Network Morning Shows Bash Oil Companies on 'April Fuel’s Day'

Photo of Jeff Poor.

About once a year, Congress brings in oil executives, with the media piling on, and blames oil company profits for high gas prices.

Across the dial, all three network morning shows on April 1 - ABC's "Good Morning America," NBC's "Today," and CBS's "The Early Show" - characterized "big oil" as the culprit behind an increase in gas prices.

On ABC's April 1 "Good Morning America," which headlined one of its segments "April Fuel's Day," Chris Cuomo questioned why oil companies aren't taxed more while they're posting higher profits.

"Congress is calling all the oil companies on the carpet today," Cuomo said. "Lawmakers want to know why big oil needs billions in tax breaks while posting record profits of $123 billion. Consumers want answers too. Gas now runs $3.29 a gallon, up three cents from last week and 58 percent higher than last year. Oil executives argue they need tax breaks to expand production."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

But punishing oil companies with a higher tax burden will not make things any better. The Heritage Foundation's Ben Lieberman pointed this out on a previous attempt by Congress to interfere in the gasoline market.

"Many in Congress are looking to provide Americans with relief at the gas pump, but raising taxes on the oil industry is not the way to do it," Lieberman wrote. "The track record for punitive measures like the windfall profits tax shows that they usually harm consumers along with the targeted industry."

The April 1 CBS "Early Show" also went after oil companies, questioning why they're "raking in huge profits."

"If gas prices seem painfully high right now, you're absolutely right. They just hit a new record," CBS correspondent Chip Reid said. "It's no wonder drivers are angry. The price of gas is burning holes in their pockets. According to AAA, the average price of unleaded regular has hit a new high, just under $3.29 a gallon. Only a year ago it was $2.67 a gallon. That's up 25 percent, an annual increase that AAA calls staggering. And it comes at a time when oil companies are raking in huge profits."

Executives from ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM), Chevron (NYSE:CVX), ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Shell (LON:RDSA) and BP [British Petroleum] (LON:BP) were all scheduled to testify before the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming - the committee set up by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that has no legislative authority.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Cover for the Environmentalists among us

The oil companies want ACCESS ...ANWR, Oil Shale in the west, off the Florida Coast, ALL these locations are FULL OF JOBS . ..full of opportunities to find Oil and drive up the Supply, and drive Down the Price.

Chavez ain't got no stinking Environmental concerns slowing him down.  Same with China. . . .what pollution ?  

   

Yes Ms Pelosi I want my share too!

Yes Ms Pelosi I want my share too!

Absolutely - take those tax breaks away from the big bad oil companies. Let's see $4.33 billion in tax breaks (which creates R & D employment) - yea, let's give it back to the drivers. Let's see: $4.3 billion divided by 200 million drivers = $0.41 a week. Hell, I won't need to buy a Prius; with 41 cents a week more in my pocket all will be well.

And then there was this:

That's up 25 percent, an annual increase that AAA calls staggering.

In the 12 months before President Bush took his seat in the White House (think Clinton/Gore) the price of gasoline rose by 56 percent.

Staggering. Simply staggering.

windfall profits

Hmmm, I wonder if Congress is going to do anything about those universities and their massive tax breaks and windfall profits. Little Johnny needs to be educated, ya know.

D

Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.

Hmmmmm, no tax breaks, less

Hmmmmm, no tax breaks, less infrastructure renewel, less exploration, less new technology for existing but more expensive extraction = less "new" oil = more demand for existing resources = higher prices in general. Looks pretty simple to me and I may be in the minority but I dont smell conspiricy OR gouging I see capitilistic supply and demand alive and well. 

Never mind that their

Never mind that their profits as a percent of revenue is average.  Never mind that demand drives price.  Let congress raise their taxes, who do you think will pay for the tax increase?  Oh yeah, the consumer. $3.00 gas will sound reasonable.

This makes me mad to no

This makes me mad to no end. It's the hedge funds stoopid!

Those tax breaks are to entice the oil companies to produce oil in America, and not outsource it. They are the same tax breaks any other manufacturing company would get! After all, the oil companies are using a raw product, crude, and manufacturing gasoline, diesel, lubricants, and whatever else oil is used for!

Insert insanely long multiple syllable cuss word laden rant here:_______

Exactly, individual welfare

Exactly, individual welfare they love, but corporate welfare they can't stand, even though it gets the same messy results for both group of folks they they think is so great.

No the oil companies do not need the tax breaks!

Because the envirofasists will NEVER EVER let the oil companies expand, compete in the world market etc. Cuba can drill 45 miles from Florida.. If permited American companies will need to go 200 miles...on and on.. SCREW supply and demand...conserve, 3 piston cars, food in the gas tank etc.

Oil companies steal 5 cents per gallon of fuel.

Government lovingly assuages 60-70 cents each gallon.

<gaia/love>SAVVVE The Whales N' Earth; conserve N' recycle !

IranianUranium<sleep>New/Infrastructure/repair?/ROFLMAO

 

Oil prices.

Oil prices have doubled in 14 months. The unemployment rate is rising. The housing market is in trouble (for the fools that bought more than they can pay for). The stock market is dropping. Food prices have steadly increased the past 14 months. All of this in the past 14 months. Something keeps popping up as 14 months. Yep, it was 14 months ago that the demcrats took control of congress and started ranting about massive increased taxes. Mouthing off has had it's effect, the lame stream media knows it but won't print the truth. 

 

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Hey Srap...that was

Hey Srap...that was good...very, very good indeed.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Here is the attack plan of

Here is the attack plan of the fabian socialists of the democrat party:

Step 1:  Regulate industries into dysfunctionality

Step 2:  Argue that said dysfunctionality  is because captialism doesn't work.

Step 3:  Argue that the sollution is complete control (or at least even more regulation) over those industries.

30+ years of anti-energy policies is going to have consequences like this.  It is not a shocker that the supply is not meeting the demand.  If I was an oil exec going in front of congress I would let them have it.  I'd say, "how dare you parade us here like we're to blame!  Your anti-energy policies have artificially choked off the supply which has resulted in higher energy prices.  It forces us to turn large profits to afford the inflated costs of oil exploration since you will not let us do it in our own country!  The truth is that you politicians actually WANT higher energy prices but then want to make us the scape-goat."

Nobody has this kind of sense any more, so get used to the high prices.  I doubt we will ever see them get any lower than this.

Where is the Outrage?

Why are these folks not outraged that US Oil Companies cannot drill in the Gulf of Mexico, Anwar or in coastal Pacific? Why are they not outraged over the taxes tacked on to a gallon of gasoline?

Why are these reporters not outraged that the government is not taking realistic action to increase supply and is in fact preventing supplies from increasing?

allanf... That is exactly

allanf...

That is exactly what is the most outrageous to me..the talking heads, the reporters who intentionally omit that this is congress and congress alones fault for the mess we are in regarding oil, but heck, they have an agenda.

I heard on some hour show today with four talking heads saying how good these high gas/prices are for Clinton and Obama to run on ect....(don't know why they left McCain out for sure as he has voted the same, in fact he was one of the leading people on the repub side that defeated the drilling in ANWR, along with Cantwell on the dems side) 

I really feel this will eventually come back to bite all of them, it has to.

I know it has been over 35 years in the making but somethings got to give...and soon.

I guess the obvious answer

I guess the obvious answer to it all is that the government publically get into the oil business as they will know what is best and how it can be streamlined to please everyone... now of course we will have to pony up a few more tax dollars to get this program off the ground and sustain it (only from those of us that work and are citizens of course) but it will be worth it as gas prices can finally come back down where they belong.

The headlines ought to

The headlines ought to read, "Congress Thanks Energy Industry CEOs for a Windfall of Taxes for All Levels of Governmnet"

Subheadline, "With fists full of tax dollars flowing into governmnet coffers, even bambi's rediculous spendthrift ideas just might be able to be funded!" 

If you don't believe me, let's just take one of the oil companies, Exxon.  In 2007, it made 359 billion.  It paid out in taxes, before stockholders got a dime, $30 billion.  But, it gets better.  Exxon employs 80 thousand people.  Exxon pays well.  So, let's say that each of these employee earned 60k in 2007.  On average, they would have paid about 15% in federal taxes or about a 500 million dollars.  Exxon sold about 50 billion gallons of gasoline in the US.  The federal gas tax is 18.4 cents.  So, service stations that sold Exxon gasoline paid about $9 billion in taxes.  And, that's just to the federal government.  The states, on average, charge another 40 cents per gallon.

So, Exxon paid over $40 billion in taxes in 2007.

Oops!!!  Did I say Exxon paid these taxes?  That's a lie.  Corporations DO NOT TAXES.  You do, the shareholder!

And every dime of expenses, including taxes were figured into the cost for Exxon's products.  So, you, meaning us - US citizens, paid every dime of the above taxes. 

So, what to do?

Hey, Congress should have had us up on the "Hill" to thank us.

Do you get a thank you from Congress today? 

Are you supporting socialism here?

I smell something rotten. A few of you mentioned that Congress wants to raise taxes. No - they want to cut the tax cuts / subsidies these guys get. (I know - not everyone said this).

But bigger point. I thought we were against socialism? Here you all are promoting socialism! Socialising losses and bad business practices. Bailing out banks who close, tax breaks for oil companies and pharma's, subsidies for ineffective large commercial farmers. Come on guys, we have to be consistent - if we preach against subsidies and socialism then it must cut across the board. Tax cuts and subsidies are just socialism for the rich. And sorry - I am against both kind of socialism.

 Nope not at all, cut the

 Nope not at all, cut the tax cut's or raise them simply equates into you and I will pay even more at the pump than we do now. The tax cut's and subsidies are the only thing keeping big oil based in the U.S.  Let's see how succesful Congress will be the next time they want to frog march em' out, or how much you and i will pay at the pump if they move overseas.

You cant' expect the prices are gonna fall when we have 2008 demand on a 1976 supply. Build more refineries, drill ANWR, drill, drill, drill everywhere, it's that simple.

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

                               " The Cake is a lie."   

Blaze... Yep, as BD

Blaze...

Yep, as BD says...

Drill Early!...Drill Often!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

what's the criteria then

Okay - so if you are for some sort of socialism (or subsidies/tax breaks as you call it). What's the criteria? It seems a bit daft if companies make such profits when the oil price is high and the subsidies are still paid as well. There must be a better system or at least clear guidelines for all business to follow. Want to create jobs? Then diversify and don't put all the money in one pot (oil) or in losing businesses (agri). It is only one way down from that strategy.

And not sure how the subsidies will affect the price as one of the writers further up made it clear that taking the subsidies away won't affect the price much.

 Being a refinery worker

 Being a refinery worker for 30 years I can tell you with a fair amount of certainty that oil companies are not going to build more brand new refineries.  Why should they? They are getting great return on invested capital at the moment. And most add on to existing refineries, it's cheaper.

And to wade through all of the environmental laws to build a refinery that nobody in the country wants built in their backyard, just isn't worth it. Most refineries are running all they can, most at 110% capacity.

We don't need the government running our oil business. They've done such a jam up job on everything else they run I'd hate to see how they do running the oil business. Look, allow refiners to drill domestically, regardless of all the crap the greenies have been feeding us, we are not going to run out of oil any time soon. Alternative energy sources are not going to be viable for the entire country.

And ethanol? That's just taking food off of the country's table for something as silly as gasoline to burn the hell up going nowhere. It simple really, we have to conserve what we do have. 

If you live in the city, you don't need a dually, diesel, four wheel drive to run to Walmarts. That's ok if you have a ranch and pull a gooseneck full of cattle or horses. Car pool, how many of you have seen these huge SUV's with one person in it? Combine your trips, if you forgot something at the store, it must not have been that important in the first place, get it on the next trip.

Like I write, I make my living in the oil business, I  appreciate everyone buying the gas and oil I  am involved in making. I  like the dividends on my stock, it really helps with my retirement. But, I drive a vehicle that get 42 MPG. I am in the saving money business, not in the shelling out money business. But at any rate, Happy Motoring!!

"Being a refinery worker

"Being a refinery worker for 30 years I can tell you with a fair amount
of certainty that oil companies are not going to build more
brand new refineries. Why should they? They are getting great return
on invested capital at the moment. And most add on to existing
refineries, it's cheaper."

And I wouldn't either, not in a political climate that makes it clear that they don't like oil, don't want oil, and are going to do everything in their power to get away from oil, no matter what.

I agree

I agree with you 100%. Too much Kool-Aid fed to us about "running out of oil". I agree - we aren't even close. Same with ethanol - just pushing up food prices. And I agree with you on the SUV in the city sentiment - I guess we need it for our big ego's. I don't think there is anything we disagree with on this. (I work closely with loads of oil companies - Exxon, Chevron, Shell and BP). They are not the animals people try and make them out to be. These are decent people trying to keep us going and make money at the same time.

I just raised the issue of whether the subsidies and tax breaks to them and others are justified. Honestly, I don't have a strong opinion on this. I only raised it because I see it as inconsistent with my broader anti-socialist stand.

Huh?

 Tax cuts and subsidies are just socialism for the rich.  So you think it's GREAT that the top 60% of wage earners in the United States pay 99.94% of the tax burden. 

Well done. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

No - we agee

I absolutely agree with you on this. I think everyone should pay an equal amount. I was just saying that I don't like the idea of someone getting a tax break who are at the top end of the scale. Of course those with a higher income will pay a higher share of the tax burden. I fall in the high end of income earners and know that I will pay more than those at the lower end. But that still leaves me with plenty of cash in hand over them. Taxes... like death hey?

Want to know what the crime

Want to know what the crime here is? It's that Exxon has paid 19 billion dollars MORE in taxes over the past 5 years than they have made in profit.

Some of these execs need to grow a pair too. When the congress folks demanded that they invest more money in alternativc crap,errrr, energy, I would have told them if they wanted a solar or a wind company, then they need to start their own. We're in the oil business, not the solar-wind-waste-time-money-and-resources business.

I'd also tell them to take their little tax break and shove it. I mean, what, it's 18 billion divided between 5-6 companies? I think they can manage without it, plus then they can't keep holding it over their heads every 6 months during these show hearings. I mean, how pathetic is to whine over this tiny amount? The government has done quite well for themselves with this little investment. Heck, over the past 5 years, they've done better than Exxon. I'd say it's a pretty sweet deal to be able to make so much money while producing nothing, and doing nothing other than confiscating the wealth of others.

Lastly, I would put it out there that we(the company) is seriously looking into locating somewhere else, maybe Dubai. And I hope they actually do.

Exactly ckc... I have

Exactly ckc...

I have heard part of the hearings in sound bites, I have waited patiently for them to begin on television on c-span..I guess I may have to go to C-SPAN site to catch it all later this week sometime because for some reason they are not repeating them as I thought they would by now, but from the little I did hear some or all of the oil guys there did give back as got as they got for a change...just enough for them not have this on yet....anyway I agree with all of your sentiments...it is past time for these people that keep getting called up to congress to tell them to stick it where the sun doesn't shine for once...to turn the tables on them and flat out tell them it is their fault that we are in the mess we are in now...and theirs alone..it has been for the past 35 years...and to include the refineries or lack thereof...all the regulations and the years it takes for permission to just speculate ect...the law-suits filed ect ect ect....

Just once if they wanted a sound bite that would wake up the American people that would be played ad nauseum on the msm someone, anyone with authority on this all needs to stand up, say it all in less that a minute and a half sound bite...to make the dang dumbed down rest of the country understand just exactly what and had been going on in this country for the past 35 years!

The arrogance and audicity of congress and the msm is astounding!

 

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Hey BT, I had the same

Hey BT,

I had the same problem as you. I couldn't find it on c-span either. It's good to hear that the execs shot back a little.

And just so folks don't get the wrong idea, it's not about the oil companies. I'd be saying the same thing no matter who the target is, be it corporate America, a sole proprietor, or the average Joe working guy or gal. The American people aren't in debt tens of trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities because of the oil companies. That's all on big government.

 

If I was an oil exec I would

If I was an oil exec I would have a 42 gallon drum of crude wheeled into the committee room and then tell the congresscritter, "here, now make 20 gallons of gasoline and sell it back to me for under $3.00 a gallon."

Increased taxes (lower tax credits) equals higher prices

OK, let me get this straight, the Congress is going to "punish" the oil companies by raising their taxes (or lowering their tax credits). This will have the following affects: 1. lower exploration 2. lower production 3. lower profits which will result in #4. 4. higher prices. As much as the Congress would like to, they can't repeal the law of supply and demand.

 

So tell me how this punishes the oil companies. Looks like the consumer is punished more.

On the mat

America needs to grill the members of Congress and ask them why they continue to make 6 figure incomes when so many people are struggling to keep gas in their cars and food on the table.

If the members of Congress were serious about reducing the burden on Americans, they would forgo their congressional pay, travel expenses, per diem allowances, free health care, "fact finding" overseas travel, free postal mailings, and various other sundry allowances and benefits that they enjoy at the taxpayer's expense. Somehow, though, I don't think Congress is really that eager to give up their own considerable profits and benefits in order to "help" Americans.

Until the members of Congress are willing to forgo their own personal profits they should shut up about the profits of others. Anything less is hypocritical.