Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 26, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • Joan Walsh: 'I Didn’t Think it Was Possible to Get Lower Than Andrew Breitbart But His Spawn Have'
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'
  • Reuters's Freeland: 'Anorexic' Americans Think Tax Bite Too Heavy When In Fact It's Dangerously Thin
  • Soledad O'Brien Spins Romney's Words on Bain, Suggests He's Dodging the Questions

Maddow Offers 'Corrections' of Buchanan's Remarks on Race - And Misquotes Him

By Jack Coleman | July 24, 2009 | 00:58

Change font size:  A |  A
Jack Coleman's picture

Viewers of "The Rachel Maddow Show" on July 20 were treated to something seldom seen -- a political analyst trying to set the record straight after an argument, in the absence of the second pundit.

Maddow preceded her criticism of MSNBC colleague Pat Buchanan by saying this tactic is "not cool" and "not fair" before proceeding with it anyway --

MADDOW: It's not cool to talk about guests after their segment is over. It's also not fair to relitigate these arguments in the absence of one of the parties who participated in the argument and I will not try to do that now.

But what I do feel obliged to do is to correct some of the things that were said in the course of my argument with Pat that were stated as fact that were not true. I feel an obligation just to correct the factual record as we would with anything else that was stated as fact on this show that was not true.

Maddow then launched her broadside at Buchanan, which can be seen in its entirety here at Maddow's MSNBC site, along with the original argument. The two segments, consisting of the argument and Maddow's follow-up, last almost 18 minutes altogether. The video in the post condenses what I consider questionable aspects of Maddow's response and the initial exchange.

It's not just that Maddow misquoted Buchanan -- and in the context of what she described as corrections. Worse, there appears little doubt that Maddow's misquoting was motivated by a conscious attempt to deceive.

Among her criticisms, Maddow claimed Buchanan said this --

MADDOW: Pat also said, quote, the US track team in the Olympics, they're all black folks. Uhm, the US Olympic track team is not all black, folks or otherwise (stated while showing photo montage of team members). Also the US Olympic hockey team is not all from Minnesota either, which he also said.

Here's what Buchanan actually said, absent Maddow's filter --

BUCHANAN: I believe everybody should get a chance to excel and be on the United States Supreme Court. But if I look at the US track team in the Olympics and they're all black folks, I don't automatically assume it's discrimination. I will say, I think maybe those are the fastest guys we got, that maybe they're the fastest guys in the country, maybe they're the fastest in the world. If they're all, or, Olympic team in hockey is eight white guys from Minnesota, I don't assume discrimination.

Buchanan was clearly suggesting hypotheticals -- "if I look at the US track team ...", "If they're all ... eight white guys from Minnesota" on the Olympic hockey team. And how did Maddow portray Buchanan's words? By slicing, dicing and stating them as fact, which Buchanan hadn't done.

The reason I believe what Maddow did was deliberate is twofold. First, Maddow showed clips of Buchanan from their argument four times -- but not when citing his remarks about athletes. Then, curiously, no footage of Buchanan was shown. Instead, viewers heard Maddow's claims about what Buchanan said.

Second, if Maddow played footage of Buchanan's remarks that she claimed he said, it would have come across as suspiciously short --

MADDOW: Pat also said, quote, the US track team in the Olympics, they're all black folks.

BUCHANAN: But if I look at the US track team in the Olympics and they're all black folks, I don't assume discrimination.

Note the missing word in Maddow's misquoting -- "and." If Maddow showed video of the fragment she extracted from Buchanan's remarks, it would not hold up as a quote -- "the US track team in the Olympics and they're all black folks." Huh? Clearly there's more to the sentence. Why not convey in its entirety, by repeating verbatim or showing footage of Buchanan saying it? Not only would this run the risk being fair to Buchanan, the sentence begins with a pesky "but". Which would beg another question -- "but" what? The only way to answer that would be by quoting what Buchanan said just before "but" -- to wit, "I believe everybody should get a chance to excel and be on the United States Supreme Court."

In fairness to Maddow, her other criticisms of Buchanan weren't off-base, not in my opinion. Buchanan claimed Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has "never written anything that I've read in terms of a law review article or major book or something like that on the law." Maddow said her staff turned up five law review articles written by Sotomayor, the most recent in 2004. Scholars can argue over whether any of the articles are considered "major" and I'll take Buchanan at his word that he hasn't read them.

Buchanan asserted it was "affirmative action" that won Sotomayor a place on the Yale Law Review; Maddow found a Yale law spokesperson to dispute this.

"White men were 100 percent of the people that wrote the Constitution," Buchanan said, "100 percent of the people who signed the Declaration of Independence, 100 percent of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, probably close to 100 percent of the people who died at Normandy. This has been a country built basically by white folks ..."

Hmm, not a single person of color among the thousands of dead in the pivotal battles of the Civil War? Maddow effectively undermined Buchanan's assertions in her response, declaring "the idea that only white people built America is a fantasy."  Maddow also turned up evidence by way of "Nixonland" author Rick Perlstein that Buchanan, a vocal opponent of affirmative action, apparently supported a variation of it while working in the Nixon White House, a version that favored ethnic Catholics.

Had Maddow ended her criticism of Buchanan there, I'd have little to criticize her here. But she didn't -- Maddow piled on, emboldened by liberal indignation, unwilling to let accuracy get in the way of a good polemic.

In the process, Maddow refuted an assertion she made in her argument with Buchanan --

MADDOW: For you to argue that there's no basis on which the United States benefits from having Hispanics be among the people who we choose the best and brightest from, defies belief. The idea that you think we're best served by only choosing from among 99.5 percent white people for these jobs, I don't believe you believe it, Pat.

But of course Maddow believes this -- as shown by her hatchet job on Buchanan the following Monday. And this dubious assertion was preceded by Maddow claiming a line of argument by Buchanan that he never made.

Despite Maddow's professed concern for accuracy, don't hold your breath waiting for her to correct these inaccurate claims stated as fact.

Share this

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Projection again. Liberals
    7 min 20 sec ago
  • I agree and.....
    9 min 19 sec ago
  • And people already get it.
    12 min 6 sec ago
  • Sometimes all you can say is
    31 min 29 sec ago
  • I don't think "embellished"
    34 min 1 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
  • GOP Rep. Saying Obama 'Not An American' Labeled 'Treasonous' by Ed Schultz
  • NYT's Maureen Dowd Whines on 'Women's Lower Caste' in the Catholic Church
  • Open Thread: How About That Arab Spring?
  • PBS for Obama: USA Today Puts Gushy 'Essay by Ken Burns' on Front Page
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.