Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Maddow Gamely Spins Napolitano's 'System Worked' Absurdity About Flight 253

By Jack Coleman | January 02, 2010 | 23:24

Change font size:  A |  A
Jack Coleman's picture

Next time Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano needs a media flack/coat catcher, I know just the right person.

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow is lashing out at critics who took Napolitano to task for claiming "the system worked" in response to a terrorist with explosives boarding Northwest Flight 253 and nearly bringing down the plane on Christmas.

In the lead segment on her show Dec. 29 (click here for audio), Maddow told viewers of a "dramatic, unexpected appearance" by Obama that day, breaking from his vacation in Hawaii to make an "unscheduled statement to the press."

"After praising the intelligence community for its hard work and for gathering the necessary information on Mr. Abdulmutallab," Maddow reported, "President Obama made a deliberate point of backstopping his Homeland Security secretary, Janet Napolitano."

As if that was the point of Obama's "dramatic, unexpected appearance." In reality, it was to prevent a bad situation from getting worse after Napolitano's remarks on CNN two days earlier.

"Napolitano," Maddow said, "has come under partisan attack in recent days for comments she made on Sunday about the response to the attempted terrorist attack."

Maddow then showed a clip of Napolitano's remarks --

NAPOLITANO:  One thing I'd like to point out is that the system worked. Everybody played an important role here. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action. Within literally an hour to 90 minutes of the incident occurring, all 128 flights in the air had been notified to take some special measures in light of what had occurred on the Northwest Airlines flight. We instituted new measures on the ground and at screening areas, both here in the United States and in Europe where this flight originated.  So, the whole process of making sure that we respond properly, correctly and effectively went very smoothly.

Back to Maddow --

MADDOW:  The Homeland Security secretary, Janet Napolitano, arguing that the response to what Mr. Abdulmutallab allegedly did after he did it was appropriate. Once the guy's attempt failed, he was subdued by fellow passengers and then crew, he was brought into custody safely, the plane landed safely, the law enforcement and aviation security response seems to have been appropriate after all of that happened.

The assertion by Janet Napolitano that things went well after the incident shouldn't really be all that controversial. Unless of course you twist it and take it out of context. Cut the taking it out of context in three, two, one ...

(Footage of remarks by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., and member of the Homeland Security Committee) --

KING: ... Napolitano said, the system worked. The fact is, the system did not work and we have to find a bipartisan way to fix it. He made it on the plane with explosives and he detonated the explosives.

Those wascally Wepublicans, Maddow fumed. "Through selective editing, Republicans have tried to turn Janet Napolitano's assessment of the response to the attempted bombing into some sort of excuse for the bombing happening in the first place. President Obama trying to put an end to that political trickery today by putting Napolitano's comments back in context." Then to a clip from Obama's "dramatic, unexpected" press conference --

OBAMA: As Secretary Napolitano has said, once the suspect attempted to take down Flight 253, after his attempt, it's clear that passengers and crew, our Homeland Security systems and our aviation security, took all appropriate actions.

Back to Maddow, still harping on keeping the matter in "context" --

MADDOW: Now we get to see if the media just keeps parroting the Republican attack on Janet Napolitano or if they will actually report her remarks in context. And the fact that Republicans are attacking her for saying something she never actually said.

Nice try, Ms. Maddow. The problem for Napolitano isn't that Republicans are putting words in her mouth -- it's that they are quoting her accurately (as shown by Maddow's footage of Congressman King). And what Napolitano said, starting with a simple declarative sentence that stands or falls on its own, was ludicrous.

In fairness to Maddow, she gets it half right, which is certainly encouraging. Napolitano did gloss over the lunacy of her "system worked" assertion by whittling "the system" to only those components functional on the day in question.

What makes Maddow's defense of Napolitano's inanity all the more bizarre is that it came after Napolitano backpedaled on it herself, appearing on the "Today" show Dec. 28 and agreeing with Matt Lauer when he asked if "the system" had "failed miserably" to prevent a terrorist with explosives from boarding an airliner.

Maddow condemns Republicans for "selective editing" and taking Napolitano's remarks "out of context." Having set the bar high for others, Maddow then shows her unwillingness to abide by the same standards.

Here is what Obama said Tuesday as shown by Maddow --

OBAMA: As Secretary Napolitano has said, once the suspect attempted to take down Flight 253, after his attempt, it's clear that passengers and crew, our Homeland Security systems and our aviation security, took all appropriate actions.

And here is what Obama said immediately after that, according to his remarks as posted at the White House website --

OBAMA: But what's also clear is this: When our government has information on a known extremist and that information is not shared and acted upon as it should have been, so that this extremist boards a plane with dangerous explosives that could cost nearly 300 lives, a systemic failure has occurred. And I consider that totally unacceptable.

Yes, Houston, we have a problem. 

Maddow further deludes herself into believing that criticism of Napolitano was solely "partisan" in nature. Hardly. The next night on "The Ed Show," Dec. 30, Maddow's MSNBC colleague Ed Schultz referred to Napolitano's "awkward initial response" to Flight 253's brush with disaster (2:39 into video link here).

Later in the same program, Schultz and Huffington Post founding editor Roy Sekoff said this (starting at 1:51 of this link) --

SCHULTZ (initially referring to Napolitano appearing on "Today" show): Now, Roy, the point in all of this is that any time there's a secretary of any department in the administration that speaks and then, you know, turns the corner and goes in a different direction, obviously there's going to be room for criticism. Do you think that she should come up and testify, has it gotten to that point? And do you think that maybe she might not be the right person for the job? What do you think?

SEKOFF: No, I think it's a quick mea culpa and you say, look, I gotta take a quick remedial PR course, you know, I've gotta have Think Before You Speak 101 and that was clearly a bad mistake on her part. But what Obama did was the right thing. He came out and he said, look, this is a systemic failure and I think it's a big mistake if we try to point the finger at the secretary alone.

Darn! I should have posted a transcript of the entire show rather than risk quoting Schultz and Sekoff out of context. 

Share this

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • War on Terrorism
  • Janet Napolitano
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Rachel Maddow Show
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Comments

We could take this discussion

Submitted by maggied on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 1:21pm.

We could take this discussion and go on with it until we get old, it's all about politics in fact when I actually interested in security measures at the airports and the safety of the flights. We can't have many guarantees yet but can't avoid flights forever neither. My job depends on traveling, I even have reserved a spare spot at the Stansted airport parking there's no way I can avoid flights, is there any endurance for people like me that this kind of transportation will become more safe?
  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Resist we much!
    12 min 4 sec ago
  • ⇒ We're not shocked
    18 min 39 sec ago
  • wonder what Rachel thinks about Al's thinking
    43 min 38 sec ago
  • Yeah,
    46 min 18 sec ago
  • Understanding the Required Minimum Distribution is on my short
    49 min 2 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.