Rachel Maddow, Alan Grayson Lament That More Democrats Don't Share Their Ardor for Abortion

We're told what our chicoes are every single day.

Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 5:21pm.

We're told what our choices are every single day. Most importantly, we're told what we can NOT choose, every single day.

We told that, no, we can't choose to take another person's property because that's called stealing. We told that, no, we can't take another person's life because that's called murder. We told, no, we can't turn onto that street because it's a one way moving in the opposite direction. We're told, no we can't cross that intersection because the light is red and others have the right of way. We're told what we can eat, what we can wear, what we can build, what we can sell, even what we can inherit. We're told what is considered trash, what is considered hazardous, what is considered charity.

We're told what to do, and what not to do, every single day, in more ways that you can remember, let alone ever learn, and, yet, despite all of this, people like yourself say "hay, women have a choice in how they can treat their unborn children! Who are we to interfere?" Does that make any sense to you, at all?

If you can be told which direction you can drive on the street, something that even the "women's choice" movement has no problem with, in Canada as well as America, then you can be told how to treat your unborn child. They both control human behavior, both control individual choice. There is no fundamental difference between the two, none whatsoever.

Think it through, will you? Women can not, should not, kill a child once it has been born, even if they, and they alone, must "care " for that child, right? Well, why should women be able to kill their own children just because they're still within that woman's body? There's no fundamental difference between caring for a child within one's body and caring for a child outside one's own body. None, whatsoever. They're still vulnerable children, and they still need care. So, why should women have a "choice" in the one situation and not the other? It doesn't make any sense, none whatsoever.

• Login to post comments

You don't care: end of argument.

Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 01/25/2012 - 5:42pm.

You don't care: end of argument. You don't care if an innocent life is lost: end of argument. You don't care that a human being has been ripped apart: end of argument. You don't care about that individual life: end of argument. You just don't care: end of argument.

Tell me, mandrake, if you don't care, as you just admitted, then why do you continually ask us why WE care? It's obvious enough that you DO care. WHY else would you continually ask what our objections are? WHY else would you continually remind us what your views are? You care enough to mention how much you "don't care," every chance you get. Why is that, if you truly don't care?

Here's the truth, mandrake. it's not that you don't care , it's that we DO care. We care so much that we comment on it every time it's mentioned. We care so much that we try to convince people like yourself, people who don't care, of why they should care. It's OUR caring that bothers you, and not you lack thereof. You need to ask yourself of why we bother you so much with our caring.

What's the matter, do we make you feel guilty or something? If so, GOOD! YOU SHOULD FEEL GUILTY! You're complacent in the face of murder. Think about it.

• Login to post comments