We better hope there are some big-time technological advances in the science of home air conditioning by the year 2040. According to the outlook offered by Dr. James Lovelock in the March 22 issue of The Daily Mail (U.K.), we're in for some dire consequences.
Sarah Sands of The Daily Mail (U.K.) (h/t Marc Morano of The Inhofe EPW Press Blog) reported Lovelock is forecasting the end of humanity due to global warming ... again.
"By 2040, the world population of more than six billion will have been culled by floods, drought and famine," Sands wrote. "The people of Southern Europe, as well as South-East Asia, will be fighting their way into countries such as Canada, Australia and Britain. We will, he says, have to set up encampments in this country, like those established for the hundreds of thousands of refugees displaced by the conflict in East Africa. Lovelock believes the subsequent ethnic tensions could lead to civil war."
But Lovelock isn't urging people to go out and buy hybrid cars or invest in squiggly light bulbs like other global warming alarmist cheerleaders. He said man's efforts to prevent the likelihood of his doomsday scenarios are unlikely.
"Lovelock believes it is too late to repair the damage. Government targets are ‘futile,'" Sands wrote. "Britain contributes such a tiny amount of emissions compared with countries such as China that our self-regulatory measures are pathetic."
"Everyone could burn coal all day and drive around in 4x4s and it would not make a scrap of difference," Lovelock said to The Daily Mail.
In fact, Lovelock thinks a lot of the activism preached by the likes of Al Gore in his movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," will just make matters worse. He cited the recent Bali agreement as an example.
"Bali may make things worse," Lovelock said. "One peculiarity is that when you burn coal and fuel you not only put CO2 into the atmosphere, which makes the Earth warmer, but you also put out a lot of dust and haze, which acts as a screen and cools the Earth."
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
32 plus or minus a billion or so
March 22, 2008 - 18:52 ET by dbo10 years ago Lovelock said we had less than 1 billion years to live. He seems to have downgraded his prediction significantly. Perhaps he's now using James Hansen's computer program. Everybody now on your knees....pray to Gaia.
Don't these people realize
March 22, 2008 - 19:43 ET by Gary P JacksonDon't these people realize they are becoming caricatures of themselves? Wasn't it the renowned oceanographer, Ted Danson, who told us the world's oceans would be dead in 10 years, something like 20 years ago?
This stuff would be hilarious, if so many folks didn't actually believe it!
Population bomb
March 23, 2008 - 08:10 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsAnother silly doomsayer is Paul Ehrlich. According to him, we all died from starvation years ago.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Methinks James Lovelock has
March 22, 2008 - 19:55 ET by R D HelmMethinks James Lovelock has lost his bloody mind.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
RD -- talking of Lovelock
March 22, 2008 - 21:32 ET by Jack BauerRD -- talking of Lovelock going bananas...
Oddly enough, the City of Lovelock, Nevada is known as the "Banana Belt."
"Paris a Desert, China
March 22, 2008 - 20:18 ET by acumen"Paris a Desert, China 'Uninhabitable' in 32 Years"
So much for the positive. What's the down side?
acu -- that's frackin'
March 22, 2008 - 21:13 ET by Jack Baueracu -- that's frackin' hilarious, and totally fact based. Observation comedy at its finest.
And thanks for all the fish.
Dogs and cats and all that.
March 22, 2008 - 20:37 ET by UphillAnd the Cubs will win the World Series. Now that's a prediction.
"Everyone could burn coal
March 22, 2008 - 21:08 ET by Jack BauerI do my bit doc, though I burn alleged "peer-reviewed" junk-science "reports" instead of coal. It's more satisfying. And better for the environment.
You know what the real problem is: too many of these "scientists" just aren't getting laid.
We can now move on with Energy Independence
March 22, 2008 - 21:18 ET by PopularTechThank you doctor lovelace as the U.S. can now move on with it's plans for "energy independence":
- The United States has 268 billion tons of coal reserves or about a 240 year supply (National Mining Association)
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Then lets put it to use
March 22, 2008 - 23:03 ET by well99Time to get off dependency to other nations.
HERE THE TRUTH...
March 23, 2008 - 10:39 ET by danybhoywell99,
It is time to become energy independent & get away from having to rely on middle eastern nations that hate us for oil, some goes for our buddy Hugo in Caracas. But the solutions from the right & left are like night & day.
The left wants to do everything that will never work without gov't subsidies, like ethanol & wind. Or course, the ethanol route will make a trip to the grocery store very expensive. I doubt if those pimping E-85 will ever cop to that.
The right, you know, people like me, want to drill for oil off the coasts of Florida & California, we need to expand our drilling in Alaska, we need to explore the oil that we have along the continental shelf in Colorado, Utah, & Wyoming as well. We can do this without wrecking the environment. But hey, let not stop there, howabout we start using coal as well? Coal liquification is NAZI era technology, just tell Sen. Byrd we'll name the program after him, & he will sponser the bill himself.
Oh, I almost forgot, expand our refining capacty, we have not built a refinary in almost 30 years. That & how many blends of gas do we really need? Reduce that number & allow gas to be shipped where it is needed, it would help greatly.
Of course, we all know what as long as the "greens" have their say, nothing will change. Here is what the people need to know, THE RADICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT NEEDS TO BE CRUSHED IF AMERICA WILL SURVIVE AS THE INDEPENDENT SUPERPOWER WE ARE RIGHT NOW. These people see America as the biggest threat to the world, instead of it's greatest hope. These people are little more then liberal/marxist/progressive/marxist/statist kooks who fail to understand that CAPITALISM is what frees people, not big gov't.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
danybhoy
March 23, 2008 - 12:42 ET by well99I agree with you and I bet you a dime to a donut your average person will too.Doesnt matter whether they are dems,independants or reps.I not talking about some elitist or some wet behind the ear college student.Just like building the fence the regular folks in this country will be ignored.We dont count.
It seems the Global Warming
March 22, 2008 - 23:09 ET by CJK51It seems the Global Warming nutjobs have a new doomsday scenario every week. It's getting to the point of it sounding like they are shopping ideas for science fiction movies or television shows. I have a great idea and it will make a fabulous movie: global warming turns the earth into a mostly water-type planet -- a "water world" if you will. And one guy has to save a woman and her child from evil fossil fuel-burning bad guys to find land.
Do you think Kevin Costner might be available? :-)
Meanwhile, here's a
March 22, 2008 - 23:40 ET by ckc1227Meanwhile, here's a different view.
http://www.theaustra...
You beat me to it
March 23, 2008 - 09:04 ET by Seabeach4348I was just about to post the link to that article. As she has done thousands to times before, Mother Earth has compensated from the warming trend when she was good a ready to do so.
Now if we can get GW Bush to rescind the silly "climate change" regulations he signed earlier while he's still in office.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html
Paris a desert? Well, the Islamic inhabitants of Paristan....
March 23, 2008 - 01:08 ET by R D Helm...should feel right at home then. :-)
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Does anybody else see the
March 23, 2008 - 01:17 ET by RESTLESS 1Does anybody else see the irony in the author being named Sarah Sands?
I hope Lovelock is a crackpot but he is a brilliant scientist.
March 24, 2008 - 06:08 ET by ruckroverI hope Lovelock is way out, but he has a mighty record as an earth scientist and enough successful patents to be the envy of a planet of inventors, and can't be simply dismissed as a crack-pot.
He bases these dire predictions on the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum of 55 million years ago. See http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/316/5824/587
An amount of CO2 and methane equivalent that is similar to industrial output of CO2 and methane from intensive modern agriculture, did tip earth's thermostat to stuck on hot for a couple of hundred thousand years. The arctic and antarctic were tropical and the rest of the planet a vast Sahara.
Whether that will come to pass in 32 years seems a bit extreme.
Overpredictions do tend to support the sceptical cause. But in the case of dead oceans this is very likely from acidification (as proven in aquarium experiments not just computer modelling) once atmospheric CO2 hits 450ppm. That will happen sometime in the 2030s and is a serious reason to cut emissions even if GW somehow does turn out to be wrong like we all wish and most of you folks believe.