The market is good for corn farmers right now. Corn prices are reaching highs because of the increased demand for food and as of late, the increased demand for corn-based ethanol.
The price of corn is at an 11-year high. Its $4.38-a-bushel price tag is fueling food inflation, according to the December 17 "CBS Evening News."
However, that's contrary to what CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta told viewers on the December 18 "American Morning." It is the low price of corn, he said, that has prompted the need for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom to impose a "sugary drink tax," specifically drinks sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup.
"[I]f you look at the history of this substance, ["American Morning" co-anchor] Kiran [Chetry] - I think this is very important - we subsidize a lot of corn production in this country," Gupta said. "We've been subsidizing it for a long time to support the corn farmers, which is a good thing. If there is a problem in all of this, it is that maybe we make too much corn and some of that corn gets turned into this high-fructose corn syrup."
Prior to Gupta's segment, CNN Business Correspondent Ali Velshi reported that many commodity prices like wheat are skyrocketing in part because of the demand for corn-based ethanol.
"As a result of that you've got corn prices up, soybean prices up, sorghum, wheat, milk, anything that has to do with livestock and farms is more expensive," said Velshi.
Gupta said corn prices, artificially lowered by taxpayer government subsidies, should be artificially raised with a tax on drinks sweetened with corn syrup.
"There's a lot of extra corn that gets turned into this substance and it's now being used as a sweetener in lots of different products," Gupta said. "That's what makes it cheap. What Mayor Newsom and others have proposed is that you actually bring it back to what would be a normal price point for these substances. It's going to be more expensive. People are going to be less likely to buy. It's going to sort of offset, if you will, the subsidies."
Unfortunately, what Gupta didn't suggest was to eliminate the tax-funded subsidy interfering with the market price of corn in the first place, and pass that tax savings along to the consumer.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
That's right. San Francisco,
December 18, 2007 - 14:38 ET by Chris NormanThat's right. San Francisco, just keep slappin' those new taxes on everything. Just keep banning this, that, and the other thing. You're just destroying your city one thing at a time, while the media cheers.
Disgusting
December 18, 2007 - 14:39 ET by KillgraveI had the misfortune of watching this particular "news"piece. Nowhere do these two idiots even entertain the notion that social engineering could be a bad thing (except for dismissively mentioning the issue is "controversal").
I don't know if these morons are just plain stupid, or dishonest in not presenting a full story.
Liberals don't want the government to legislate negatively against a woman's biological self-determination (i.e. abortion), but they're just peachy with the government legislating against personal choice in what to consume.
Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid, little minds.
Wow..what accurate and detailed reporting
December 18, 2007 - 14:47 ET by JayTeeAfter reading these Vague, general, non specifics like below...from Gupta....
"lot of extra corn" "we subsidize a lot of corn production" "subsidizing it for a long time" "what would be a normal price point" "we make too much corn"
Does the Dude not understand the "Bushel" measurement, and can he actually do some research and give us some FIGURES ? with all these Generalities you can't pin him down on any stats, because he doesn't give any....It's all Touchy Feely baloney, nothing of Substance was Said.
it's because
December 18, 2007 - 17:45 ET by UndercoverConservativeNewsom and his crew love everything that is "high". Taxes, drugs, etc.
I'm reminded of an old Bloom County strip.."Tain't corn, it's dope!"
Let's see if I got this
December 18, 2007 - 15:16 ET by dscottLet's see if I got this right:
1. the price corn is at an 11 year high
2. it's the low price of corn that prompted the SF mayor to enact a sugary drink tax
3. the price of food increased due to the sweetener, fructose, made from corn has pushed up many grocery prices
4. groups around the world are warning about substituting ethanoal for gasoline may cause a food shortage.
5. more corn than ever has been planted by farmers, potentially displacing other crops (debatable).
6. the US government subsidizes (government gave money to producer) the production of ethanol.
Ok, can anyone else see what's wrong with this picture?
Obviously the so called business correspondent with CNN can't. Tell us, do the job requirements for a business correspondent at CNN call for an actual degree in business, economics or at least some managerial experience running a business or department? Or will a high school drop out do? Ok, did this person at least read the WSJ? I am mystified at what passes for professional journalism or at least the failure of CNN producers to do their JOB!
Did any of the morons at CNN even bother to scrounge the internet to confirm any of their information or gather the facts??? Here's a novel idea, gather the facts and THEN form an opinion.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
We still have farmers
December 18, 2007 - 17:17 ET by Right2thePointWe still have farmers getting payments for NOT planting land and just letting it sit idle and those funds are still in the current bill working it's way through congress.
They need to release that land for production to lower consumer end cost.
The farmer gets the smallest piece of the pie after all is said and done, it is all those middle man processors and food product makers who get more revenue from the crops themselves.
A balance of production allowances with profit margins for farmers should show the way, but if corn and other crops are at low points in inventories it shows someone has their models off to optimize the market availabilty / subsidies.
You would think this clown
December 18, 2007 - 15:17 ET by fitzfongYou would think this clown Gupta would be considered an embarrassment to the medical profession. But I've often found that medical doctors are not nearly as intelligent as their impressive titles suggest they are. It's as if they spend so much time qualifying to become doctors that they lose touch with the rest of the world. They become so focused on their career pursuits that they never have to learn the important simple things...like filing or tying their shoes. By discussing economic policy through the do-gooder prism of his narrow activist medical practice, Gupta shows how little he knows about governmental policies, taxes or economics. Before he makes a fool of himself again about subjects beyond his comprehension, he should try tackling something simpler, yet equally beyond his capabilities...like learning how to fill out a prescription order legibly.
Video No Longer Available
December 18, 2007 - 17:21 ET by stratmanGupta is a neurosurgeon, not a financial consultant. Why he would be doing this idiotic puff piece is beyond me. I couldn't watch the video because is is unavailable... already. Gupta fanboys and girls no doubt had this removed pronto.
Gupta is the darling of Oprah, which rocketed him to celeb status overnight. He is entertaining and non-threatening, but I wouldn't irritate him during surgery while he's got a knife in his hand or a retractor nearby to toss. A regular metrosexual idol.
He is a Liberal of the first order, which makes him a natural to add commentary on CBS. But he was horrible in this economic story, with almost zero facts as represented by the transcript above.
I am no fan of his but I can respect his medical abilities. He should stick with his field of knowledge when commenting on the news. Leave the financials to his own portfolio. Otherwise, get some damn facts, man! You sounded like a goof.
BTW, many neurosurgeons have underlings which write their perscriptions for them. I'm sure Gupta has a fluffer follow him on rounds and in the office.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
Video fixed. Been having
December 18, 2007 - 17:30 ET by Jeff PoorVideo fixed. Been having some technical difficulties.
Thanks for fixing the
December 18, 2007 - 21:04 ET by stratmanThanks for fixing the video.
Most of the segment was within Gupta's medical realm. He strayed at the end when he talked about farming, subsidies and taxation. He should have kept his yapper shut instead of sounding like an ignorant Liberal.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
LOL
December 18, 2007 - 15:55 ET by OldSailor88I was just watching Studio B with Shep. He was absolutely LOSING HIS MIND while interviewing a proponent of the high fructose corn syrup tax. I hope someone captured it for YouTube. It was awesome. I thought old Shep was going to pop a vein!
No kidding
December 18, 2007 - 19:54 ET by FranksamFirst, let's tax everybody to support the farmers. Second, let's tax everybody on what they consume. Is there a pattern of abuse here?
Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory. -Franksam
Newsom concerned with grain prices? Nah!
December 18, 2007 - 21:29 ET by nkviking75I find it hard that Newsom proposed this tax because he cares one whit about commodity prices. I'm sure his goal was to control behavior by discouraging consumption of soft drinks. Gupta's tying himself in knots trying to justify a truly stupid proposal, probably because he too wants to cut soft drink consumption.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
the fix is simple
December 19, 2007 - 14:07 ET by wizardjrIf subsidies are causing dislocation of government funding then STOP THE SUBSIDY, duh!
nkviking75 is right, it's not about correcting a government cash flow issue. It's about controlling your life and lifestyle.