Joe the Plumber was certainly on to something when he got then-candidate Barack Obama to admit he wanted to redistribute the wealth, according to former Republican presidential candidate and Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.
Huckabee, who now hosts a show aired on the weekends on the Fox News Channel, told "On The Record" host Greta Van Sustren on Nov. 16 that Obama's policies go beyond just the redistribution of wealth, especially on health care. He likened a provision in the House health care bill that would require people to have some sort of health care coverage to a "poll tax."
"[W]hile we really wish [the president's priorities] were recovery, getting jobs back - that's the number one thing we ought to be focused on - but it appears to be redistribution," Huckabee said. "That's what's going on in the health care world, where we're trying to make sure that we've redistributed health care, taking it from people who have it, taking from them, giving it to people who may not even desire to have it, and forcing people into an unconstitutional system where they're going to have to virtually pay into a private marketplace in order to get full rights of citizenship. It's the equivalent of a poll tax."
And it goes far beyond health care, Huckabee explained.
"But we're also seeing this whole idea of redistribution, even in terms of world power - the United States no longer really intent on being a superpower but spreading the power around," Huckabee said. "We have a president bowing to Japanese emperors, dismantling our missile forces in Eastern Europe. There are many signs of it. And a friend of mine in San Francisco said that the difference is redistribution versus recovery. I think she's right, think she's on to something, and it's probably not in the best interests of the people of the United States."
Huckabee told viewers he thought Obama was well-intentioned, but was simply wrong in his policy decisions.
"I think he really wants there to be peace on earth, good will toward men," he said. "But the fact is, you don't create jobs by putting the government in a position where it starts picking winners and losers in the marketplace, anymore than you have a good football game when the referees start deciding the outcome, rather than just simply making sure that game is being played fairly."
Van Sustren asserted Obama wanted "full employment," and Huckabee said he agreed. However, he explained that Obama is creating a sense of insecurity and that insecurity is making small business owners reluctant to hire people back and improve unemployment, and by extension the economic recovery.
"Small business owners across America, Greta - and believe me, I'm on a 64-city book tour in three weeks," Huckabee replied. "I'm talking to thousands of people firsthand, face to face. Every small business owner says, ‘I'm laying people off. I'm hunkering down because I have no idea what the government is about to do to me'."
The uncertainty stems from a fear of increased taxes and regulations, in addition to a lack of available credit.
"That is the kind of action on the part of the government, whether it's fear of more taxes, fear of greater regulation, fear of the lack of credit so they can't put a floor plan together and stock inventory - this is the kind of stuff that kills jobs, it doesn't bring them back," Huckabee said. "Now, do I think the Obama administration wants to do good things? I really do. But I just think they're going about it in the worst possible way if they're really serious about recovery."






















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Kinda?
Tue, 11/17/2009 - 12:05 ET by okiehawk44Huckabee and many others are too "kinda sorta" when discussing Obama.
Obama is a disaster for this country and I do not (DO NOT) think his motives are quite as pure as does Huck.
He inadvertently spoke his mind to Joe the Plumber and that is why his team tried (still are BTW) to destroy him. He got the truth out Obama.
Too much credit.
Tue, 11/17/2009 - 13:11 ET by jaywlHuck gives Obama way too much credit when he says our President has good intentions. When Obama opened up with Joe the Plumber it was one of his unscripted moments. When he is away from prepared remarks he lets the world see another, the real, side of his intentions. "Cap and trade will lead to costs 'Skyrocketing" and other offhand comments such as the Cambridge police acting stupidly and his seeming inability to remember the script when it is not in front of him illustrate the point. When he starts hemming and hawing, doing the ahs and such at impromptu moments you can bet your ass he does not want to say what he really believes. It is so hard to remember the lie told to the wife last year or to the American people when a script is used.
His dishonesty is so bad and his policies so disastrous for the country I wonder if my wife isn't correct when she says Obama is controlled by the devil or is the Anti-Christ. She's weird that way. But! The influence on Obama by Soros, Andy Stern and that bunch gives pause, especially George Soros. Has he bought the President of the United States? The tangled web of money and organizations Soros controls is nothing but an attempt to hide the extent of his influence over our President, his party and the country itself. Why, for instance, are things like health care reform, civilian trials of terrorists, Cap and Trade, etc. going forth despite all polls showing that the public opposes each one? Could it be that, as happened last year, they believe a billion dollars can buy or repair anything.
"Liberals"
Tue, 11/17/2009 - 14:15 ET by iveseenitallUnless you've had certain experiences with the disastrous effects of modern "liberalism", it takes a long time to finally have an epiphany concerning them. For example, I've watched O'Reilly change his attitude over the years. At first he almost defended them. Slowly but surely, as they pulled their crap on him, he came to realize their true nature--vicious, dishonest, and hypocritical to name a few of their qualities. Guys like Huckabee, McCain, Gingrich are surprised at how radical Obama is, while people like Limbaugh have understood them for years. They are the enemy within. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to believe that a modern "liberal" will ever tell the truth or can have his/her mind changed. They are narrow-minded ideologues who want to "change" you. But if they can't-- forget seeking the truth, they hate you and will attack you sans conscience. From poor schools, to government corruption, to societal immorality, to the breakup of families, to weaknesss overseas, to the poor economy--modern "liberals" and relativists are directly responsible for most of what has gone wrong in America in the past half century. And if we go down, it will be on their shoulders. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Jay and Ive, I couldn't ...
Tue, 11/17/2009 - 14:38 ET by SentryDanJay and Ive, I couldn't agree with you more. However, to prove that there is a link between Soros and obama won't be easy.
I hope that "We the People" can get rid, through legal means, the liberals who now have control of the country. I would not like to imagine what the other possibility is.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.
Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.