NewsBusters is holding a 5th anniversary happy hour in Washington, and you're invited! Click here for details.

Oops! Frequent Maddow Guest Cox Undercuts Nicolle Wallace's Catty Claims About Palin

  • Bookmark and Share

Don't be surprised if McCain '08 campaign adviser Nicolle Wallace passes up future chances to vent for Rachel Maddow.

Wallace did not appear on the Maddow show, agreeing instead to go on the record off-camera with her criticisms of Sarah Palin's new book, "Going Rogue: An American Life."

Maddow told viewers of her MSNBC show Tuesday that John McCain held a conference call Nov. 13 and asked that if they wanted to respond to Palin's book, to "at least avoid being interviewed about the book on TV," Maddow said --

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MADDOW: The Rachel Maddow show, however, has been able to do an off-camera but on-the-record interview with one of Palin's main targets in the book. She is campaign senior adviser Nicolle Wallace. Palin blames her in the book for her expensive wardrobe being charged to the Republican Party, for her disastrous interview with Katie Couric, and for a lot else besides.

On the Couric interview, Palin writes that Nicole Wallace pushed her into that interview for dubious reasons, saying "Nicolle went on to explain that Katie really needed a career boost. 'She just has such low self-esteem,' Nicolle said. She added that Katie was going through a tough time. 'She just feels she can't trust anybody.' I was thinking, And this has to do with John McCain's campaign how?  Nicolle said, 'She wants you to like her.' Hearing all that I almost started feeling sorry for her."

Asked if that was accurate, Nicolle Wallace told us this -- "The whole notion there was a conversation where I tried to cajole her into a conversation with Katie is fiction ... I am not someone who throws around the word 'self-esteem.' It is a fictional description. Katie Couric was selected because we did evening anchors. ... I did not advocate an interview with anyone I am friends with."

Gov. Palin was also asked by Oprah Winfrey about the Katie Couric interview. (footage shown of Palin on Oprah show)

WINFREY: You do say that it wasn't your best interview. Were you prepped for that interview?

PALIN: Not so much because it was supposed to be kind of a light-hearted, fun, working mom speaking with working mom and the challenges that we have with teenage daughters ...

MADDOW: Nicolle Wallace told us that that too is not at all accurate. She says, "We set up this interview on the day of the U.N. General Assembly, with a walk-and-talk in front of the U.N. It was never made as two working gals. It's either rationalization or justification or fiction. That was supposed to be to highlight her foreign policy savvy (in the context of) the U.N. General Assembly. The picture is in front of the U.N. to highlight her expertise and readiness to be vice president -- it wasn't about two working gals."

Finally, when asked for her overall reaction to "Going Rogue"'s theme, that the Republican ticket in 2008 would have been more successful if the campaign had just followed Gov. Palin's instincts rather than those of people like Wallace and campaign strategist Steve Schmidt, Nicolle Wallace gave us this response -- "I think she has probably a legitimate complaint that things could have been better conceived and executed. A book about that would have been painful but not entirely unfair. What she gets wrong is this personalization that Schmidt and I were these lone villains -- and that took place entirely in her imagination.

"Just like the Obama and Clinton campaigns, we were consensus driven. ... I think she fixated on me from very early on. She hated me from the beginning. I try not to take it personally; the fact is that she wrote a book based on fabrications. She gave a brilliant convention speech -- other interviews that inspired support. But this book is a bizarre fixation on things that everyone else has moved on from.

With the notable exception of Nicolle Wallace. Maddow then introduced Air America Radio host and former Wonkette blogger Ana Marie Cox, who wasted no time undercutting Wallace's claims --

MADDOW: So you spent a lot of time covering the campaign, you obviously know Nicolle Wallace from then. What do you make of her rebuttal to Sarah Palin? Does that sound like her voice to you?

COX: It sounds very much like her voice to me and it sounds pretty, end of discussion to me, almost about the book in general. I think that Nicolle speaks about, she has the same feelings about the book that a lot of the other senior staffers have, which is that there are things that sound like they happened, they involve the same people in the same, you know, scenes like at the UN, but that actually, the words that are exchanged and the background to those stories is just not true.

MADDOW: In terms of that last very personal quote from Nicolle Wallace saying, she told us that Sarah Palin 'hated me from the beginning.' From your experience covering the campaign, again, was the relationship between Palin and the staffers quite personally heated or at odds? Was there a lot of personal friction?

COX: There, see, one of those things that's sort of strange to me, in reading the book, in reading the back and forth between them now, is that at the beginning I didn't sense that at all. I should say, I covered Sarah Palin very briefly and did not get to know her or her staff the way that I got to know the McCain staff, having traveled with them through the primaries and the general election.

It was clear by the end of the campaign that there is a lack of patience, let's say, among the senior staffers for Sarah Palin. I never saw it as hate and I wonder when that started and if it might not have started for Sarah Palin after the campaign was over. And so she sort of projected backwards to the very beginning.

"She" being Palin -- or Wallace?

Cox's remarks are more credible if one name is substituted for another -- I never saw it as hate and I wonder when that started and if it might not have started for Nicolle Wallace after the campaign was over. And so she sort of projected backwards to the very beginning.

You know, with that curiously similar timeframe that Wallace provided to Maddow -- "from the beginning." 

Cox was also a guest on Maddow's show the preceding Friday and based on Maddow's introduction of her that night, and their remarks on Tuesday, it's hardly a stretch to conclude that Cox persuaded Wallace to go on the record for Maddow.

Here's how Maddow introduced Cox on Friday (as seen in the third segment of the embedded video) --

MADDOW: Joining us now, the most sentient person with good sources in the McCain camp who will agree to come on this show ...

Notice also how on Maddow's show Tuesday Cox described her experience covering the '08 campaign -- "I covered Sarah Palin very briefly and did not get to know her or her staff the way I got to know the McCain staff, having traveled with them through the primaries and the general election."

... cultivating Wallace as a source all the while. Funny how Cox's campaign coverage provided her with just enough distance from Palin as needed in the future, but plenty of proximity to summarily dismiss Palin's assertions in the book.

Cox also had this to say about Palin on Maddow's show Tuesday (at end of second part of embedded video) --

COX: I'd also like to say that all the McCain staffers I talked to, not a single one of them believes that she even wants to run for elected office ever again. They see her as having grabbed as much of the spotlight as she can. She's interested in being as big a celebrity as she can. But I think that there's a fundamental realization, I think she must realize it too, she cannot run for office having written a book like this. This kind of score-settling book, who would ever work for Sarah Palin again after reading this?

Just as Wallace must be wondering -- will Republicans ever hire me again after I've spilled my guts to moonbats like Maddow and Cox?

NewsBusters is turning 5. Enter our free t-shirt contest to help us celebrate!


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"...everyone else..."

"...this book is a bizarre fixation on things that everyone else has moved on from."

Well of course they've moved on, they're embarrassed as hell!

It seems Clear

It seems clear to me, at least at this time, that the Republican Party is going with the MSM on this one and will not support Palin.

Schmidt and Wallace both decided long ago to cut bait on Palin and trashed her in the media long before the book was even discussed.

The fact that the MSM NEVER had an interest in Palin's side of the story while broadcasting as much dirt from "annoymous" McCain staffers to discredit her, seems to me a logical motivation to write the book.  Go around the media.

The same idea that conservatives don't have the right to defend themselves permeated the Wilson-Plame debacle and to this day the stories about it are revisionist history.

These people ran a failed campaign, so why would anyone want to rehire them?

 

confused

I watched this expecting something... all I saw and heard was two chirpers that I would never normally watch and when it was finished, wondered why I was even watching it...

don't post videos of that dolt faux man please... unless she morphs into a horse or something... please.... once was enough.

Don't you wish

you had that time back so you could do something more interesting and worthwhile, like say....take out the garbage

Yes!

Yes!

Several thoughts...

Jack, the story and video did not support your headline.

I thought Ana Marie might disagree with RM.  I saw AM do that once when RM attempted to make something bigger out of McCain's declination of PBO's invitation to watch the Super Bowl at the WH.  AM disagreed, saying that McCain really liked his Cardinals football and probably wanted to watch the SB in a more conducive atmosphere.

A night or two ago some lib was quoting some conservative commentating woman named Cup.  I do not believe I have ever heard a conservative refer to AM as some woman named Cocks.  But most consevatives aren't name callers.

Stop federal judges from foisting their notions of "fairness" on the States.  Amend the 14th Amendment! - tim413

How do story and video not support headline?

Please elaborate, I'd be happy to discuss it

Jack

I just watched the video again.  I would agree with your headline if the only Ana Marie comment was the sentence re AM not witnessing any Sarah Palin hatred toward N. Wallace.  But Ana Marie spent the remainder of the three plus minutes bashing Palin, Palin's book, etc. and supporting McCain staff. 

I had expected a complete N. Wallace put down as I witnessed AM do re McCain and the Super Bowl.  We all need to be really careful not to give the appearance of using liberals' standard trick of quoting out of context.

Stop federal judges from foisting their notions of "fairness" on the States.  Amend the 14th Amendment! - tim413

Would you agree ...

... with my premise that Cox was most likely responsible for persuading Wallace to go on the record for Maddow? I'll go through this a step at a time to avoid any misunderstanding.

In a word....

I just watched the video for a third time.  I saw/heard nothing to suggest AMC convinced N. Wallace to talk with one of Rachel's producers.  I suspect NW did not need any convincing -she was likely very willing to take the producer's call and bash Palin (a.k.a. setting the record straight).

Can we move on?

Stop federal judges from foisting their notions of "fairness" on the States.  Amend the 14th Amendment! - tim413

The post isn't limited to video clip

There is also the commentary that accompanied it. You challenged me on this and I've been dutiful in responding. Once again, would you agree with my premise that Cox was most likely responsible for persuading Wallace to go on the record for Maddow? Or would you prefer to move on now that you are being challenged?

AM

I thought her name was anna marie cox?

Shes pretty dirty too, used to write about all sorts of sleeze. 

Oops! Frequent Maddow Guest Cox Undercuts Nicolle Wallace's Catt

I watched the Maddow clip.

 Can I have those few minutes of my life back please?

 I've watched Maddow. How horrible is she and her program!

 As a result of her miserable program, and her miserable personality, I have chosen to refrain from watching her program any longer. She is a mean, nasty, deceitful, vicious, malicious person and her guests are merely either advocates and partners in her crime of incivility and hatred, or they are targets for said hatred.

 I've learned nothing new from this clip.

 McCain aids, or those aids who were assigned to her, appear to have been petty, snotty twerps. This clip appears to reinforce that concept.

 Furthermore, the guest speaking on the program is working for Air America, an unimpressive group of losers who spew hatred and left wing propaganda, and whine and spew more hatred, and whine. They have no integrity there and aren't a serious broadcasting services.

 

lan astaslen - I will not submit. I will not surrender!

 

Mitchell Ambushing Palin

Hilarious series of pictures:

Andrea Mitchell Tries to Ambush Palin: http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog 

(That beak should be registered as a deadly weapon.) 

Good grief Slick

Has anyone caught her story on this event? 

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Re Andwea

Love that caption about Alan on one of the pictures. I think the blog added it later because I didn't see it the first time I looked.

I wonder if Letterboy's lovenest is stocked up with the magazine cover?

Slick

I'm thinking that if Andrea had approached with anything other than that "cheated on wife" look on her face, she may have gotten somewhere. The hate on here face was palpable. 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

The Mckainnedy team LOST

The Mckainnedy team LOST the election, and none of them are of strong enough moral CHARACTER to admit THEY LOST?

Maybe if they had more interest in winning, and less interest in whining about maintaining their losing streak, they might have won.

Obama, the first "alleged" president

http://gjresult.com

 

McLame

McCain would have lost by even more if not for Sarah.

You set us up

 

 

Did you fake your headline just to get us to watch this video?  That was a waste of time.

Not sure what you mean

How is it a fake headline?

Democrats hate Palin because she is a HAPPY achiever.

Democrats think no one should be happy without asking their permission.

Anna, oh Anna

Anna used to be pretty. WTH, happened to her?

Has she been hanging around Maddow too much? Did she cross the street? 

Im just asking

Palin vs. Wallace

As of the current date:

I know and respect Sarah Palin.

RE:  Nicolle Wallace.  Who is this person?  She is either a misguided pseudo politico who wants to take deep bows for one of the worst run presidential campaigns in recent history (and I'm a Conservative), or she is one of the most lack-lustre interviews on an embarrassingly unprofessional and negatively rated "entertainment" show with that Maddow person.

"Look Ma.....I'm King of the World!"  B. H. Obama

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.