Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons

Was Ed Schultz Slamming 'No Labels' Group - or Joe Scarborough?

By Jack Coleman | December 21, 2010 | 22:39

A  A

Sounded to me like Scarborough was the actual target. Perhaps you'll agree.

Here's the easily angered Ed Schultz on his radio show yesterday, lashing out at the so-called "No Labels" organization whose most prominent members include fellow MSNBC pundit and former Republican congressman Joe Scarborough (audio here) --

By the way, I've gotta spend some time, I'm gonna try to do this on the tube as well, spend some time talking about these people who just want to get along. I don't know, what's the name of this group that's out there? You know, the middle of the roaders or the fence riders, I don't know what that, the centrists or whatever. You know what this is? This is some political hacks out there trying to reinvent themselves. By the way, what is the middle of the road position on don't ask, don't tell? What's the middle of the road position on whether Republicans want to get rid of Social Security or not? How about Afghanistan, where's your middle of the road position on that, are we in or we out, what are we doing? I mean, oh, the No Labels! You see, they're so insignificant I can't even remember who they are, but they're gonna, they're gonna get a lot of media attention because there are some media folks out there who have locked onto this, as if they're holier than thou and they know so much more than everybody else!

More of the same from Schultz during Monday's radio show (audio) --

You know, it's easy for somebody who's got a bankroll, who's got enough money to choke a corral of horses, to sit there and say, hey, we gotta get along. Let me tell you something. It infuriates me. This country was founded on people who believed in principle. No middle of the roader advanced anything in this country. Nothing! It was people who believed that there was a certain direction that this country had to take if it was going to survive. You know, no middle of the roaders passed civil rights legislation! No middle of the roader won any war! No middle of the roader did anything for public education! And I think, it's almost as if these folks are trying to advance their own agenda with visibility, that they come up and say, well, we just have to get along. I can't get along with Jon Kyl. And I'm not going to act like I have to be ashamed for saying that. You do not see Republican senators on "The Ed Show" on MSNBC. I don't want 'em! I don't want 'em and I'm getting sick of righties on my show anyway! I'm getting sick, we might have 2011, there might not be any freakin' righties, I'm sick of 'em!

The aversion is assuredly mutual and appears shared by someone Schultz presumably counts as an ally -- AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka (audio) --

If you'll check, the labor leaders had lunch with the president on Friday. Some of 'em didn't even show up. Richard Trumka, who apparently won't talk to me, we've requested him on this show, we've requested him on the TV show, he's, no, he don't want to face me for some, either that or he doesn't like me. The president of the AFL-CIO is always conveniently busy when we request him for "The Ed Show." Why? Because I'm gonna stir it up on labor! I'm gonna ask him, where do you stand now?!

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Ed Schultz
  • Richard Trumka
  • Radio
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Sounds to me like Schultzie

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:53pm.

Sounds to me like Schultzie is a real "with me or against me" kinda guy.  And I'm pretty sure he's pissed off at anyone who isn't an extremist.  

Oh, and I wish you'd turn the treble down (or at least give us a warning) when linking to one of his rants.  My ears hurt.  

  • Login to post comments

Your ears probably hurt---

Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:55pm.

from all the tender loving things said about you here at NB's.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Nothing brings out the

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:57pm.

Nothing brings out the holiday cheer like a difference of opinion.

And some other stuff.  

  • Login to post comments

Most people can live with a difference of---

Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:03pm.

opinion.

It's that other stuff that causes problems.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Thanks for advice about treble

Submitted by Jack Coleman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:06pm.

The first clip was recorded twice, lower the second time, just for that reason. Alas, Schultz is painful to the ears at nearly any volume.
 
  • Login to post comments

Wow!  What great service! ;

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:09pm.

Wow!  What great service! ; )

He did seem especially screechy, and I wouldn't normally listen to him except for that my eyes are extremely tired and I didn't want to read it.  

  • Login to post comments

We aim to please :0

Submitted by Jack Coleman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:27pm.

Unpalatable as recording Schultz is, transcribing his quotes is worse. The man can barely string together consecutive coherent sentences.

  • Login to post comments

I commend you for your work.

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 1:26pm.

I commend you for your work.  And I'll keep an ear out for those screechy Ed tapes, you know - just in case.  ; )

  • Login to post comments

History Lesson for Ed...

Submitted by Flying_Flynn on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:17pm.

"You know, no middle of the roaders passed civil rights legislation!"


That's correct Ed...it was REPUBLICANS that did!

Flying Flynn
  • Login to post comments

Well, other than the fact

Submitted by Jer on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:55pm.

Well, other than the fact that Democrats introduced the 1960's civil rights legislation and more Democrats than Republicans voted in favor of it, I guess the Republicans were really the ones who passed it.  Sort of like it was actually the Democrats who blocked the Dream Act--even though 52 Dems supported it, while only 3 Republicans.voted for it.  It's the weird NewsBusters math.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

so

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:02am.

You are equating *failure* to pass to actually passing legislation? What kind of math is that?

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

amy...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:25am.

I don't believe I mentioned "failure" to pass anywhere in my post.  So the question of math is not relevant to that issue.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer---

Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:34am.

I thought cajun had you on a numbers "time-out".   :o)

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by well99 on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:49am.

Well a higher percentage of Repubs voted for it.Just a note:You do remember Eisenhower and the 1957 Civil Rights bill?

  • Login to post comments

Not to mention several Civil

Submitted by Krillinfan on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:14am.

Not to mention several Civil Rights laws passed by the Republicans back in the late 1800's also repealed by Democrats.

"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress."

-John Adams

  • Login to post comments

I know, well99

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:52am.

I know, well99...

Eisenhower had an impressive record on civil rights, and the Republicans were definitely instrumental in the enactment of the 60's legislation.  I do have a problem with the contention it was the Republicans who passed it. 

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Wouldn't have passed---

Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 4:01am.

without 'em.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

This country was founded on people who believed in principle. R

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:18pm.

Yes, it was. Now it's an everchanging playing field where the left keeps moving the damn ball!

 

Ed is pissed because as lame as No Labels is, they *are* a sign that we won't put up with the left determining the starting line anymore - stay mad Ed, it's gonna be a BUMPY ride!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Middle of the Road?

Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:32pm.

Gee, Ed, down in my neck of the woods you would have to be a middle-of-the-roader because your fat mouth and fat rear would hog both lanes.

  • Login to post comments

Hmm. Special Ed slamming Morning Jerk

Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:38pm.

LOL - Only in his dreams, I would suspect.

Dayem, I didn't just post that, did I?

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Dave, Yes, you did.  And

Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:58pm.

Dave,

Yes, you did.  And now I've replied to it, it's locked in, baby. :)

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

"...lthe so-called "No

Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:57pm.

"...lthe so-called "No Labels" organization whose most prominent members include ... Joe Scarborough"                                                                                                                                                                         Wow, if their most prominent members include Joe Scarborough, I predict this "No Labels" group will die a quick and fairly anonymous death...                                                                                                                                                                                Is it my imagination or did the screen just change, reinstalling the old feature - number of comments and new comments? If so, welccome back old friends!  We've missed you!                                                                                                                                                                                  Update: Damn, now it's back to just "read more". Was that my imagination?                                                    



 
Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

and fox is the fake news channel

Submitted by michiganruth on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:24am.

"You do not see Republican senators on "The Ed Show" on MSNBC. I don't want 'em! I don't want 'em and I'm getting sick of righties on my show anyway!"

so this is an example of REAL journalism on MSNBC, but the Fox anchors (including the excellent Bret Baier) are partisan jerks and Fox is an arm of the GOP?

yeah right. tell me another one, Eddy...

  • Login to post comments

Careful there

Submitted by dirtydan64 on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 1:05am.

Ed you might find yourself sitting next to Rush in front of the FCC using that kind of language, Easy does it Special Eddy !!!

  • Login to post comments

Sounds to me like pretty soon

Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 2:27am.

Sounds to me like pretty soon it'll just be Ed and a mirror.

Barack_Must_Go.....

  • Login to post comments

Behind the Scenes at MSNBC

Submitted by Texndoc on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 8:47am.

You don't think Joe Scarborough is talking to the bosses about trying to make it a "serious" political network (which means Joe's show of course) and getting rid of the circus acts like Ed Shultz?  Why do you think on election night you had Olbie, Maddow, and Ed Shultz but no Scarborough?  And the next morning on Scarborough you had Brokaw but he didn't appear at all with the kooks the night before?  

There are definitely camps at MSNBC.  Olbie likes Maddow who likes Olbie, nobody likes Scarborough, Tom Brokaw would rather die than appearing ever with Olbie or Ed Shultz......

  • Login to post comments

covering his ass

Submitted by texanbychoice on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 10:35am.

  I love the way Big Ed covers his big Fat Ass. He cant's get anyone from the right to appear on his show, so he declares that he may go through 2011 without a single "rightie". He doesn't want them, he's sick of them.

 

 

 Courage is not the absence of fear, it's the mastery of it.
  • Login to post comments

Worse than Olby

Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 10:44am.

So is this fat hateful M F saying that it is OK to be totally partisan and ideological and to never work with the other side?

Then why did he complain when REPUBLICANS didn't like what the Socialists/Liberals were doing the passed two years?

Oops, facts and this fat M F don't get along.   

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use