Multiple Mistakes About Obama and the Born Alive Act Plague New Book, 'The Amateur'
Edward Klein’s unauthorized biography of Barack Obama, "The Amateur," was released yesterday.
While I appreciate that Klein devoted a chapter of his book, albeit only three pages, to Obama’s opposition as state senator to the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, he got it pretty much all wrong. You can read the chapter at the link above, but here is the relevant section:
Obama did, however, have an interest in opposing a law that would have banned late-term partial birth abortions, a gruesome procedure that was once condemned by the late New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan as “too close to infanticide.” All across the state of Illinois, people were riveted by the controversial debate. The Chicago Sun-Times ran a cartoon showing God reaching down from heaven to a baby in front of Obama, who is holding a sign that reads “Live Birth Abortions” and yelling at God, “You keep out of this!”
An Illinois nurse named Jill Stanek testified before the Health and Human Services Committee that she had discovered that babies were being aborted alive and allowed to die in soiled utility rooms. One baby was accidentally thrown into the trash. Though Obama never showed up at the committee hearings, he voted against the bill – not once, but twice.
When, after a decade in the political wilderness, Illinois Democrats gained a majority in the legislature, Obama became chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee. As chairman, he prevented the “Live Baby Bill” from getting a committee hearing, guaranteeing that the legislation would die, much as the late-term babies were dying in the state’s hospitals.
People often get details about this chain of events wrong. For many years I, myself, thought Obama voted against the Born Alive Act three times, when it was actually four. It doesn’t help that the Obama campaign and liberals persistently try to muddy the waters.
But Klein’s portrayal of events was wrong on just about every point. I expected more from the former editor-in-chief of The New York Times Magazine, who has also had many books on the NYT bestseller’s list.
First and foremost, at issue was the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, not the Partial Birth Abortion Ban, which Obama also opposed as state senator but had to do with a different abortion procedure.
And, as previously stated, Obama voted against the Born Alive bill a total of four times, not two.
But my biggest issue is Klein’s conjecture that Obama did not attend the committee hearings on Born Alive. I’ve never heard that before. I have previously written about an exchange between Obama and me at one of those hearings, so to say Obama wasn’t even in the room inadvertently calls my portrayal of events into question.
The quickest refutation to that claim is Obama’s committee votes on Born Alive (here, here, and here). Substitutes are noted in Illinois, and Obama had no substitutes. He was there to vote.
In addition, State Net, a branch of LexisNexis that has reporters memorialize state legislative committee hearings, published notes on our March 5, 2002, exchange, which was quite an odd one and the reason I’ve written about it before. Click to enlarge…
I should note this conversation was about a companion bill to Born Alive. It would have mandated that a second doctor be present in the event any baby was anticipated to be born alive in the State of Illinois.
As I testified, current Illinois law allowed (and still allows) the abortionist to determine before a baby is born whether s/he thinks the baby will be viable. It is easy to see why the person being paid to deliver a dead baby would do all s/he could to ensure that outcome, even if slightly delayed. Obama didn’t believe an abortionist would stoop that low. Pro-lifers do. It makes total sense. Kermit Gosnell proved our point.
But what made the conversation odd was Obama’s statement, “I agreed with you last year and we suggested that there be a Comfort Room or something of that nature be done.”
In fact, Obama hadn’t said anything the year before (see StateNet’s notes here and here), and now he wanted to take partial credit for devising the subsequent Comfort Room?
The concept of such a room was so twisted. Rather than take abortion survivors to the Soiled Utility Room, nurses now took them to a room where they could have photos and footprints taken as keepsakes. And Obama was all in. (See more photos of the Christ Hospital’s Comfort Room here.)
At any rate, Klein got this incident all wrong. I’ve been reading his book and find it quite interesting but wonder how much of it is accurate, if this was any indication.
[HT: Fran Eaton at Illinois Review]
- Jill Stanek's blog
- Login to post comments


















Comments
Disgusting that this man Obama has any power
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:00am.
Sickening.
Our descendants will think us barbarians.
Maybe the author was....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:01am.
"The Amateur"?
Wow. A member of the MSM
Submitted by texastommy on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:08am.
Wow. A member of the MSM getting a story wrong. Shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
Did anybody proof read that
Submitted by texastommy on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:13am.
Did anybody proof read that extract from the Illinois legislative history? There's more errors in that than there are insane democrates in Congress.
so he was actually worse than
Submitted by searcher0 on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:13am.
so he was actually worse than Klein's book portrayed.
but have bumpers stickers "I brake for squirrels"
Submitted by MidAmerica on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:49am.
You have to wonder what type of people can look at a live baby and then just 'shelve' it to let it die. What kind of monsters are these people?
There is so much falshood intertwined with fact in Obama's life.
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:02pm.
We may never know what is actually true and what is actually false until a generation or so in the future when historians can dig up all the facts and lies and put them side by side and create an actual timeline.
For instance, my grandparents had friends that didn't believe that FDR was confined to a wheelchair and thought that he only used it occassionally. They cited the lack of pictures of him in a wheelchair as "proof".
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Trivial
Submitted by griv on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:21pm.
"Plague" seems to be a bit over the top. IMHO, your points on this seem trivial whether valid or not.
Why would you abort a fetus
Submitted by ParalegalGoddess on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:47pm.
Why would you abort a fetus but still keep footprints and take pictures as "keepsakes"? sick.
That's what I wondered
Submitted by panzerakc on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 6:30pm.
Who exactly are these "keepsakes" for?
Since she's there for an abortion, I would guess the pregnant woman wouldn't want them.
The nurses who just participated in ending the child's life?
Frankly, this sounds to be a bit too much like sadistic murderers who take "trophies" from their victims.
Would You Abort Obama?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:56pm.
Look, this guy can't seem to remember what he believes.
I voted for it before I voted against it.
I am pro-Life/Choice.
I am pro-Gay Marriage, errr, the Constitution.
Doesn't this sort of fumbling and bumbling make you wonder...?
If you had the chance, what would be a fair outcome?
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
That murdering heathen
Submitted by misterbee241 on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 1:04pm.
in the White House is God 's judgement on America.
No Christian would support such a heinous act.
I might not be thrilled with Romney, but I'll see myself rotting in Hell before I'll vote for ANY murderous democrat.
The First Black Omega Man
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 1:29pm.
"What we are doing here is adding one more burden on Women, and I can't support that."
Yes, Obama, we know how you feel about "unwanted children" and how they are a "burden" upon women, and upon society in general (do you know how much it costs us all to raise those unwanted children? To feed them, to cloth them? It's cheaper just to give women unlimited, free access to birth control! ). After all, you did say that you wouldn't want your daughters to be burdened with an unwanted child. Therefor, it's ok to kill unwanted children, even it they are born alive. After all, the unwanted people in our society are a burden upon everyone else, right? Just like the uninsured are a burden upon society (Get insurance or you will be punished! You're costing us a fortune!), the uneducated are a burden upon society (You better graduate school! It's the LAW!), the Rich are a burden upon society (They're taking more than their fair share!) , ect. ect. ect.
Geez, Obama, you sure feel that a lot of people are a burden upon society! What happens if you eliminate all those burdens? Will society magically become a Utopia? Or will the population drop so dramatically that society collapses upon itself? I think the latter is the more likely scenario, for you always seem to find another group, another demographic, that is a burden upon society, like the recent burden the Catholic Church is placing upon society, each and every time you speak. At the rate you and the rest of the liberals are going, you truly will be a society of One, and only one! Everyone else will be dead! I guess that's your idea of a Utopia.
Obama, the First Black Omega Man of the 21st century!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Hear, hear!
Submitted by panzerakc on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 6:33pm.
From one who would probably be considered "a burden".