Maddow Can't Bear the Horror, the Horror of GOP House Victories in NY, Nevada
The strangest thing happened last night on MSNBC -- its self-proclaimed civics geek Rachel Maddow ignored the results not one but two special elections the day before to fill vacancies in the House.
I know, I know, hard to believe. I mean, every time Maddow does report on elections results -- such as when Democrats win -- she'll segue into her reporting by mock drumming to NBC's bombastic election night music in the background. The woman eats and breathes elections. Can there be much doubt that Maddow camped outside her polling place the night before she first cast a vote to avoid lines in the morning? (video after page break)
Inexplicably enough, not a word from Maddow on her show Wednesday night about Republican Mark Amodei beating Democrat Kate Marshall to win in Nevada -- dog bites man -- nor about Republican Bob Turner defeating Democrat David Weprin to win in NY's 9th -- man bites dog. The New York district used to be represented by erstwhile frequent Maddow guest and political soulmate Anthony Weiner before he tweeted his way into future editions of Trivial Pursuit.
What makes this all the more strange is that Maddow couldn't wait to report the results back on May 25 after Democrat Kathy Hochul won a special election in NY's 26th. In fact, Hochul was Maddow's first guest that night, appearing less than a minute after the show began.
Two months later, on July 13, Maddow again dutifully reported on the results of a special election in the House, this time to fill a vacancy in California's 36th District. "Over the past twelve years as the blog Smart Politics notes today," Maddow told viewers, "there have been 192 elections in which the Republican Party has tried to take a California congressional seat out of the hands of the Democrats, 192 straight elections. Of those 192 elections, Democrats in California have won all 192 of them. Over that same period, seven of California's congressional seats that were Republican have gone to the Democrats. California in terms of federal office is very, very deep blue."
And what a shock, California is also in very, very deep doo doo, due largely to a breadth of political diversity unseen since the Politburo.
What did Maddow focus on last night instead of those bellwether special elections? She interviewed Harvard professor, author and professional scold Elizabeth Warren about her challenge to GOP Senator Scott Brown. Then she chatted with former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell about Republicans pushing a plan to apportion electoral votes in the state by congressional district. Following that Maddow spoke with JournoList refugee Spencer Ackerman on alleged anti-Muslim bias in FBI and police training.
Then came the week-old news of a neo-Nazi being sentenced in Washington state for an attempted bombing along the Martin Luther King parade route in Spokane last January, and the tale of two Kentucky brothers creating the website "Shermageddon" -- a play on the expected traffic nightmare of "Carmageddon" in California two months ago -- after the Sherman Minton Bridge linking Kentucky and Indiana was closed due to structural damage.
Not a one of these stories -- not one -- was more newsworthy that what happened in those special elections. I'm sure Maddow will get around to reporting about them eventually. It's just a matter of whether she'll blame the results on racism, sexism, homophobia, or all of the above.
- Jack Coleman's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Another liberal with a serious cognitive deficit.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:03pm.
She thinks that Republicans don't exist because she personally doesn't know any.
Of course, Republicans have a natural aversion to witless liberal shills, so no Republican would want to know her.
Nothing, I repeat, nothing
Submitted by djwolf12 on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:09pm.
will EVER compare to the night where Maddow had to announce that Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's old seat. The look she had on her smug face was like someone peed in her cheerios. Now that was priceless!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jBsYO44jWs
I remember it well
Submitted by Jack Coleman on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:22pm.
That rarity of a night when I enjoyed watching Maddow
Geez...you were right.
Submitted by NeoKong on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:27pm.
That was pretty good.
She was so upset she was stuttering.
Don't forget Maddow hosted
Submitted by kg on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 10:28am.
Don't forget Maddow hosted "Election Night" coverage on the WI Republican re-call elections with the same fanfare as a national Presidential election. Watching her and Schultz sulk was priceless.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
She turns a blind eye to any bad news for dems
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:12pm.
I hate people like that. They think admitting anything bad about your party means that you are somehow giving strength to your rivals
Report the news good or bad, that is what good journalism used to be
She doesn't report ANY bad democrat news
Submitted by djwolf12 on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:18pm.
because she is totally in the tank for the Democrats. Remember when Michelle Bachmann got reelected and her supporter held up the "Tingles" sign for everyone at the MSNBC studio to see? Maddow got so angry at that and said that the reason why that person did it was to say that MSNBC was in the tank for the Democrats.
Madcow
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:22pm.
Yo Madcow: Ignoring something will not make it go away!
adam
Submitted by jimtrees on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 9:28pm.
She swallowed hard and her adams apple was moving 4 inches either way.
yo rachael
Submitted by D'saredumbpeople on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 10:37pm.
try a telepromter butch
Just her
Submitted by Bob K on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 11:04pm.
own special way of denying reality.
Or...
Submitted by Chris Norman on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 12:19am.
I suppose it's better, in a way, than subjecting her unfortunate viewers to watching her with her fingers in her ears and loudly singing "la-la-la-la-la...". On the other hand, I would love to see that. :)
It Is Possible The Republicans Will Take The Jewish Vote.
Submitted by Avitar on Thu, 09/15/2011 - 11:58pm.
In Maddow's world that can't happen. I suggest her show obtain a copy of "Erik the Viking" It might help them realize that the world they see is not there for the rest of the human race.
Avitar......Sadly, the Jewish vote, like the Black vote, will
Submitted by Rush Fan on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 12:46am.
remain in the hands of the Democrats. In 2009 Norman Podhoretz, noted in a Wall Street Journal an article titled Why Are Jews Liberals? that Barack Obama captured 78% of the Jewish vote. and
For additional insight into the liberal leanings of American Jews, may I suggest you read conservative talk radio host and author Dennis Prager's article titled Explaining Jews, Part V: Why Are Jews Liberal?
Also Barry Rubin's article Why are Jews Liberal? Here's One Take.
...
Submitted by BTW Biological ... on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 2:38am.
Maybe she didn't report on it because they claim that Weiner's district was about to be faded out anyway. Remember even Pelosi said that it was "just a local election by 2 known people".
Still, I remember that when Weiner was still seated that district was important or maybe it was just him. He was the liberal bulldog. Yet when the scandal broke, the district was suddenly unimportant. Plus if it was such an insignificant district why'd they care If Weiner stayed or went?
But WHY is this only considered an election by 2 known
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 9:06pm.
people by Stretch Pelosi when the Republican (who won) is a Roman Catholic and the Democrat (who lost) is Jewish in a predominantly Jewish district???????
Randy Madcow Too Busy Trying To Get Her Androgyny Right?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 9:43am.
Do you screeching, racist Conservatives have any idea just how long it takes for Randy to get his hair just right?
Hours and hours.
First, he has to try to strike that perfect balance of man and woman. That way he can appeal to both lesbians and hetero libutards. Then, if there is any time left, Randy has to jiggle Comrade Downgrade's nads while she hums show tunes in his big, floppy ears.
That said, there just isn't enough time to report on anything that doesn't fit her twisted, psychotic narrative.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
So will it be Maddow, Matthews, or Schultz that will be...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 1:03pm.
...the first to dive head-first out the nearest window on election night?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
That will definitely be Must See TV!
Submitted by djwolf12 on Fri, 09/16/2011 - 9:10pm.
I envision this being the scene inside the MSNBC studios that night and I will laugh.....and laugh.....and laugh......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyd5MhFy36A&feature=related