Dobbs Rants About Safety Chief’s Remarks; Calls Her 'Imbecilic'

Photo of Jeff Poor.

No one has ever accused Protectionist-in-Chief and CNN host Lou Dobbs of being one to exercise discretion when something has ticked him off.

The host of “Lou Dobbs Tonight” blew up after interview after CNN correspondent Christine Romans interviewed Nancy Nord, chairman of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, on his a February 18 show.

This – Nord, is she as imbecilic as she appears to be as absolutely insensitive to American consumers, as absolutely lacking the judgment to run a federal agency designed and created to protect the American consumer?” Dobbs asked. “I mean this woman is beyond belief.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Nord told CNN correspondent Christine Romans media stories have caused parents to become “very confused.” She said this had nothing to do with free trade.

Safety is not a trade issue,” Nord said. “We will be vigilant in making sure that imports that come into this country are safe. Again, safety is not a trade issue.”

However, Dobbs saw things otherwise and had no qualms with voicing his opinion on trade issues.

“Well, where the heck are the Republicans? Only an idiot would think otherwise. When the woman is sitting there saying that it’s because we are overwhelmed with imports and we can’t inspect them, how could it be anything but a trade issue as well? I mean unbelievable,” Dobbs said.

Dobbs also attacked Nord’s IQ level, suggesting it was below “triple-digits.”

“Well I think anyone with a triple-digit IQ would have a philosophical difference with her,” Dobbs said. “Thank you very much, Christine Romans. And anybody who cares about what the heck they are doing in that job. Christine Romans, thank you, if I didn't say thank you, I want to say thank you again – another failure by our government regulators to protect the consuming public in this country.”


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dobbs may have a point, but

Dobbs may have a point, but the problem is that we have too many government agencies doing too many things they are incompetent to do in the first place.

The marketplace could police consumer product safety better than any bureaucracy.   The potential loss of one's business is a great deterrent against poor product quality or safety.

"Put any genius at the head of a governmental bureaucracy and he will soon become an idiot." - Publius

Classic

Dobbsian rant...

Where's the original Nord statement?

I don't trust anyone interpreting intent or meaning from another person. Particularly not someone from CNN.

I want to see it myself.

Sytematic

Unfortunately, this is symptomatic of most , if not all, government agencies and systems. Mediocrity would be a vast improvement. And the Dims want government health care? God help us.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Lou Dobbs

You conservatives forget that the military is a government agency, and so is the undermanned, underpowered border patrol, and NASA. You don't support those agencies of the gov't?

NASA did get their men to the moon and back, and the government and computer experts came up with the Internet, not commercial computer people, who did make it into something more.

We all want a better military and a well-funded border patrol and how is that not fundamentally the same as a border inspection of incoming food and goods?

So the government must do a good job in the area where that good job is needed and we can point to examples of where the government has done well in an overall sense, the examples above, and the negative consequences that are the result of not having that agency work well. (9-11 ring a bell?)

The government is supposed to do things for the people, run its institutions, its RES PUBLICA, its "things of the people".

We do need protection from foreign or domestic products that don't meet rational standards agreed upon, and we can't have it both ways.

The market can't police itself because the most responsible people and corporations would be penalized competetively by having to divert resources to this while the less principled would go on doing what they do: look for the maximization of profit without regard to the long-run safety and health of the people or our environment.

The marketplace regulates

The marketplace regulates itself all the time. The marketplace is merely free people making decisions for themselves.  I'd much rather trust that than trust a government agency...

How many people have gotten sick eating government approved food?  Almost all of them.  Remember the Tylenol scare?  No government regulation forced Tylenol to begin using tamper-evident packaging - the market demanded it. (And if you retort "yeah, the marketplace worked, but only after a tragedy," I'll come back with, "well where was the government in preventing it?") 

BTW - You Liberals forget that the National Defense is a Constitutionally enumerated power of the Federal Government.

Rex, you must never have been in the military!

 

The military, border patrol, and NASA generally succeed because they are motivated, well trained, and usually have a clear mission. Even then, remember that SNAFU is a military expression.  Your average civil service employee is better paid, less motivated, poorly trained and has less sense of mission than any of the three organizations above. If you can fix that then it makes sense to have a govt agency monitoring imports, otherwise it's a waste of time and money and the domestic sellers should be the ones responsible.      

NASA? Are you kidding

Speaking as a "conservative" - I would endorse shutting NASA down in a second. NASA is a joke - the International Space Station is a joke? The Shuttle is a joke.

Tell me one thing (aside from Hubble) that NASA has done in last 10 years that matters to anyone?

NASA? I vote kill it.

Safety Chiefs Remarks

I watched this and Dobbs is right.  Unfortunately Newsbusters neglects to put up the second film clip where the Nord says, " we are overwhelmed with thousands of containers and we can't possible inspect them."  It was after this that Dobbs went on his rant, rather than before as is put forth in the article.

GOV-MENT: THE INFINITE FUNGUS

The federal gov-ment is way way too large and growing like a fungus... and being unionized we know how too many vote. Gov-ment does a few things well but does too many things that are none of its business... its purpose in life becomes to "justify its position and grow". .. by 4-12% funding yearly while changing the rules (moving the goal posts) to be revelant.

Remember when Nadar's group "just opened doors" at midmorning 30 years or so in D.C.? Many offices were empty or our public servants were asleep on their desk at "near double a good salary".

With all the catcalls for "holding teachers and others accountable"... how is the massive federal gov-ment held accountable?

When was any even minor agency dropped or de-funded? We still need NPR? We still need Extension Agents? Remember the Grace Commission? Over 2,000 recommendations to improve the efficency-effectiveness of the federal gov-ment? Have we had another commission the past 20 years or so? NO.

This is the same gov-ment that can't build a fence or find 12 million illegals (for one example). Billions in welfare fraud yada, yada. This is not good. Give us all a break (or a gov-ment job)

Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)

The Gov't Sucks But

Never been in the military? My grandparents and mother escaped the communists in Yugoslavia at the end of World War II and the inefficient US military protected and fed them, not an armed posse from General Motors and Ford, though those companies supplied weapons.

My neighbor's dog died because of the Chinese food poisoning episode.

Yes, gov't sucks but not as much as Chinese commie uninspected food and Tito's men gunning for you because you are against communism. My great-grandmother didn't make it and starved to death, by the way.

Bush and the Wall Street republicans don't want fences and don't want real ID so they can continue to knock down the price of labor and increase consumer demand, and the leftists want to come up with a whole new group of "oppressed" clients that they can represent. So, of course, the "gov't", the mix of Wall Street country club republicans/democrats and the voice-of-oppression left, can't ( or really WON'T) fix anything in that area.

When you look at vaccinations and public health, the improved quality of air in our cities, and our less polluted waters, you can see the results of well-done regulation.

So I say, (no offense taken) that whoever said I wasn't in the military must be very young and very ideological and have little actual knowledge of history (no offense intended).

I appreciate your plight. 

I appreciate your plight.  I have several friends who escaped communist tyranny, but some of your distrust is misplaced.

You have a valid point about the Wall Streeters (many of whom are Democrats, too - don't forget)...  But this is violation of marketplace ideals, not the embodiment of them.

The American government's role should be to prevent fraud etc., not participate in it.   Their failure is not the failure of the marketplace, but the failure of government.

Freedom is the solution. 

There is another reason the

There is another reason the US Military, US Border Patrol, NASA, and maybe a few other agencies...

Get the job done. Brotherhood. The guy/person next to you, behind you, in front of you....

It is a great motivator.

By the way.  Rex you failed to answer the question.

Perhaps a better question. Did you have any service to your country?

If so, Thank You.

Actually Rex I've got more than 60 years on these old bones

 

and am a Vietnam vet as well as a history buff. I have nothing but the highest esteem for the US military, the finest in the world, but I will still state that it succeeds in spite of the inefficiency that any organization of that size has, because of the quality, dedication, and training of its members. The rest of the government has no such standards so we get a bunch of overpaid, unmotivated civil service hacks waiting for their pensions.

"...we are overwhelmed with

"...we are overwhelmed with thousands of containers and we can't possible inspect them."

My company deals with several forty-foot containers a month. It takes a crew approximately two hours to unload one. Multiply this by millions of containers entering the country. The backlog caused by the inspection of every container would enable someone to walk across the Pacific on the decks of the ships waiting to enter Long Beach harbor. The notion we can unload and hand inspect every container entering this country for safety or security is "imbecilic" itself.

Lou Dobbs is imbecilic...

Lou Dobbs is imbecilic... he's the definition of pessimism... how anyone could watch his show night after night is beyond me...

Check out my blog at: http://preacherskid.blogdrive.com/

Will do. Lou used to be your

Will do. Lou used to be your basic, non-descript, run of the mill business reporter until he discovered "angry populism" would make him a star on a shrunken cable news channel...

moron

The man is a polulist one-trick pony moron.

The issue is too many tasks and not enough $$$

The government is mandated to perform certain tasks and allowed to perform others by the Constituttion. The real problem is that it spends almost half of it's budget (maybe more) trying to do things that it has no authority to do or is prohibited from doing in that same Constitution.

Military, border control and import inspections are all tasks that the government is supposed to do. Education, tracking labor statisitcs, providing health care and providing housing are not (just to name a few).

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Actually...

...the military is poorly run, managed and budgeted. It is a function of the government because, realistically, it can't be a private enterprise. Most of the time, it's not even being used.

Even when the military is being used, it's probably being used in the wrong way-- Iraq circa 2004-2006 being exhibit A (though there are others, of course-- Viet Nam 1961-68, Korea 1950-51 to name 2). Eventually, because of the determination of its members, the support of its nation and a few competent leaders (Petraeus, anyone?) the military succeeds, usually in spite of the government that is using it.

As for inspecting cargo containers... well, that would more like than not require a force larger then the army and probably be just as poorly managed-- except for the herculean efforts of a few hard-working men and women in the trenches.