Although the collapse of Bear Stearns happened back in March, the debate still rages as to what led to the failure of the 85-year old investment bank that had survived years of previous turmoil, including the Great Depression.
After JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon appeared on PBS's "The Charlie Rose Show" July 7 and commented on an August 2008 Vanity Fair article alleging that CNBC reporting could have been part of Bear Stearns' downfall, the cable channel's on-air editor Charlie Gasparino criticized what was claimed in the article and Dimon's reaction on CNBC's July 8 "Power Lunch."
"Well, you know, he [Dimon] said one thing that I'm just - listen, I didn't watch it," CNBC's Charlie Gasparino said, "I'm just going by what appears to be a transcript here: ‘Where there's smoke, there's fire.' Oh really? Sometimes where there's smoke, there's no fire, Jamie. I've got news for you."
In March, Dimon's firm, JPMorgan, purchased the beleaguered Bear Stearns at a discount price, with the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department brokering the deal.
But according to Gasparino, assertions that rumors were responsible for Bear Stearns' collapse are the product of "ill-informed writers and reporters" and that the company had several fundamental flaws - including its leadership - which caused the investment bank's failure.
"I mean, what he [Dimon] was essentially saying is that he believes that rumors brought down Bear Stearns," Gasparino said. "I know that's become popular among some ill-informed writers and reporters lately - that rumors took out a firm that had bad management, which earlier in the summer, the CFO got on a conference call and said this was the worst financial debacle he's ever seen and the stock went down like 10 bucks in three minutes, a same firm where, you know - the CEO was playing golf while Rome was burning."
"You could name a million problems with Bear Stearns that kind of gave the impression that there was a problem there - a real desperate problem," said Gasparino. "And it ain't rumors; I got news for you."
In 2002, Business & Media Institute advisory board member Don Luskin said that Gasparino had played a role in rumor mongering for then-former New York state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.
Luskin said Gasparino was "formerly an uncritical and dutiful conduit for Eliot Spitzer's leaks at The Wall Street Journal." The claim was an attempt to connect Salomon Smith Barney telecom analyst Jack Grubman's upgrade of AT&T with improper influencing from Citigroup chairman Sandy Weill according to Luskin.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
CNBC
July 9, 2008 - 11:18 ET by PurdueMattThe stuff that CNBC puts on its website is extremely liberal. Their headline always promotes panic and hysteria about the markets and/or economy. They always have something on the front page about how great the legalization of gay marriage, marijuana, etc... Yesterday they had a commentary on their front page about how an Obama win would immediately bring down oil prices by $40.
Bear Stearns was a bailout nobody wants to call "a bailout," but
July 9, 2008 - 11:29 ET by sarcasmoThe real problems are yet-to-come. IMO they'll involve the graph nobody can believably explain soaking up what would otherwise be immediate hyperinflation (see this graph).
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Jeff- as an economic
July 9, 2008 - 11:34 ET by TheGingermanJeff- as an economic writer, I find it disturbing that you would actually insinuate that the downfall of Bear-Stearns was due to CNBC.
You're not being serious. I refuse to believe that any rational adult would believe a word of this article.
Are you really trying to tell us that you don't understand the downfall of this firm? You don't know why this happened? CNBC rumor was responsible?
This wins my vote for most ridiculous story ever posted on Newsbusters.
I'm not insinuating anything
July 9, 2008 - 11:52 ET by Jeff PoorI'm not insinuating anything - as an analyst, I'm just reporting what's on the news.
What is reported on CNBC may not cause troubled firms to go out of business, but it does impact stock prices and as an economic writer, you should know that. Charlie Gasparino, who alledgedly acted as a mouthpiece for Eliot Spitzer - a liberal - while he was at the Journal according Don Luskin, is firing back at Vanity Fair (a publication that is hardly right-of-center) about accusations that JP Morgan CEO and one of the most powerful men on Wall Street - Jamie Dimon - takes seriously.
Jeff, Are you really
July 9, 2008 - 12:03 ET by TheGingermanJeff,
Are you really trying to tell me that you can't think of any other reason these guys are trying to displace blame onto CNBC? As an analyst, you can't think of any other reason, really?
Come on. The Bear Sterns downfall was the fault of one group - Bear Sterns.
the cnbc rumor was not the
July 9, 2008 - 11:56 ET by athoughtor2the cnbc rumor was not the sole reason. but when you harp on it, people do tend to listen. it could have caused more than a few people to make a run on their assets held at the Bear. Thus potentially speeding up the process, might have been inevitable anyway but it certainly didn't help matters