There she goes again, revealing more than intended.
Hardly a broadcast of her MSNBC cable show passes without Rachel Maddow earnestly claiming to have invited a Republican guest, only to be told, thanks no thanks.
But based on Maddow's remarks on her show this past Friday evening, those claims come across as dubious -- given Maddow's censorious rationale for selecting guests. Or more accurately, those possessing the temerity to disagree with her politics.
Maddow had this to say during a discussion with Ana Marie Cox about what they perceive as more vocal criticism of Obama from Republicans who do not hold elected office (click here for audio) --
MADDOW: I have to, just as a programming thing, I mean, there's this issue of all the face time that Liz Cheney is getting, all the discussion time that Rush Limbaugh get (sic), that Newt Gingrich get (sic), that Mitt Romney gets, that Mike Huckabee gets. I mean, these people don't have jobs and ....
COX: Let's, don't put them on the TV, Rachel. Like, I just, I don't want to tell you how to do your job but, like, come on.MADDOW: But, we quest-, but, I mean, the Rachel Maddow show staff, many of whom you know, we sit around all day and talk about whether or not we should put folks on the air. But in terms of the political debate that's happening in the country, it's just not being engaged in by elected Republicans. The only people who are talking from the right are these folks who I prefer not to put on TV 'cause they don't have jobs and I shouldn't feel obligated.
Wow -- Rush Limbaugh doesn't have a job? Aside from the best-paying and most influential one in media. Except for that.
How about Mike Huckabee -- unemployed, really? Last I checked, the former Arkansas governor works as a political commentator for Fox -- much as Maddow is so engaged at MSNBC.
Is it only Republicans that Maddow views in this light or does it also extend to Democrats? Take frequent Maddow guest Howard Dean, for example. Like Huckabee, Dean is a former governor and also served as chairman of the Democratic National Committee. And like Huckabee, Dean currently holds no elected office -- yet often finds time to excoriate Republicans while schmoozing with Maddow. Go figure.
And what about Maddow's guest when she said this -- former Wonkette blogger Ana Marie Cox, now a contributor to The Daily Beast, Air America Radio and Playboy magazine. I'll take a wild guess and venture to say that Cox wasn't elected to any of these gigs, although this mysteriously doesn't prevent Cox from expressing views that neatly dovetail with those of the DNC.
Maddow interviewed Obama last October right before the election, but I wonder what she would have done if given the same opportunity a few years earlier. Back then, Obama was ostensibly a United States senator, though everyone knows his real job was running for president. John Kerry followed a similar path, seeking the presidency from 1984 when he was first elected to the Senate to 2004 when he was defeated by Bush at the end of an official presidential campaign. After that, Kerry began actually serving in the Senate.
At least what Maddow is suggesting is a tad more creative than the standard liberal shtick of decrying "hate speech" and "fearmongering" from right of center or demanding more "fairness" and "diversity" in media. The labels change but the motive remains the same -- keeping conservative opinion out of the mix.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
That was my first
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 05:21 ET by motherbeltThat was my first thought....that she said to Ana Marie Cox, with a straight face that these people "don't have jobs."
Being a blogger is job????? Really?
Rachel...what is YOUR "job" ? According to your own standard, you don't have one.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
"Enlightened": being wrong
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 07:47 ET by kg"Enlightened": being wrong and still keep a job. If Maddow had a real job, with her track record of error, she wouldn't last more than a few days. It's amazing that if you look at MSNBC's record one has to wonder how they stay in business.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
People make money doing this?
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 08:28 ET by KC MulvilleI recall an old interview of George Will by Charlie Rose. Asked to define "journalism," Will said that his job is "to reason in public." As a handy definition, you can't do much better than that.
Why don't conservatives come on her show? Because they have no reason to believe that they'll be treated fairly. They know they'll have to face smirk-to-the-camera questions, then get interrupted with more accusations. Waste of time.
If Maddow had the guts to take on guests from her own side, that might be a step to believing that her guests are going to get a fair shake. But between her show and Olbermann's, the arguments of the liberal side are simply never addressed, and conservative arguments are distorted and dismissed.
Why don't conservatives
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:02 ET by motherbeltWhy don't conservatives come on her show? Because they have no reason to believe that they'll be treated fairly.
The real reason is because she doesn't invite them!
The only people who are talking from the right are these folks who I prefer not to put on TV 'cause they don't have jobs and I shouldn't feel obligated.
She thinks they don't have jobs....unlike Wonkette.....and have no right to be heard....also unlike Wonkette.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
No jobs
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:35 ET by KC MulvilleYeah, I don't get that one at all. That makes absolutely no sense.
Conservatives are not invited . . .
Wed, 06/10/2009 - 01:22 ET by DoktorFranken. . . . because they would verbally kick her ass.
In a battle of wits Maddow ain't packin'.
And now you see the true
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 05:39 ET by ArchConservativeAnd now you see the true face of liberals (progressives). Hatred toward those who are unemployed. No wonder they don't care that unemployment is at 9.2 percent. They publish articles about how "fun" it is not to have a job. And now this Maddows person says that people without jobs shouldn't have a say in the political discussions that affect them.
These people have such a strong distaste and contempt for the everyday person that they claim to represent. This should put that lie to rest.
Remember: if you don't have a job, then liberals and Maddows don't think you should have any say or any voice in the political discourse of this country.
Very anti-Constitutional. Very progressive. Very liberal.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
Obama: Not my President. Ever.
ArchC, you're commend on
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 06:48 ET by ThisnThatArchC, you're commend on "fun" is right on. Here's an article from the LA Times last week. Some quotes:
And the Dims want me to pay more taxes and be real concerned about "the uninsured"? Ok, I will -- just as soon as these people show a little more responsibility. Otherwise, don't tell me you need more of my money. The evidence is overwhelming -- you don't need my money, you simply want my money.
___________________________________
Liberals constantly demand that we accept a glaring falsehood as truth; Obama's elimination of the word "terror" will make terrorist acts less terrifying
"Recession gives people
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:11 ET by motherbelt"Recession gives people permission to be unemployed," said David Logan, a professor at USC's Marshall School of Business. "Why not make use of the time and go do something fun?"
And that explains why something like 95% of "new" employment is found in the last couple of weeks of unemployment, just before the benefits run out. Why go and get another job until you have to?
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Same thought crossed my mind
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:01 ET by Jack ColemanI was tempted to include it and maybe I should have, along the lines of what you wrote about Maddow's contempt for the unemployed. Ah, but it's contempt mixed with empathy.
out of a job
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 05:52 ET by m1xramMaddow has got it all figured out except for one small detail. If she keeps all those people, she doesn't like, off the show, she'll be out of a job. People prefer honest reporting so MSNBC keeps loosing market share.
Keep up the good work Maddow!
Why would Rush and the
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 06:46 ET by George S PattonWhy would Rush and the others waste time with these losers ?Maddow would love to have Rush on the show but she knows that she lacks the mental skills required to debate.
Ture... Rush would eat her alive...
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 07:03 ET by urbuggenmeah...no never mind ... I don't think Rush swings that way!
Who's this Maddow dude?
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 07:18 ET by BKeyserWho's this Maddow dude?
dude
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:14 ET by tomolson3What kind of parents would name there son "Rachel"
What kind of parents would
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 12:02 ET by Dan The Man 2What kind of parents would name there son "Rachel"
Perhaps we should ask Jhonny Cash afetr all he wrote A Boy Named Sue.
Facebook Rachel!!!
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 08:44 ET by SgtCheeseNOLSI found Rachel Maddow's fan page. You cannot make a comment on her wall, BUT you can make a comment to hers! Daily she will link her own articles and stuff on the wall, and from there you can make comments.
Let the debates begin!!!
USCG
It's that magic thing
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 08:46 ET by zachlindIt doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand why Ana Marie Cox gets a seat at Rachel’s table. With those two winking and flirting it’s like prom night with no adult supervision.
Not so sure about that, zachlind
Wed, 06/10/2009 - 08:18 ET by Jack ColemanYou could be right about half the equation but I have my doubts that Cox actually likes Maddow.
job
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 09:46 ET by sanskritgOut of curiosity, what is Newt Gingrich's "ostensible" job?
LIZ CHENEY
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 10:17 ET by UtherpendI would pay to see Liz Cheney on MadCow's show, she would mop the floor with her.
"For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security."
Usually - excluding
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 10:20 ET by IndyAdamUsually - excluding Congress, of course - one gets paid for (or better yet, loses) a job based on performance. Where, again, are MSNBC's ratings?
Has the GOP learned
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 10:30 ET by RR GOPHas the GOP learned nothing?
Don't go anywhere near these MSM shows. Get interviews on Fox News or on Rush's show...that way the majority of people will actually have a chance to listen to you...and without editing.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Maddow is doing the GOP a
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 11:10 ET by Chris NormanMaddow is doing the GOP a favor by not having them on. Why legitimize her show with GOP guests? This should spread to other MSM shows who refuse to give the GOP a fair hearing. For instance, what was gained by Newt Gingrich appearing with Harry Smith, except a boost to Gingrich's ego?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Another name for being a guest on MSNBC
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 11:53 ET by KC MulvilleThe Witness Protection Program
That's funny - and so
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 15:29 ET by Chris NormanThat's funny - and so true. Hidden in plain site where no one would want to look.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Rachel
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 11:14 ET by east tennessee johnRachel, Rachel, Rachel. Have you seen the ratings? Why should conservatives come on your show, be abused and help you get what msdnc compared to Fox doesn't have, ratings/viewers? Do you think an appearance on your show benefits them in any way possible? If so, how?
The right will one day
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 11:25 ET by snaggletoothieThe right will one day retake the White House and majority status in the congress. The only help needed from Rachel Maddow is that she continue to just be herself.
I was perusing the apps for
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 12:05 ET by Dan The Man 2I was perusing the apps for the iphone and Madow had one there for her show. I almost puked.
Maddow iphone app
Tue, 06/09/2009 - 15:39 ET by SickofLibsAnything to do with "shopping for surgical appliances?"