NBC News: California Offshore Drilling Possible; CNBC Says Not Likely

Photo of Jeff Poor.
  • Bookmark and Share

It's one of the few times one can wish the reporting by NBC News was right and CNBC was wrong.

A segment on the July 21 "NBC Nightly News" pointed out some of the key points of a budget deal reached between California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and leaders of the state legislature. The deal means some service cuts - but also includes the possibility of exploration and drilling for oil off the California coast.

"California is our biggest state in terms of population and it long ago ran out of money," "Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams said. "They got nothing to pay the vendors they owe and now they have struck a deal for more cuts, and these are going to hurt. They're going to allow offshore drilling for the money it will bring in. The LA Times reports tens of thousands of seniors and children would lose access to health care. Prisoners will spend less time in prison. And the governor is going to sell cars and furniture and office supplies and autograph some of it, he says, to raise more money. It's an unbelievable turn of events."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

NBC correspondent Miguel Almaguer explained this is an unprecedented move for the state - despite the pushback caused by the earlier efforts to open up more of the U.S. coast for drilling.

"And to generate cash, the expansion of oil drilling off the coast near Santa Barbara - a move not seen off the Golden State scenic coast in 40 years," Almaguer said.

Despite Almaguer's report and corroboration by the July 21 Los Angeles Times, CNBC correspondent Jane Wells is very skeptical  that drilling off the coast of California will happen anytime soon. She was asked by CNBC's "The Kudlow Report" host Larry Kudlow on his July 21 program about the possibility of "drill, drill, drill" in California.

"Now that would really be a California miracle, Larry," Wells said. "According to the LA Times, there is something in this budget about exploring, drilling again off Santa Barbara. They were first talking about it a year ago when oil was high. When oil prices fell again, it went right off the table. The California Coastal Commission is very powerful and I would be really, really surprised. It's more likely they will raise taxes than they will drill."

Wall Street Journal editorial board member Steve Moore explained that Californians may have to ultimately accept oil exploration and drilling.

"You know, I want to add though, to this idea of drill, drill, drill," Moore said. "Jane, I really think the only way out of this crisis is for Californians to realize if they want to raise the revenues to pay for all these social programs, they got $8 billion of revenues they can tap by developing their own resources right offshore. And, at some point liberals are going to have to decide in California - do they want all these social programs or are they not going to drill to get the money to pay for them."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

LA Times is a farce

"The LA Times reports tens of thousands of seniors and children would lose access to health care."

That's pure BS.  The elderly are covered by Medicare, the children by CHIPs, both of which are federally funded, and full funded.  So, who's losing health care?  The editors of the LA times, most likely, as their company can't afford to pay for their health insurance premiums anymore due to lack of sales.  Heh.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

IRRC the states are given

IRRC the states are given block grants with Medicare CIPS ect..rolled in.  So the states set the standard and it could be that some will be left out in the cold.

But they won't be.

No one will be left out in the cold.  Those children who don't qualify for CHIP's (or who's State budget won't cover them) will qualify for Medicaid.  One again, they're covered. 

BTW, Access to Medicaid isn't controlled, administered,  by any state.  That's a purely federal program.  It's only CHIPs, and other state/county programs that are administered by the relevant state or county.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Forget It

Sorry, not going to happen, not a hope in hell. The enviros are just too powerful, and the laws written over the last few decades favor them. Until the laws change, nothing else changes. If 99% of the enviros are in favor of drilling, the 1% remaining can tie drilling up in the courts for ten years easy.

Step one is to demand an 'environmental impact study' before the project begins. Who does the study? The same enviros, paid for by the oil company. This is how they fund themselves. They will (surprise) take five or six years to do the study.

Ask yourself, if you owned an oil company and had a very limited budget for exploration and drilling, where would you invest? California or somewhere else in the USA with an idiot socialist President in charge, with corporate taxes on the rise? Or one of the many friendlier countries in the world? You'd be a fool to invest in the USA today.

And it certainly would not

And it certainly would not be until all this energy cap and trade nonsense gets hammered out. No way No how is anyone stupid enough start writing checks and getting the ball rolling without knowing what the tax is going to be or if the rug, ah la Venezuela style is gonna get ripped out from under them.

Slick, unfortunately, I

Slick, unfortunately, I agree with you. 

Meanwhile, the economy has hardly got off the ground and already you are seeing the cost of oil moving up. 

Just think, as the Fed keeps rates ultra low, the economy will boom once again and once again oil will go over $150 a barrel.  There is no good substiture for oil at this time.  We have the reserves, but lack the political will to act. 

 

         The people

         The people told the govt. to "Drill Here, Drill Now" and they, thanks to Pelosi & Reid, spit in our faces. Now California wants to drill to bring in more money. I say "NO". If the rest of the country can't, they can't either. Get rid of the idiots you sent to congress, then WE can talk.

The oil will probably just

The oil will probably just end up in Japan or China anyway...but at least the $ would lessen the possibility that the rest of us will have to bail out California so they can continue their feel good programs and racially-based welfare.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

Taxes

Oakland just passed a bill to tax pot, ideas are growing 

JDW

DAILY WAVE

Jobs, jobs, jobs ... Spending, spending, spending

broke

California is not broke. They have plenty of oil.

yesyesyes!

PLEASE let it be so! Imagine the irony, energy independence starting in CA, common sense in drilling starting here of all places!

 

WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)