CBS Commiserates Over Higher Bank Credit Card Fees; Ignores Gov't Takeover Threats

Photo of Jeff Poor.
  • Bookmark and Share

It was either an effort to avoid blaming individuals for ill-advised borrowing or an effort to vilify the banking system, but a segment on the April 20 "CBS Evening News" took a very one-sided view of credit-card lending. 

On a day bank stocks struggled and dragged the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) down nearly 300 points, "Evening News" scrutinized the current state of the banking system's credit-card lending. According to anchor Katie Couric, that sell-off of bank stocks occurred as a result of the realization the institutions would be forced to cover bad loans.

"Wall Street had been on a six-week winning streak, but today it suffered its worst drop in two months as investors rushed to sell bank stocks," Couric said. "[T]he sell-off came after Bank of America reported earnings of more than $2.8 billion last quarter, but that good news was offset by the word that the bank has set aside more than $13 billion to cover its losses from bad loans made in the past."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

One concern some investors had about the banks, which Couric neglected to point out, was a report in the April 20 New York Times that the Obama administration may convert federal loans to the banks into common stock, giving them more power to control the institutions. That is a threat Glenn Beck pointed out on his April 20 Fox News show and a reason bank stocks struggled in trading.

Instead, Couric pointed to credit cards and the pressure the banks were feeling to counteract bad credit card debt through other means.

"Many banks are piling up red ink from credit cards and consumers are paying the price," Couric said.

The segment by CBS correspondent Anthony Mason focused on the risk of credit card lending by banks, in a time when unemployment is rising.

"For banks, plastic has become a problem," Mason said. "As unemployment is soaring, so are the banks' losses on credit card debt."

Mason explained that as the rate of uncollected credit card loans has exceeded 8 percent for all banks and 9 percent for the larger beleaguered institutions, they were attempting to make up for these losses by raising interest rates and fees. And Mason reported that credit card companies have increased interest rates and minimum payments, while dropping credit limits and closing some accounts altogether.

"With bank losses on bad credit card loans up nearly 50 percent over the past year, it's estimated the banks will cut limits on credit cards for consumers by $2.7 trillion, Katie," Mason said.

Couric responded that it didn't seem fair because many of the banks in question received taxpayer TARP bailout money, and then the banks were penalizing taxpayers. But Mason assured the "Evening News" anchor the government was on the case as President Barack Obama will convene a summit of credit card executives on April 23.

"Well, the banks are desperate Katie," Mason explained. "But of course, this is really hurting people especially people who are already in trouble, who may have lost their job - for whom credit cards are kind of the last safety net. This is why the president is getting involved and the White House said tonight the president will in fact himself be at the meeting on Thursday with credit card executives."

However, on CNBC's April 20 "Power Lunch," co-host Michelle Caruso Cabrera, Bill Griffith and Dennis Kneale said the banks can't be completely faulted and held culpable for acting in their best interests, with the economy as it is.

Caruso Cabrera explained that tightening up on credit cards was part of the de-leveraging process, which banks were in some cases leveraged 40-to-1, causing the current banking crisis. 

"Hold on though - we know they have been yelled at that they were over-leveraged," Caruso Cabrera said. "They must reduce the amount of leverage that they have. They must allocate credit in some way. So what do you do? You raise the cost of it. It's that simple. It's a price-allocation system."

And Griffith pointed out that throughout their history credit cards have by nature been a source of quick credit with a high cost.

"Credit card rates have always, always, always been high, I mean relative to the prevailing rates, ridiculously high for two reasons," Griffith said. "One, it helps them offset the losses they have to incur as a result of the amount of money they lend to people who can't pay it back. And, number two, let's face it - they're that high because we pay them."

And Caruso Cabrera brought up the personal responsibility/behavior factor.

"You're right - credit card debt is like smoking," Caruso Cabrera said. "You have been told all your life it is bad for you and some people do it anyway."

Kneale questioned the motives of government and media going after credit card lenders. "Why is this a story now?" he asked. "Why is there suddenly a big crisis with the credit card companies? Are there not already enough laws in place regulating the card companies? It's because Washington has bailed out the banks and Washington has a new foot in the door to start throwing its weight around trying to cap the rates."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Kneale Off Base

Dennis Kneale is off base asking the question "why now?" regarding credit card lenders.  It's been widely discussed for quite some time in the media and the financial media in particular.  Much attention has been given to the "credit card problems will follow real estate problems" theme.

And there is really an issue lenders are abusing.  It is the reduction of credit lines and actual cancellation of credit of some card holders.  The card holders being targeted are the best payers.  They pay off their cards each month.  They are the safety net card companies have to hedge against their bad payers.  The kicker is that the card companies extended high credit limits to these people based upon their impecible credit.  They are now cutting back the limits on these people (the very best and most responsible).  These tactics can adversely affect the credit ratings and FICO scores of the card holder.

This response doesn't make sense

Huh?  What does this mean:

"And there is really an issue lenders are abusing.  It is the reduction
of credit lines and actual cancellation of credit of some card
holders.  The card holders being targeted are the best payers.
"

This makes no sense.  Why would credit card companies do something that essentially shoots themselves in the foot?  Only government-run "businesses" do that.  Take public transit for example.  What do they do when business is bad?  Raise rates.  (which never works).  Compare that with airlines.  What do they do when business is bad?  Lower rates.  (which works).

No, I think that Kneale's comment is right on.  Really, why is our president concerned about this?  Do you know what got us into this mess in the first place?  Government (Clinton and Janet Reno) telling banks that they had to lend more money than they thought prudent.  How is this any different?

Government intervention brought about this crisis.  But somehow, we now regard the people who run businesses as idiots, and only government can wisely guide them back to prosperity when it was government idiocy that got us there in the first place. 

It means exactly

It means exactly what it says.

http://online.wsj.co...

Dies Irae. . .

10 I and my brothers and my men are also lending the people money and grain. But let the exacting of usury stop! 11
Give back to them immediately their fields, vineyards, olive groves and
houses, and also the usury you are charging them—the hundredth part of
the money, grain, new wine and oil."

 12 "We will give it back," they said. "And we will not demand anything more from them. We will do as you say."
      Then I summoned the priests and made the nobles and officials take an oath to do what they had promised.

Ill Advised

I do sympathize with Mr. Poor's remarks about ill advised borrowing. But the practices of the credit card industry should not be immune from  scruitiny and reasonable regulation.

Here is one practice: Universal Default.  You pay your bill on time but have an outstanding balance.  An allegation of a lay payment appears on your credit report.  Your bank uses that allegation and the terms of the loan to adjust your interest rate from say 12% to 22%.

I know, you can say a "deal is a deal". Do you know credit card companies can change the terms of your loan by sending you a notice?  If you owe them money and don't agree, your loan is in default and the balance is immediately due.

allanf

"Here is one practice: Universal Default.  You pay your bill on time but have an outstanding balance.  An allegation of a lay payment appears on your credit report.  Your bank uses that allegation and the terms of the loan to adjust your interest rate from say 12% to 22%."

I agree totally.  I had one of those promotional 0% interest rates and noticed the payment due date kept moving up a couple of days each month.  Finally, a payment was late and it went to some default rate, which I can't remember because I paid the thing off the following month.   

 

CBS & credit cards

Jessie R. Hamby   Never watch, never use.

Diamond Buyers

Hi,

 

Business software
collection: Accounting, Finance, Point of Sales, CRM, Inventory, Payroll and
many more. Daily updates, no adware, no spyware.

Diamond
Buyers