I'm Sorry Jason.  I honestly made a foolish mistake in slaughtering your name.

Please delete my post, or leave it as you wish displaying my ignorance for all.

I would delete it, but it has already had attachments made to it.

Again, sorry

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

No one has ever once in public on the left or right actually examined Anita Hill psychologically. Liberals like those of the typical Ohio rag see harassment as all males are beasts and women victims while Conservatives see Thomas being accused by a female........but no one ever looks at Anita Hill.

Since no one was there with a video, the public facts of Hill are necessary to be explored. Arlen Specter in the hearings tripped her up in questioning and exposed her as lying and changing her story. This is a fact as Hill is a legal educated person and yet was caught in a lie.

This backs Thomas statement of Hill being a woman who got caught up in attention and was swept away with the moment.

Since Thomas has never been documented as lying in any of this intense scrutiny, Hill must be examined as a proven liar and Thomas given credit for his observation that Hill was a rather difficult person with a poor attitude.

In knowing this about Anita Hill, it appears her motives in legal terms would be that of jealousy or a woman scorned........not by Thomas rejecting her, but by the heirarchy choosing a Conservative black male over a liberal feminist female.
Notice in Hill the poor attribute of absolutely going nowhere since the hearings and literally being encased in nothingness again. All of this confirms an Affirmative Action minority female, with a grudge against the world for various reasons from race to her rather not beautiful appearance.........and a pschopathy builds of a woman crusading by the instigation of promises of moving on up, if she only stopped Clarence Thomas who was in her mind the anti black.

What needs to be examined thoroughly is Anita Hill and especially the story she told of the "coke can with pubic hair".
Focus upon that aspect as a normal mind would never come up with a metal can ever associated with anything sexual for the simple reason of sharp edges cutting, size, absolute "chilling effect" to the sensual realm and as aluminum cans replaced tin cans in the 70's people would see it impracticle and dangerous.

In Anita Hill's mind, she chose sexual harassment and a sweet inviting beverage which would be defiled by a pubic hair. But reason the source of her "heart" which was effecting this story. She chose metal which could be blunt force and cutting of a pure brutal nature. It is highly probable that Anita Hill psychologically was the coke can, being a dark inviting package with pubic hair, but the male world had inflicted a cold metalic brutalization of her by ignoring her and casting off her as a woman.
It is a sort of Ugly Woman Syndrome which liberal females suffer from in rage. The unattractive like Anita Hill are crushed by it and the semi attractive such as Hillary Clinton in her White House years was continually trying to frump herself down so as to be accepted by the ugly women of her clique.
This is not unique as advertisers choose frumpy models to sell products to a certain class of women who will only buy from Oprah type women.

No one will probably ever examine this for what it is in Anita Hill, but as the years have progressed she is the one who has been proven to fit a type of the woman scorned while Clarence Thomas has been righteous and proven so at every turn in the public eye.

Why did Anita Hill cry coke can? Why did no one up until now actually expose the reasoning why?

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Sadly....(sigh)....I'm from Toledo, The Blade is a huge leftist rag, the owner/editor John R. Block is just slightly left of chairman Mao. Two days before the '04 elections, he sponsored George Soros to speak at The University of Toledo, to try and influence the election.

I guess, what else would you expect from a paper that prints crap like this...