage the explosion of complex financial deals in the financial sector, deals which depended on endlessly rising real estate prices. If anything, the Republicans encouraged them as some "triumph of the free market." Hence the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which gutted Federal oversight of default subprime swap derivatives, whose abuses led to the collapse of AIG this past week.
And when the Democrats took over Congress, they too let the good times roll without second thoughts.
This is entirely human. When everyone is having fun at a wild party, no one wants to stick his neck out and be the party-pooper saying that folks have indulged too much and it's time to go home.
I don't know. I am getting an itchy feeling.
September 22, 2008 - 20:02 ET by JWFWhen Republicans screw up, it's the fault of the Republicans.
When both parties screw up, it's the fault of the Republicans.
When Democrats screw up, it's the fault of both parties.
..Last Call!... "America
September 22, 2008 - 20:14 ET by bigtimer..Last Call!...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
For Christ's sake
September 22, 2008 - 20:35 ET by allahallahoxenfreeWhen are we just going to start the boycott of 95% of the media. No network TV news shows, no CNN, MSNBC, no bullshit dinosaur newspapers, no DNC talking point alleged news magazines. Why the hell hasn't this happened yet? We need to contact adverstisers and advised them we refuse to purchase their goods/services if they advertise for any of these blatantly corrupt news media. How much is enough, this used to be funny but now its turned positively Orwellian.
CONGRESSIONAL TERM LIMITS!!!
WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A FINANCIAL COUP!
September 22, 2008 - 20:57 ET by Interested and concerned CDNliberals laid the foundation, stated there was no problem and have literally nationalized a large percentage of the mortgage industry in the guise of a bailout. Investment banks are a thing of the past. Once the booton fall out of the housing market, the credit cards will be next becuase consolidation is impossible without equity, true private ownership will wain. You don't want to pay taxes? too bad, you owe the government anyway, and what's more? You owe more than your holdings are worth, and if you have a job in the private sector, think for a minute...is it really a private sector job when your pay is garnished at say 73%...Just enough for you to live on day to day.
Conspiracy rant over.....
The MSM is a threat to the security of the USA
September 22, 2008 - 20:59 ET by wdhorningBy not telling the truth, so the voters can see who is the best person to be president and to run Congress, to handle all financial situations, the MSM is actually a threat to the security of the USA. I mean, if the Democrats, along with Obama are in power, total economic destruction is assured, mark my word!!!
Since there is not enough money to just give it all away on every program that can be dreamed up, total collapse is assured, because they will try to give it all away! I am of the opinion, now, that this is no longer a presidential race, but a legallized conspiracy by Obama and Democrats to destroy the United States, economically, through legislation, which is just about as bad as an all out nuclear attack.
Satire in the vein of SNL's Todd Palin's possible incest:
I personally, IMHO, rank ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and PBS right along side radical, blood-thirsty terrorists, scum communists and child molesters. YES, NBC, if you can falsely "accuse" Todd Palin of incest, I can, in satrical manner and in my personal opinion, say you rank at the level of child molestors or blood thirsty terrorists, even if the facts do not bear this up, just by saying, "yes, it is un-proven, but since it is un-proven it might possibly be true (logically speaking)." And yes, as you put it on SNL, it is "un-proven," but because it is un-proven, all of the owners and top managers MSM companies could very well be literally child molestors. How does if feel? (See disclaimer.)
Now for a more serious note -- why I am really so angry...
There are children who suffer in this country at the hand of child molestors. This is a serious, crime, requiring sober behavior and intelligence to deal with it. It is not to be treated lightly. Children's lives are usually ruined for life because of child molestation/incest.
So, for NBC to take a serious issue such as child molestation/incest and use it in satire for political gain, says mountains about their mindset and the dispicable behavior of NBC, its owners and SNL combined. Furthermore, Trig Palin is innocent, their pregnant daughter is innocent, Todd Palin is innocent, and so are the molested/incested children of the world. You just do not make jokes about this!!!!
Furthermore, how do you think it makes a teenage daughter feel to hear some satire, as that put forth by SNL, that her loving father is satirically accused of incest?
Also, since Todd Palin is not a public figure running for public office, I hope some lawyers help him sue NBC and SNL for all it's got. Their satire could only harm Todd Palin's character, since he is not running for private office but instead works at a regular job, so such slander and libel could impact him at work, especially if his wife is not elected vice president, and he has to continue to work at his present job.The lawsuit should also include the harm done to the Palin daughter.
Disclaimer: this is only a stated opinion, and in no way represents the truth or actual facts about anyone or any organization, unless it does so by mere coincidence. It is strictly intended to make people think about the issues, the mindset and the behavior observed in actual, matter-of-fact incidents (Obama for president, SNL satire, Democrats spending habits, etc). Furthermore, my "satire" about SNL/NBC, etc, was for illustration purposes only, and not intended to draw laughter.
wdh
September 22, 2008 - 21:07 ET by BlondeThought provoking post. Thanks.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Look at the bright side,
September 22, 2008 - 21:30 ET by RESTLESS 1If this bailout goes through, they can kiss UHC goodbye.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
OBAMA IS A GREEDY PIG
September 22, 2008 - 21:51 ET by john5750Sen. Dodd believes our economy will recover if and only if we eradicate all the "toxic instruments that exist in these [financial] institutions." One would hope Democrat Barack Obama would agree with Dodd, especially as Democrats are viewed by Americans as the Party most committed to addressing and ameliorating financial crises.
But Obama cannot confront this crisis in the manner Dodd desires, for his National Campaign Finance Chairperson, Penny Pritzker, is largely responsible for the creation and lending of the "toxic instruments" Chris Dodd decries as responsible for our current economic woes.
Beholden to Penny Pritzker as well as to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, Barack Obama is essentially one of those "toxic instruments" we must shed if we are to recover from the mortgage and sub-prime lending crisis.
Danny Schechter, Leftist media critic and author of Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity and the ‘Sub Prime Scandal,’ offers a history of the sub prime mortgage. I quote one of the reviews of his magisterial text:
When it began, "subprime lending" wasn’t a term in common usage, let alone understood outside financial circles. One of its late 1990s originators was Obama campaign finance chairperson Penny Pritzker when she served on the Board of the failed family-owned Hinsdale, IL Superior Bank. It cost the FDIC $700 million and depositors another $65 million, while Pritzker made millions on predatory lending now called "subprime" mortgage schemes. One definition is as follows: "the practice of making loans to borrowers who do not qualify for the best market interest rates because of their deficient credit history." Another in the recent environment was to force-feed them to the largest number of homebuying prospects possible.
According to the short history Schecter’s recounts, it is Penny Pritzker who invented the "toxic" financial instrument that has precipitated our current financial crisis. The doyenne of predatory lending, Penny Pritzker is just another Jim Johnson and Frank Raines: both the cause and the symptom of all that is wrong on Wall Street, Penny Pritzker and her position of power on the Obama campaign raises serious doubts about Obama’s ability to reform the institutions responsible for our current economic doldrums.
Pritzker’s involvement in this crisis is not limited to the invention of the sub prime mortgage instrument; she is also largely responsible for the current financial crash. I quote Dennis Bernstein, who cites Timothy Anderson, a finance expert who relentlessly pursued the late Republican Henry Hyde for the latter’s entanglements in the failure of Clyde Federal Saving & Loan:
Though Superior Bank collapsed years before the current sub-prime turmoil that is rocking the world’s financial markets – and pushing those millions of homeowners toward foreclosure – some banking experts say the Pritzkers and Superior hold a special place in the history of the sub-prime fiasco.
"The [sub-prime] financial engineering that created the Wall Street meltdown was developed by the Pritzkers and Ernst and Young, working with Merrill Lynch to sell bonds securitized by sub-prime mortgages," Timothy J. Anderson, a whistleblower on financial and bank fraud, told me in an interview.
"The sub-prime mortgages," Anderson said, "were provided to Merrill Lynch, by a nation-wide Pritzker origination system, using Superior as the cash cow, with many millions in FDIC insured deposits. Superior’s owners were to sub-prime lending, what Michael Milken was to junk bonds."
In other words, if you traced today’s sub-prime crisis back to its origins, you would come upon the role of the Pritzkers and Superior Bank of Chicago.
It all stems from the questionable practices of Penny Pritzker and the Superior Bank of Chicago. Prtizker, by the way, is a major bundler for the Obama campaign. Indeed, the scion of one of Chicago’s wealthiest families has raised between $200,000 and $500,000 for Barack Obama’s Presidential bid. Her family also donated over $40,000 to Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign. Now wonder why Obama is opposed to interest rate freezes and a moratorium on sub prime mortgages: most of his campaign cash is from those who have shamelessly profited from our current economic collapse.
Democrats are aware of this problem, and a few are not very pleased. One Democratic member of the House uttered the following when interviewed by a reporter for the conservative American Spectator on 8 Sept 2008:
"How can Obama go out with a straight face and say it was Republicans who made this mess, when it is his key advisers who ran the agencies that made the big mess what it is?" says a Democrat House member who supported Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. "It’s his people who are responsible for what may well be the single largest government bailout in history. And every single one of them made millions off the collapse that are lining Obama’s campaign coffers. If the McCain campaign lets this one go, they deserve to lose."
Hopefully the McCain campaign will not ignore this egregious conflict of interest of Barack Obama. And hopefully the Obama campaign will fire and denounce Penny Pritzker for creating the current economic crisis on Wall Street. But I doubt Obama will, for Obama is the recipient of cash from many who are the beneficiaries of the sub prime mortgage scandal: he accepted $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans during the primaries. And here are the names of a few of Obama’s bundlers who earn their profits in the unscrupulous sub prime loaning industry:
Louis Susman, Michael Froman and J. Michael Schell of Citigroup; Steve Koch of Credit Suisse; Bruce Hayman, David Heller, Eric Schwartz, and Todd Williams of Goldman Sachs; Mark Gilbert, Christine Forester, John Rhea, Nadja Fidelia, and Theodore Janulis of Lehman; and Robert Wolf of UBS Americas.
Beholden to the interests responsible for creating the sub prime mortgage crisis that has rippled across our country and across the world, Obama cannot eliminate those who created the "toxic instruments" Democrat Chris Dodd decries, for he is too dependent on their largesse.
Will Obama return the donations and bundled cash he received from the subprime industry? Will he fire and denounce Penny Pritzker? Or will he simply ignore his complicity with the unscrupulous sub prime mortgage industry and simply give us more "okie doke," "bamboozling" and "hoodwinking?" Even if he does denounce the industry that has financially sustained his campaign, it will be too little, too late: the economy has already collapsed; the foreclosure crisis has already destroyed communities; and families are on the streets.
Barack "Sub Prime" Obama: unable to reform the industries responsible for our current economic crisis, he is anything but ready for prime time. Indeed, Obama is and will remain "sub prime."
You forgot Barney Frank
September 22, 2008 - 23:52 ET by _Dominick Dimeby_Barney rode herd on oversight and was pretty much left alone since the inception of these "liar loans". As for the MSM I have to parse virtually every news story of any kind for the truth to save my sanity. I expect the parroting of dem talking points in any conversation I encounter about politics. It can be depressing yet I am serene enough to merely point out factual errors since people's opinions are rarely swayed by a polemic and I cannot spare the time to do more. I used to laugh at the parrots doing the news copying each other verbatim but now when I hear what Rush calls a "montage" it is simply sad. Even in college there were folks with which to have a lively debate, bright minds on both sides of the argument. Now I would give anything to hear a dem with his[her] own ideas or at the very least a different way of repeating the talking points of the day.
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man
is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress.John Adams
I suppose if John Adams had known about today's version of the fourth estate...
BARNY FWANK...
September 23, 2008 - 06:34 ET by danybhoyAm I the only person who thinks that Barny Frank likes Freddie Mac better then Fannie Mae? When I say like, really mean like.I'm just saying...
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
double
September 23, 2008 - 06:59 ET by cocodriedouble
Pweeeese. Give Ms. Fwank a
September 23, 2008 - 06:57 ET by cocodriePweeeese. Give Ms. Fwank a wittle wespect. She is genewous enough to wet Michewe Wobama the full use of her dwesses.
Financial crises
September 23, 2008 - 00:10 ET by weirdoneMay I ask a question? How are your investments doing?
Today I have repented of my selfish sinful past and divested myself of all of mine and sent the remaining monies to the IRS because that is the Patriotic thing to do as per Obama/Biden. I will hence forth put myself and my family in the benevolent hands of the Government and allow them to take care of all my needs and desires. A change I hope will unburden my soul.
Say what you will about the greed of the private sector, the current financial crises have been orchestrated by the Federal Government over many years. Starting in the Carter administration and snow balling through the Clinton years those on the Politically Correct Socialist Marxist Left, having learned nothing from the Savings and Loan debacle of the 70’s and 80’s, have made it possible for people who have little or no financial means to purchase homes they could not afford by requiring Commercial Banks, etc. to give them loans that they had no hope of paying off. These loans were then bundled and sold to institutions like Fannie Mea and Freddie Mac. This was accomplished, in the guise of social justice, with regulations and intimidation, threats of fines etc, and the willing participation of those who ran Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Now when the “Chickens have come to roost,” as Obama’s pastor Reverend Wright so succinctly puts it, they have chosen to bail out the companies that they forced to make these loans and make those of us who have played by the rules, worked hard, paid our own bills and saved for our retirement pay for the disaster that they have created. The thing that really burns me up is that while they were creating this disaster they were receiving salaries from the taxpayers and huge donations from the same corporations they were destroying. Now we the taxpayers find it is our Patriotic Duty to bail them out. Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that I as a taxpayer am liable for the corruption of those I didn’t vote for in the first place? I am sick to death of these greedy parasites who like to call themselves public servants while lining their pockets with graft and the public’s money. The Federal Budget for 2009 is scheduled to be 3 TRILLION DOLLARS and the National Debt has been raised to 11.3 TRILLION DOLLARS. Add to that the current cost of the bail outs that these parasites are about to stick us with. How much is enough?
The revolution that brought this country about was fought over pennies in taxes. Last year I paid over $12,000.00 in taxes that I am able to identify. That did not include gasoline taxes, sales taxes, or taxes on everything I purchase. How about you, you think you are getting your monies worth? I think I am getting Royally Screwed and half of the American people intend to vote for those who want to raise taxes on everything that they can think of. Barak Obama’s solution to every problem is to raise taxes. Joe Biden “I want to take money and put it back into the pockets of middle class people.” What BS! Hillary Clinton, “I want to take that money and put it into a Trust Fund. Like the Social Security Trust Fund perhaps? ” Where in hell do these Socialist thieves get the idea that they can take the fruits of someone Else’s labor or investments and do with them as they see fit.
The Democrat’s choice of Presidential Candidate, Barak Obama, and his friends, are up to their eyeballs in this mess as he is the second largest recipient of donations from both Lehman Brothers and Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae and Democrats top both lists. His advisors, James A. Johnson and Franklin Raines are both former Chief Executives of Fannie Mae and looted 10’s of millions while there; another reason not to vote for him. Senator Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee was the largest recipient and has done all he could to block any reform. Likewise, Charles Rangel, in trouble for his financial malfeasance, is Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Who do you want to write legislation to address the problems they helped create, those who were instrumental in causing the problem in the first place? And what do you bet the bill will be loaded with more Pork we can not afford. Obama was on the news today proposing another 65 billion dollar rebate in an attempt to buy more votes. Is that a solution when the country is already flat broke? How do you rebate to people who pay no taxes in the first place and where do you get the funds short of borrowing more from China or speeding up the printing presses further devaluing the US dollar? These people are all insane and anyone who votes for them is likewise insane. It is time to throw all these corrupt bums out, revoke their pensions, confiscate their ill gotten gains and return them to the taxpayers. Mark Twain was certainly correct when he said “The only criminal class we have in America is the Congress.”
The Economic Fix and the Problem Source
September 23, 2008 - 00:43 ET by Lame CherryThis is beyond Jimmy Carter and if people are interested in the current intricacies and the fix of it one can read below.
I realize I answered NB's question this morning on the narrow of should Congress pass the bail out as that is what the question was. It requires more intricate answers though and solutions beyond what is being addressed.
God bless
http://lamecherry.bl...
No New Deal, No Obama Appeal & No Old World Steal
The
largest problem the United States faces is not Barack Obama, the
financiers who back him stoking this financial mess to install Mr.
Obama, but it is in the fact of the anarchist cancer of too many
Americans self hating themselves and ripping apart everything American
which does not fit their narrow definition of their own state of
perfection.
What America is facing currently is the second
market manipulation or attack aimed at undoing the "fixes" the US
Treasury has been installing.
Monday saw the markets rise and huge sell offs for profits by the financiers leaving once again the poor people holding the bag.
Money
in stocks just does not appear. When it goes up it costs someone
somewhere when sold for a profit and when they go down it bankrupts the
holder.
For what is currently happening on Wall Street and their
driving crude prices up, this has to be coming from the Rothschilds in
Europe who have a massive bankroll.
As they do not spend their
own money ever, this is serious as they are spending their own money
now as in assets to continue this attack upon the United States.
There
is only one cash reserve left in untapped in off currency resources. If
these financiers succeed in bankrupting the central banks of the world
which plugged this gap, they will succeed in taking the top of the
American western economy.
I have posted on how to fix this and I
sincerely believe that this almost trillion Congress is playing with to
Wall Street should instead be infused to homeowners to build disaster
shelters. This will spread the currency to many hands who will then
create an economic recycling of funds inside America where the cartels
can not get at the money.
I will detail this as follows.
To
deal with Wall Street debt, I refer to my original solution in what the
Fed is attempting in cutting out the debt, placing it in receivership
bonds which will be paid off at a nominal not taxable rate by the
parent corporations over the years with economic protection in no
hedging, derivatives or selling the debt.
They sincerely mean to
break the economy in a real 9 11 attack it appears. I do not know if
the Yankee capitalists are prepared for this as what is occurring now
is exposing they do not have the funds to fight this current onslaught.
I
find it difficult to believe the capitalists would be causing this
upheaval as John McCain is their man and this only assists Obama and
the Clintons.
What is occurring is not going to affect people
who have their bills and homes paid for, but it will affect US ability
to project economic power. If the US can not project economic power,
then some other nation state will project that power. The only group
who has that kind of dominating economic power are the central
Europeans.
They have been leveraging for this position and now are
very close to achieving it in supplanting France and the British by now
harnessing the old German order of economic might, with the Italian
Babylonian system fused by the massive Greek shipping. These people
have the finance to supplant America in raw currency and it was these
people screaming about American fixes which were hurting their efforts
at supplanting America.
Oil prices were tanking, so we are to
believe that all that money suddenly was dumped by investors into oil
futures on the last day in this revenue cycle to buy a falling product.
That
does not make any sense and it only reveals that what has been
occurring is the Europeans behind this have opened the flood gates in
electronic transfers from global stock markets pouring into oil futures
which is fully intended to be the throttle on the western economies.
France,
Germany, and Great Britain along with the United States markets are all
under attack and recoiling under this manipulation.
The definition
must be narrowed though in this is as"Europeans" in the sense or
"Americans", because the financial captors of this are instead a
banking lineage of a central west Asian people in the Ashkenaz who are
hiding in "Jewish" faith, but instead are secularists.
These
Ashkenaz elites are not practicing Jews of faith, so do not lump this
into Jewish or Judean peoples. These are secularists whose tool is
money and religion is the false light.
This is serious as this
group headed by the Rothschilds are using their money and they never
use their money. I realize that is repeated, but it needs repeating.
This is a direct attack upon the west to cripple the entire economic
power of the American led west in order to place into power the central
European empire rising from the unholy Roman Empire dead.
In this
mix, it is uninformed to blame this on the Rockefeller group. They are
Ashkenaz, but have been slapped around a great deal by the European
heirarchy over Bill Clinton's selling uranium the Europeans considered
as their property.
Bill Clinton is giddy though as he has something
in the works in bringing down Barack Obama in order to reinstate Mrs.
Clinton who if one notices is MIA not getting her fingers dirty in this
monetary mess so as to arise to the occasion as Barack Obama implodes.
The
American capitalists had this election sanctioned by their group to
defeat Obama. They had dropped oil in their operational capacity in
price, but now have to contend with the Rothschilds spiking prices as
an impressive slash at the west's jugglar.
This is economic warfare of all the stakes on the table.
As
stated, the Bush Administration knew this hit was coming and had these
stop gaps in place which the Rockefellers bit into. They had this $700
billion plan ready anticipating this 9 11 style hit now taking place
which is intended to offset the massive hemorrhage which was created
for this very purpose.
This continued attack on America is facing
trillions of off the books European funds collected. This is a woven
tumor into every aspect of corporate stocks to bonds. They dump
billions out of Wall Street due to no short selling (making money on
losses) and pump those funds into oil which strikes at the US economy,
because as these Europeans spike oil, that same oil can be sold short
as it falls creating the Ashkenaz financiers a cash flow of debt out of
the west to be utilized against the west.
This is the ultimate shell game.
The
last situation America needs now is dumping $700 billion into the
bottomless pit of debt of Wall Street, equally it does not in the least
need another communist black hole of welfare in Franklin Roosevelt's
New Deal.
If the money goes to Wall Street it will disappear into
the pockets of the elite while vanishing into debt. If the money goes
into communistic New Deal policies the money will disappear into the
hands of the many liquidity showing up as Walmart snacks flowing money
out of America and into China.
I address the New Deal for those
who do not know of this FDR program which had WPA, the Works Progress
Administration which was termed by Americans watching the money handout
as We Poke Along, as it was nothing but handing out money to people
holding shovels not accomplishing a thing.
Most of FDR's programs
were struck down by the Supreme Court. FDR's National Recovery
Administration was as Hughey Long termed fascism which was nothing more
than corporate planning of the economy.
Want to know what is the
genesis of the great debt failures in America? It is FDR's Social
Security, Federal Housing Administration etc... which created the huge
lump of debt now being exploited as America has no cash reserves.
FDR
did have one good program in the Tennessee Valley Authority or TVA.
This program went into a wilderness poverty area, built hydro electric
dams bringing civilization to the destitute and jobs that uplifted an
absolute barren area.
There is nothing wrong with investing in
America where it increases the quality of life for numbers of Americans
and increases their ability to purchase products from other Americans
thereby creating a self flowing continuous economy.
It is this
which requires the 700 billion dollars and not Wall Street. I laid out
a plan in taking "global warming" billions being wasted on the elite
scientific few who are shills for the European order behind this
current attack that that money should be taken and granted to United
States homeowners to give real value to their homes in building
survival shelters and stocking them.
It is this which I again
state is the answer to what is bogging down America now. It certainly
is better than FDR's world war which kicked the economy to grow again
and is what ended the Great Depression as FDR's deliberate policies
kept the economic situation stagnant by his policies.
Call it
Stockholm Syndrome for an entire American people so ravaged that they
kept voting for this communist Democrat who was enslaving them and
implementing the corporate enslavement of America.
Simply put
the solution is Congress votes to grant each American homeowner $40,000
to build, stock and supply survival shelters or national security with
the caveat that all items must be American manufactured or of American
origin, including firearms and ammunition.
This construction will
employ numbers of local people all across America. The stocking of food
assists the agriculture economy. The appliances assist all
manufacturers in America who employ vast numbers of Americans in
manufacturing, vendors etc...
This will recycle money 10 times
over and in taxes repay this $700 billion to the government eventually
in the $7 trillion dollar area.
This is how one solves the economic problem of Americans.
As
for the massive derivative debt, just like credit card debt can not be
fled from by citizens, the government must place these debts into a
cordoned fund which is sold to the public where the corporations will
be required to pay this debt off at a reasonable rate where investors
in that promissory debt will be rewarded in not being taxed on this for
their retirement.
This plan costs the United States not one
cent. It generates taxes to fund the government and it stops the
derivative bubble in placing the debt back onto the scam artists who
created it and requires them to pay it.
The bonus, real American
citizens obtain tax free retirement funds to supplement the
impoverished Social Security system which amounts to making the elderly
exist in poverty misery until they die.
For those who speak of
returning the Federal Reserve to the control of the United States
currency as being a real National Bank controlled by the US Treasury
for the US benefit, this is a wonderful idea. But the reason the Fed
was created and is run by the same bankers now attacking the United
States is that it is a siphoning system for the Ashkenaz to be paid a
handling fee for every dollar produced.
Would you like to have a
monopoly where you get paid a percentage of every dollar printed? Sure
you would, but do not think for a second they are going to give up this
monopoly. One of the stated reasons John Kennedy was eliminated was his
second currency of Silver Certificates he created which was competition
to the Rothschild Rockefeller group.
If one wants this solved,
one uses Alexander Hamilton's original mandate of making these banks
under charter for 10 years to be renewed by Congress by majority vote
and balanced by the President. If a mess such as this exists, the
cartel looses it's monopoly with the Justice Department prosecuting the
said fraud.
This way the cartel works for the American people and
the moment they know they are going to loose their monopoly and it will
go into a competitors hands the problems will disappear as these
cartels will be operating this for the benefit of all Americans as
their satisfaction decides in their citizen prosperity who rules the
Fed.
This is not that difficult to solve and while this was
designed for Barack Obama and now seems a hint of a chance to install
Mrs. Clinton in the fallout, there is a correct policy as stated above
to fix this which will benefit the free peoples of the west.
It
is vital that Gov. Palin succeed as one notes that oil is the weapon
this European faction with their American brokers are using as a siphon
on the west. Produce American oil, produce survival shelters where the
money is recycling in America and there is not any way the cartels can
get their hands on the currency and they will loose all leverage in
inflicting injury upon Americans.
This is the simple not cost
anything plan which Congress should be voting on. I realize the Bush
Administration is fighting an economic war by another faction and it is
rewarding American interests at taxpayer's expense, but a better
solution is available in the above plan.
agtG 321
IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
This is typical democrat
September 23, 2008 - 07:22 ET by cocodrieThis is typical democrat policy. Create a severe problem then spend billions of dollars to fix the problem beyond repair. Been voting since 1960 and have seen this over and over.
Historical Perspective
September 23, 2008 - 09:12 ET by earlewineTake a look at this post from 2000 that shows exactly how this all got started with the CRA...
http://www.city-jour...
financial crisis
September 23, 2008 - 11:35 ET by east tennessee johnThere are 3 events that happened that helped create this crisis.1) The Glass-Stegall Act, which created a firewall between commercial and investment banks was repealed in 1999. Obama advisor, Robert Rubin was big on this happening. Made an even larger fortuneafter leaving Clinton Adminstration.2)Community Reinvestment Act loans began to explode in 1998 growing to just over 30% of the market. This was when Fannie and Freddie took a holiday on every aspect of regulation and management . The players made fortunes and socialized the risks. They spent mega millions on political support and creating "community based" support groups to isolate them form and legislative actions of reform. The 2 primary villans are now Obama advisors. 3.)With the investment firewall removed, ambitious invrstment baking firms,led by Bear Stearns, packaged and sold off the so-called conforming loans in layered risk mortgage backed investment securities and the house of cards was complete. Ponzi would have been proud. This is truly a Democrats mess. If it weren't a Special Prosecutor would have been appointed by now and a few summary executions would have taken place.