BEHAR: "Every scientist at every note believes in it but Sarah Palin doesn't believe in it."

Did she go to the Dylan Rat-again school of climatology?  Who is "every scientist"? 

My IQ went down for a second trying to decipher what they were saying.

#1 - I saw a clip linked on the right side of this site to a woman who was on Behar with Ron Reagan and another Lib Talker.  They bashed this woman for saying Cliterosomy (or whatever it's called).  

Then Behar comes on talks for an hour about The V?

#2 - What is it with liberals and comedy?  They obviously can't debate issues so it all has to be satire and cynicism rapped in "humor"

#3 - They say Obama would appear tougher if he did things he wasn't doing, like, uh, act tough.  Duh!

#4 - Palin would start "allot of wars" if she was President?  Because she shoots animals and wan't to drill, but she wouldn't drill.

#5 - A new study that got front page news on CNN.COM, and New York Time paper and I am sure it got mentioned on TV News as well says "Abstinence Works"  and these clowns are saying "it really works" sarcastically.

And they talk about playing lose with the facts. 

I actually watched that whole painful segment.   It made my backside pucker.   I can take one empty head t.v. bimbo going on a rant about how stupid Sarah Palin is while they spew one falsehood after another but two together was just too much.

I have to  lie down now.

Ditz's on parade with absolutely no clue how clueless they are. 

Ya know what ladies....the odds that the scientific shmoes  responsible for this "disinterested" research into global warming, that has us all melting down in the next 15 minutes....the odds that they got it right are just about the same odds as either of you winning the Nobel.....oops!  I mean the same odds as either of you being able to walk and chew gum at the same time....no wonder you're on TV.

One a member of The View, which also held such highly credible science experts such as Rosie O'Donnell who said, "for the first time in history steel melted" in hinting that the Bush government was behind a deliberate attack on 9/11 and they actually were blown up by the US government (really - the fatass REALLY said that). 

The other who loves to talk about women and vaginas - unless of course a woman like Sarah Palin comes around. Funny thing however: most of those wretched libtard kook leftwing women I wouldn't touch with a ten foot tuna pole (geddit???). 

First of all, any woman who writes anything with "vagina" in it is totally weird.  There are some parts of me I don't need to share with the public.

Secondly, anyone who says "I identify with working people. I feel for people are out of jobs and they don't have money" has no concept of what she's talking about.

I had a heck of a time understanding the conversation based on the text given.  And they have the nerve to make fun of Sarah Palin?

enslar:.."global warming"...causes "earthquakes and tsunamis"..? well, when it comes to political fallout, due to socialist/p.c. fraud, i guess she could be right... ohh and "volcanoes" too.,

(these ladies (enslar and behar) are  just simply brilliant, demonstrating excessively high intelligence levels)

 vcb-tn

But let's hope they are wrong on Sarah..............

How can anybody listen to this.  I have a hard enough time reading it.  Earthquakes and global warming, I should of stopped reading right there.  How stupid do you have to be to believe Global warming creates earthquakes.  Yes, she the Creator of a show called the "Vagina Monologues" identifies with working people.  You mean working people like farmers and policemen.  Maybe it's just me I think the working people She identifies with are actors.  Who are working people but not the one's I think of.  I am also tired of hearing of how abstinence doesn't work.  Lets see if the kids actually stuck to abstinence it would work.  If they have sex no longer can they call it abstinence.  Abstinence works 100% percent of the time.

Vaginas worldwide are laughing at the ignorance displayed by these two on a regular basis.

Wow, these women are incredible.  It's hard to believe that so much ignorance could fill that stage, but Behar and Ensler are up to the challenge.

Ensler is just a raving feminist who hates men and thinks that teaching teen girls to sleep around is empowering them.  Behar - well, all she has to do is open her mouth and you know darn well you are dealing with someone who has a cranial vacuum.

It cracks me up that these females hate Sarah Palin so much.  Palin is the epitome of the liberated woman that was touted and praised so much in the 70's and 80's.  But because she is a conservative, she is disqualified. 

Feminists are such hypocrites.  They are an embarrassment to women everywhere.  

I've heard about men thinking with what's between their legs.  Now I see that some women think with their's too... and the contest is on to see which gender has the lower IQ.

Camouflage conservative in Baghdad-by-the-Bay

Joy Behar is a certifiable idiot. Global warming is the most massive fraud in our lifetimes. Maybe if she wasn't so obsessed with Palin she could educate herself. Those scientists she's so impressed with have been caught lying, admitted political pressure, have used college papers and magazine articles as their "consensus". The list of fraud and deception in her idea of "solid science" is long. Plus, the head of the IPCC is a mere railroad engineer with companies that will profit off of carbon trading, like all the other corrupt companies (including Al Gore's) who are pushing this massive lie for their own financial gain. 

 Some of us actually do our research:

http://aprilbaby.typepad.com/a_california_life/

 And as for that old gas bas Ensler and her troupe of worthless coots - what an embarrassment to women. Big freaking deal, Jane Fonda and other silly females can "own" the word C*nt.

That's impressive? How sad for you.

Women were flying planes, running companies, kicking ass decades before these irrelevant ninnies walked the planet.  Strong women do a hell of a lot more than talk about their freaking vaginas. They use their brains to make a difference. And some of even govern states.

If these two tools pass for intelligent life on the left, that's truly pathetic.

"Why do we tawk about Sarah Palin?"

"Why do we tawk about Sarah Palin?"

"Why do we tawk about Sarah Palin?"

Let me remind you Joy, at the time of record unemployment, record deficit, two wars, devastation in Haiti, crashing approval ratings, and a dead healthcare plan, YOUR President's spokesman interrupts his press briefing to "tawk" about Sarah Palin. 

Once upon a time, people who uttered complete nonsense and gibberish such as this, that earthquakes and tsunamis were the result of "global warming" (translation: the mean and nasty United States raping the planet of its resources-- note, their translation, NOT mine) were hauled off to insane asylums-- oh but now, they are celebrated in the state-controlled media as "open minded", "enlightened creatures" etc-- hell, just the title of this nonsense should be a red flag to anyone with "half a brain tied behind their back": "...An emotional creature..." as opposed to a REASONING one! Oh and by the way, that word used in the title: CREATURE-- implies Intelligent Design!

"And you say a woman running for U.S. vice president believes in creationism but not global warming."

I am a little perturbed at this arrogant assumption in the West regarding Creationsim. We in the West have been so indoctrinated to believe evolution as fact, and it is so engrained into our consciousness that we can't even conceive any longer that it might possibly be wrong.

Evolution is basically a religious philosophy. Both creation and evolution are religious views of life upon which people build their particular models of philosophy, science, or history. The issue, therefore, is not science versus religion, but religion versus religion (the science of one religion versus the science of another religion).

The famous evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky quotes Pierre Teihard de Chardin: “Evolution is a light which illuminates all facts, a trajectory which all lines of thought must follow.”

To the Christian, of course, this is a direct denial of the sayings of Jesus as quoted in John 8:12: “I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.” In Isaiah 2:5 we are exhorted to “walk in the light of the Lord.” In verse 22 of the same chapter we read, “Cease ye from [trusting] man.”

It does not take much effort to demonstrate that evolution is not science but religion. Science, of course, involves observation, using one or more of our five senses (taste, sight, smell, hearing, touch) to gain knowledge about the world, and to be able to repeat the observations. Naturally, one can only observe what exists in the present. It is an easy task to understand that no scientist was present over the suggested millions of years to witness the supposed evolutionary progression of life from the simple to the complex. No living scientist was there to observe the first life forming in some primeval sea. No living scientist was there to observe the big bang that is supposed to have occurred 10 or 20 billion years ago, nor the supposed formation of the earth 4.5 billion years ago (or even 10,000 years ago!). No scientist was there—no human witness was there to see these events occurring. They certainly cannot be repeated today.

All the evidence a scientist has exists only in the present. All the fossils, the living animals and plants, the world, the universe—in fact, everything—exists now, in the present. The average person is not taught that scientists have only the present and cannot deal directly with the past.

Evolution is a belief system about the past based on the words of men who were not there, but who are trying to explain how all the evidence of the present (that is, fossils, animals, and plants, etc.) originated.

Webster’s Dictionary defines religion as follows: “Cause, principle or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith.” Surely, this is an apt description of evolution. Evolution is a belief system—a religion! 

Fossil bones do not come with little labels attached telling you how old they are. Nor do fossils have photographs with them telling you what the animals looked like as they roamed the earth long ago. (Kind of makes you wonder then, how evolutionists can speak with such authority on the matter)

When people visit a museum they are confronted by bits and pieces of bones and other fossils neatly arranged in glass cases. These are often accompanied by pictures representing an artist’s impression (make note of that! An ARTIST'S IMPRESSION) of what the animals and plants could have looked like in their natural environment. Remember, no one dug up the picture, just the fossils.

The only way anyone could always be sure of arriving at the right conclusion about anything, including origins, depends upon his knowing everything there is to know. And there is only ONE who has those qualifications - the Biblical God.

Not only is Sara Palin's support of Creationsim logically consistent, it is also in keeping with God's Word - In the beginning God created...

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge

Matthew 24:6-8  And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge

Aside from the critics, does anyone actually watch the Joy Beher show? I never have. If there's any consolation, probably few people are actually hearing her comments, and those that are most likely roll their eyes when they hear a conversation like this one. I think the fact that Sarah Palin's popularity continues to grow makes it pretty evident that no one really gives a hoot what Joy Beher says.

They must be the "peer review" that James Hansen and Michael Mann refer to. Surely these broads can publish in the next IPCC journal.

Whatever else people may say about her, Palin behaves with more dignity than these women. 

Talking about vaginas as daily conversation and earthquakes as bogeymen?  

I want to be more like these women.  Do they like anything?  Do they laugh at anything besides other people?  Tres declasse, bourgeoise, icky.