Mike Papantonio Actually Claims Huffington Post is 'Not Left Leaning'
... which proves one thing, namely that attorney and "Ring of Fire" radio show cohost Mike Papantonio doesn't read The Huffington Post.
How can you tell you're dealing with someone whose politics could not be more obviously, obliviously liberal? When he or she denies being liberal. Conservatives, on the other hand, don't scurry from their conservatism. (audio clips after page break)
That same liberal in serious denial and crying out for psychotherapy can just as surely be expected to deny that something liberal actually isn't.
Exhibit A -- Papantonio, guest hosting on Ed Schultz's radio show May 4 and talking with John Nichols, Washington correspondent for The Nation (audio) --
PAPANTONIO: Hey, make some sense of this, John, I just so value your opinion, make some sense of this. Arianna Huffington, you know, which oddly enough, her site in this is described as a left-leaning Huffington Post, I don't, I don't see it ...
NICHOLS: It's not a news site, really.
PAPANTONIO: It's, it's not, yeah, it's not left leaning. But she comes and says the assassination was a mistake, the most despicable thing you can do. What in the hell's she talking about when she's talking about Obama's assassination of bin Laden?
Papantonio isn't just clueless about HuffPo's liberal orientation -- he also gets it wrong on what Arianna Huffington condemned as "despicable." It wasn't the killing of bin Laden -- or "assassination" as Papantonio curiously prefers to describe it -- it was Obama politicizing bin Laden's death in a campaign ad that suggested Mitt Romney would not have pulled the trigger.
As for Papantonio's claim that Huffington Post is "not left leaning," let's take a look at the site today. The most prominently situated op-ed on the main page? Written by economist Bob Kuttner, co-founder of The American Prospect magazine, which is described on its home page as "liberal, progressive, lefty -- call it what you want, we're proud of it."
Just beneath Kuttner's op-ed is one from Anne Sinclair, editorial director of "Le Huffington Post" (yes, its French edition), expressing "Good Luck, Mr. President!" (yes, with an exclamation point!), to incoming French president Francois Hollande. The fact that Hollande is a socialist should not be construed to mean he is left leaning, at least according to Papantonio.
Also to be found today at HuffPo is an op-ed from NY Times columnist Paul Krugman. Please disregard Krugman's well-established, swooning Keynes fetish. This in no way makes him liberal, as Papantonio would be quick to point out.
Nearby you'll find a clip of former NBA star Charles Barkley telling Mitt Romney, "You're going down, bro." A search at HuffPo for similar disparagement of President Obama from a prominent athlete, supermodel or teen singing sensation will prove extended and fruitless, yet more evidence from Papantonio's perspective of Huffington Post's scrupulously balanced politics.
Speaking of politics, let's have a look at the HuffPo section of the same name. Lead story -- on Republicans "settling for the 'one left standing' ", meaning Romney, a story that Papantonio will cite as an example of HuffPo's devotion to balanced coverage (look, Republicans!).
A sampling of headlines from HuffPo Politics hints at what to expect -- "Proposed GOP Bill Would Hurt Those Already Hurting," "James O'Keefe Ducks Trouble at GOP Event," "If He Were President, the Far Right Would Lead Romney Around by a Ring in His Nose," "The Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate," "Rick Scott Choice Could Be His Biggest Failure," "GOP Plan Cuts Social Services to Protect the Pentagon," "Obamacare Pays Off -- in Real Cash," you get the idea. Unless you're Mike Papantonio.
Hold on a sec, what's this? The editor at large of "HuffPost Gay Voices" writing a piece titled "Joe Biden Was for Marriage Equality Before He Was Against It" and criticizing Biden for not wholeheartedly embracing gay marriage. Or as Papantonio sees it, yet more right wing propaganda from HuffPo.
In case you're wondering how The Nation's John Nichols responded to Papantonio's criticism of Huffington, here's a link to a two-minute long clip of Nichols' response. In it you'll hear Papantonio confuse Obama with Osama while Nichols diplomatically steers Papantonio from his persistent assertion that Obama ordered bin Laden "assassinated," and ending with Nichols claiming that Franklin Roosevelt responded to the attack on Pearl Harbor by going to war -- with Nazi Germany.
It is also worth noting that while Papantonio denies that Huffington Post is liberal, Nichols denies it's a "news site." Not the sorts of things you heard from left of center until Arianna Huffington dared disparage Dear Leader.
- Jack Coleman's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Of course Papantonio doesn't see it -- look where he sits
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 1:11pm.
The guy is so far out in Left field he's shagging fly balls in the parking lot.
When a reporter from socialist magazine The Nation is to the right of you, you're about as far left as one can get.
We need Papantonio and his unhinged ilk to have more visibility so average Americans can see what the Left really thinks. I wish NBC or CNN would give him a TV show.
Pap
Submitted by mmilesll on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 1:19pm.
Stupid doesn't even begin to describe this clown. How does he ever get to work?
Gives truth to the slogan...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 1:43pm.
"Don't believe the liberal media!"
Next up, defeat the liberals from POTUS to dog catcher... Then no one needs to listen to their "journalism"...
Forget Mike Paps
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 1:45pm.
I'm wondering if it's time for Arianna Huff-n-Stuff to change her political affiliation again.
You mean back to PASOK?
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 2:23pm.
She was only a "conservative" as long as it suited her Republican husband's political prospects. Once he deserted her and the kids for his male lover, she jerked high and left to return to her natural habitat.
They can't be that stupid or blind...
Submitted by c5then on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 2:03pm.
The denial of liberal leaning, and of anyone be a liberal at all, is definitely on purpose. They are trying to fool the electorate into believing that their views, liberal, socialist, Marxist views, are really centrist.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
It's not left-leaning.
Submitted by dave_worrell on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 2:51pm.
It's tipped all the way over and crashed to the ground.
I can say that again.
Submitted by dave_worrell on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 2:54pm.
Oops.
The only thing you need to know about libs/dems
Submitted by ohio granny on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 3:46pm.
The only thing you need to know about libs/dems is they are LIARS. They lie because they cannot be honest about their agenda. If they told the truth they could never be elected to any political office again, not even dog catcher.
I complained to the folks at
Submitted by Kenny Bunkport on Mon, 05/07/2012 - 5:09pm.
I complained to the folks at AOL about HuffPo's left leaning news coverage. Since...you know...they bought the g*d d**n thing. This is the reply they sent to me.
Thank you for the comment and we appreciate your passion. AOL's news division, The Huffington Post, works very hard to provide news that is beyond left and right and is free of bias in any direction. We want the AOL community to be a place where Americans from all political viewpoints feel welcome, and we hope that you will continue to share yours with our community in the comments sections of articles with which you disagree.
I sent them a reply concerning how HuffPosters often gang up on you to push the conservative "troll" off the forum. I mentioned that the forum is pretty leftwing for a centrist news organization. I also told them to please not insult my intelligence by claiming to be "bias free".
This time no response. I guess they don't have a form letter for when the subscriber calls "Bull$h*t" on the first form letter.