CNN Uses Suspicious Newsweek Poll to Boost Democratic Congress

Photo of Jason Aslinger.
  • Bookmark and Share

Already being suspicious of media polling, my eye was caught by the CNN.com article titled: "Approval of Congress at 22 percent." The article begins by stating that:

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released Friday shows the approval rating for all members of Congress sits at a dismal 22 percent, while 75 percent of those surveyed disapproved of the way Congress is handling its job.

This statement was followed by a link that directed readers to the "full poll results." Upon clicking the link, you are directed to a 4-page PDF summary of the poll itself.

The report indicates that just over 600 Americans were asked the following question: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job? The current poll results, as well as those of a year ago, were listed as follows: Oct. 12-14, 2007 (Approve-22%; Disapprove-75%; No opinion-3%); and Oct. 6-8, 2006 (Approve-28%; Disapprove-63%; No opinion-9%).

Following these results, however, is an extensive list of polling data on congressional approval ratings going back to April 1974 (presumably the oldest polling data available). The historical polling data is labelled "GALLUP CNN/USA TODAY/GALLUP TRENDS." It should also be noted that the polling is not listed on a monthly or yearly basis. Some years had monthly results on the poll question, while other years (particularly in the 1970's) listed as few as one poll per year.

I then wondered how the current approval/disapproval ratings stacked up to the historical data. In scanning the polling data, there was only one prior poll which indicated a disapproval rating over 75%. This result came from the poll dated "1992 Mar 3." The poll also had a record low percentage of people who had no opinion (3%), and was the only poll taken on a single day. This particular poll, notably, has a "^" character next to it, which is referenced at the end of the summary as "Gallup/Newsweek."

Of all the historical data included in the summary (from 1974 to 2006), there are no other notations for a "Gallup/Newsweek" poll, nor any other type of poll for that matter. That poll, out of nearly 100 listed, is the only one with a special notation on it.

If not for this one "Gallup/Newsweek" poll result from 1992, the current CNN polling would be quite remarkable. In fact, the headline would have to be something such as "Congress Has Highest Disapproval Rating in Polling History." But as it stands with the single renegade Newsweek poll, the current Democratic Congress is not quite the worst ever.

A search for a similar CNN poll summary from the past came up empty, as well as finding any information on the 1992 Newsweek poll.

So is it just a coincidence that the single "Gallup/Newsweek" poll just happens to be the record-breaker for Congressional disapproval? Or did CNN jam a square peg into a round hole in order to spare the current Democratic Congress from being the worst in polling history?

Other aspects of the article are troubling as well. The article states the following in defense of Democrats.

Even though the overall approval rating of Congress leaves much to be desired, Democrats can find a bit of a silver lining in the new survey. Approval of congressional Democrats stands at 43 percent, twice that of Congress in general.

However, the 43% figure is not included anywhere in the summary.

The poll results were also accompanied by a video piece from Bill Schneider, who, in commenting on the historical data stated, "Congress was down in the late 1970's after Watergate," with a screen feature showing Congressional approval ratings at 19% in 1979. Schneider attributed these results as being part of the downfall of then-President Jimmy Carter. So it was the hangover from the 1974 Watergate scandal that caused record low approval ratings in 1979?

The final gem from Schneider is his prediction that the presidency could change as it did in 1980 and 1992 (i.e. party changes), but that "no one is betting that the Democrats will lose their majorities in the House and Senate."

It truly doesn't matter what the polls results are. The media will report the polling through its liberal prism.

—Jason Aslinger is a private practice attorney in Greenville, Ohio.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Congress

 "Or did CNN jam a square peg into a round hole in order to spare the current Democratic Congress from being the worst in polling history?"

EXACTLY Jason!  Last I heard they were at 11%, the worst in history, you hit the nail on the head.  Outside of raising the minimum wage they have done nothing(and that was nothing), President Bush has outwitted them at every corner, they look pathetic and are.  And who watches CNN anymore, they are going the way of MSNBC, a kool-aid drinking Media Matters follower.

Besides, now that the scams

Besides, now that the scams have been exposed about polling practices, who the hell still believes any of them anyway?

Bill Schneider

I don't know much about Bill Schneider's background. I find his analyses on CNN both uninsightful and characterized by a very pro-Democratic slant.

I don't take him seriously at all.

Bill Schneider

I don't know much about Bill Schneider's background. I find his analyses on CNN both uninsightful and characterized by a very pro-Democratic slant.

I don't take him seriously at all.

}}---> Glorious Poll numbers

Even doubling the poll numbers doesn't get Congress a quarter's worth of change from their polling dollar.

  • I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous

When I heard that "Polls"

When I heard that "Polls" said that Bill Clinton's approval ratings went UP after the Lewinsky scandal, after he was exposed as a liar and cheater, I lost what little faith I had in polls.

 

"no one is betting that the

"no one is betting that the Democrats will lose their majorities in the House and Senate."

If these trends continue, and as more scandals are revealed ( by NB and Rush and the like, certainly the msm will suppress any dem scandals), and they contine thier America bashing and dissing of our soldiers, then that is one bet I will definitely take, and I would win a mint.

Restless...I could not

Restless...

I could not agree more with you....

I saw this report by the Simpleton Schneider whose reports always sound like he is talking to a bunch of five years old with a bed-time story...the doofus.

Congress has ratings at 11%, I do not care how they spin it...and if the repub's don't get a backbone and use numerous different tactics on the dem's during their individual campaigns we will lose again, but there is a lot of opportunities they have had at their disposal of the blatant hypocrisy and outright lies that have happened since the brains Pelosi took over....just this latest outright lie they told about NOT cutting back hours but increasing them because the Do-Nothing Republicans could not get anything accomplished according to their campaign ads and slogans.

There is plenty for the repubs to use on the dems if they just do it.

This latest BS with Turkey is one recent example, they did this intentionally for us to lose after we have made great gains...they want us to lose and the repubs had better learn to use that to our advantage, it is the truth, not a lie...the only way the dems ever win.

Good afternoon BT,

They whole Turkdy-Armenia thing was a backdoor way to cost our military precious air space and base ops. The last I heard, even most dem in congress thought this idea idiotic. The more the likes of pelosi and reid speak, the more the voters of this country see how impotent these dem leaders are.

P.S. Did you happen to catch Dennis Prager commenting on reid stating that global warming was keeping the wildfires in California burning, and in the next sentence ( he was asked by a reporter if he had just blamed gw for the fires), deny completely he had seen it? The audio of that was hilarious. I bet video would be even funnier.

Added: I found a link to the reid story and audio is available also. It looks like it was Hugh Hewitt's show and not Dennis Prager's.

Opinion Research Corporation

ORC replaced Gallup as CNN's "polling partner" earlier this year. It's owned by a friend of Hill n' Bill named Vinod Gupta.