Was Ed Schultz Slamming 'No Labels' Group - or Joe Scarborough?
Sounded to me like Scarborough was the actual target. Perhaps you'll agree.
Here's the easily angered Ed Schultz on his radio show yesterday, lashing out at the so-called "No Labels" organization whose most prominent members include fellow MSNBC pundit and former Republican congressman Joe Scarborough (audio here) --
By the way, I've gotta spend some time, I'm gonna try to do this on the tube as well, spend some time talking about these people who just want to get along. I don't know, what's the name of this group that's out there? You know, the middle of the roaders or the fence riders, I don't know what that, the centrists or whatever. You know what this is? This is some political hacks out there trying to reinvent themselves. By the way, what is the middle of the road position on don't ask, don't tell? What's the middle of the road position on whether Republicans want to get rid of Social Security or not? How about Afghanistan, where's your middle of the road position on that, are we in or we out, what are we doing? I mean, oh, the No Labels! You see, they're so insignificant I can't even remember who they are, but they're gonna, they're gonna get a lot of media attention because there are some media folks out there who have locked onto this, as if they're holier than thou and they know so much more than everybody else!
More of the same from Schultz during Monday's radio show (audio) --
You know, it's easy for somebody who's got a bankroll, who's got enough money to choke a corral of horses, to sit there and say, hey, we gotta get along. Let me tell you something. It infuriates me. This country was founded on people who believed in principle. No middle of the roader advanced anything in this country. Nothing! It was people who believed that there was a certain direction that this country had to take if it was going to survive. You know, no middle of the roaders passed civil rights legislation! No middle of the roader won any war! No middle of the roader did anything for public education! And I think, it's almost as if these folks are trying to advance their own agenda with visibility, that they come up and say, well, we just have to get along. I can't get along with Jon Kyl. And I'm not going to act like I have to be ashamed for saying that. You do not see Republican senators on "The Ed Show" on MSNBC. I don't want 'em! I don't want 'em and I'm getting sick of righties on my show anyway! I'm getting sick, we might have 2011, there might not be any freakin' righties, I'm sick of 'em!
The aversion is assuredly mutual and appears shared by someone Schultz presumably counts as an ally -- AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka (audio) --
If you'll check, the labor leaders had lunch with the president on Friday. Some of 'em didn't even show up. Richard Trumka, who apparently won't talk to me, we've requested him on this show, we've requested him on the TV show, he's, no, he don't want to face me for some, either that or he doesn't like me. The president of the AFL-CIO is always conveniently busy when we request him for "The Ed Show." Why? Because I'm gonna stir it up on labor! I'm gonna ask him, where do you stand now?!
- Jack Coleman's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Sounds to me like Schultzie
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:53pm.
Sounds to me like Schultzie is a real "with me or against me" kinda guy. And I'm pretty sure he's pissed off at anyone who isn't an extremist.
Oh, and I wish you'd turn the treble down (or at least give us a warning) when linking to one of his rants. My ears hurt.
Your ears probably hurt---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:55pm.
from all the tender loving things said about you here at NB's.
MD
Nothing brings out the
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 10:57pm.
Nothing brings out the holiday cheer like a difference of opinion.
And some other stuff.
Most people can live with a difference of---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:03pm.
opinion.
It's that other stuff that causes problems.
MD
Thanks for advice about treble
Submitted by Jack Coleman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:06pm.
The first clip was recorded twice, lower the second time, just for that reason. Alas, Schultz is painful to the ears at nearly any volume.Wow! What great service! ;
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:09pm.
Wow! What great service! ; )
He did seem especially screechy, and I wouldn't normally listen to him except for that my eyes are extremely tired and I didn't want to read it.
We aim to please :0
Submitted by Jack Coleman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:27pm.
Unpalatable as recording Schultz is, transcribing his quotes is worse. The man can barely string together consecutive coherent sentences.
I commend you for your work.
Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 1:26pm.
I commend you for your work. And I'll keep an ear out for those screechy Ed tapes, you know - just in case. ; )
History Lesson for Ed...
Submitted by Flying_Flynn on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:17pm.
"You know, no middle of the roaders passed civil rights legislation!"
That's correct Ed...it was REPUBLICANS that did!
Well, other than the fact
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:55pm.
Well, other than the fact that Democrats introduced the 1960's civil rights legislation and more Democrats than Republicans voted in favor of it, I guess the Republicans were really the ones who passed it. Sort of like it was actually the Democrats who blocked the Dream Act--even though 52 Dems supported it, while only 3 Republicans.voted for it. It's the weird NewsBusters math.
Jer
so
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:02am.
You are equating *failure* to pass to actually passing legislation? What kind of math is that?
Ronald Reagan
amy...
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:25am.
I don't believe I mentioned "failure" to pass anywhere in my post. So the question of math is not relevant to that issue.
Jer
Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:34am.
I thought cajun had you on a numbers "time-out". :o)
MD
Jer
Submitted by well99 on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:49am.
Well a higher percentage of Repubs voted for it.Just a note:You do remember Eisenhower and the 1957 Civil Rights bill?
Not to mention several Civil
Submitted by Krillinfan on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:14am.
Not to mention several Civil Rights laws passed by the Republicans back in the late 1800's also repealed by Democrats.
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress."
-John Adams
I know, well99
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 3:52am.
I know, well99...
Eisenhower had an impressive record on civil rights, and the Republicans were definitely instrumental in the enactment of the 60's legislation. I do have a problem with the contention it was the Republicans who passed it.
Jer
Wouldn't have passed---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 4:01am.
without 'em.
MD
This country was founded on people who believed in principle. R
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:18pm.
Yes, it was. Now it's an everchanging playing field where the left keeps moving the damn ball!
Ed is pissed because as lame as No Labels is, they *are* a sign that we won't put up with the left determining the starting line anymore - stay mad Ed, it's gonna be a BUMPY ride!!!
Ronald Reagan
Middle of the Road?
Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:32pm.
Gee, Ed, down in my neck of the woods you would have to be a middle-of-the-roader because your fat mouth and fat rear would hog both lanes.
Hmm. Special Ed slamming Morning Jerk
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:38pm.
LOL - Only in his dreams, I would suspect.
Dayem, I didn't just post that, did I?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave, Yes, you did. And
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:58pm.
Dave,
Yes, you did. And now I've replied to it, it's locked in, baby. :)
"...lthe so-called "No
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 11:57pm.
"...lthe so-called "No Labels" organization whose most prominent members include ... Joe Scarborough" Wow, if their most prominent members include Joe Scarborough, I predict this "No Labels" group will die a quick and fairly anonymous death... Is it my imagination or did the screen just change, reinstalling the old feature - number of comments and new comments? If so, welccome back old friends! We've missed you! Update: Damn, now it's back to just "read more". Was that my imagination?and fox is the fake news channel
Submitted by michiganruth on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 12:24am.
"You do not see Republican senators on "The Ed Show" on MSNBC. I don't want 'em! I don't want 'em and I'm getting sick of righties on my show anyway!"so this is an example of REAL journalism on MSNBC, but the Fox anchors (including the excellent Bret Baier) are partisan jerks and Fox is an arm of the GOP?
yeah right. tell me another one, Eddy...
Careful there
Submitted by dirtydan64 on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 1:05am.
Ed you might find yourself sitting next to Rush in front of the FCC using that kind of language, Easy does it Special Eddy !!!
Sounds to me like pretty soon
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 2:27am.
Sounds to me like pretty soon it'll just be Ed and a mirror.
Barack_Must_Go.....
Behind the Scenes at MSNBC
Submitted by Texndoc on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 8:47am.
You don't think Joe Scarborough is talking to the bosses about trying to make it a "serious" political network (which means Joe's show of course) and getting rid of the circus acts like Ed Shultz? Why do you think on election night you had Olbie, Maddow, and Ed Shultz but no Scarborough? And the next morning on Scarborough you had Brokaw but he didn't appear at all with the kooks the night before?
There are definitely camps at MSNBC. Olbie likes Maddow who likes Olbie, nobody likes Scarborough, Tom Brokaw would rather die than appearing ever with Olbie or Ed Shultz......
covering his ass
Submitted by texanbychoice on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 10:35am.
I love the way Big Ed covers his big Fat Ass. He cant's get anyone from the right to appear on his show, so he declares that he may go through 2011 without a single "rightie". He doesn't want them, he's sick of them.
Worse than Olby
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 10:44am.
So is this fat hateful M F saying that it is OK to be totally partisan and ideological and to never work with the other side?
Then why did he complain when REPUBLICANS didn't like what the Socialists/Liberals were doing the passed two years?
Oops, facts and this fat M F don't get along.