She shouldn't have to defend her motives.  Limp-wristed homos and their enabling propagandists in the MSM never have to defend theirs.

Independent my fat American a**!!!!

shyster, you are a through-and-through liberal and you know it.  

obama's notion of bi-partisanship is telling conservatives to shut up and do what he wants.

Carrie did a very good job sticking to her guns and explaining her position.  As previously stated, why does she have to defend her position?  

In this day and age when all the fringe groups are trying to foist their beliefs on the majority of people there is no outlet for the majority.  

The outlets for ideas are all on the side of the fringe and her having a microphone lets her tell the rest of us, who believe the same way, that we are truly the majority.  Her exposure benefits us all. 

I am shocked, SHOCKED, to find out that a beauty queen has fake breasts!

Quick, Shuster!  When was the last time you criticized the President for anything?

Or agreed with anything any Republican said?

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

 "I have no party, I'm a complete Independent,"; should say;

" I have no class, I'm a complete idiot".

How irrelevant must you be to have your show canceled by MSNBC? Is it even possible to have ratings lower than .01? Nobody watches the entire network, so how can they even tell his show sucked?   

President Obama is nothing more than a lying empty suit; a Hollywood style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to be a total fraud.  

WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION! 

If they are so "gay", then why are they all so angry?

Putting the Twit in Twitter.

Cosmetic surgery?

Is Shitster aware that No. 2 (Plugs) and No. 3 (Princess Botoxia) have partaken of the forbidden fruit of surgical enhancement? Probably dozens of times?

Why does he feel obliged to attack this woman? He's clearly on his way out at MSNBC, so the only thing I can think of he is angling for an administration job? He's making such as ass out of himself and his ratings are so abysmal no other network is going to touch him.

Beauty is more than skin deep with Miss Prejean, I applaud her for her stance, she was honest and sincere.

On the other hand, with shuster and hilton ugliness and hatred goes all the way to the bone, they and others like them are brainless twits that pass the minutes of their useless, empty lives hurling insults at those that do not agree with them.

Keep persecuting Christians, God has a special place for you, it's called HELL!

Things are really getting bad in the MsM when they're reduced to defending a foul-mouthed gossip columnist.

And what does the fact that anyone has had cosmetic surgery have to do with their stance on marriage? That particular question was purposely meant to embarrass Ms. Prejean on a personal level and was completely irrelevant.

As far as the bible and marriage are concerned, this is just another example of defining the defense of traditional marriage as a strictly far-right religious idea. Traditional marriage has been the norm in many cultures for centuries.

Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand

As is almost always the case, he is distorting the point Miss California and all of the States that have voted on this are making. No one is calling for any rights to be taken away. Gays can co-habitate, they can get health insurance for their significant other, they can do everything a straight couple can do, but they cannot call their "union" a marriage. Marriage is defined as being between a man and a woman - simple as that. The only reason the dopes in the MSM and wannabe dopes like Shuster continue this distortion is because it's a convenient way to bash conservatives without the fear of  a fact check. I mean,they aint gonna fact check each other are they?

So Shuster fancies himself a biblical scholar?  Hate to break this to him, but he's a got a bit more studying to do.

First off, the Book of Leviticus is riddled with commands of all kinds.  His argument goes along the lines of this: If I can show one (or more) commandments from Leviticus that are self-evidentally no longer binding, then none of those commandments must be binding.  Unfortunately, for him, however, this argument, which relies on induction, is simply not valid.  On the other hand, if I can find but one of those commandments that are self-evidentally binding, then it does follow that they cannot all be non-binding.  I thus submit Exhibit A (Lev. 18:9-10):

9 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy sister by father or by mother, whether born at home or abroad. 10 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy son's daughter, or thy daughter's daughter: because it is thy own nakedness.

Does Shuster mean to say that incest is legitimate, because, after all, men can shave?

Sorry.  The verses in Leviticus that deal with sexual perversions are quite clear in their condemnation, unlike the verses dealing with personal hygene.  I submit Exhibit B (Lev. 18:22-25):

22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination. 23 Thou shalt not copulate with any beast, neither shalt thou be defiled with it. A woman shall not lie down to a beast, nor copulate with it: because it is a heinous crime. 24 Defile not yourselves with any of these things with which all the nations have been defiled, which I will cast out before you, 25 And with which the land is defiled: the abominations of which I will visit, that it may vomit out its inhabitants. (emphasis mine)

 

"Let's wrap him up, alright?" -- Keith Olbermann

Here's what Jesus had to say about marriage and what he authorized on it:

Mark 10:7

"For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.  What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. "

Thank you.

Perez Hilton has a groupie—how precious.

Gentlemen...

I abhor all violence to women. When I hear of murders, rape, and kidnappings of these pretty girls, I cry in my heart. I want to turn back the clock of time to rescue them. What happened to Carrie Prejean was just as horrible, because sometimes, psychological assaults can have long lasting damage.

We must not let this pogrom of hate contiune. For me, this electronic rape of a beautiful and intelligent young lady was the final straw with the left in general.

I personally have nothing against a person's sexual orientation or what kind things they do in their bedrooms, in other words, private lives. Gay marriage is not the issue here. Whether you are for or against it is your personal opinion. I am 100% in favor of free speech...unlike the left.

The left is against any opposing view that doesn't subscribe to their repulsive and irresponsible agenda. The fact that this pretty girl spoke her mind is something they will never tolerate. They don't care that several young men love and adore her...it didn't fit their communist politically correct manifesto. The rat bastard pervert Hilton went on to call her a c*nt on MSNBC and no one is holding him responsible. NO ONE. Hence, electronic rape was committed in my opinion, and Miss Prejean's violated honor must be defended. This will not stand.

The liberal left must be destroyed at all costs, because they are in the process of doing it to America. There's no turning back now. Take action. 

Honor Carrie Prejean.

2010: A GOP Hill

A liberal would never take the Bible out of context to make a snarky point.....

I have a lot of gay friends, and none of them are as bitchy as
David Shuster.  He's sickening.

Just some observations:

1.  Shuster is a clearly a religious bigot, mocks the bible, should be prosecuted for committing a HATE CRIME.

2. Shuster clearly has no understanding of the context of what he is reporting on in the Bible..and he is a journalist?  Wow, even a rank amatuer could place context around those versus and prove Shuster's reading comprehension is that or below that of a 1st grader. For example: Cutting the hair, a command given to a certain few, who would voluntarily devote their lives entirely to God, they were also to abstain from all alcohol, and had a very peculiar dress code...  About two thousand years later..John the baptist came on the scene, and adhered to these very same tenants set forth in Torah milleniums prior.  The verse concerning planting two differnt crope in one field was an object lesson to the Hebrews to not mix those things deemed Holy by God, with those things deemed UNCLEAN with God..the two cannot mix and should not mix...as God makes it clear in the Bible HE cannot even be in the prescense of SIN (unholiness.)   and that dovetailes with the scripture regarding touching a dead pig (designated an unclean animal by God...of course Shuster is attacking Christians, Jews and Muslims with this particular insult to God/Hashem/Allah...so he is not making any allies here at all. Let me put this as simply as possible...if there is a God, and God created everything we see, then clearly God created all this for some reason, now wouldnt it make sense that God would communicate this purpose to us.  And then let us also contend that he would have to communicate to his creations (a primitive people)  in a method they would be able to understand?  Lets not forget the first lesson above, dont mix clean(holy) with unclean(evil).  That alone lets us know there is Good and Evil in Gods eyes.  And if that is true then either what Shuster is pushing is Good, or Evil.  By definition because he is rejecting his creator, (and this is entirely HIS DECISION, so he cant blame anyone but himself) I would be bold enough to assert that Shuster has shown himself to be evil..or immoral if you preffer.  Wow all this from a few verses in the Bible that Shuster REJECTS.

Since MSNBC can't pay the rent of their offices don't be shocked when you see Shuster answer the call, 'cleanup on isle 3, at your local McDonalds. He's not qualified for anything higher than the mop and bucket brigade. Old, Retired and glad of it.

OK you smug little punk,who's trying to hold on of what little he has of what he considers a "career", how did you lose your job at 1600, only to be replace by Ed Schultz who lost rating share? It says alot about what your superiors at MSDNC think of your "journalistic skills" doesn't it asshole? Is this the "best" you can do, insult women? Afterall, besides this story isn't your 1 and only 1 claim to "fame" is insulting the Clintons about "pimping" Chelsea? You are nothing more than a gutless little weasel with the backbone of a common invertebrate.  I"d suggest you do the honorable thing, but being an MSDNC employee, you don't have an operational definition of the term,do you.  What does any of this have to do with her opinion, jerkoff, or are differences in opinion not allowed in your Obamaman's brave new world?You're at least 20-25 years younger than me but I'd do the time just to bitch slap you you arrogant punk.

More tolerance from the left. This is why our country's culture is messed up.