'Silence is Consent,' Sharpton Pontificates - Except When It's His
On his "PoliticsNation" show last night, the Rev. Al Sharpton was indignant -- then again, when is he not? -- that Mitt Romney did not immediately reject a statement by a woman at a rally in Ohio that President Obama should be "tried for treason."
Romney answered the woman's question about restoring balance between the three branches of government but ignored her remark about Obama as treasonous. Approached by a reporter after the rally and asked if he agreed with the woman, Romney said "I obviously don't agree he should be tried." (video and audio clips after page break)
This fell wantonly short as far as Sharpton was concerned. "Mr. Romney, you want to lead this party," Sharpton said. "You want to lead this country. And yet you think this is leadership?" This was the same "lack of leadership" Romney showed by not condeming Newt Gingrich's pithy description of Obama as the "food stamp president," Sharpton said.
"There was silence from you on that one," Sharpton inveighed. "But make no mistake, folks, this party has been going right off the cliff for some time now." As evidence of this, Sharpton showed a clip of Obama's health care speech before Congress in September 2009, when he was interrupted by GOP Rep. Joe Wilson yelling, "You lie!"
"This is about more than what happened today," Sharpton said. "It's about a party and now a candidate that refused to denounce talk like this. Willard, winning the election like this is not winning at all."
Oh my -- that unseemly outburst from Joe Wilson and nearly three years later the presumptive GOP nominee ignoring a harshly worded comment on the campaign trail. Could the trend line here be more ominous? Kudos for the stinging prep work on this by Sharpton's team at MCNBC, clearly no slackers there.
Sharpton's guests for the segment (seen in its entirety here), former RNC chairman Michael Steele and former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, were asked their thoughts on the matter.
"I think in the moment of hearing that (Romney) probably discounted that as hyperbole and didn't give it any credence," Steele said in a rare moment of lucidity on MSNBC. "So he addressed the specific question and left that hanging out there. And you know, Reverend, as you know when you were a candidate, you don't answer everything that's put in front of you, nor do you address it. You just kinda let the stuff that stands out there that's obviously, you know, not relevant to the debate alone and you move to the core question, which he said he did."
Steele's defense of Romney allowed Sharpton to do what he enjoys most, which is wax piously about What Should Have Been Done. "I don't know that," he told Steele, "because I've learned by being around certain rooms and allowing things to go unchallenged that I should have challenged them. ... So I've learned that you do, silence is consent."
Perhaps one of those "certain rooms" includes the set of Sharpton's radio show. Seeing how he was willing to cite Joe Wilson's heckling of Obama in 2009 to bolster his argument, here is Sharpton's response to a radio show caller three months earlier suggesting one of the most ludicrous conspiracy theories in decades (audio) --
CALLER: He (Michael Jackson) is truly the soundtrack of my life. I also have a theory about Sarah Palin as well and I'm going to put it out there on the radio, hopefully someone can investigate. But I think maybe she did something to Michael Jackson. Maybe there's a scandal there. Maybe she's stepping down because something's about to come out. I don't know, but I'm gonna just put it out there on your show so we'll see.
SHARPTON: All right, thank you for your call, Ashley. That's interesting. I'll put it out, we'll see. I don't know.
Imagine how much more indignation Sharpton could exude had Romney responded to the remark about Obama as traitor by saying, "that's interesting" and "I'll put it out, we'll see."
- Jack Coleman's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
This is so gonna' backfire on them.
Submitted by NeoKong on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:00pm.
Sharpton offends more people than he inspires.
Nobody who voted against Obama is going to have their mind changed by Sharpton"s implications.
The thing is however that he may offend many people who did vote for Obama.
Strange Point of View!!
Submitted by Samaritan01 on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:02pm.
Wasn't Sharpton "silent" on the black beat-down of that white couple who's supposed "crime" was driving past a group of racist blacks?? Sharpton now admits he "consents" to that hate crime? This guy makes me want to wash.
Exactly
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 3:16pm.
Where's the flood of civil rights activists to Norfolk? Where's the justice, "Rev?"
At the Intersection
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 4:17pm.
of Church and Brambleton, in Norfolk, Virginia. The victims, both reporters for the leftist daily paper, The Virginian Pilot, are being all but ignored by their own employer.
A Beating at Church & Brambleton.
by Michelle Washington
Hypocrite! We! Much!!!!
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:13pm.
Sorry, Jack.
Low hanging fruit....but it was just there for the taking.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 4:39pm.
...I ***Heart*** You!
ROFLMAO
♥ You Back
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 5:35pm.
Big D (name of my favorite boat, evah, BTW).
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Is Al Sharpton the Edward R Murrow of Our Generation?
Submitted by HollyW on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:23pm.
After reading in the Daily Rash Al Sharpton's hard hitting interview with the pilot of the Navy jet that crashed into a Virginia apartment building, I have no doubt that Sharpton is the Edward R Murrow of our time. No, really! http://www.thedailyrash.com/al-sharpton-interviews-pilot-of-navy-jet-tha...
Is Sharp really serious when
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:35pm.
Is Sharp really serious when he asks the pilot if he was texting before he crashed? That question sounds tongue in cheek kind of a question, a joke. You can't be too bright or a serious journalist if you ask that kind of a question of a pilot, especially military.
I could be wrong...
Submitted by dmacleo on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 7:16pm.
but I think that whole thing was satirical.
I mean... Now, I was told that you and the other pilot ejaculated before your plane crashed and you dumped your load all over the neighborhood.
Sigh
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:37pm.
I wish Rev. Tawana Sharpyton would do a lot more consenting.
And this is a sad commentary: Rev. Tawana has really dirtied up one of the memorable lines of "A Man for All Seasons," when More says to Cromwell in the trial in the House of Commons, "Master Secretary, the maxim is 'qui tacet consentire.' Silence gives consent."
Of course, Tawana probably hasn't seen that play or movie. After all, it's about a political figure with a firm ethical foundation and moral compass to guide him. What would Al the Opportunist know about that?
Seriously?
Submitted by Ars21689 on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 2:45pm.
Is he trying to be funny, because that's all that is coming across to me.
Hypocrisy
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 3:10pm.
is consent, but only under certain circumstances...
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
part time
Submitted by Cyclopps on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 6:48pm.
I second the motion.
Votes?
Hey Al how's Tawana doing these days
Submitted by I hate marxists on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 3:13pm.
And by the way did your team ever catch the thug who killed the army and navy store guy who owned that store in your neighborhood. Get a life racist
2008/McCain Redux
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 4:13pm.
Didn't they jump all over McCain for not immediately waxing indignant when some woman at a rally said something bad about Obama?
This is the only tactic they know: the president hasn't come out and rebuked David Axelrod's calling people "contract killers." He never did denounce the union boss saying we're gonna "take those sons of bitches OUT!. And yet they hammer each and every Republican who doesn't immediately jump up to condemn any stupid statement that comes out of the mouth of any "civilian" -(not political operative)-within earshot of them.
As for Al Sharpton not responding, at times he's been the instigator of actual violence, not rhetorical, so he should just shut up until he's ready to condemn himself.
And Sharpton should be tried
Submitted by celator on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 4:11pm.
And Sharpton should be tried for his tenacious determination to avoid paying his taxes to the IRS. So there.
Once again, he'll have to come in second
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 4:31pm.
Buffet's ahead of him in the tax-buffet line.
"Silence is consent" is just
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 5:27pm.
"Silence is consent" is just lefty PC claptrap. Can't help but feel manipulated and pressured into doing or saying something. Sometimes silence is saying something. Sometimes saying something about an issue or opinion etc is giviing it validity it does not deserve.
Silence is consent
Submitted by bobsmom on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 6:24pm.
which makes it not "rape rape", right? Argh. Sorry Al, I can't take you seriously. Especially since all the pix I've seen of you lately make you look (to me) like one of the California Raisins for some reason. All you need is some big ole Nikes.
What a POS. I have noticed Al
Submitted by Antisocial-ism on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 6:36pm.
What a POS.
I have noticed Al getting thinner as of late. Hopefully there is an oncogenic storm taking place in his body. If so, it could not happen to a more deserving piece of effluvium.
Sharpton knows liars all right!
Submitted by swim-r-sink on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 6:38pm.
Reverend Al Lied about the parents of Trayvon were not notified of the death of their son until 3 days after the fact! You Lie Al! The father was notified the morning after the night of his death! And guess what your Lord ZerO is the biggest lying POTUS this Nation has ever had to put up with because you and your Lying pals in the Leftist media! So listen Al there is a ring in Hell in Dante's Inferno just waiting for you and your kind! Burn Baby! Funny how M BS DNC axed a couple people over this race hustling Trayvon debacle and not YOU!
Disgusting
Submitted by Cyclopps on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 7:16pm.
This one is an unmitigated charlatan. Reverend of what? Where in HELL did he get those credentials? A CRACKER Jack box? Was justice ever designed to masquerade as hate?
His whole purpose is to instigate as well as Jackson and Wright and lets not forget that clown Farrakhan talking about those "evil" french fries. Why? To further the lefts agenda which is communistic in it's core but has tentacles reaching out to "community organizers" posing as do gooders for the underprivileged and under represented, aka under educated Americans.
Anyone with a whit of intellect would retch at the thought of this guy or his minions representing them anywhere.
BUT....he is a useful tool in Obanana's tool box as he helps in creating strife for the masses which is a part of the divide and conquer plan, fits into the "critical race" theory and resultant plans to rectify.
He makes me ill.
I'll remember that, Al. I'll remember that you're a hypocrite
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 9:07pm.
"It's about a party and now a candidate that refused to denounce talk like this. "
I'll remember that, Al, the next time someone like, oh, say, Henry Waxman, calls a Republican President a traitor.
What's that, Al? Having a high ranking member of the DNC expressly calling for the impeachment of Bush isn't applicable? Bush being refereed to, by many in the democrats party, as a "war criminal," isn't applicable. That Republican Presidents are thinly called things like "baby killers," Nazis, "traitors," "raciest," who "hate black people, want to "keep blacks on the plantation," are having a "war" against women's "reproductive rights," and whose policies, especially their fiscal, and their environmental, policies, are supposed to have killed millions of people every year, from starvation, exposure to toxic wastes, refusal to stop Global Warming, isn't applicable? Why not? Oh, it's because you're a hypocrite? Well, we knew that!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Would this be acceptable Al?
Submitted by Dan Diego on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 9:18pm.
"All right. Okay. We're going to... ...hold on one second. I can't hear myself. But I'm glad you're fired up, though. I'm glad."