Once again, the media have demonstrated its disregard for the rationale behind business decisions.
Delta Air Lines (NYSE:DAL) and Northwest Airlines (NYSE:NWA) are in negotiations for a merger, which could be a win-win for both companies. However, a segment on NBC's February 15 "Today" portrayed it as the two airlines teaming up to take advantage of travelers and ignored the possibility that the survival of both airlines may hinge on this merger.
"But airline mergers have traditionally meant job losses, especially in the airlines' hub cities, as well as fewer flight options for passengers in smaller cities and higher ticket prices," NBC correspondent Tom Costello said. "In Atlanta, we found frequent travelers fearing that's exactly what could happen."
"Today" interviewed a traveler in Atlanta afraid they would see higher fares out of the Delta hub airport. But even in Atlanta, competition wouldn't be greatly affected by a merger. Currently, Northwest and Delta compete on only three routes from Atlanta - to Northwest's hub cities Memphis, Tenn., Minneapolis and Detroit.
Both Delta and Northwest filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2005. Delta emerged from bankruptcy in April 2007 and Northwest a month later. Higher jet fuel costs and excess capacity have plagued the airlines over the past decade. A merger could help offset some of these concerns.
The segment didn't include a spokesman from either airline, but instead interviewed a Democratic politician who is opposed to the merger.
"Competition is what is keeping prices reasonable today," Rep. Jerry Costello (D-Ill.) said. "If you eliminate competition, the fewer airlines you have the fewer choices people have."
Neither "Today" nor the congressman mentioned the impact of one of the airlines going completely out of business if a merger is blocked. Liquidation was narrowly avoided by Northwest after it filed for bankruptcy in 2005 according to USA Today's "Today in the Sky" airline blog.
"Today" only included one supporter of the proposed merger, airline travel consultant Terry Trippler, who said it would create a worldwide airline combining Delta's presence in Europe with Northwest's presence in Asia. But Trippler's support was undermined by the negativity in the rest of Costello's report.
A report broadcasted during CNBC's February 15 "Closing Bell" confirmed that Continental Airlines (NYSE:CAL) and United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAUA) are also negotiating a merger deal.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Geez, these people are stupid!
February 15, 2008 - 18:03 ET by masslibertarianHey Congressman Costello (obviously related to Lou), what's the effect on competition if one or both of these airlines go out of business?
This is a tough, tough business that is capital intensive, fuel cost sensitive, regulated to the hilt (despite so-called deregulation), hamstrung by labor unions representing the pilots, flight attendants and baggage handlers, etc., etc. And that's before you get to the still-lingering effects of 9/11 on the revenue side.
Did anyone inform Rep.
February 15, 2008 - 18:08 ET by motherbeltDid anyone inform Rep. Costello that if they both failed, that would be two fewer airlines competing for business?
I'm just surprised, if he feels that strongly about it, that he didn't have a plan in hand for a federal bailout.
You're partially right: Not just stupid, STUCK on stupid.
Stuck on stupid
February 15, 2008 - 20:37 ET by HypocriteHaterIt's this kind of studitity that should make it mandatory for all elected congressman to have a degree in economics.
For something that's simple enough for a 5th grader to understand, the necessity of this airline merger has gone completely over the head this highly paid congressman.
And these people want to be in charge of our economy. God help us all!
When it comes to the air
February 15, 2008 - 20:15 ET by sublight68When it comes to the air travel, there seems to be an awful lot of people who think it's a Right to have low fares and service to all cities, large and small.
It's a business! If fuel prices triple those costs get passed along. If there aren't enough passengers to support a Dubuqe to Toledo route, it gets canceled, even if it inconveniences a few people. And if an airline can't survive, it raises prices, merges with another or goes out of business.
Business/Government OWES people Jobs
February 15, 2008 - 20:41 ET by exLibIt's all about jobs.
Democrats feed the insanity that people are OWED jobs and that it is the function of Businesses and Governemnet to insure that people have jobs.
The fact that it's likely the majority of people in this country feel that if they are out of a job it's not "their" fault it's "The Governments" fault is one reason this country is sliding off the ledge...
I know a few people who don't seem that bright or skilled. Yet because they believe they have to have a job, they are employed. They don't feel entitled to a job, but understand they have to work hard and earn it.
Government can NEVER be big enough for leftie kooks, never.
February 15, 2008 - 21:32 ET by upcountrywaterLets do this for the childern at the controls Aeroflot flt. 593.
iranian uranium; iranian ICBM's iranian satellites..
4 (unthinkable) H-bombs, NOW THAT'S SOME CHANGE
Keep the change Bob. h/t Sam Peckinpah
Take the bus and leave the driving to them.
February 15, 2008 - 23:12 ET byIt was a "win win" team up for Exxon and Mobil, gave us $3 gas.
Gas was way too cheap at $1.19. I wish it was $5 a gallon to thin out
the traffic more so I could ride my bike to work. Thank God they closed
100 refineries.
I only wish Exxon VPs would buy wind drive yachts. Can't have it all I
guess. You guys, just don't throw your empty Dom bottles in the water.
OK?
Looking forward to NY to LA for a grand each way. Big mergers are great for the environment.
$3 gas
February 16, 2008 - 00:33 ET by masslibertarianYou can't honestly believe the Exxon/Mobil merger has anything to do with gas costing $3/gal. ... can you?
And 100 refineries closed due to this merger? Puh-leeze. How about posting a list of these refineries.
Refinery capacity is definitely a problem. We now import 15% of our gasoline - not oil, gasoline - because we haven't brought a new refinery on line since 1976. Why, you ask? Because of the ludicrous EPA permitting process brought about by tree-huggers like you (presumably).
Also, the fact that the refineries we do have in spite of tree-huggers like you (presumably) have to produce dozens of different blends of gasolines to comply with a patchwork quilt of various state environmental regulations brought about by tree-huggers like you (presumably) drives up prices as does the fact that we cannot drill for our own oil in known reserves in the barren wasteland of ANWR and the continental shelf because of tree-huggers like you (presumably).
And I really weep for your not being able to ride your bike to work on those congested roads that my gasoline taxes paid for.
Where was the MSM whining over corporate mergers from...
February 15, 2008 - 23:13 ET by R D Helm1992 to 2000?
Oh, silly me.
Smile. It is not the end of the world.