Ann Coulter did her best to drop a bomb on the October 10 episode of "Tucker" on MSNBC. At the conclusion of her interview, Ann Coulter announced (video) that the National Enquirer was just reporting that John Edwards had an 18-month affair while on the campaign trail. You can read the story here.
Before going any further, this allegation must be met with a healthy degree of skepticism. First of all, the story is originating from the National Enquirer, which in and of itself, raises questions as to the story's reliability. Secondly, Coulter had a notorious run-in earlier this year with Elizabeth Edwards on an MSNBC episode of "Harball." Coulter would have every motivation to repeat a salacious tabloid sex allegation about John Edwards.
With that said, though, you would think that the mere allegation would be worthy of a media frenzy based upon its recent behavior. The media have extensively covered the "bathroom sex" case of Senator Larry Craig. Before that, the media happily reported when Sentator David Vitter's phone number showed up in the records of the "DC Madam." Even before that, the Mark Foley story lingered for a month during a crucial point in the 2006 campaign.
Sex scandals aside, the mainstream media also pay attention to Ann Coulter, devoting plenty of press coverage to Coulter's printed statements about some of the 9/11 widows. The media also condemned Coulter for her aforementioned exchange with Elizabeth Edwards.
So now we have a tabloid allegation of marital infidelity by a presidential candidate. And the allegation has been repeated by Ann Coulter on MSNBC - so it's not as if it can be completely ignored at this point.
But there are big differences between this story and the others mentioned. The sex scandals listed above all involved Republican politicians. And there is less possibility to frame Ann Coulter in a negative light here.
It is not unprecedented for the press to cover a sex scandal involving a Democratic candidate for presdient. Going way back in time, Senator Gary Hart ruined his presidential chances with an extramarital affair, which received plenty of press coverage at the time.
In this case, though, the question has to be asked: will the mainstream media pursue this allegation at all? If the media is to be consistent in its energized pursuit of sex scandals involving politicians, then it will be beating down doors to either confirm of refute this allegation. But will they? The first thought is that the media would be inclined to ignore the allegation, but the potential boost to the Clinton campaign might give the mainstream media a reason for following this storyline. Time will tell.
—Jason Aslinger is a private practice attorney in Greenville, Ohio.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Edwards deserves the benefit
October 10, 2007 - 19:43 ET by NewsbusterbrownEdwards deserves the benefit of the doubt, which is something a Republican would not receive from the Old Media.
Yes he does deserve the
October 10, 2007 - 20:27 ET by dscottYes he does deserve the benefit of the doubt. But one can't help but wonder if this might the reason why Elizabeth gets to say what she wants, when she wants at the time of her choosing????? Have we ever seen a candidate's wife shoot her mouth off like Elizabeth? Talk about being held by the short hairs.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
I know one
October 10, 2007 - 23:55 ET by ArcherBTheresa Heinz Kerry.
Personally, I think Ann should shut the Hell up when it comes to Edwards. The guy's not going to win the Presidential nomination. Hell, it's doubtful that he'll even win his own reelection. Let him fail all on his own. He's doing a fine job without Coulter's help. All she can hope to do is screw it up!
If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. --George Orwell
Agreed
October 11, 2007 - 03:01 ET by KC MulvilleBut I've become cynical about these things. My first reaction was to wonder if the Edwards camp planted the story themselves. The political umpires (i.e., the media) have all but called the Democrat race over. Edwards needs to grab the spotlight, and he might just be politically desperate enough to try this. In some ways, it's just too perfect a setup.
I've probably gotten too cynical for my own good.
I believe it might have
October 11, 2007 - 09:21 ET by Gat New YorkI believe it might have been a plant as well, but a HillaryCo plant. This has all the earmarks of Hillary's style to eliminate enemies (competition) through any means available.
What troubles me in the story is how he supposidly met this woman. "When they met at a bar." He was in the middle of a very high profile Presidential campaign, constantly surrounded by handlers and the media and are we to expect that he somehow was able to break away to a quiet place in a bar and played up to a woman? And no one knew? I'm not a fan of Edwards but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt here and look at the Clinton camp instead.
Gat: The only reason I
October 11, 2007 - 13:01 ET by Conservative_in_mass.Gat:
The only reason I hesitate on a ShrillaryCorp. plot is that by proxy it could backfire on her. The question will immediately be raised about her own lack of judgement regarding Bubba's long record of repeated infidelities.
I have to agree the whole episode is a waste of time; Edwards has no shot at the nomination whatsoever. As for the MSM their selective outrage on this issue is well documented.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~ Unknown
Kaus Mentions It
October 10, 2007 - 19:47 ET by Dave659This story is unlikely to stay buried for long. Mickey Kaus mentions in on his Slate blog, along with a reference to an earlier Huffpost about the Edwards campaign's mysteriously burying some video
promotion, the hint being that the videos are connected to the affair.
Coulter would have every
October 10, 2007 - 19:59 ET by general companyYour kidding right?
Oh, no! Has John Edwards been up to
October 10, 2007 - 20:07 ET by RJMonkey Business?
Will he go the way of the dodo and Presidental candidate Gary Hart?
MSNBC
October 10, 2007 - 20:10 ET by BufordAnd the allegation has been repeated by Ann Coulter on MSNBC - so it's not as if it can be completely ignored at this point. But.....how many people saw the exchange? PMSNBC doesn't exactly blow the ratings away.
The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program...........Ronald Reagan
Man in the Mirror
October 10, 2007 - 20:21 ET by BradySomehow I can't believe that failed VP candidate John Edwards had an affair with a woman.
Please don't infer that I think he might have one with a man either.
Now a mirror...
The fairest of them all
October 10, 2007 - 20:24 ET by acumen".....John Edwards had an 18-month affair while on the campaign trail."
Did the tabloid provide the name of the mirror?
Late to the obvious
October 10, 2007 - 20:25 ET by acumenHa. you beat me to it Brady....
Best to wait for some
October 10, 2007 - 20:33 ET by botgBest to wait for some substantiation; the Enquirer? Did Ann say it happened or 'it is reported in the Enquirer ....'
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
If it's good enough for
October 10, 2007 - 20:51 ET by ConservativeRexIf it's good enough for Ann Coulter, it's good enough for me. Bank on it!
I'd say it's going to take
October 10, 2007 - 20:51 ET by balboaI'd say it's going to take more than the Enquirer to fuel the fire. If it's true, the MSM will get on it.
Will Ann be mentioning other Enquirer stories on Hannity and Colmes, like Big Foot sightings?
Hey Bal of course not
October 10, 2007 - 21:06 ET by general companyWill Ann be mentioning other Enquirer stories on Hannity and Colmes,
No, because it's Fox. But she was on MSNBC, so you can say what ever you like, just ask Oberdude
The speculation here in MA.
October 10, 2007 - 20:53 ET by MassConservativeThe speculation here in MA. by a local radio host was that this was not the work of the Clintonistas but was instead Obama (maybe he has finally grown a pair).
His rationale was that Obama stands the closest to Edwards in the polls and ideology so he is most likely to benefit from the Edwards implosion (assuming allegations pan out to something).
Also, there could be blowback to the Clintons if people start to associate this with Monica-gate and they start to get that bad taste in there mouths (no pun intended) again (i.e. do we really want to be thinking about presidents and sex scandals again).
"There are scandals that need to be addressed. Republicans address them, Democrats re-elect them." - Tom Delay
Oooh
October 10, 2007 - 21:02 ET by well99"Also, there could be blowback to the Clintons if people start to associate this with Monica-gate and they start to get that bad taste in there mouths (no pun intended) again (i.e. do we really want to be thinking about presidents and sex scandals again)."
That hits the head on the nail.
Little VP action
October 10, 2007 - 21:08 ET by general companythis was not the work of the Clintonistas but was instead Obama
The merge
It is wrong
October 10, 2007 - 20:57 ET by well99If there were real facts it would be one thing but to smear like media manipulation is wrong.
Probably is bogus, ?
October 10, 2007 - 21:12 ET by general companybut to smear like media manipulation is wrong.
True, but I see why they do it,,,it's fun!
lol
October 10, 2007 - 21:16 ET by well99Ok have fun.
Ann Coulter's latest column goes after two canidates
October 10, 2007 - 21:28 ET by Daniel BakerShe doesn't mention John Edwards though. Read here http://townhall.com/columnists/AnnCoulter/2007/10/10/fred_sawyer_and_huckabee_finn
_______________________________
Learn about "the best choice for people of faith" http://www.evangelic...
Gimme a Break
October 11, 2007 - 12:30 ET by BigSpoon65BigSpoon65
Best candidate for Christians? You mean the phony ones like Mitt? Yeah, the flip-flopper from Massachusetts. No, not that one the "new" one. Must be something in the water up there. Runs on liberal social values to win the governor job and then promptly betrays the voters who elected him on those principles. Can't be trusted! What's the difference between Hillary and Romney? Both career politicians that will say anything for your vote. But please don't plan on holding them to a single word they say. There is a reason that his candidacy is stuck in 1st gear and he can't escape 4th place in most of the polls.....NOT TRUSTWORTHY!
Edwards is a Lawyer....
October 10, 2007 - 22:17 ET by 186kpsIf the story is false the Enquirer may find itself in a bit of a jam.
They must have taken Edwards' being a Lawyer into consideration when deciding to run the story.
If the story is true Edwards will sink to single digits in the polls...oh wait..he was just there.
I Don't blog about rumored Democrat Candidates' Scandals
October 10, 2007 - 22:21 ET by Pasco ConservativeI won't lower myself to that level :) But then again...
it's the "Breck Girl"
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.
-Unknown
Connect the Dots, People!
October 10, 2007 - 22:47 ET by Del DolemonteThe Clinton's personal lawyer David Kendall is also associated with the National Enquirer.
http://www.washingto...
Del... I said that about
October 10, 2007 - 22:58 ET by bigtimerDel...
I said that about the Clintoon connection on OT when Ann was saying this live on television I posted about it...
Of course she has a lot to do with this....btw, I remember way back when she started getting he claws via other people in the msm press adn otherwise, there were always little tid-bits if you caught them, PC or no personal computer.
Part of me wonders about anyone also attempting to get a two fer out of this...maybe trying to hurt Coulter, but then again maybe it is vice versa against the Edwards ....
Oh well...
I hope you know to a point I am kidding because whether it is true or not, the msm are not going to treat this like they would if it were anyone with an r behind their name.
LOL
Of course if this is true Elizabeth will just say it was/is a little snafu...blah blah blah ..she wants that Inauguration as badly as Hillary does, both need to take off their rose-colored glasses, oh well, they will with time, forcibly maybe, but they will.
What better way for Hillary
October 11, 2007 - 11:04 ET by dscottWhat better way for Hillary to put the Hsu money laundering (bundling) issue on the back pages. Do we hear the MSM abuzz over Hsu, NOT! This skirting of McCain Feingold is a scandal of epic proportions, but it is treated as a non event. If this story about Edwards has any truth to it at all, you can bet the Clinton's opposition research team (dirty tricks squad) was behind it.
I suspect that this was a shot over the bow to Obama as well, because he is next. Obama so far hasn't taken the hint because he is challenging Clinton over her war authorization vote in an editorial on the campaign trail today.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
Hi dscott... I haven't
October 11, 2007 - 11:12 ET by bigtimerHi dscott...
I haven't heard one word about this so far anywhere since I heard Ann Coulter report about this on Tuckers show late afternoon my time yesterday...
Does make one wonder ...
Was she set up?
Are the msm holding back on purpose?
Did Coulter do this intentionally to get back at Elizabeth and John for what they did to her on Hardball hand in hand with Matthews? (I can't see her sinking to that level so I really don't think so, but time will tell)
Anyway...this inquiring mind would like to know....lol.
Give the Guy a Break
October 10, 2007 - 23:16 ET by BarkerJohn Edwards is living in two America's.........
About Edwards
October 11, 2007 - 00:18 ET by JJVCould this story in the Enquirer come from a source associated with the Clinton campaign? I'm just sayin'......
}}---> Edwards
October 11, 2007 - 03:21 ET by Cool ArrowJohn can only wish the American people cared whether or not he cheated on his ailing wife.
Truth is, he's too insignificant for notice. Even the VP nomination was well beyond his reach before this gossip.
For Ann's sake, I hope she has some independent substantiation to go with that schadenfreud. Really can't blame her after Lizzie's scripted impromptu attack on the Chrissy show.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Enquirer
October 11, 2007 - 06:13 ET by zoro7957.....If I'm not mistaken,it was actually the National Enquirer that did uncover the Gary Hart affair.
And various other stories, including...
October 11, 2007 - 08:29 ET by sarcasmoLimbaugh's drug addiction. It's unfair these days to say they're not accurate because they have editors like the great Mike Walker, who rocks, at the Enquirer.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
}}---> The Enquirer
October 11, 2007 - 08:47 ET by Cool ArrowWhen the MSM holds a paper in contempt, maybe it's worth reading.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
They do sorely-hate
October 11, 2007 - 08:59 ET by sarcasmoBeing "scooped," and that was easily apparent in the Limbaugh case. Media talking heads on TV whined incessantly about the Enquirer breaking the "hillbilly heroin" story at first, and then when it became apparent the story had legs, they quit talking about the Enquirer-aspect at all.
Don't want to get scooped, "mainstream" news media? Go do some journalism, like the tabloid you so-scorn. :)
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Why doesn't Ann Coulter
October 11, 2007 - 12:39 ET byWhy doesn't Ann Coulter start rumours about her own sex life, which is seemingly non-existent.
"In a bar"...yeah, right.
Blaster
October 11, 2007 - 13:05 ET by well99How would you know?Is this a I think it is so it must be so statement?Do you have the hots for her so you dig up everything you can about her?
What was his name?
October 11, 2007 - 14:02 ET by the_red_stateWhat was his name?
The Clinton connection to
October 13, 2007 - 09:42 ET by dscottThe Clinton connection to the National Enquiror has been established, Roger Altman. As I suspected, Opposition Research hatchet job.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/10/hillary_allies_in_media_gang_u.html
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity