Media Provide Little Coverage to Medal of Honor Awardees


Update:  The media finally wakes up and starts covering this.  I wonder how much Newsbusters had to do with that.

Click here to see video honoring Michael Monsoor and a roundup of blog reactions to the posthumous Medal of Honor ceremony. Many in the blogosphere paid their respects to a true hero, but the media were unsurprisingly absent.

Via Blackfive:

Google News shows that no one, other than local news in San Diego, is covering the awarding of the Medal of Honor to US Navy SEAL Michael Monsoor.

This is quite evident of the MSM's bias. I don't know how you can argue in favor of them today. This story is one that should be told across the nation.

I wasn't going to blog about this today or even post the New York Times and AP's embarrassing report on US Navy SEAL Michael Monsoor. The New York Times printed 78 words about the pending MOH for Mike Monsoor and had to correct the story. Three sentences for a man like Mike...

I checked my frustration because I hoped that they might print something today about the Navy SEAL who sacrificed himself to save his teammates. I thought, maybe, it would make for a nice front page story this morning.

"The Paper of Record" did not print one word.

Read the entire post at Blackfive where you will find contact information for the NY Times and what you can do about this.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is beyond

This is beyond disgusting.

That the media in general could be so wrapped up in their own narrative and so willing to ignore heroism on this scale, for the sake of advancing their own agenda, is simply shameful.

 

This is and has been

This is and has been absolutely disgraceful, deplorable, disgusting...I have been so saddened by the lack of coverage, but it does figure unfortunately...

I watched Pres. Bush today give the award to Navy Seal Monsoor, I got tears rolling down my cheeks too...just as choked up by the President as I was by anything...

I would like to say the msm of all venues should be ashamed but they know not what that means.

Here is the latest about this all today from Pat Dollards site...video too.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Thanks, bt, for linking to

Thanks, bt, for linking to the video....I hadn't seen it...very moving.

I'm sure Slick Willy could have coaxed a tear down his cheek, while he bit his lip throughout reading the citation (is that what they call it?) and the sycophantic media would have gone on and on about how much he "felt their pain" and how "deeply touched" he was by it all..." a President who is deeply, wounded by every life that is lost...." ad nauseam.

But with Bush, it's just another piece of fodder in his "illegal war"....

As I said above, this is shameful....I should have added but unfortunately, not surprising.

Boy mb...have you ever got

Boy mb...have you ever got that juxtaposition right regarding Clintoon and the msm...that is exactly what they would do at the top of all the news show and ad nauseum on cable...

It really is sad when you see a President who you know every death twists like a knife in his heart, that is one thing about the President he is a compassionate man and he wears it on his sleeve..., I remember how he was during ceremonies after 9-11, and he wanted to keep it private with the families, heck I remember how he was when our men came home after the Chinese commies let them go...I had nothing but admiration, Clintoon would of been right there hogging all the air time, it's all about him...I am glad for this with the President we have, I am ashamed of the msm...for any good it does. 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

What exactly do you find shameful,, motherbelt?

What exactly do you find shameful, motherbelt?  This is being extensively covered by the media.  [See CobraMan's post at bottom of thread, for one example.]

John Stephenson's blog needs to be corrected.  It is unfair and inaccurate.

Jer

I was just listening to

I was just listening to Pittsburgh AM radio (KDKA) and they had a CNN report about it, even played a clip of President Bush describing the circumstances. Have hope people, some media is covering this.

 

Rog...well that is some

Rog...well that is some good news...all is not completely dim.

Btw...I think it was last night Glenn Beck did a beautiful job on a tribute to Navy Seal Monsoor...I got teary-eyed too then.... 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

I just googled this, and

I just googled this, and found stories on CNN.com, ABC News.com, AP, USA Today, LA Times, OC Register, and WaPo, so...?

Bal: This story was first

Bal:

This story was first covered by the Navy Times during the intital announcement on 19 March 2008.

The story itself was not covered by any other journalistic organization until the 1st when a minor blurb appeared in both the LA and NY Times.

Why the delay?

Good question. Maybe because

Good question. Maybe because the ceremony was today?

Feeble.... The LA Times,

Feeble....

The LA Times, (Monsoors hometown newspaper) does not even deign to provide a page 22 paragraph saying "The US Navy announced today plans to award the Medal of Honor to local boy from the suburbs Petty Officer Michaal Monsoor in the WHite House on 8 April 2008.  Monsoor was killed protecting his team mates in action in Iraq"

Good GOD!  I wrote that in ten seconds and they could have put it under a local car advert.

 

BD...Do you know whether

BD...Do you know whether the story was covered by any conservative newspapers at the time of the Navy Times article?

Jer

I did not check... But it

I did not check...

But it leads to an interesting question.  Please LIST the conservative newspapers....

I would say that the Military Times Company, all of whom covered it, are and did.

Military.com did cover it upon announcement.

I have tried searching the Wall Street Journal, but they do not have a search function.....

Any others i can look at?

Regardless, since Monsoor was a local boy, the LATimes should have lead the front page on the 19th of March with this.  They should have also followed up with interviews of family, friends, and former teachers on the 20th.  This did not happen.

Conservative bloggers were

Conservative bloggers were on it, like Blackfive and others.

Considering many newspapers get their information from the major news services (who didn't report this), this might be why nobody reported it?

 

Hmmmmm.... The Military

Hmmmmm.... The Military Times is a sub to Gannet who released it via AP.  Not a good excuse. 

The real reason is the mainstream press (NYT, LAT) was not interested in this story.

So why are they SUDDENLY

So why are they SUDDENLY interested now? Because the White House just announced the award, and the ceremony.

They are certainly quick to

They are certainly quick to report when the US Army/Navy releases names of casualties (KIA) but not when it names a MOH winner.

Right............

Pretty feeble excuse Bal.....

Well, I don't know what to

Well, I don't know what to tell ya'. What possible reason could they have for waiting OTHER than the ceremony and announcement by the White House? They're waiting two weeks just to screw with you?

1.)  lack of desire to

1.)  lack of desire to cover a positive story of an element they dislike (US military).  Couple this with the fact that real heroes probably make them itch, but welfare queens can be made to positively GLOW.

2.)  Lack of desire to cover a positive story during an administration they dislike.  

3.)  I still think they probably assigned a reporter to find out if Monsoor used to kick the neighbors dog or wear a dress to the junior high prom.

BD... Triple

BD...

Triple Bingo!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

One Last Question

Now that we have hammered all of that out, is it OK to question the left's patriotism yet?

Oh brother...

Oh brother...

I think it is always

I think it is always appropriate to questions EVERYONES patriotism.

Nonsense, bt...check out

Nonsense, bt...check out CobraMan's post re. NBC at the bottom of page, and mine and bal's about CNN, LA Times, and NYT.

Jer

Nonsense about what Jer?

Nonsense about what Jer? What did I say that you consider nonsense...

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Excuse me, bt...I thought I

Excuse me, bt...I thought I was responding to your "Triple Bingo" post regarding BD's three assertions.  [I had already had several exchanges with BD, so I was disagreeing with your agreeing with him.

Sorry for the confusion.

Jer

If ANY of that were true,

If ANY of that were true, why report the story at all?

Jeez boa..that is the point

Jeez boa..that is the point to begin with, they have not covered it with the coverage it has deserved....in fact boa they wouldn't cover it all if they, being the majority of the msm of all venues had their way.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Why wouldn't they "have

Why wouldn't they "have their way"? Who's forcing them to run a story if they really don't want to? C'mon...

Was there something wrong with the LA Times article other than it didn't come out 13 days ago? 

Well, that is a good

Well, that is a good question.

I would say that they are forced to do it.  They have no desire, but they have to cover it or they make themselves and their views obvious....

Sadly, I cannot see WHERE they paper places the story, but I BET it is not on the front page of the LA TImes tomorrow.  I will be very happy to discover I am wrong about this if you have access to tomorrows paper ....

Ten days ago I bet it would be on page B-10 under an auto dealer advertisement or an ad for an above ground pool dealer.

Well, the other two

Well, the other two recipients of the MoH did not receive much fanfare, either. Paul Smith receive his MoH on April 4, 2005, and the NYT only reported it after a press release by the White House, TWO years after that brave soldier died.

Tell me THAT's not reporting with an agenda.

I think you guys are trying too hard to disprove liberal media bias here. There is no denying it took weeks for a newspaper to cover this, be it "liberal" or "conservative". Sloppy reporting or political agenda, does it really matter? EVERYBODY should know of these brave, dead soldiers' deeds of bravery. Instead, we try to catch glimpses of Britney's vajayjay, or which skanky ho-bag Flava Flav is going to bang on his p.o.s. show.

Trying to compare the NYT to the Post, Wash Times, or Pgh Trib-Review is laughable. NYT is THE PAPER OF RECORD, is it not? Shame on them, and shame on you guys for trying so hard to defend them.

If anything, it's less than

If anything, it's less than timely from the first announcement. But it's perfectly timely with the ceremony being this week.

The headline of this post claims the media's absent. We provide links that disproves that. Then BD says, Well, they covered it, but 13 days too late. I say that's because the ceremony and White House announcement just happened. BD says it's because there's an effort to not report on anything positive about the media. Which makes no sense because if it were true, then they'd NEVER do the story.

Bad journalism I _might_ believe. Part of the "agenda" by the MSM? Nope. Not buying it. 

Bal: You are getting

Bal:

You are getting caught in a trap I set two weeks ago. 

In the OpenPage forum of Newsbusters I posted the Navy Times article and offered bets to all when and where the story would be covered by the NY Times and LA Times. 

I daily updated all the way until 9 days later when it became obvious that they were not going to cover this story in a timely manner in accordance with the US Navy annoncement.

I was AMAZED that it took 13-14 days for this to actually covered.  Now, go back to the statement about me pouring melted ice cream on an Iraqi while in uniform and tell me this would not make the front page.

This is not simply bad journalism as I have demonstrated in being able to write the story in a paragraph in ten seconds, the lack of coverage by the paper of record and Monsoors hometown paper was intentional....

Whatever. I disagree. 

Whatever. I disagree. 

BD...e.g. Pittsburg

BD...e.g. Pittsburg Tribune-Review, New York Post, Washington Times, Wall Street Journal

Jer

Tried WSJ, no search

Tried WSJ, no search function....

Washington Times has zero

Washington Times has zero mention.

New York Post zero.

New York Post zero.

Neither of them are

Neither of them are Monsoors hometown newspaper.

If my Hometown newspaper in the Dakotas got word of ME posthumously being awarded the MOH, I can guarantee they would cover the US Army announcement.

I bet if I was seen dumping warm ice cream on a Iraqi at a soccer match in uniform, I would make the front page of the LA Times the same day...

Jer

BD posted this every single day since it was originally published in the Navy Times.

Each day saying something along the lines of  "when will the mainstream media pick it up?"

As we all know, the media now reads the blogs to find "hot" stories...so I cannot wrap my head around the fact that NO ONE in the mainstream media was without a clue as to this story.

It's just another indictment of the bias.

Good news from Iraq is not news at all....Oh...did you see VIOLENCE is up over the last three weeks?  Did anyone bother to report that the latest bout of fighting was at the Iraqi government's instigation?  No?

But you heard Hillary and Barry Hussein play politics with it today.

The whole thing is totally disgusting.  And I lay the disgusting part at the feet of the politically avaricious democrats and freaking cut and runners.  They can lose the war if they want. 

I'll not allow it. 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Did you see this LA Times

Did you see this LA Times article?

http://www.latimes.c...

Michael A. Monsoor, who grew up in Garden Grove, has been selected to receive the medal posthumously for his efforts to save fellow SEALs during a firefight in 2006.By Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer 
April 1, 2008On the last day of his life, on a rooftop in Ramadi, Navy SEAL Michael A. Monsoor was assigned to protect three SEAL snipers. When an insurgent's grenade lobbed from the street bounced off Monsoor's chest, he didn't hesitate. He yelled "Grenade!" and pounced on it even though he had a clear path of escape.

He was dead within 30 minutes, but he had saved the lives of three SEALs.

On Monday, the White House announced that Monsoor, 25, who grew up in Garden Grove, has been selected to receive the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest medal for combat bravery, for his actions that violent day, Sept. 29, 2006.

It will be the third Medal of Honor bestowed for bravery in Iraq.

Monsoor's family and his fellow SEALs said Monday that even as they grieve over his death they are not surprised that he sought the safety of others before his own.

Sara Monsoor, a pediatric nurse at Children's Hospital of Orange County, said her brother never mentioned the dangers of his deployment in his e-mails and phone calls home. Still, the family knew he had been assigned to what was the most violent city in Anbar province, the home of the most hard-core elements in the Sunni Arab insurgency.

"We knew things were difficult there and if anything happened, Mike would be the first to jump in and try to make it better," his sister said. His fellow SEALs, she added, "were like his brothers."

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Seth Stone, Monsoor's platoon commander on the mission that cost his life, remembered Monsoor's sense of humor and dedication to duty. "Mike never complained. He always had a smile," Stone said.

He said he knew something had gone tragically wrong on the rooftop that day when he heard the sickening sound of the muffled explosion.

President Bush is set to present the medal to Monsoor's parents, George and Sally Monsoor, at the White House on April 8.

"We're looking at it as a way to celebrate Mike," his sister said of the ceremony.

Monsoor is buried at Ft. Rosecrans National Cemetery in San Diego, across the bay from SEAL headquarters in Coronado. 

A petty officer second class, he will be the first in the Navy to receive the Medal of Honor for actions in Iraq. 

Only one Marine, Cpl. Jason Dunham, and one Army soldier, Sgt. 1st Class Paul R. Smith, have been awarded the medal for actions in Iraq. SEAL Lt. Michael Murphy received the Medal of Honor for service in Afghanistan. All three awards were posthumous.

Monsoor has also been awarded a Silver Star for rescuing a wounded SEAL during the same deployment. While under continuous fire, he dashed into a street to drag his comrade to safety. He never told his family about his heroism. They learned about it the month before his death, while attending another SEAL's funeral.

Born in Long Beach, Monsoor played football at Garden Grove High School, graduating in 1999. He enjoyed snowboarding, body-boarding and spearfishing, as well as riding his motorcycle and driving his Corvette. His father and one of his brothers were Marines, but he decided to enlist in the Navy in 2001.

The family talks about him constantly, his sister said: "We just try to carry on. We're all totally proud of him."

Monsoor completed the grueling 25-week SEAL training in 2004 on his second try. A broken heel had forced him to drop out on his initial attempt. The dropout rate for many SEAL trainee classes exceeds 50%.

In Ramadi, Monsoor's Delta Platoon, SEAL Team Three, was assigned to mentor Iraqi army troops. In late 2006, insurgents were spread throughout the city and had the support -- either through shared ideology or intimidation -- of many residents.

As a communicator and machine-gunner on patrols, Monsoor carried 100 pounds of gear in temperatures often exceeding 100 degrees. He took a lead position to protect the platoon from frontal assault.

On three-quarters of their patrols, the SEALs drew insurgent fire, Stone said. Some firefights lasted for hours. Over about five months, the platoon killed at least 84 insurgents and detained numerous others.

On Sept. 29, the platoon engaged four insurgents in a firefight. Anticipating further attacks, Monsoor and other SEALs had taken up a rooftop position. Civilians aiding the insurgents blocked off the streets, and a nearby mosque blared out a message for people to rise up against the Americans and the Iraqi soldiers.

Monsoor's duty was to protect three SEAL snipers, two of whom were 15 feet away. His position made him the only SEAL on the rooftop with quick access to an escape route.

But when the grenade hit him and fell onto the roof, he "chose to protect his comrades by the sacrifice of his own life," according to a Navy report. 

The two SEAL snipers nearest to Monsoor were injured in the blast. Monsoor was immediately evacuated for medical care, but it was too late. 

The SEALs, a tough and close-knit, group, were deeply affected by his death, Stone said.  

bal...Also AP/NYT article I

bal...Also AP/NYT article I link three or four posts below.

Jer

Bal & Jer:  I have

Bal & Jer:

 I have mentioned those articles published on the 1st of April.  But as mentioned previously, the announcement was made and released on the 19th of March by the Military Times Company in their weekly publications. 

What did the LATimes wait 13 DAYS for? 

On Monday, the White House

On Monday, the White House announced that Monsoor, 25, who grew up in Garden Grove, has been selected to receive the Medal of Honor,

 

What date was this

What date was this released?  And where?

It's in the April 1 LA times

It's in the April 1 LA times article I just pasted in.

Precisely, the Navy

Precisely, the Navy announces on 18 March but the story waits 13/14 days for the hometown newspaper to release?

Nope, this is FISHY!!!!!!!

Could it be that they

Could it be that they decided the story regarding the recent rash of youths using paintballs on cars travelling the I-5 had more urgency and provided a better story and thus was worthy of the space?

Could it be that they decided to dig for dirt?  Find some skeletons to mar the occasion and change the story? 

I mean, the paragraph I wrote is so SIMPLE!  My J-school experience was 23 years ago, these are practiced professionals, right?

BD...you mentioned the

BD...you mentioned the articles and called them "minor blurbs'.  That is an inaccurate description.

Jer

Negative, my thesis is that

Negative, my thesis is that the NYT and LAT waited 13 days beyond the DOD Announcement with NO blurbs. 

 Remember, the Navy Times based on a Dept of Navy annoncement covered this on the 19th of march.  The others not until 1 April.

The issue is not with the quality, but the timing.

BD...Affirmative.  I

BD...Affirmative.  I understand your problem with the delay, and I'll accept your statement that it is your primary objection.

But, in your initial post, you did refer to the articles as a "minor blurb" in both the LA Times and NYT.  That is not a fair description.

Jer

I stand corrected. But I

I stand corrected.

But I also stand by my thesis that both papers failed to adequately cover this story in a timely manner.

If you can show me towmoorws LA Times, I will bet the ceremeony does not make the front page.  My prediction is B10.

BD...The ceremony, as I

BD...The ceremony, as I pointed out previously, has already received prominent and thoughtful coverage on "liberal" CNN.

I have no idea where or to what extent it will be reported  in tomorrow's papers.  But, I don't care if every single newsroom were populated with hardcore anti-war leftists, I don't accept the notion that there is, or will be, a conscious effort to ignore or bury the story in furtherance of some anti-military mindset.

Jer

Jer: As a member of the

Jer:

As a member of the military, AND a school trained journalist who put himself through college as a journalist, I am highly sensitzed on this issue.

Over the years, I have had contact with journo's (Including former calssmates, my family members, and academics in the journalism field) and can verify that their is INDEED a bias against the military in the press.

Our next point of discussion will likely revolve around the placement of the story in Monsoor's hometown paper.

If ANYONE can tell me which page the ceremony made on the LA Times this morning, I would appreciate it.  I am banking that it does not make the front page, and likely not the first section.

Anybody get a hard copy of

Anybody get a hard copy of the LA Times today who can verify what page the story was on?

Okay!: Confirmation that

Okay!:

Confirmation that the story did NOT run on the front page of the LA Times.  Instead, the lead story is a feel-gooder about a convict named Ken Layton.

Instead, the story is buried in the A section under a headline "Bush weeps while presenting Medal of Honor"

Nor did the New York Times place it on their front page, rather they decided that the cloumn below the fold should bear the headline "Equestrians Death Spreads unease in sports growing ranks". 

The NYT instead put their story entitled Bush Gives Medal of Honor to Slain Navy Seals Member  By SARAH ABRUZZESE on Page 14.

So, convicts and uneasy equestirans are more important than the Medal of Honor Recipient. 

BD...As the son of a

BD...As the son of a newspaper/radio man who was a combat veteran of World War II, I [as someone who frequently wishes he had gone to journalism school, has some military experience and a long-standing interest in military matters] am certainly not insensitive to the issue. 

There is no question that if Monsoor had been a Navy war hero from our home town [or surrounding area], his story, his picture, the award ceremony, every detail of his life and death would have warranted front-page coverage in my dad's paper. 

With large metropolitan dailies, however, there are different dynamics and different demands that have little or nothing to do with ideological considerations.  That is not to say I am dismissing any claim of liberal bias--or an anti-military bias.  In fact, I will readily acknowledge that beginning in the Viet Nam era [and continuing to this day], journalists developed a reflexive skepticism--they would say a healthy and necessary skepticism--concerning information disseminated by military and government spokespersons.  When that is mixed with anti-war and anti-militarism attitudes which are held by a great many journalists, it is easily--too easily--concluded that a solid wall of hostility exists within the media surrounding all things military.  But, by extending this view to include a loathing of individual soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, or as in the present case, a crass disregard for individual acts of heroism, the argument rapidly runs aground.  A thirteen-day delay and inside Section A coverage are extraordinarily thin reeds on which to rest such a weighty claim of media animus.

Do I think Monsoor's heroism and the Medal of Honor ceremony should have been front page news in the LA Times?  "Yes".  Was it buried on page 10 of Section B under a car ad?  "No".  Do I think the print and broadcast media, in gerneral, gave it tasteful, respectful, and reasonably prominent coverage?  Well, one would never think so from reading John Stepenson's blog, but I believe the evidence suggests "they did". 

Jer

Jer:  When I was going

Jer:

 When I was going through Journalism School in the 1980's, one of the portions of the editing class was to determine what went on what page as an effort of prioritization.

A story that has mass interest such as a bus crash that kills 30 school children would have a higher interest level than a story that including the hook that 30 school childred witnessed a car crash.

As part of that class, we had to prioritize the daily stories from the AP wire and indicate where we would place them in our our fictitious newspaper.  We then had to defend our choices.  Later we had to reorient these based on available space in the newspaper.

No one in my class, nor the old prof would have accepted the placement of a feel good story about  a convict on page one, and relegating a MOH Ceremony to the interior pages.   

Thus we must assume the choices were not based on newsworthiness, but rather on other choices and motivations. 

BD...I tend to agree with

BD...I tend to agree with you.  I think you said Monsoor was from the LA area, and, as such, I do think it should rate first page Section A coverage.  Or, at the very least, there should have been extensive reporting on the first page of the "local" or "metro" section.

Jer

I'd like to give United

I'd like to give United States Navy Seal Michael Monsoor a big HOOHAY! 

It is because of men and women like him that we enjoy the most free nation on earth. 

The human race is poorer for his passing. 

May he rest in peace. 

God bless him!!!

jd... Amen. "Never

jd...

Amen.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

John... I think you need

John...

I think you need to correct this blog.  First, are you not aware of this AP article which appeared on the NYT website on April 1.

Second, I have already seen two segments on CNN [which is about to air a third] covering the ceremony- the first one was lengthy and I think a live telecast.

There seems to have been rather extensive media coverage, and rightfully so.

Jer

Why?

Why would anyone bother to read the NYSlimes even to read the 78 words? The horrable smell is the NYSlimes burning itself to the ground. Sewage really smells bad when it burns.

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

There are cases of clear

There are cases of clear bias [the Knuckledragger comment and the ABC Raddatz military endorsements report to name a couple of recent examples] and countless instances of possible bias regularly blogged about and commented upon at NB.

But this one is an unfair slam.  Mr. Stepenson's report is not only misleading, but, at least in part, contains assertions which are flatly inaccurate.

It should be amended, retracted, or corrected.

Jer

NBC covered it

NBC covered it; I watched it about 45 minuets ago. They also mentioned it a week ago and stated at that time that they would cover it more extensively tonight.

NBC actually remarked favorably on President Bush and his emotional speech and presentation. I was surprised that NBC mentioned how the military deaths (all, not just this one) have been hard on President Bush and they did so in a manner that bestowed respect upon the President.

Although short, I found the coverage to be honest, respectful, and inspirational. Well Done, NBC!

BUT when the Pulitzers and

BUT when the Pulitzers and Emmy's are handed out, it's top news

Another free million dollar idea...

(Don King Enterprises is still ignoring my Wright vs Hagee preacher-off pay per view idea, but as usual being ignored is not slowing me down.) This one's even easier than the preachers. Show name? "MOH." Show premise? Track down all Medal of Honor recipients who managed to survive it (a few from the Vietnam era still live) immediately, and ask them about what happened in a good, detailed interview. Try also to find other witnesses, since these guys frequently tend to underestimate what they've done.

Once you've done those, the hard work begins. Track down witnesses to other MOH incidents where the recipient was killed, and get their stories of what happened. Budget? This should be reality-show cheap, because in essence it IS a reality show. It's just a show you idiots have ignored for some reason, despite some INCREDIBLE stories. There. Another easy, money-making sarcasmo-idea for the media to ignore.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

MSM Still absent.

OK, libs.  This is ridiculous.  Time is 2148 or so, 4-8, central time.  Quick Google search on "Michael Monsoor" gives the following:
page 1
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=michael+monsoor&btnG=Google+Search
page 2
http://www.google.com/search?q=michael+monsoor&hl=en&start=10&sa=N
page 3
http://www.google.com/search?q=michael+monsoor&hl=en&start=20&sa=N

So where's all the MSM coverage??? 

 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

nofate, hit the "News"

nofate, hit the "News" button on those pages. 

boa... You just taught me

boa...

You just taught me something I didn't know about.

Thanks for future use...I love this site to learn from others about everything.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

No problem. :-) I actually

No problem. :-)

I actually found the "News" button about a year ago when having a "discussion" on the phone with my sister, one of those "I AM looking at the Google page!"

Yeah but boa..if I had a

Yeah but boa..if I had a moment like that while talking on the phone I wouldn't of most likely realized the importance of what just happened and retained it...if you are following me here, I have just learned about this wonderful machine from scratch here at my age and you here all on NBs have taught me so much all along the way from my beginning here on NBs, which I realize has been awhile now...that was clear back when this site was still the wild wild west...lol....

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Been there

bal:  thanks.  Did that.  See below.

 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Uh-oh!

Just did another search on the "news" side of Google.  There are quite a few referenced there.  Not time enough to check them all out, but the ABC story had to mention in the last paragraph that the ceremony was on the same day that Petraeus and Crocker were to appear before congress.  Some of the comments leave a lot to be desired, too.

 My bad, I guess. 

Link:   http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ned=us&ncl=1149535788&filter=0&q=&ie=UTF-8

 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Howdy nofate... I just

Howdy nofate...

I just learned something because of the both of you...gotta' love it.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Something new every day

Hey, bt.  I love my alternative media. 

 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Fox News

Brit Hume gave this story a paltry 45 seconds, which is probably more than many others but it wasn't enough. I felt compelled to send them an e-mail and wonder why, in the course of an hour's broadcast, they couldn't find time to provide expanded coverage, say maybe two minutes, to tell the whole story of what this man did.  And worse yet, at the White House ceremony of some 250 people, apparently CA two senators, Feinsten and Boxer, nor the Madame Speaker of the House, thought it worth their time to be present.  What a bunch of self-centered morons - disgraceful.

 

 

MOH Media Coverage

FNC showed the ceremony live.


A member of the right-wing media

This will thrill all of NB, I'm sure.

Howard & Robin just spent about 10-15 minutes on him, and played segments of what Bush said discussing the incident, etc.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Who are Howard and Robin? 

Who are Howard and Robin?  CNN?