Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 25, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • Joan Walsh: 'I Didn’t Think it Was Possible to Get Lower Than Andrew Breitbart But His Spawn Have'
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'
  • Reuters's Freeland: 'Anorexic' Americans Think Tax Bite Too Heavy When In Fact It's Dangerously Thin
  • Soledad O'Brien Spins Romney's Words on Bain, Suggests He's Dodging the Questions

PolitiFact Whacks Maddow Again, This Time on Perry Tax Plan

By Jack Coleman | November 03, 2011 | 17:59

Change font size:  A |  A
Jack Coleman's picture

Rachel Maddow's "devotion" to the facts "borders on obsessive" proclaimed an MSNBC promo last winter that could have been produced by The Onion.

A dubious Maddow claim that didn't quite reach that level of obsession has caught the attention of PolitiFact Texas, part of a fact-checking project that originated with the St. Petersburg Times and won the Pulitzer Prize in 2009. (video after page break)

On her show Oct. 25, Maddow said this about Texas Gov. Rick Perry's newly-released tax plan --

So, tanking Rick Perry has now come up with his own version of a flat tax that accomplishes the same goal of huge tax cuts for rich people and big tax hikes for everyone else.

PolitiFact's W. Gardner Selby, a veteran reporter who began covering politics in Texas nearly 30 years ago, wrote yesterday why he rated Maddow's claim "mostly false" on the PolitiFact "Truth-O-Meter" that ranges from "True" to "Pants on Fire."

His thorough evaluation included responses from Maddow spokeswoman Lauren Skowronski, criticism of the Perry plan from a Treasury official in President George H.W. Bush's administration, a "preliminary look" at the plan from an expert at the Tax Policy Center, followed by Selby citing from a more detailed analysis by the center.

In conclusion, Selby wrote --

Nearly all of the nation's wealthiest residents would see tax cuts if Perry's plan became law, in keeping with Maddow's claim. Will they be huge? That's an eye-of-the-beholder question, but some could be sizable by any definition.

Some other Americans -- including 45 percent of residents earning $19,343 to $39,862 -- also would see tax cuts, a projection suggesting that does not support the claim that the plan means big tax increases for everyone but the wealthy. Perry's plan allows every taxpayer to continue under the current system. No one would pay more unless he or she chooses the flat tax against their financial self-interest.

Maddow's statement, leaving the incorrect impression that Perry's tax plan hugely benefits the rich while everyone else pays more, rates Mostly False.

Back in February, in the middle of a contentious battle over public-sector unions in Wisconsin, PolitiFact took Maddow to task for her flat-out false claim that Wisconsin was on track for a budget surplus.

This marks the 15th time that Maddow's claims have crossed PolitiFact's radar. Of these, four were rated false, three as mostly false, three as half true, four as mostly true and one as true. None were deemed deserving of the lowly "pants-on-fire" designation.

Share this

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Rick Perry
  • W. Gardner Selby
  • Rachel Maddow Show
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Comments

I can't believe this

Submitted by dnlchisholm on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 6:58pm.

Today’s actions by President Obama’s Super PAC provided even more proof that Mitt Romney is the republican that scares democrats most. This anti-Romney ad buy is $100,000 and it’s far from the first anti-Romney attack ad President Obama’s Super PAC has produced. The continued paid attacks this early in the election illustrate a level of desperation from the Obama administration that makes sense considering President Obama’s record of accomplishment is so weak.
http://mittromneycentral.com/2011/11/02/president-obamas-super-pac-prior...

  • Login to post comments

You must work for the DNC

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 7:55pm.

CAIN is the one they are witch hunting right now. Obama would love to run against Romney. Romney's policies did Massachusets no good, and that white rich man will make an easy target.

Obama and minions are working hard to get Romney as the candidate.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Huh?

Submitted by Denny Crane on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:54pm.

You come in and post something that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread. 

Is this just a weak attempt to drum up support for Romney? 

Be on the lookout for random acts of journalism from the MSM~h/t Rush

We Are The 53%

  • Login to post comments

It's a miracle

Submitted by Marcus Porcius on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:02pm.

Politifact is well known for bending over backwards to claim Republicans are lying and liberals are telling the truth. I'd love to know what the motive really is for going after Madcow.


"Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions." G.K. Chesterton
www.theconservativereview.com
  • Login to post comments

The Perry flat tax...

Submitted by zenman1661 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:25pm.

would be a big tax break for the wealthy, but unless I am miscalculating his tax, with my below 40,000 yearly salary and bymyself, I would end up paying a $1000.00 more a year.in income tax then the current tax system. I don't feel that the rich should pay more tax then they do now, but I don't like the rich getting a break when I don't

  • Login to post comments

Are you making less than

Submitted by Scuba Dude on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:55pm.

Are you making less than $34,500 a year? Because if you aren't then you are in the 25% bracket.

If you are making less than that you are in the 15% bracket.

From what I understand Perry's plan has a flat 20% tax rate for all income AFTER $12,500.  Plus you get to subtract your mortgage, charity, state & local taxes and capital gains and dividends before you calculate how much you owe.

I would run your numbers again.

I know I would see my taxes go down since I am in the 28% bracket.

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." President Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

You must have missed this

Submitted by Snappy on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 8:57pm.

You must have missed this part of the plan......

"Perry's plan allows every taxpayer to continue under the current system. No one would pay more unless he or she chooses the flat tax against their financial self-interest."

So dont switch the flat tax, keep paying a grand less than you would under flat tax and understand that life isnt meant to be fair, sometimes people get breaks, bailouts and lavish golden parachutes and you and I dont. Thats the way things shake out sometimes. Dont wast your time whining about the breaks they get and spend more time figuring out how to get to where they are.

  • Login to post comments

Figure 40,00 annual salary

Submitted by zenman1661 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 9:46pm.

my tax last year was about 4,235 (straight from IRS chart) with standard deduction. With Perry my tax woiuld be 20% of approx 28.000 minus his deduction which would come out to $5600. I know I don't have to use it but shouldn't a new tax plan help people who aren't rich or married with a lot of chlldren for increased deductions.

  • Login to post comments

Not that I understand your numbers,

Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:00pm.

But the fact remains, you can stay in the old system if you choose to.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Your numbers do not make

Submitted by Scuba Dude on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:31pm.

Your numbers do not make sense. The ones under Perry do but not the one under the current system.

$40,000 annual salary puts you in the 25% bracket. If you look at the link I gave you they say that you would pay $4,750 plus 25% of excess over 34,500. That means your total taxes would be $6,125.

Under Perry's plan you would only be paying $5,500.

All these numbers are with no deductions for mortgage, charity and others permitted under Perry's plan.

I would suggest rerunning your numbers.

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." President Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

People

Submitted by zenman1661 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:18pm.

This is is the 1040EZ form not Rocket Surgery. Take 40,000 gross income, subtract 9300 standard deduction for approx 31,000 taxable income. Go to the tax table chart. Look up 31,000 and the tax is 4200. These numbers are rounded abit but represent reality. The real question becomes do enough people see my point about his flat tax and the answer according to the polls is yes. Despite Cain's current issues, Perry is now 4th behind Gingrich in many polls. He got no bump whatsover from his plan like Cain did with his 9-9-9.

  • Login to post comments

Not sure

Submitted by Denny Crane on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:57pm.

But I think the 20% would also include payroll taxes. So you have to tack on an extra 7.65% of your gross income.

But regardless, you wouldn't pay more. If the flat tax made you pay more, then you would go with the regular way and pay the same.

Be on the lookout for random acts of journalism from the MSM~h/t Rush

We Are The 53%

  • Login to post comments

tax

Submitted by milootoole on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 12:49pm.

I am retired. Paid payroll tax for 47 years--now it looks like I pay payroll tax for others under Perry's flat tax? Do I then not pay that payroll tax portion if I stay with the old method??

Oh yes, and since my social security was paid with after tax dollars, why am I paying tax on that --under either the existing plan or Perry's plan??

  • Login to post comments

Your SS was paid with after

Submitted by Snappy on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 8:27pm.

Your SS was paid with after tax dollars? How do you figure that one?

  • Login to post comments

Sorry this is a few days later

Submitted by Denny Crane on Sun, 11/06/2011 - 1:54am.

I don't know the specifics about his plan, but as far as some of your other points.

SS is an insurance program, not a retirement program. You pay into it at a certain rate over the years, but your benefits are based on something different. Not on what you paid in. Basically the money you paid in is not the money  you get back. 

Since SS has been incorporated into the general fund and budget, the taxes that are paid from other sources also contribute to it, and money collected for SS is used for other programs. 

Be on the lookout for random acts of journalism from the MSM~h/t Rush

We Are The 53%

  • Login to post comments

What are you really concerned about, Zen?

Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:26am.

Judging from what you are writing, I don't think you are really concerned about what you will lose in taxes so much as you are trying to show your desire to have Cain versus Perry, especially with your mentioning of the polls, which are irrelevant.

You even cite a tax table chart which is also irrelevant because Perry's plan hasn't even been put into action and you act as if it were.

So what are you really trying to say, Zen?

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Ooh, so good. Do it again

Submitted by greydawg on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 8:23am.

Your headline says PolitiFact "whacked" Maddow. Isn't that the kind of stuff she really digs? Oooh, feels so good. Do it again. Pleeeze.


  • Login to post comments

I guess Politifacts didn't

Submitted by HelloDare on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 7:49pm.

I guess Politifacts didn't check this bit of hard-hitting reporting:

Maddow Claim About Wisconsin Towns Named Union Looks Decidedly Dubious

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2011/07/25/maddow-claim-about-...

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Gwen Moore, she of the bad
    5 min 57 sec ago
  • Joan (crap/face)Walsh
    15 min 50 sec ago
  • The media couldn't care less
    20 min 46 sec ago
  • Bashir Wiki
    27 min 18 sec ago
  • But just remember........
    36 min 39 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
  • GOP Rep. Saying Obama 'Not An American' Labeled 'Treasonous' by Ed Schultz
  • NYT's Maureen Dowd Whines on 'Women's Lower Caste' in the Catholic Church
  • Open Thread: How About That Arab Spring?
  • PBS for Obama: USA Today Puts Gushy 'Essay by Ken Burns' on Front Page
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.