Conservative Think Tank Challenges Comcast CEO on 'Potentially Libelous' Claims by Maddow
An attorney for the National Center for Public Policy Research, speaking yesterday at Comcast's annual shareholder meeting, demanded an on-air correction and apology for defamatory claims by MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.
National Center general counsel Justin Danhof directed his statement to Brian Roberts, CEO of Comcast, majority owner of NBCUniversal, which in turn owns MSNBC. In his remarks, Danhof hinted at legal action if Comcast fails to comply. (video after page break)
According to a press release issued today by the center, Maddow "accused the organization I am representing and by extension its longtime CEO, the shareholder I represent today, of 'funnel[ing] cash and perks ... to Members of Congress' to affect their position on legislation. If true, which it absolutely is not, this would constitute bribery, a fact about which your network is aware, as the word 'bribe' was used by Maddow in her segment. I am not here today to ask you to comment on this specific matter, as it may be subject to litigation, but to ask about the fact-checking processes the company has in place to reduce the exposure of its shareholders to libel claims."
The Maddow segment aired April 23 (embedded in its entirety above) and focused mainly on the Jack Abramoff influence-peddling scandal. Four days earlier, lobbyist Tony Rudy became the last of 21 people sentenced in the scandal for accepting donations while he was a congressional staffer and later doling out gifts to public officials after he became a lobbyist, "all in exchange for legislative favors," according to an AP story on Rudy's sentencing.
Rudy helped organize an all-expenses paid trip in 2002 to St. Andrews Golf Club in Scotland for Abramoff, former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed, GSA official David Safavian and GOP Congressman Bob Ney of Ohio, who resigned from Congress four years later and was convicted on charges of conspiracy and making false statements stemming from the Abramoff investigation.
"When Congressman Bob Ney got home from that golf trip," Maddow said April 23, "he said that the whole thing had been paid for by a group called the National Center for Public Policy (sic). That group denied paying for the Scotland trip at the time, but they were hip deep in the Abramoff scandal."
"Hip deep?" Maddow elaborated on this dubious characterization. Before Tony Rudy worked for Abramoff, she said, he was a staffer for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay in the mid-1990s and accompanied DeLay and Abramoff on a six-day trip to Russia. "Again, all expenses were paid," Maddow said, "and again, like Bob Ney, Tom DeLay claimed the whole thing was paid for and organized by this obscure, forgettable Washington, D.C., non-profit called the National Center for Public Policy Research."
It's here that Maddow's remarks cross the line from inaccuracy to defamation, according to the center. "This organization, it turns out, funded all sorts of Jack Abramoff-related activities," she said. "Remember, Abramoff's goal was to serve his corporate clients by essentially using corporate money to bribe members of Congress to support legislation that favored whatever corporation had hired him. And this group, the National Center for Public Policy Research, was essentially one of the ways that Abramoff funneled money or perks to various members of Congress."
"So Jack Abramoff would have his client, the Choctaw Indians, for example, donate tens of thousands of dollars to this obscure, forgettable group, this National Center for Public Policy Research, and then that group would bankroll an all-expenses-paid trip to Scotland for Tom DeLay!" Maddow said. "That six-day trip to Russia that Tom DeLay said was paid for by the National Center for Public Policy Research? It actually appears to have been paid for with money that was given to that group by Abramoff's Russian oil clients."
The center's chairman, Amy Ridenour, denied Maddow's claims and described MSNBC's "editorializing" as "frequently outlandish." (Disclosure: Ridenour is a contributing writer to NewsBusters).
"But there is a difference between an over-the-top editorial and a harmful lie expressed with reckless disregard for the truth," stated Ridenour, a Comcast shareholder. "I have had check-signing authority at the National Center for our entire 30-year history, and I would know if we had ever once given cash to a member of Congress, and we haven't. We don't even make campaign contributions, and we don't hand out perks to anybody to affect legislation, and never have. We've only sponsored congressional travel for one member of Congress in 30 years," trips by DeLay in 1996 and 2000.
"Rachel Maddow's allegations are false, and I believe the network knew it had no evidence for them, yet broadcast them anyway," Ridenour stated further. "MSNBC has to know that credible bribery allegations against members of Congress get investigated by the Department of Justice, yet Rachel Maddow claimed we were -- apparently routinely -- bribing congressmen for about 10 years starting in the mid-1990s. Why were no congressmen charged, let alone convicted? Why wasn't I charged, as the sole CEO during that time? The answer is that there was nothing to charge: MSNBC made it up."
In his challenge to Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, the center's general counsel Justin Danhof pointed out other "potential libel" on MSNBC -- "On March 23 and April 9, for example, your network falsely claimed the Koch brothers were connected to Trayvon Martin's death, and apparently you have refused to run a correction, even though unwarranted media attacks on the Kochs have resulted in death threats against individuals at their company. ... Chris Matthews said Republican primary voters are comparable to Grand Wizards of the Ku Klux Klan, then claimed he didn't mean to say it. Ed Schultz called Laura Ingraham a slut. Then, he apologized. But he has also claimed that Republicans want to see sick people die so they can make money off their corpses; that conservative commentators want to see Cheney shot; and he said of former Vice President Dick Cheney's heart, 'We ought to rip it out, kick it around, and stuff it back in him.' "
"Are MSNBC personnel unable to govern their own speech?" Danhof asked. "Or is all this outlandish talk just a formal company tactic designed to boost your ratings? And what, if anything, does Comcast do to prevent libel exposure?"
Roberts said he was not familiar with the Maddow broadcast in question, according to the center's press release. "But I will tell you that we will look into it and we will get back to you," Roberts added. "Thank you for your comments."
Maddow is already embroiled in a defamation lawsuit brought by Christian evangelical rocker and radio host Bradlee Dean for alleging that he advocates execution of gays.
The National Center for Public Policy Research describes itself as a "conservative, free-market, non-profit think-tank" created in 1982 and supported by "voluntary gifts from over 100,000 individual recent supporters" and two percent of its revenue from corporate sources.
- Jack Coleman's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
They deserve a lawsuit
Submitted by Flatliner on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 7:47pm.
My bet is that any retraction she may give will seek to minimize her lies and distortions and suggest that what she said was actually true, but she just hasn't collected the proof she needs. I'd love to see the lawsuit go forward and hope you keep us posted on its progress.
That may just be the only way
Submitted by ricklail on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 7:52pm.
That may just be the only way to shut the conga line of morons on MESSNBC down. They lie all the time. A couple suits and it could be over.
Mark Levin had a good line last night. He called the guest on Morning Smoe a circle of stupidity.
Heard the circle line
Submitted by GregE on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 10:26pm.
Perfect. And Mika's on pivot.
Comcast has failed
Submitted by bmacdmac on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 7:54pm.
Failed to even look at what NBC or MSNBC produces or puts on the air. The are failing the share holders, their bread and butter, and the public in general. It's lie after lie, half truth after half truth for one party. Thankfully there were enough of us that when it came time for the city to award a contract to carriers that were able to force the city to drop them and move on.
Comcast
Submitted by HudsonRiverGirl on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 7:10am.
Comcast is there to make sure that the lies continue. A little set back now and then is a small price to pay for their purposes.
MSNBC Lies
Submitted by rafedzell67 on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 8:05pm.
MSNBC's chickens are coming home to roost!
Maddow should stick to interviewing dams.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 8:06pm.
Sans hoodie, of course.
So if the National Center for Public Policy Research
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 8:45pm.
is "...this obscure, forgettable Washington, D.C., non-profit ...." then why is she even talking about it, and making a point to call it obscure and forgettable a couple of times?
Let's
Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 8:53pm.
hope this lawsuit gets some action asap. Wonder why it wasn't mentioned how nbc doctored the Zimmerman tape and all the idiots showing the false tapes on their shows. That, alone, should have tanked msdnc/nbc. Hopefully, this lawsuit will permentatly end this pathetic network
"... Ask about the
Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:25pm.
"... Ask about the fact-checking processes the company has in place ..."
hahahahahaha
NBC fact-checking. See "Edited Zimmerman 911 tape 1," "Edited Zimmerman 911 tape 2," and "Edited Zimmerman 911 tape 3." See also, "Pickup truck with exploding gas tanks."
I don't think this is going to go very far.
Submitted by CobraMan on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:32pm.
I don't think this is going to go very far, but at least they're trying.
Here's how I see it turning out: Comcast will issue some blase "statement" about how the comments of its on air talent "in no way reflect the views and opinions of Comcast," Maddow will issue a non-apoligy about how her statements were "misinterpreted" and "taken out of context," to be followed by a vapid damnation of the National Center for Public Policy Research, and the rest of the News media will completely ignore it, except fore Fox News. This of course will cause Maddow, Mathews, and the rest to repeat their attacks against Fox News for being biased.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Madcow Lied?
Submitted by mmilesll on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:33pm.
I am shocked that this idiot would lie, I mean she has never done it before. Roberts could care less, he is a big nobama supporter. People need to drop Comcast-their service sucks anyway.
Yep
Submitted by oldfart on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 7:50am.
contracting now to go dish. Tired of the bovine excrement that comes from their minions and contributing money to their salaries.
Are we sure Rachel Maddow
Submitted by Raison d'etre on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:43pm.
Are we sure Rachel Maddow isnt a dude?
You're right
Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 10:43pm.
Have you ever seen Ron Reagan and Rachel Madcow in the same room at the same time? No? I didn't think so.
And that "No Heroes" weenie, Chris Hayes, he borrowed Racial Madcow's glasses and won't return them.
The bigger the lie ...
Submitted by Arlen Cooper on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:46pm.
Mad(c)ow acts as though she gets paid by the lie. How do constant lying "common-taters," a'la Mad(c)ow maintain their propaganda machine without any persecution from collegues or prosecution for lible & slander?
I don't know enough about the Maddow issue to even
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 9:55pm.
hazard a guess about the liability prospects. But as far as the laundry list of potential libelous statements rattled off by general counsel Danhof, I can confidently assert that if such hyperbolic remarks, sarcastic jabs, ideological opining, satirical potshots, partisan ridicule, distasteful needling and the like were deemed actionable defamation, then most of politically-oriented talk radio and several TV programs as well--left and right--may as well cease broadcasting and turn out the lights tomorrow.
Jer
That sounds, Jer, pretty much like ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 10:24pm.
all your lefty complaints regarding NB articles and authors of same that you disagree with.
" --then most of politically-oriented talk radio and several TV programs as well--left and right--may as well cease broadcasting and turn out the lights tomorrow."
I see, though, that you seem to allude to both sides being equally guilty of "--hyperbolic remarks, sarcastic jabs, ideological opining, satirical potshots, partisan ridicule, distasteful needling and the like--".
No wonder you disagree so often with NewsBusters --- where it is pointed out that just isn't so.
Liberals may not have a lock on poisonous partisanship, but they have damned sure perfected it.
MD
Care to give a few exaples there, Jer?
Submitted by CobraMan on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 11:29pm.
Since I don't listen to talk radio, or watch much network news or talk shows (Dinnertime local and national news is about all I can stand), I don't have much exposure to all those "hyperbolic remarks, sarcastic jabs, ideological opining, satirical potshots, partisan ridicule, distasteful needling and the like" which you claim is being committed by people on both sides of the political divide. So, I was wondering, can you give me a few examples? You know, for comparison sake?
I would especially like to see some examples of, oh, I don't know, say, Rush Limbaugh, claiming that some left wing "think tank" (That's such a misleading term. I don't care which side of the political divide they're on! They're nothing more than political advocates claiming to be "researchers.") that is "essentially using corporate money to bribe members of Congress " like Maddow said about National Center for Public Policy Research. That would be an exceptionally helpful comparison.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Cobra...I specifically declined to comment on Maddow's
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 2:42am.
remarks and referred directly to the "potentially libelous" statements identified by the general counsel of the Center. That is the issue my post addressed.
Spinsanity is no longer active, but it was a neutral site which compiled inflammatory rhetoric and over the top charges engaged in by both sides. Much of their material is no longer available, but a lot of it is still accessible from their archives via various means including a search bar. Enjoy!
Jer
PS..But I'll give you one clear comparison that illustrates my point: NewsBusters was in a tizzy not long ago because Matthews spent a minute or so on one show saying Gingrich looked like the devil. On the other hand, several years ago Limbaugh spent a couple of days calling Tom Daschle "Satan" and making multiple devil-related references to Daschle. How's that?
I've linked that before. I'll try to find it.
There's a difference between
Submitted by winston smith on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 9:13am.
There's a difference between stating an opinion and reporting something as fact.
Limbaugh's rant on Daschle over 10 years ago was meant to be funny. I realize that making jokes by comparing Daschle to Satan might not be something to laugh about for many of us, but what Rush was doing was ultimately giving his opinion of Daschle. Everyone knows not to take that kind of stuff seriously. If I recall, at some point during the rant Rush was singing 'Devil with the Blue Dress On' by Mitch Ryder. Hardly something one would do if he wanted to be taken seriously. It was just a long, silly joke.
On the other hand, Maddow's statement had a different posture. It was meant to sound like an authentic report. There was no joking or singing. She was making statements and reporting events as if they were fact --- which they were not. Legally , this is more serious than an an opinion or an over the top rant. You really can't say Rush was lying. You really could say that Maddow was. National Center...has a case.
Bingo,
Submitted by Boudin on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 10:52am.
No context, no culpability. Unless they are on the receiving end.
Winston, I don't disagree...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 2:42pm.
That's why I explicitly stated I was not commenting on Maddow's remarks. I didn't see her report. I'm not familiar with the details of the subject-matter of her report. I have no idea regarding the truth or falsity of the statements she made when the report was aired or what efforts were made to determine their accuracy prior to dissemination.
I was addressing the additional comments made by the Center's general counsel. [See my original post and my responses to Cobra above and below.]
By the way, you may or may not recall that Limbaugh's devil terminology applied to Dashcle occurred at or around the same time Rush was accusing the Senate majority leader of backing the terrorists, aligning himself with the Axis of Evil, calling him Tokyo Tom, Hanoi Tom, and, if not directly, at least indirectly labeling him a traitor. Do you think his audience took those incendiary accusations seriously?
Jer
A clear comparison?
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 12:09pm.
Jer, do you really think NewsBusters is compatible to, say, an MSNBC show like Maddow's show? In your dreams! Newsbusters has a much bigger following! ;-)
"How's that? "
Not too good, as you had to go back several years to even find a similarity.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
For heaven's sake, Cobra...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 2:04pm.
I went back "ten years" for the purpose of providing a a near-exact analog for what NewsBusters had just recently presented as an example of outrageous rhetoric uttered by Chris Matthews on MSNBC. Both incidents--Limbaugh's and Matthews'--involved the use of "devil" comparisons associated with high profile politicians from the two major parties.
And the relevant entities in my counter example are not NewsBusters and MSNBC [or Maddow] but Limbaugh and his audience of millions vs Matthews and his considerably smaller audience.
I thought I made it abundantly clear in my initial post that I was NOT commenting on the merits of a libel action based on Maddow's accusation concerning the Center's alleged funneling of funds, etc., but rather on the general counsel's extended remarks outlining other instances of "potential" liability which included statements that seem to me to be of the type which--although often objectionable and sometimes contemptible-- are not all that uncommon in the rough and tumble world of talk radio and highly partisan political opinion shows.
So, yes, it was a very clear comparison.
Jer
Chill, Jer
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 2:14pm.
Chill, Jer, I'm just yanking your chain a bit. You seem a bit wound up the last few days. I saw the snipe hunt you had with others in another thread. Are your property taxes past due or something?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
I'm chilled, Cobra...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 2:52pm.
I noticed the "winky" thing after your opening paragraph, but not after the closing one.
And my property taxes are paid, but Ouch!
Jer
Oh, and speaking of "wound up", I'm relieved to see Boudin back today. I was afraid he may have spontaneously combusted.
Heh!
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 3:16pm.
"Oh, and speaking of "wound up", I'm relieved to see Boudin back today. I was afraid he may have spontaneously combusted."
Good one!
And I second the "ouch" for the taxes. Ours went up 12 percent, while the city downgraded the property value by 8 percent. Coincidence? I think not!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Tell me about it, Cobra...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 3:37pm.
There are homeowners in areas of metro Atlanta who have watched the value of their real estate cut in half while the county increased the millage rate to ensure sufficient property tax revenues to keep from going broke. It's the worst of both worlds.
Jer
I hope they sue
Submitted by octavioj on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 10:16pm.
These people toss allegations like there is no consequence. They deserve to get a slap.
Roberts said he was not
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 11:37pm.
Roberts said he was not familiar with the Maddow broadcast in question...
Bull-squeeze.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Like Roberts doesn't get a daily briefing
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 12:05am.
from Comcast's legal department on what was said on each show? If he doesn't, the shareholders should fire him. If he does, he's a liar for denying he knows what's going on.
He knows what Prissy Chrissy says, he knows what Special Ed says, and the rest of the line-up.
Just wondering-...
Submitted by Scrap Iron in Texas on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 4:42am.
Isn't that basically what lobbyists do?
Bribe the members of congress with campaign money?
How is it different?
I don't see ANY difference, do you?
You don't understand.
Submitted by donsaliman on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 5:25am.
When you are a liberal, you can say anything you want.
When you are a conservative, if you say you don't like the color black, the liberals will try to get you fired, because they say what you said is a racist remark.
Well,I've NEVER Been So Happy
Submitted by truemidwest on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 8:14am.
That my brother was let go by Comcast a couple years back. Of course,I joked at the time that it was because they needed to finance their purchase of NBC,which was why my brother and several other "middle management" were brought in and basically told"Your position's been eliminated;clean out your desk and get out."
truemidwest
Exit Poll?
Submitted by Karl Magnus on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 10:32am.
It would be very interesting to view the results of a credible exit poll of those who attended this meeting. NO media types though, ONLY shareholders. I can't believe that none of them has any complaints re: Comcast, NBC, and MSLSD.
Apparently Comcast hasn't noticed the tanking ratings of the networks who still support Earflaps McSandTraps via lies, character assassination, and slander. If I had stock in Comcast, I would be a constant thorn in their side.
SHAREHOLDER: "Show me the Benjamins or buy back my stock!"
~(Ä)~
When I was a stockholder of GE
Submitted by needle on Sat, 06/02/2012 - 11:50am.
When I was a stockholder of GE, while it was the owner of NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC, from time to time I would write letters to them asking them to be a responsible influence upon the public instead of a divisive influence. I pointed out that how they managed their media assets would impact their customer relations for their whole wide product line. Of course, they completely ignored me. Subsequently I got rid of my sizable holding, and avoid buying GE products if at all possible. Interestingly I now realize my efforts and boycott were and are completely in vain, because GE’s biggest customer is the US government, which means Democrat and RINO politicians. As for the rest of the country, GE offers the middle finger and so does Comsast.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Obama and the Democratic party's owns M.S.N.B.C.
Submitted by greatj on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 8:45pm.
Maddow and the rest of the emotionally and mentally disturbed M.S.N.B.C.propaganda misinformation operatives take their orders from Obama and the Democratic party.Boycott M.S.N.B.C. and Comcast,VOTE ROMNEY.
This has three strikes
Submitted by John21 on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 8:53am.
This has three strikes against it
Strike 1: It is MSNBC, no chance of any non-liberal information on this network. No chance of hearing any factual (non twisted) information on this network, their bias will not permit it.
Strike 2: You expect honesty or a rational statement from Ms. Madcow? Really? Let’s do a little history she has been on the air for a couple of years now can you name a single incidence of rational thinking or honesty during that time? I didn’t think so.
Strike 3: Liberals do not apologize for their factual errors, they either ignore your complaint or attack the complainant on some her matter. The NBC series of networks operate under the same basic system “liberal agenda” = Good everything else = Bad. Democrats are liberal and drink the Kool-Aid = Good. Republicans are conservative and believe in independent thought = Bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
So typical of the hatefilled left
Submitted by South40 on Mon, 06/04/2012 - 6:43pm.
Look for Maddow to say she was just kidding (joking) as so many on the left do. The hate-filled liberals at that network spread fallacies with impunity and do so under the guise of comedy. It's no wonder their ratings are in the gutter with no chance of recovery. I can't believe I once used to be a regular viewer.