It has to be tough advocating an ideology that requires seeking out things that are bad in American society.
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman found one very heartbreaking story Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton had been using on the campaign and used it in the lede of his April 11 column.
Unfortunately for Krugman it wasn't quite accurate. Even worse, his own paper was one of the first media outlets to debunk the story.
"Not long ago, a young Ohio woman named Trina Bachtel, who was having health problems while pregnant, tried to get help at a local clinic," Krugman wrote. "Unfortunately, she had previously sought care at the same clinic while uninsured and had a large unpaid balance. The clinic wouldn't see her again unless she paid $100 per visit - which she didn't have. Eventually, she sought care at a hospital 30 miles away. By then, however, it was too late. Both she and the baby died."
However, the more accurate account was published in April 5 edition of the Times. According to the Times story by Deborah Sontag, administrators at the O'Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio, said "Bachtel was under the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with the hospital, that she was never refused treatment and that she was, in fact, insured."
Krugman admitted to the error April 14 on his Times's blog:
"It has been clear from early in this controversy, including from Times reporting, that Bachtel was insured at the time of her death. Some people read my column to say otherwise. That was not my intended implication, although I obviously didn't write clearly enough.
Her family asserted, however, that she had been unable to receive care from a local clinic, even though insured at the time of her pregnancy, because of unpaid bills from an earlier period in her life when she had been uninsured. It was in that sense that lack of insurance allegedly contributed to her death, the assertion I made at the end of the column."
Krugman went on to say he went with the story based on reporting from the Associated Press.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Time OUT!
April 15, 2008 - 18:00 ET by CaringwhiteguyIt's time for the NYT to have Paul take a time out. I know the Times wouldn't spank. That's so 50's. Maybe a week without pay would be appropriate.
Krugman's the kind of guy
April 15, 2008 - 18:06 ET by Chris NormanKrugman's the kind of guy that, when a story he uses for evidence proves to be not true, he replies, "Well, it should be!".
This is the kind of logic
April 15, 2008 - 18:23 ET by red_dragon311This is the kind of logic they have.
I was talking about the looging industry and how we get wood from "tree farms" ( if I am wrong please educate me so i don't sound like an ass lol ) that replant tress that are cut down
I get " well it takes 500 years to grow a tree ........."
and I told this person those arn't not the tree being cut down, that trees are a crop....."well they WANT to cut them down"
it boggles the mind how these people think, and this is my friend
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
They have the opinion -
April 15, 2008 - 18:36 ET by Chris NormanThey have the opinion - they just wish it was applicable towards something real.
In true liberal fashion,
April 15, 2008 - 19:13 ET by motherbeltIn true liberal fashion, Krugman will bravely "take full responsibity".....with zero consequences.
It is quite obvious...
April 15, 2008 - 19:20 ET by heldmyw...That you ignorant sister-pokin', gun-totin', Christ-tokin', 'Merica-clinging troglodytes don't understand the statement: "FAKE BUT ACCURATE"!
Sheesh! Do I have to get Dan Rather down hee to explain it to you AGAIN?
Get Mary Mapes on the horn!
Hey, the fable was too good
April 15, 2008 - 19:27 ET by Chris NormanHey, the fable was too good not to be used...
Or...
April 15, 2008 - 21:24 ET by WhoIsJohnGalt"It COULD be, right?!"
Gotta love debating against geniuses like that.
Liberal method
April 15, 2008 - 18:04 ET by Jerry MackTell a lie often and soon people will start to believe it.
Kruggie's fragile ego
April 15, 2008 - 18:24 ET by d1carterThis may send the "professor/journalist" over the edge. His fragile ego can not take much of this. He used a totally inaccurate story to bolster a completely flawed theory. Now what? It wasn't his fault, it was the AP or maybe it was Clinton's fault, yeah, that's it. Kruggie couldn't have just blindly written about something that wasn't true, just to prove his point.
Proof
April 15, 2008 - 18:33 ET by AzRenegadeThis is just proof that the loony leftists all use the same talking points. In this case it is the same lies retold.
Can these people ever confirm their stories or is "it sounds great" good enough for the Times? Why does anyone read that trashy rag anymore?
It would seem the Times has a long history of fabricated stories and lousy journalists.
AzRenegade
Nice
April 15, 2008 - 18:37 ET by BigBI thought this weasly little prick was an 'Ecconomist'... I didn't read the entire article, but did it have anything to do with finance...??
The only time I ever read about him is when Larry Kudlow is ripping him a new one over one of his 'Enlightend' (communist/socialist/martian) ecconomic theories...
And now his own paper is breaking it off in his ass....
MAJOR HEH!!!!
Now, this might sting just a little bit.....
Liar Liar
April 15, 2008 - 19:30 ET by ammo johnKrugman has always been a little weasel. That was confirmed when he went head to head with O'Reilly a few years ago. When he would look down with his answers, you could tell that he was lying out his ying-yang, and Mr O challenged him on it.
Not a very good example of Krugman getting it wrong.
April 15, 2008 - 22:58 ET by Biff McCainEven if Krugman is 90% wrong, the girl is still dead; the clinic wouldn't treat her because of her bad credit.
Biff read the article
April 16, 2008 - 01:06 ET by yankeemonnBiff; apparently you did not read the article. The woman did receive treatment.Unfortunately she expired despite receiving good care. Krugman and Clinton just didnt bother to deal with the facts which is typical
I dont think most people are aware of this, I do know the msm never mention it. On every emergency room entrance in this country is a sign writen in spanish and english that states this facility can not deny you treatment if you are unable to pay. Thats a fact. Check it out
Facts/
April 16, 2008 - 01:27 ET by gfrrmanlib...need not apply. Selah
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
I Don't Know
April 16, 2008 - 09:15 ET by timzankAdmittedly, I don't know the exact facts surrounding the death, but I find it VERY hard to believe (if she was insured at the time) her past due medical bills would have come into play at all.
Funny thing
April 16, 2008 - 01:24 ET by gfrrmaneven though I've seen this article before on the Internet in the last week or so, it miraculously appeared in my own local fishwrapper today, The Atlanta Journal/Constitution! Needless to say, the AJC will hear from me and a LOT of others. Is Krugman a tool/fool? No more questions your honor!!! I rest my case. :-)
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER