WaTimes Warns Climate Change Bill Has a Cost: $494 a Year for Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child

Photo of Jeff Poor.
By Jeff Poor | November 13, 2007 - 18:39 ET

What's another $500 taken out of your paycheck over the course of a year? It probably isn't much to global warming alarmists like Al Gore, but that's what it could cost you if legislation pending in the U.S. Senate is passed into law.

Does that $500 have your attention? Well, multiply that times every member of your immediate family.

According to a November 11 Washington Times editorial, a bill introduced in the Senate by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.) that would require companies to scale back greenhouse-gas emissions could cost Americans $4 trillion to $6 trillion over the next 40 years.

If that bill were passed and made law, the tax would cost every man, woman and child - more than 303 million Americans - $494 a year, a significant burden on the U.S. economy.

If you're not yet skeptical of this global warming initiative, listen to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who warns the effects of carbon caps would be limited unless imposed globally. He said in his book, "The Age of Turbulence," that caps imposed only on the United States could be detrimental.

"There is no effective way to meaningfully reduce emissions without negatively impacting a large part of an economy," Greenspan wrote. "Net, it is a tax. If the cap is low enough to make a meaningful inroad into CO2 emissions, permits will become expensive and large numbers of companies will experience cost increases that make them less competitive. Jobs will be lost and real incomes of workers constrained."

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Case of Beer Index

That's 33 1/3 cases of beer ($500 divided by $15/24-bottle-case).

This is getting serious now! 

Just my $0.02

Wc.... Serious

Wc....

Serious indeed!

LMAO!

Does that include...

... illegal aliens?  Or just the honest tax payer?  Because I tell you, renouncing my citenzenship is looking better all the time.  That way you guys can pay for my share for me.

The public discussion of

The public discussion of climate change and its potential impacts has placed far too much emphasis on "hair shirt" arguments. Those global warming "alarmists" supposedly want us all to turn our thermostats down to 50 and make our businesses less competitive. Truth be told energy efficiency is exactly that---a more efficient way to do things. Done right, efficiency saves money and makes businesses more competitive. Done right, home energy efficiency also saves money at no sacrifice of comfort.

And even leaving climate change out of the equation, cheap fossil fuels are on the way out, and it behooves us to get on with a vigorous national energy policy that will move us away from what amounts ---globally---to an addiction to substances available mainly from unfriendly people on the wrong side of town.

For a bracing counter to the Washington Times scenario, see the following press release from the American Solar Energy Assocation about a study that points to the potential for huge revenues and 40 million new American jobs from the renewable energy and energy efficiency industries:

http://www.ases.org/...

Be More Efficient...

save money, reduce or even eliminate dependence on foreign energy sources are good and legitimate goals.

Save the planet by doing these? Poppycock!

Literally speaking, we humans are ants relative to the planet Earth, its environment, its climate and its place in the cosmos. 

Just my $0.02

This clown is just a shill,

This clown is just a shill, a lobbyist, a profiteer seeking a windfall from the AGW scare.  He never debates.  He just posts and runs.     

The War on Capitalism

What this really is about is a war on capitalism. The socialist have finally found a way to successfully attack capitalism and if people do not wake up fast they may win.

The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

that's actually a bargin

that's actually a bargin when you realize every man, woman and child in the US owes $8000 toward our national debt.

Iraq and Afghanistan as well

WASHINGTON — The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could total $2.4 trillion through the next decade, or nearly $8,000 per man, woman and child in the country, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate scheduled for release Wednesday.

/pocket change

Just to be clear

Using the formula required to get the $8,000 figure for Iraq, this climate bill costs nearly $20,000 per man, woman and child.

 

Now you all know why the

Now you all know why the push by the drive by media with the "green week" etc.  It is to stop those that know GW is BS.  That GW is just another means by our government to force money out of our back pockets.  This time for a totally useless purpose. 

Tell your reps in Washington what you think of this bill before we are all saddle with it.

Tell you reps that we need to drill for the oil we have in abudance and to build refineriers and nuclear power plants. 

Oh, and by the way, we can't possible rid ouselves of dependence on foreign oil even if the above measures are taken.  But, if the above measures are taken now.  In a decade or two, we will be no more dependent than we are now.  If those measures are not taken, we will become ever more dependent.  Meanwhile other economies, that are growing far faster than ours, will be competing for the same foreign resources. 

Think that those that

Think that those that worship at the alter of liberalism won't do or say whatever they think will win you over to their cause that they care so much about that you should too?  Here is what Rush had to say today about one of the drive by media's "heroes," that said the ocean would be dead in 10 years. 

 

RUSH: Remember back in 1988 when this program debuted, Ted Danson predicted that we only had ten years to live because the oceans were going to be dead and, if the oceans died, then we would soon follow?  He made a big deal out of this, one of the early environmental alarmists, the brilliant oceanologist, Ted Danson.  Back in 1993, on my television show, I implored the Drive-By Media to ask Ted Danson where he got his information on the oceans having ten years left.

RUSH ARCHIVE:  They're always making me justify my existence.  I wish they'd do that to Hollywood celebrities who claim to be oceanographers and so forth.  "Mr. Danson, Mr. Danson, what do you mean we've only got ten years left on earth unless we do -- what's -- what's -- what's your source?"  They never do.  They just -- whatever Ted Danson or Whoopi Goldberg, any of these other Hollywood celebs say, they just accept it as gospel.  When I say it, "Prove it!  Where did you get that information?  You have no right to say that.  You're just a racist, bigot, sexist, homophobe pig."

RUSH:  That's how the media reacts to me, "You can't say that, prove it!"  Ted Danson makes these claims, "Oh, oh, he cares so much."  Well, last Friday on CNBC's High Net Worth, the reporterette Jane Wells interviewed Ted Danson, and she said, "There was a time when you said the oceans are going to be dead in ten years.  They're not dead?"

DANSON:  No.  They're not.  But, I'm sure there was some hyperbole in what I said to draw attention to the issue, but you go to science journals now, 70% of the world's fisheries are at a point of collapse.

RUSH:  Really?  Oh, you lied, it was just hyperbole.  So now after being proven to have lied, but, but, but 70% of the ocean's fisheries or the world's fisheries or whatever are at a point of collapse, 70%.  So he's been proven wrong, throws another figure out there, wow, we're in trouble, oh, no, 70% of the world's fisheries are closed.  So Jane Wells then said -- well, the answer she reported after -- "Danson says some people have wondered, why listen to an actor? They make fun of celebrities taking up causes. He gets that."

 

DANSON:  Celebrities can be silly, we can take swipes at them, and what the heck, why not, we are silly.  But we do raise money.  You know something, this community raises more money for charity than any other community in the world.  This community is so generous.

WELLS:  He says over the years he's probably given $3 million of his own money to the Oceans Campaign, and just last week he flew to Geneva to urge the World Trade Organization to lift subsidies which may result in overfishing.

DANSON:  I do want to be engaged in the process.  I do not want to be victimized, or embarrassed, or guilty that I haven't done something during this really critical time.

RUSH:  So, once again, after being proved wrong about the death of the oceans, he remains an expert, he remains a go-to guy.  Why?  Because he donates so much to charity to the oceans.  He threw $3 million down the drain if he donated it to an ocean charity.  The idea we can control the oceans is about as absurd as being able to control the climate!  Anyway, I just think that just illustrates the point.  Celebs are silly, he admits all this, and yet we know that you people are going to take us seriously because we're like the big clique in high school, and you all wish you were in our group.