CNBC's Steve Liesman has always gone after tea party inspiration and network floor reporter Rick Santelli for his views, but this time it was Santelli playing offense.
The CNBC "Power Lunch" crew was discussing Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) CEO Ken Lewis and disclosure of details surrounding his bank's acquisition of Merrill Lynch May 5. Santelli accused Liesman, CNBC's senior economics reporter of saying "dumb things" and acting like Nixon, when he suggested there could be a compelling reason for Lewis was not forthcoming about the acquisition.
"Ask the question in a more compelling way which is - I want you to save the world and not disclose," Liesman said.
Lewis says he was pressured by then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to agree to an acquisition of Merrill Lynch to prevent systematic failure of the banking system and to keep it quiet, a potential violation of SEC sunshine regulations. Santelli dismissed Liesman's premise.
"Come on Steve - are you going to come up with excuses to break rules and break the law?" Santelli said. "You sound like Richard Nixon. Who did you vote for, Steve?"
Liesman was defensive over the reaction from Santelli, however Liesman has had a history of defending the TARP bailout that Santelli and others have criticized.
"Hold on, hold on Rick, all I was posing was the ethical issue here - that if it helps out and to stabilize the system, is there a compelling reason to not disclose?" Liesman said. "I am not advocating that in anyway shape or form. If you want to blow a gasket on that Rick, just blow it on somebody else, not me."
Santelli told Liesman not to say "dumb things" if he really didn't think there was a possibility breaking rules could be justified.
"You don't break rules because of crisis conditions. End of story, end of story," Santelli said. "Well, then don't open your mouth and say dumb things."
Santelli asked the other guests on "Power Lunch" to vote on what they would have done. He said he would have called Paulson and the Bush administration on its bluff and taken it to the Supreme Court had he been a CEO in the same position as Lewis.
"If the government would have set you around that table as a CEO of a bank and said sign it, I know what I would have done," Santelli said. "I would have torn it up and said, ‘See you in the Supreme Court.'"
Santelli explained rules shouldn't be compromised - even if the finance system is facing a crisis.
"I think what really hit my button was the whole notion that should somebody of high authority tell you to go against something clearly borderline illegal, if not totally illegal - to go along with it because there's a crisis, I don't think that's an excuse," Santelli said. "It shouldn't be an excuse and I hope that we all learn something from ‘Frost and Nixon.'"



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I just keep loving Santelli
May 5, 2009 - 14:55 ET by Radical1979I just keep loving Santelli more and more. Can we have his input on the Obama administration trying to strongarm the whole Chrsyler situation? I think what I love the most about Santelli is that he's an independent thinker. We need more of those people in the media.
Missing...
May 5, 2009 - 16:00 ET by HeavyChevyone Rick Santelli. Last seen leaving work. Was reported by several passersby as being shoved into a brown van which sped off into the night. Current whereabouts...unknown.
Watch your back dude!
Hey HC... He sure won't
May 5, 2009 - 20:12 ET by bigtimerHey HC...
He sure won't be showing up at any of the Tea Party phenomena he started...
O's bus that ran over so many critters including his own grandmother may be in use again....
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Yeah BT...
May 5, 2009 - 20:27 ET by HeavyChevyand if the 4th of July turns out twice as big as the 15th of April Bambi may have to trade his bus in for a Semi.
HC... ...and they will
May 5, 2009 - 20:34 ET by bigtimerHC...
...and they will double in size if not more...
Bambi better keep that motor running...I'm just waiting for the day he is headed down the highway...with no return ticket.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Clear and Present Danger
May 5, 2009 - 16:08 ET by Lord Erond"The old Potomac two-step, Jack"
"I'm sorry Mr. President, I don't dance"
"They'll know we were right in the end"
-Harry Potter, The Order of the Phoenix-
Glad to see that Santelli
May 5, 2009 - 16:20 ET by fitzfongGlad to see that Santelli stood up to and humiliated that economic illiterate and all-around Obama apologist, Steve Liesman. Long overdue.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
When are the rest of the
May 5, 2009 - 17:31 ET by MidAmericaWhen are the rest of the namby pamby eunuches on Wall Street going to stand up to this President who wants to destroy there livelihoods? I am disgusted with obama, he is what he is, but why are the supposed Power People, the Titons of Industry just laying down while obama rolls up in his limosine and takes over their businesses like some Chicago gangster. C'mon you MBA's grow a pair!
Obama took so much money
May 5, 2009 - 18:36 ET by snaggletoothieObama took so much money from Wall St. and big business that all these companies think they are going to be the one that wins the lottery and gets well taken care of by the bribee. There have been some big winners so far. The rest are just keeping their heads down and hoping they escape or hit it big. And Obama knows he can screw over some of his big donors and the others will continue to pay him off because that's the only game they know.
he's an exceptional person
May 5, 2009 - 19:56 ET by katainkenthow is it he still has a job there.
Hold on ‘cause the world will turn if you're ready or not ~ KT Tunstall
Nixon? Rather poor
May 5, 2009 - 21:19 ET by RR GOPNixon?
Rather poor analogy.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Liesman: I know if we just
May 6, 2009 - 01:25 ET by EdhenryLiesman: I know if we just discuss this long enough and try the complicated "nuanced/intelligent/socialist/leftist" path, we can help the economy limp along until it sputters and provides everyone with an fair (equally poor) standard of living, void of personal reponsibility and entreprenuership.
Santelli: power to the people.
Gangster Government
May 6, 2009 - 09:55 ET by slickwillie2001Michael Barone on Chrysler: White House Puts UAW Ahead of Property Rights: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com
"The Chrysler negotiations will not be the last occasion for this administration to engage in bailout favoritism and crony capitalism. There’s a May 31 deadline to come up with a settlement for General Motors. And there will be others. In the meantime, who is going to buy bonds from unionized companies if the government is going to take their money away and give it to the union? We have just seen an episode of Gangster Government. It is likely to be part of a continuing series."
If you look at what the UAW gave to the Bamster during his election and what they are getting from him now, that has to qualify as one of history's biggest payoffs on an investment. Where's the outrage over obscene profits?