Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun

Did Rachel Maddow Mock FBI Tactics That Led to Arrest of Whitey Bulger?

By Jack Coleman | June 23, 2011 | 20:11

A  A

Sure looks like it, but decide for yourself.

Whitey Bulger is the alleged crime boss arrested Wednesday by FBI agents in Santa Monica, Calif., with his longtime girlfriend Catherine Greig.

The basis for the Jack Nicholson character in "The Departed," Bulger is suspected of involvement in at least 19 murders and myriad other crimes. Until last month, only one other figure on the FBI's most wanted list was considered more dangerous -- Osama bin Laden.  

On her MSNBC show Monday, Maddow described new FBI tactics in the agency's 16-year manhunt to bring the notorious fugitive to justice (video clip after page break) --

MADDOW: The FBI held a press conference in Boston today to announce details of their current strategy to find Whitey by finding Catherine. And they think they will find Catherine with a little help from the ladies of "The View." Seriously, if watch "The View" or Ellen DeGeneres or daytime soap operas, you may soon also see this.

FBI COMMERCIAL: This is an announcement by the FBI. Have you seen this woman? The FBI is offering $100,000 for tips leading to Catherine Greig's whereabouts. These photos are from the early 1990s. Greig has had plastic surgeries. She is wanted for harboring James "Whitey" Bulger, a fugitive on the FBI's 10 most wanted list.

MADDOW: The theory behind this FBI ad is that the women who watch Ellen or Dr. Oz or "The View" or Regis and Kelly might also themselves spend time at beauty parlors or getting a little work done. And that is the kind of place where you might run into Whitey Bulger's fugitive girlfriend.

A clip was shown of an FBI spokesman at the press conference saying Greig, a former dental hygienist, probably has "well-kept teeth," frequents beauty salons, and has undergone "multiple" plastic surgeries. (Link here for the Maddow segment in its entirety)

MADDOW: Now, I'm not kidding here, but a year ago the FBI started putting ads in the newsletter of the American Dental Association and in Plastic Surgery News, published by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. The ads say, 'Have You Treated This Woman?' They then list all the procedures she's had over the years, from breast implants to something called lower blepharoplasty. From the dental ad and the plastic surgery ad they say they got over 100 tips. And so now they are doubling down. Ladies who watch Dr. Oz, if you have ever sat down for a mani pedi next to Whitey Bulger's girlfriend anywhere, that's $100,000 for you if your tip means they find Catherine Greig. And there's $2 million for you if your tip leads through her to Whitey Bulger himself.

Oh to have been a fly on the wall at the FBI when they decided they were going to go with this strategy.  (Mimics FBI agents in animated discussion) All right, I'll call the plastic surgeon trade publications and you (pause) ... Do you think we can get on 'The View'?!

Yes, Maddow finished the segment by describing it as "Best new thing in the world today," the title of a recurring feature on her show. But given how she seemed to mock the FBI strategy, one could just as easily interpret the "best new thing" shtick as ironic -- as with so much else that liberals say, the better to have it both ways.

Two days after Maddow had her fun with this, Bulger and Greig were taken into custody. Here's how it was reported at the Wall Street Journal --

The arrests came as a "direct result" of an FBI publicity blitz that began Monday, Richard DesLauriers, special agent in charge of the investigation for the FBI, said in a news conference Thursday in Boston.

Unfortunately for Bulger, Maddow wasn't working at the FBI when the publicity blitz was conceived and hence wasn't in a position to kill it through disparagement. 

Not surprisingly, Maddow made no mention of the fact that Bulger is the brother of William "Billy" Bulger, a well-known Democrat who ran the Massachusetts state senate for nearly two decades. 

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • Crime
  • Billy Bulger
  • Catherine Greig
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Whitey Bulger
  • Rachel Maddow Show
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Mock?

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:39pm.

Maybe. It's hard to see through the egg on her face.

  • Login to post comments

2 words...dumb [edited]!

Submitted by fatboy on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:59pm.

2 words...dumb [edited]!

  • Login to post comments

Nice

Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:07pm.

Very classy.

  • Login to post comments

ADMINS

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:15pm.

Please remove this post! What do you think this is fatboy, HuffPo?

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Once again it needs to be pointed out that since HuffPo

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:27pm.

comments became fully moderated a couple of years ago, a vulgarity such as that one would never be permitted to be posted, or if it somehow initially slipped past the mods would be taken down in short order.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:08pm.

Sorry, knee jerk reaction on my part. I'm ticked off that it's been there as long as it has.

NB is very disappointing lately.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Help me out, Jer.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:14am.

What was "the word?"  I missed it.

Tell me what it rhymes with.  My mind has a way of filling in the blanks.

Thanks.

As far as that guy Maddow's comments:  Ah, the plan worked, stud (I can use that word, right?)!

As usual he was thinking like a liberal.  It's not results that count.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

Grease. Or bird, depending on

Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:10pm.

Grease.

Or bird, depending on your view.

  • Login to post comments

Newsbubba...

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:48pm.

Similar to "twit"...rhymes with "what".

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Tanks, man.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 8:07pm.

Got it.  That's tw ... I mean, WHAT I thought!

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

It aint the Ladies fault

Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:29pm.

Your FAT

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

I still don't see how this

Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:23pm.

I still don't see how this turned into this.

Damned sad, if you ask me.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Good question.

Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:49pm.

Since the FDA is going to require that cigarette packs carry warnings in the form of large pictures of diseased lungs and the like, I think they should required liberal books and publications to carry those before/after pictures of Maddow.

"Liberalism may have a profoundly deleterious effect on women's health."

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

  • Login to post comments

She did a Chaz Bono without getting...

Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:25am.

The addadictome surgery...... Proving that Randy really is a Gutless PIG!

Ohhh and Fatboy...... that comment is WAY outta line you should remove it yourself!

Liberals: No Morals, No Standards, NO Problem!
  • Login to post comments

I guess if Maddow were to

Submitted by ant on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:49pm.

I guess if Maddow were to lose her dog she would immediately drive to another State to start looking. I mean, why concentrate on the usual haunts?

  • Login to post comments

Should the FBI be mocked, or

Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:53pm.

Should the FBI be mocked, or should the public who feasts on the daytime-pap, bread and circuses be mocked?

  • Login to post comments

Ignore the Lying Satchmo troll.

Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:41pm.

This is a troll that claims to be against incest and abortion yet advocates the complete removal of all laws against abortion and incest.

Ignore this troll until he finally spouts off with the troll invective that gets all trolls banned.

  • Login to post comments

Could be she's mocking the

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:18pm.

Could be she's mocking the FBI, but it could also be that she's laughing at how silly it sounds on the surface. Seriously, it sounds goofy to solicit the people who watch The View.

  • Login to post comments

That it does ...

Submitted by Jack Coleman on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:36pm.

... unless Bulger gets arrested two days later. Then it just might look more like a stroke of genius, no?

  • Login to post comments

Yup, looks like some good ol'

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:46pm.

Yup, looks like some good ol' fashioned thinking outside the box.

  • Login to post comments

balboa

Submitted by well99 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:45pm.

I think we could actually use some more thinking out of the box.People tend to get in ruts at their jobs.New ideas can bring real change for the good.George Washington Carver proved that.

  • Login to post comments

Actually I think we call that........

Submitted by ZmanCav on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:46am.

..............PROFILING!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And it works.

  • Login to post comments

"Maddow" and "logic" are mutually exclusive terms.

Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:09pm.

For someone with a PhD in political science (a vacuous area of academic pursuit by any definition), she is remarkably impaired in historical knowledge about basic research techniques in history. If she (or more properly, her ghost writers) had bothered to check out historical accounts of how the FBI operates, she would have seen that the FBI communicates with the public in a wide variety of different ways to ascertain the locations of fugitives of all types. Has the dimbulb ever been to a post office to see the "wanted" posters? Probably not.

Will ignorance of history + poor research + political hack commentary = Rachel Maddow. Who knew the "new math" was so clear?

  • Login to post comments

1) Yes, Rachel "The Snarl"

Submitted by Van Halen on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:40pm.

1) Yes, Rachel "The Snarl" Maddow DID mock the FBI tactics that lead to Whitey's arrest.
2) Yes, Rachel was WRONG AGAIN, like she is in some major way at least once a week.
3) Yes, Rachel's ratings are way down there in the bottom of the news show races.

  • Login to post comments

Rachel, Rachel, Rachel........

Submitted by gailannr on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 12:00am.

You are soooooo......STOOPED. But then if I think you are STOOPED, you should see your two BFF, Jon Stewart and Bill Maher, they walk like this (((((((((!

  • Login to post comments

The last thing in the world

Submitted by Bob K on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 12:37am.

I am is a Maddow fan. That being said, the FBI taking 15 years to find an old man who ends up being discovered "hiding" in plain sight does not make me think they are deserving of a pat on the back and a atta boy. If anything, it reveals how inept and pretty much worthless they really are.

Bob K
  • Login to post comments

Uh, Bob?

Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:22am.

Of course "I am is a..." does not give us great confidence in your analysis there big guy.

  • Login to post comments

I think you missed the

Submitted by Satchmo on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:48pm.

I think you missed the beginning of the sentence, which is in the subject line: "The last thing in the world". So the complete sentence is, "The last thing in the world I am is a Maddow fan."

  • Login to post comments

Shut up Paultard.

Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:35pm.

You don't talk to me ever. You have been shown and taught time and time again how to properly fill out the subject line so we don't have to read the first part of your first sentence twice. You respect no one here and you advocate the death of babies.

So take a hike Paultard.

  • Login to post comments

You certainly have a bizarre

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:29am.

You certainly have a bizarre fixation on the subject line. Odd that you would've made the mistake you did previously given this.

The subject line doesn't really work in this format since each entire post is visible. Maybe if posts were collapsed and only the subject line appeared, then it would make sense and be of some use.

And I'll decide when or if I want to talk to you, not you; but you already know that.

  • Login to post comments

We having a conversation here Paultard?

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 12:57am.

Pack sand. ...but you already know that.  Go groom your daughter to have sex with you once she reaches the legal age. That is what you want. to make legal Circus Freak Show

  • Login to post comments

I think that technically, a

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:12am.

I think that technically, a conversation is spoken. So, no. It was a good question, though.

  • Login to post comments

That also means

Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:18am.

Technically of course, that you will NOT decide if you will "talk" to the Vet as you had previously written.

  • Login to post comments

Correct. Although if you'll

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:28am.

Correct. Although if you'll notice, he is the one who first used the word and I responded, continuing his usage. Parallelism, you know.

  • Login to post comments

It WAS

Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:31am.

Until you decided to go off the tracks and get nit picky with word choice.

  • Login to post comments

I'm sorry, but it was what?

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:40am.

I'm sorry, but it was what?

  • Login to post comments

Jeebus Pervmo

Submitted by sentry_99 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 2:03am.

Parrallelism? Off the "tracks"? Nevermind.

  • Login to post comments

You go Paultard. Put on your Stupid with full regalia.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:37am.

We never had a conversation. None of my posts followed what you wanted to whine about.

Now shut up and wave your  Stupid Flag.

  • Login to post comments

The Paultard Satchmo puts on his Stupid AGAIN.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:32am.

conversation: a (1) : oral exchange of sentiments, observations, opinions, or ideas

                             (2) : an instance of such exchange : talk <a quiet conversation>

                         b : an informal discussion of an issue by representatives of governments, institutions, or groups

                         c : an exchange similar to conversation

Examples of CONVERSATION

We had a conversation by e-mail.

 

 

What is it like Retard? Being so stupid it is physically painful?
 

  • Login to post comments

Isn't it funny when you come

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:32am.

Isn't it funny when you come across a definition and the word you want defined is used in the definition? In this case, it reads like this: conversation - an exchange similar to conversation. It's begging the question! Isn't that crazy?

  • Login to post comments

→ It depends

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:36am.

Depends on what your definition of "isn't" is.

  • Login to post comments

Take it up with Merriam and/or Webster Paultard.

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:41am.

Yeah Paultard. I changed the definition just to make you look the fool. You go Paultard. Put on that Stupid and start up the marching band, A parade of Stupid has just broken out on your front lawn.

  • Login to post comments

Oh Paultard. Yo Paultard. Here paullytardy......

Submitted by The Vet on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 3:57am.

You hyperfocused on the one definition of the word Paultard. Even after I give you the definition pounding out your stupid --- I think that technically, a conversation is spoken.--- You, the Retard, The Ron Paul Retard, the Paultard focus and whine about the the one definition when another one made the match as well.

This one defined it's use as well Paultard ---

2a (1) : oral exchange of sentiments, observations, opinions, or ideas (2) : an instance of such exchange : talk <a quiet conversation>

Talk, Paultard, Talk. Not using the same word in the definition Retard Paul Tard. If you had bothered to follow the link, Paultard, you would have been able to click on talk and see this ---

Talk 3: pointless or fruitless discussion : verbiage 
        4: a formal discussion, negotiation, or exchange of views —often used in plural

 

Yep, Paultard, no matter which way it comes down, English confuses you horribly, don't it?

  • Login to post comments

Better a fixation on subject lines than---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:09am.

a fixation that makes a female relative the subject of a personal sexual campaign; and then being a lying coward who doesn't even have the balls to stand up and admit to having evinced that very thought.

Triple "P" award goes to SatchelMouth: Pusillanimous, Prevaricator, Pervert.

MD 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

What on earth are you talking

Submitted by Satchmo on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:14am.

What on earth are you talking about?

  • Login to post comments

Just like I said, Satchmo Pervmo Incestmo---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 1:42am.

Pretend ignorance.

No one will ever call you on "consensual" sex comments about sex between a man and his daughter; as in "What if it was consensual?" (h/t Satchmo)

If you don't own up to it, it never happened.

Right?

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

I think her feelings are hurt

Submitted by Injest on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 12:49am.

And they think they will find Catherine with a little help from the ladies of "The View." Seriously, if watch "The View" or Ellen DeGeneres or daytime soap operas, you may soon also see this.

I think her feelings are hurt.
They also ran the ads on FNC, specifically during BOR show, and it worked.

The FBI didn't think it was worth any money to buy time on MSNBC and they were right.

  • Login to post comments

Give'em a break, Injest

Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:20am.

One of those 24 people watching may have been the ladies hair stylist!

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

Rachel is just doing what she

Submitted by Chris Norman on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:20am.

Rachel is just doing what she does best, sneering, mockery, snarkiness, condescension - to appear as somehow superior to us "dumb schmucks"...

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Mocking the FBI?

Submitted by Mike009 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:04am.

I'm no fan of Rachel's but after looking at the clip, I'd say it's a stretch to say she was mocking the FBI.

  • Login to post comments

ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!

Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:23am.

OF COURSE Randy madcow was mocking the FBI! You see in a way I see the point. In MY opinion its actually where they should have been looking the whole time!!!!! That said if I was going to make fun of the FBI that would have been my reason to mock them! Let us not forget the FBI does alot of good things and just because Randy doesn't like them going after Criminals (s/he would rather they go after those that have Legal guns and protest abortion) doesn't mean they aren't doing a good job!

Liberals: No Morals, No Standards, NO Problem!
  • Login to post comments

Meanwhile...back on the ranch

Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:24am.

Holder's DOJ and its subsidiary, the ATF, were running roughshod over principles of law enforcement, by not only allowing guns to be sold to known "straw men", but then to cease surveillance and allow these same guns to fall into the hands of known criminals and the Mexican drug cartels. A.K.A. Operation Fast & Furious....we have a forum going here with some great links about this soon-to-be (and naturally, therefore, uncovered by the MsM) scandal that may rid of us this scourge Obama before November 2012.

Gee Rachel, where's your mocking indignation for Obama's band of gunrunners? Eh? Crickets Chirp.

In an odd coincidence, we rented the movie "The Departed" Wednesday....great flick.  I am not a DiCaprio fan, but the acting (and what a list of actors)....was amazing.  A plus.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Love that movie, Blonde

Submitted by Jack Coleman on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:01pm.

... and I want to see it again in wake of Whitey's arrest. (SPOILER ALERT) Devastating when DiCaprio gets it in the end.

  • Login to post comments

Last five minutes of that

Submitted by balboa on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:06pm.

Last five minutes of that movie... wild.

  • Login to post comments

ChickaBOOMer: O'Donnell's Bulge Over Bulger

Submitted by StewartIII on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:59am.

O'Donnell's Bulge Over Bulger
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2011/06/odonnells-bulge-over-bulger.html

  • Login to post comments

Hey...

Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 12:14pm.

I am a man, and Rachel makes me hot.

Do I have issues?

Please vote "Yes" or "No".

Thank you.

  • Login to post comments

Yes.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:04pm.

If Mr. Maddow makes you hot, you should really consider becoming gay.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

No

Submitted by shawn. on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:08pm.

A dress and high heels and I could see it. To each their own :-)

  • Login to post comments

Yes

Submitted by well99 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:20pm.

So does shawn but we already knew that..)

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use