Kent Jones, a former Air America Radio humorist and writer for "The Daily Show," has his moments when he appears each weeknight on "The Rachel Maddow Show."
But based on Jones' whopper of a claim about the movie "Casablanca," film criticism is not his forte.
Here's what Jones said May 5 on Maddow's MSNBC show in describing recent articles by Stephen M. Walt and Daniel W. Drezner on the best films about international relations --
Two writers from Slate.com, Stephen Walt and Daniel Drezner, each made a list. High on both lists was "Casablanca," which makes the radical claim that America is just one part of the rest of the world.
The segment segues to a clip from the film, showing Humphrey Bogart's cynical saloonkeeper Rick Blaine (yes, that was his last name) and Claude Raines' amoral French police captain Louis Renault --
RICK: I came to Casablanca for the waters.
RENAULT: The waters? What waters? We're in the desert.
RICK: I was misinformed.
As was Jones if he believes the America in "Casablanca" is "just one part of the rest of the world." This is not merely inaccurate. More accurately, it could hardly be more wrong.
In fact, America is mentioned tellingly in "Casablanca" dialogue immediately preceding that cited by Jones, as Rick and Renault look up to see a plane take off from the nearby airfield --
RENAULT: The plane to Lisbon (pause) You would like to be on it?
RICK: Why? What's in Lisbon?
RENAULT: The clipper to America (pause) I have often speculated on why you don't return to America. Did you abscond with the church funds? Did you run off with a senator's wife? I like to think you killed a man. It's the romantic in me.
RICK: It was a combination of all three.
RENAULT: And what in heaven's name brought you to Casablanca?
RICK: My health. I came to Casablanca for the waters ...
Moreover, the significance of the New World in the context of the film is quickly established in the voiceover narration that opens the movie--
With the coming of the Second World War, many eyes in imprisoned Europe turned hopefully, or desperately, toward the freedom of the Americas. Lisbon became the great embarkation point. But not everybody could get to Lisbon directly, and so, a tortuous, roundabout refugee trail sprang up. Paris to Marseilles, across the Mediterranean to Oran, then by train, or auto, or foot, across the rim of Africa to Casablanca in French Morocco. Here, the fortunate ones, through money, or influence, or luck, might obtain exit visas and scurry to Lisbon, and from Lisbon to the New World. But the others wait in Casablanca -- and wait -- and wait -- and wait.
And where do many of those fleeing Europe converge after reaching Casablanca? To a nightclub and gambling den by the name of "Rick's Cafe Americain." As Renault tells the German major Strasser, "Everybody comes to Rick's."
Strasser is in pursuit of Victor Laszlo, a Czech Resistance leader accompanied by his wife Ilsa Lund (Ingrid Bergman). Unbeknownst to Laszlo, Ilsa was once in love with Rick, in Paris shortly before the German invasion, when she mistakenly thought Laszlo was dead.
Much of the action in "Casablanca" centers around Strasser's ruthless efforts to find two stolen letters of transit that ensure escape from Casablanca. Strasser accurately believes a petty thief named Ugarte (Peter Lorre) gave the letters to Rick --
STRASSER: I strongly suspect that Ugarte left the letters of transit with Mr. Blaine. I would suggest you search the cafe immediately and thoroughly.
STRASSER: You give him credit for far too much cleverness. My impression was that he's just another blundering American.
RENAULT: If Rick had the letters, he's much too smart to let you find them there.
An earlier version of America as "just one part of the rest of the world." To which Renault responds with one of the best lines in the movie --
RENAULT: We mustn't underestimate American blundering. I was with them when they blundered into Berlin in 1918.
This is the extent of Renault's defiance of Strasser, at least initially, and he compliantly bends to Nazi pressure. Renault tells Rick that Laszlo is trying to escape to the United States and warns him not to help --
RENAULT: Rick, Laszlo must never reach America. He stays in Casablanca.
Laszlo later tells Rick why it is essential for him to flee for the States --
LASZLO: You must know it's very important that I get out of Casablanca. It's my privilege to be one of the leaders of a great movement. You know what I have been doing. You know what it means to the work, to the lives of thousands and thousands of people that I be free to reach America and continue my work.
Laszlo and Ilsa are hardly alone in their rationale for coming to Casablanca. It is shared by the aging German couple, the Leuchtags, who speak in broken English and toast their imminent departure with brandy served by Carl the waiter -
MRS. LEUCHTAG (beaming with happiness): To celebrate our leaving for America tomorrow.
CARL (sitting down): Thank you very much. I thought you would ask me, so I brought the good brandy and a third glass.
MRS. LEUCHTAG: At last the day has come.
MR. LEUCHTAG: Frau Leuchtag and I are speaking nothing but English now.MRS. LEUCHTAG: So we should feel at home ven ve get to America.
CARL: A very nice idea.
MR. LEUCHTAG (raising his glass): To America.
While the Leuchtags are elated at thoughts of their new home, the desperation of a newlywed couple to escape is palpable. The young woman, Annina Brandel, appeals to Rick for help while her husband loses at roulette--
RICK: How long have you been married?
ANNINA: Eight weeks. We come from Bulgaria. Oh, things are very bad there, Monsieur. The devil has the people by the throat. So, Jan and I, we, we do not want our children to grow up in such a country.
RICK: So you decided to go to America.
ANNINA: Yes, but we have not much money, and traveling is so expensive and difficult.
"The devil has the people by the throat" in Europe -- and can't be trusted to respect the neutrality of countries like Portugal. This is why those leaving Casablanca don't feel safe remaining in Lisbon. With evil gaining ground around the world, America is the only safe place left.
Jones's claim about "Casablanca" jogged my memory of an essay by Lance Morrow that appeared in Time magazine in December 1982, coinciding with the 40th anniversary of the film's release --
Semioticians, who study the significance of signs and symbols, have discussed Casablanca as a myth of sacrifice. One can have fun with that. Consider it this way: America is the Promised Land, the place of safety and redemption. Rick Blaine has been cast out of America, for some original sin that is as obscure as the one that cost Adam and Eve their Eden. Rick flees to Europe, which is the fallen world where Evil (the Nazis, Satan) is loose. He meets and beds the widow of Idealism. Idealism (meaning Victor) is dead, or thought dead, but it rises from the grave. Rick, losing Ilsa, falls obliviously into despair and selfishness: "I stick my neck out for nobody." He becomes an idiot in the original Greek sense of the word, meaning someone indifferent to his duties as a citizen.
That Jones would make such a claim about "Casablanca" on the Maddow show comes as little surprise considering its namesake's penchant for Depression-era revisionism and shaky grasp of American history. Rather than accurately convey what America represents in "Casablanca," Jones inadvertently reveals what America means to him.
Updated by Noel Sheppard at 3:20 PM | Jones isn't just clueless concerning "Casablanca," because a tad later in the segment, another inanity surfaced:
JONES: Also noted the 1997 film, "Wag the Dog" in which the government and media team up to invent a completely fictitious rationale for starting a war. Like that would ever happen.
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: Mushroom cloud -
Pretty preposterous given the war fabricated in "Wag" was to cover up the fictional president's sexual scandal. As such, when the film came out, most people thought it was pointing fingers at then President Clinton.
In fact, when the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke in 1998, and Clinton implemented a strategy of regime change in Iraq months later, only to commence a four-day bombing mission -- Operation Desert Fox -- against that country in December, many considered it a "Wag the Dog" scenario designed to distract the public from looming impeachment proceedings.
This somehow eluded Jones and Maddow.
Of course, the original book that "Wag" was loosely based on was "American Hero" by Larry Beinhart. This was a satirical conspiracy theory alleging Bush 41 had started "Desert Storm" to further his re-election chances.
As such, by using this movie to bash Bush 43, Jones was once again demonstrating an ignorance of film, history, or both.






















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Given the state of our educational system,
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 12:49 ET by dervishit's not a surprise to find a lot of people who don't understand much about American history.
But not to understand the background of the AFI's Greatest Movie in History That Doesn't Feature Orson Welles, well, that's just sad.
I'm shocked....shocked....I tell you!!
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 13:18 ET by BEGRUNTCaptain Renault: "I'm shocked, shocked there's gambling going on in here!!!"
Waiter: "Your winnings sir"
"And let's have no displays of indignation......if we've told lies, you've told half lies, and a man, who lies like me, merely hides the truth, but a man who tells half lies, has forgotten where he put it"
Dryden...(Claude Raines)......Lawrence of Arabia
The blindness of the Left
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 15:32 ET by GalvanicIsn't ironic that liberals constantly berate conservatives for not appreciating the arts, yet they can't -- or won't -- see the patriotic messages in American film. In the case of Casablanca, they've taken select snippets of the film to affirm a contemporary Leftist message, and totally missed or ignored the proverbial elephant in the living room.
The film was released in 1943 -- well after Pearl Harbor but before it was evident that the war had turned to favor the Allies and USSR.
Rick's Cafe Americaine is metaphor for the US itself -- a haven for refugees of the chaos and death in Europe. Despite the presence of the Nazi overlords and a wormy Vichy police captain, it's where a wanted Czech resistence leader can stand up in front of the Nazis and lead an inspiring rendition of the French national anthem (La Marseillaise), and where Frenchmen demoralized by Vichy rally to their anthem, finding their patriotism and drowning out the singing of the Germans (Weren't they singing Wacht am Rhein?). It is at Rick's that the Oppressed find their spirit of freedom and rise to spit in the face of the Nazis. The Nazis and even Captain Renault are virtually powerless under Rick's roof.
Rick himself is the reluctant but stoic American hero of the times, caught up in political conflict and realities he'd hoped to avoid in Casablanca, but no longer able to once his former lover and her husband show up. He'd hoped to remain neutral (like the US), but the war engulfs him (like the US). Forced in the end to choose between selfish passion and patriotic calling, he opts for the latter, even at the cost of losing everything he owns in Casablanca.
Audiences today, living in a world of relative morality and self-absorption, may not appreciate Rick's choice or why he made it.
But to audiences in 1943, the message came through loud and clear, and it's why it was not only one of the most popular films of the WW2-era, but remains so today.
Kudos, Galvanic... Very
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 17:46 ET by JerKudos, Galvanic...
Very nice analysis, eloquently stated.
Jer
BTW...Are you sure it was released in '43? I was thinking '42.
Yes, general release in 1943 ...
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 20:14 ET by Jack Coleman... but its premiere in NYC in Thanksgiving 1942, as I recall, only weeks after the Allied invasion of North Africa.
Remembering a classic
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 23:55 ET by GalvanicThanks for your kind comments, Jer.
You may be right, Jack. I originally had 1942 written in the post, but then checked my DVD copy and it read 1943, so I edited it. But a late 1942 release does seem correct.
After posting, I rewatched the emotional Marsaillaise scene in Rick's Cafe for the umpteenth time, and was again impressed with the stark symbolism and unabashed sentiment of patriotism and resistance in the very face of the enemy. It's so very powerful.
How the libs misinterpret this film is beyond me.
Well, Galvanic, to be fair,
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 00:04 ET by JerWell, Galvanic, to be fair, there are a good many of us "libs" who don't misinterpret the film.
By the way, I've seen the movie countless times, and still get choked up during the Marsaillaise scene.
Jer
Same here, Jer
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 10:18 ET by GalvanicI'm no fan of the French, but that particular scene grabs me everytime. That one, and the scene at the airport near the end.
Rick hands the letters of transit to Lazlo, who shakes his hand and says, "Welcome back to the fight. This time I know our side will win."
Great writing.
Yes, "America is just one
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 13:39 ET by snaggletoothieYes, "America is just one part of the rest of the world." The part that gives the world hope.
What happened to the Hollywood that made patriotic films?
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 13:56 ET by DaMavCasablanca has long been one of my favorite movies for many reasons. But even put on a pedestal, the movie is a blatant piece of propaganda for the Allies and against the Axis. And America was portrayed in an extremely favorable light -- the hope of the world against evil. Reagan before Reagan. A wonderful reminder that Hollywood wasn't always a festering sore of anti-Americanism.
How can these idiots have missed it? Their world view prefers seeing Truman as a war criminal. They are trying to rewrite history, and now that the vets of WWII are dying off they have started on Evil America the bully vs. innocent Japanese and German civilians. Jon Stewart may have recanted but many on the left were vociferously defending his condemnation of America's blow that ended the Second World War. And Obama is doing his best to make Churchill into John Lennon.
What allows this to happen is the takeover of American history education by the left, brainwashing our children. It's all about slavery, witch trials, and the Eeevil McCarthy in schools these days. No wonder they fall for the revisions.
I really think that people
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:02 ET by balboaI really think that people still have a "hangover" from Nixon. They don't trust government, they see the potential for corruption in power, big business. They think that it is the Democrats who are only truly interested in "the little guy."
balboa: I'm not so sure
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:09 ET by QueenMumbalboa: I'm not so sure it's that. Most of those in the 20's-30's age range don't know too much about Nixon, especially if they're educated in liberal universities. And I see a contradiction in "They don't trust government, they see the potential for corruption in power, big business." Not trusting government and corruption in power, yes. But why do the same people want to demonize "big business" when the anti-thesis of government control is free-market capitalism?
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
Some of the 20-30-somethings
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:17 ET by balboaSome of the 20-30-somethings have inherited this distrust, perhaps.
Falsely, they believe that there's corruption in government except when _their_ party is in power, that business will run rampant over the "little guy" unless government steps in.
That's pretty convoluted
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:30 ET by QueenMumbalboa: That's pretty convoluted thinking, wouldn't you say? The young adults that I know personally are well-educated and generally don't think their parents are as smart as they. IMO, what they primarily lack are critical thinking skills and common sense. Today's young people have successfully overcome racism. And yet they're willing to believe the liberal lie that America is still a racist society. So I doubt that this apparent disconnect is inherited.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
True. I'm probably placing
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:37 ET by balboaTrue. I'm probably placing too much importance on Nixon, but I do think that jaded a good number of people.
Perhaps we're more cynical as a people, maybe less inclined to trust anything that smacks of being overtly earnest. From baseball players lying about 'roids to politicians getting in trouble, etc.
Nixon? Hell, JFK did more
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 15:21 ET by BDNixon? Hell, JFK did more to tarnish the presidential image and image of the nation in his short two years but he is still "Camelotted".
Perhaps, but hasn't info on
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 16:15 ET by balboaPerhaps, but hasn't info on JFK leaked out gradually to the public over the past 40 years, as opposed to Nixon who went out in one big ol' flash?
JFK will always represent to some the promise of new leadership, even if he didn't always live up to that standard.
→ Tru dat, bal
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 16:28 ET by Cool ArrowMy only problem with Kennedy was his cowardice related to the Bay of Pigs. I think it's clear he knew the cost in terms of Cuban fighters whom the American government had encouraged.
Far as I can tell, Kennedy never raped, or otherwise forced himself on the women with whom he liaised.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
What about..........
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 16:45 ET by Kingfish17......Marilyn Monroe?
→ Marilyn Monroe
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 18:54 ET by Cool ArrowI always figured it was obvious she thought there was more to the relationship than Jack or Bobby were willing to give.
I never bought into the murder conspiracy thing.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Exactly, Cool... [Now if
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 19:01 ET by JerExactly, Cool...
[Now if I could just get you to see the light on that Bay of Pigs deal.] :-)
Jer
Quiz
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 16:41 ET by Kingfish17Which President dropped marginal tax rates for the wealthiest of Americans? JFK or Nixon
Which President imposed wage and price controls on America? JFK or Nixon?
Who was "conservative" and who was a Statist?
The myth that only
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:36 ET by motherbeltThe myth that only Democrats care about the little guy is just that: a myth. After 40 years of the Democratic "War on Poverty" there are no fewer poor than there ever were.
Just like blacks, who continually vote for Democrats who have not made their lives one bit better, who keep their kids trapped in substandard and downright dangerous (physically AND mentally) schools.
But the myth that the Democrats "care" about them lives on...kept alive by Democrats and believed by people who can't see the truth when it slaps them upside the head, or just don't care.
For the life of me, I can't understand why.
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
You are correct, we have
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 15:19 ET by BDYou are correct, we have waged a war against poverty that has become a self licking ice cream cone.
We now have poverty that allows its supposed most wretched to misallocate their wages and welfare checks to expensive sneakers, color televisions, all you can eat dinners at the Sizzler food bar, satellite television, and cars modified to be as loud as possible.
In other words, poverty in this nation is largely a myth constructed for political reasons.
Not just Nixon . . .
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 15:44 ET by GalvanicLBJ certainly inspired a lot of mistrust in government. Nixon's behavior was icing on the cake.
One of our critical dilemmas is a general lack of historical perspective in the public, and its gullibility when it comes to getting info from the likes of The Daily Show and others. It's no wonder that politicians can change facts and the public hardly bats an eye.
A high school history teacher told me that the number of students who've taken Oliver Stone's JFK as gospel is alarming. If they aren't spoon fed news and history in entertaining morsels, they have no inclination to seek it out themselves.
We as a society are doomed if our decisions are based on the creative writing and wrong-history conveniently delivered right to our homes by the entertainment industry -- and I include MSNBC in that industry.
Galvanic, I agree...I've
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 07:24 ET by motherbeltGalvanic, I agree...I've commented here many times that too many young people believe "JFK" is a documentary. This is why Hollywood's excuse that "it's just a movie..it's fiction" rings hollow. They know exactly what they are doing!
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
The "Eeevil McCarthy"
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 18:43 ET by JerWhat allows this to happen is the takeover of American history education by the left, brainwashing our children. It's all about slavery, witch trials, and the Eeevil McCarthy in schools these days. No wonder they fall for the revisions.
Well, I can tell you what happened when your buddy Joe McCarthy was calling the shots: The Casablanca screenwriter who supplied the pro-American political narrative for the script was later blacklisted. McCarthy wasn't an evil man. He was simply an extraordinarily reckless opportunist. McCarthyism, however, was indeed evil.
Jer
So, what exactly is
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 20:08 ET by BDSo, what exactly is McCarthy-ism?
Is it McCarthyism to report that the State Department is riddled with Sov's?
McCarthyism? In my
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 23:49 ET by JerMcCarthyism?
In my view, briefly stated: Condemnation for political beliefs....Guilt by association.
The State Department was indeed penetrated by the Soviets. Nevertheless, McCarthy was long on accusations, but woefully short on proof--the quintessential demagogue.
Jer
Jer: So you also believe
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 09:12 ET by BDJer:
So you also believe nearly everything the libs are doing right now is a McCarthyite move right?
BTW, what do you think he
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 14:27 ET by balboaBTW, what do you think he means, "America is just one part of the rest of the world"? That America wasn't front-and-center in an American-made movie? It's a vague statement.
First...
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 16:07 ET by nolotrippen... they misquote and mangle the Bible.
Then they misquote and mangle the Constitution.
Then they misquote and mangle great movies.
"I've had one motto I've always lived by: Dignity.
Always dignity." --Don Lockwood, Singin' In The Rain
Mr. Coleman has constructed
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 19:31 ET by JerMr. Coleman has constructed a rather grand narrative around a brief, simplistic, and somewhat ambiguous observation by Kent Jones. A little more context would be helpful.
It is noteworthy that the screenwriter (Howard Koch) generally credited with providing the political texture to Casablanca was later blacklisted during the McCarthy era.
Jer
BTW...One of those "best lines" about "America blundering into Berlin in 1918" is historically inaccurate. Neither the U.S. nor any of the Allied forces made it to Berlin during WWI.
Fair enough about that line from Renault
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 20:20 ET by Jack Coleman"Blundered" to victory over Germany in WWI would have been more accurate and carried as much punch.
As for context, I provided plenty, and I began the piece by complimenting Jones. The man has made me laugh more than once; this time he made me wince. The America he claims exists in "Casablanca" is nowhere to be found in the actual movie.
It's just a vague line by
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 20:28 ET by balboaIt's just a vague line by Jones. I don't really understand what he's saying or trying to say.
It's not vague ...
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 21:41 ET by Jack Coleman... it's dismissive -- American exceptionalism, phooey!
Jack... I'm not
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 23:41 ET by JerJack...
I'm not necessarily holding you responsible for [what I believe to be] insufficient context. It may very well be that Jones made the statement without further elaboration or explanation. However, since there is no transcript or video provided, the question remains open.
Jer
No video?
Thu, 05/14/2009 - 23:22 ET by Jack ColemanNot sure what you mean, Jer. Embedded in the post is a video of Jones' remarks and a clip from "Casablanca." I made sure the video started with Maddow introducing Jones, extending until Jones spoke of "Casablanca," and ending when he moved to next subject.
My apologies, Jack... I
Thu, 05/14/2009 - 23:51 ET by JerMy apologies, Jack...
I clicked on your highlighted Walt and Drezner links, and was already familiar with your previous blogs about Maddow's "Depression era revisionism" and "Shaky grasp of American History", but this was after I had skimmed right past the Casablanca video. Seeing the still image of Bogart and Rains, I didn't realize it was actually tape from a segment of Maddow. My eyesight not being so sharp these days, I failed to notice the Maddow and MSNBC logos in the corners of the frame. My mistake.
I do wish Jones had amplified his remarks however.
Jer
Rick Blaine
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 18:56 ET by arcb102000I view "Casablanca" as the return of the hero to his previous state. I have always considered Rick as a symbol of the American people. As I recall from the film, Rick is supposed to have fought against fascists (the bad guys) in the Spanish Civil War. He was idealistic, and losing Ilsa causes him to become jaded. At the end of the film, he again regains his idealism through sacrifice for Ilsa.
The film seemed to me to parallel America's views of Wilsonian idealism resulting in our WW1 involvement, followed by disillusioned isolationism of the 20s and 30s, and then involvement in WW2 and the fight against fascism.
→ Yeah, what he said
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 19:00 ET by Cool ArrowI thought it was a good show, too.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
arc
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 19:22 ET by Noel Sheppardarc,
Well, remember that when the Peter Lorre character is arrested at the beginning, and Rick doesn't help him, he famously says, "I stick my neck out for no MAN!"
Now, he didn't say "nobody." He said "no man."
Yet, in the end, he's sticking his neck out for a woman -- or is he?
The beauty about this ending is that Rick is once again giving up his one true love, but this time for another man who he believes can't live without her.
He tells Ilsa, "You're part of his work, the thing that keeps him going."
As such, his sacrifice isn't to Ilsa -- it's to Victor, who he clearly admires and believes is necessary to defeat the Nazis who he clearly despises.
Earlier in the movie, the young Bulgarian gal asks Rick whether Captain Renault can be trusted:
Ah, but at the end of the film, he finally discovers that somebody DOES love him that much, and that gives him the will to get back in the fight.
Truly a marvelous ending to a truly marvelous film. ns
I always felt Rick's
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 20:52 ET by Radical1979I always felt Rick's character represented the U.S. He sometimes pulls away from helping others after his failures during the Spanish Civil War etc. But in the end, Rick, and the U.S., do the noble thing in sacrificing for a higher good. Rick gives up Ilse so her husband can carry his message to the U.S., and joins the fight again. The U.S., no matter how badly we are perceived or maligned by the rest of the world, ALWAYS helps those in need.
Liberals never make that choice, they always take the road to self-satisfaction.
Insert Jokes Here:
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 21:51 ET by RpeggioWe should help the lame liberal left comedians and writers with some Obama jokes....they appear to be unable to poke fun at the President...."he's too competent" etc. gimme a break. Here are a few obvious areas that contain comedic gold, that they appear to be unwilling or ignorant about:
Excessive teleprompter use:
- "President Obama may be over-doing it with the teleprompter.....whenever you watch him on tv it looks like he's watching a tennis match...(look left/right/left/right)....especially if you speed it up on your DVR. I saw him the other day at his daughter's birthday party, (looking back and forth) happy, birthday, to, you, happy, birthday, to, you. " Or " I wonder if he uses that thing in the bedroom....(looking left/right) honey, you, look, hot, tonight....etc. There's a zillion ways you could make jokes about his excessive teleprompter use.
That's just a couple quick ideas, it really does look like he's watching a tennis match when you speed it up. There's a lot of comedy gold in his teleprompter use....I mean the guy is over-using the thing so ridiculously.
-The Air Force One NY Fly-Over: I've seen jokes about it, but none of them aimed at Obama of course...it is HIS plane. You could easily poke fun by saying. "The President had a little issue this past week with the Air Force One fly-over of NY.....supposedly a photo-op....kind of a bone head move (wincing). I mean really, the President doesn't need to add that picture to his resume or portfolio right? What position's a higher than the President of the USA.....(pause, look puzzled, and then just look up to the sky) (end the joke by saying) it IS the ONLY position above his pay grade. (course a liberal leftie would deliver that joke as if he agreed Obama is so great he could be God, but if you tell it with a tinge of attitude, you can poke at his apparently huge ego)
Other character flaws or issues he's dealt with that jokes could be made about: his slow deliberate speech pattern has jokes in it, his huge ego, his big ears, his wife wearing the pants in the family or being bigger than him and able to kick his butt most likely, his many challenges in picking folks for his administration because many had tax issues, investigations, backing out and saying no like Gupta etc.)....he still has several positions unfilled like Surgeon General (a joke about that vacancy and having to deal with swine flu was an easy target), his spending record amounts of money on a Chinese credit card (quadrupling the debt spending in his 1st 100 days), his many broken campaign promises already, his ordering dijon mustard and referring to his elitism-refer to the old Grey Poupon Rolls Royce ads, his old friends Wright/Ayers/Rezko when they pop back into the news scene and so on...
Every week there's a comment, action, or event that has Obama within it just waiting to be written and told....but the media and hollyweird are mostly liberal lefties and still in love with the man...they don't want to poke fun at him....period...the jokes are always there waiting to be told, they just love the man. It's pathetic and embarrassing.
"Here's looking at you, kid!"
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 23:09 ET by metaphorsbwithuJust a wonderful piece. Thank you Mr. Coleman. Hardly anything more to add, except perhaps this great piece of dialogue:
Major Strasser: "What is your nationality?"
Rick: "I'm a drunkard."
Captain Renault: "That makes Rick a citizen of the world."
Insightful, telling, and a little prophetic too. If only we had more writers like that now!
metaphorsbwithu
Wow! Really grasping at
Sun, 05/10/2009 - 23:40 ET by RR GOPWow! Really grasping at straws now aren't they? Obviously they are finding it harder to support the Obamanation especially since half a million or more Americans continue to lose their jobs every month, no one wants to buy our debt without charging outrageous interest, and the Dollar's becoming inflated and we may be looking at $4-5 a gallon in the coming months because of this inflationary tax and spend/hope and change/step 'n fetchit nonsense.
Personally, I thought Casablanca was boring and mediocre, though it did have its moments. I find The Treasure of the Sierra Madre and especially The Maltese Falcon to be better films.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Rachel!
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 00:06 ET by blazermaniacI thought the words, "Rachel Maddow" & "Mis-informed" were always part of the same sentence. No wonder her so-called ratings continue to tank.
Double R...
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 00:17 ET by JerWe would have never been movie "buds". I thought Casablanca superb, and Treasure and Maltese Falcon both vastly overrated.
Jer
Jer
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 00:40 ET by Noel SheppardJer,
When's the last time you saw "Falcon"? Sam Spade was a fabulous character for Bogie, and his scenes with Mary Astor and Sidney Greenstreet are nothing less than delicious. Some of the best dialogue ever written for the big screen. Absolutely brilliant.
Honestly, I used to feel the same way as you. I thought Casablanca and Big Sleep were in a different league than Falcon. But, having watched this film several times, it is not only NOT overrated, but it might be Bogie's best performance. Honestly. He's a more natural Sam Spade than Philip Marlowe even though Marlowe is a better character, and Sleep is a much better book. Not even close.
Please watch this again. It really is brilliant.
As for "Treasure," it's a good film, maybe even a great film, but not in the same league as Sleep, Casablanca, and Falcon. Not even close.
That said, want to talk about "African Queen"? Bogie and Hepburn? Amazing. ns
I will, Noel... To
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 01:18 ET by JerI will, Noel...
To be honest, my criticism of The Maltese Falcon was unfair. I have seen extended segments of the film on multiple occasions, but have never actually watched it in one sitting--from beginning to end. It's a genre I find especially appealing, but the disjointed viewing has undoubtedly influenced my negative reaction.
On the other hand, The Big Sleep was a poor adaptation of a marvelous book. Plot development was a mess.
Jer
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 01:50 ET by Noel SheppardJer,
Noooo. Though Howard Hawks didn't stick to Chandler's marvelous book, it's a fabulous film due to the complexity of the plot and the brilliance of the dialogue. Marlowe was a great character, and the scenes between Bogie and Bacall were classic.
There's a scene in a restaurant where the two of them are talking about horse racing, but it's all sexual double entendres which for the time were totally unheard of on the screen. They were brilliant together in this film -- I think their best by far.
"To Have and Have Not" gets the best reviews of Bogie-Bacall films because of the whistling scene, but Sleep was a much more interesting plot, and much more interesting characters for the two of them with a lot more heat.
Yes, it's not as good as the book. Maybe not close. But how many films really live up to that standard?
If you haven't seen Sleep in a while without any interruptions, try it again. I think this is the best murder mystery film ever made with the possible exception of Chinatown -- but J.J. Giddes was really a Marlowe takeoff, wouldn't you agree? ns
Noel.. As a special favor
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 02:22 ET by JerNoel..
As a special favor to you, I'll give Big Sleep another chance, but in my opinion, the film suffered from excessive plot complexities which never quite coalesced into a satisfying denouement.
Yes, Bogie and Bacall were superb, and the clever double entendres, uber-risque for the time, still enliven their repartee even--perhaps especially--in the "anything goes" atmosphere of contemporary cinema. But, damn, it just seemed like somebody must have sneaked onto the set every night after shooting and reshuffled all the pieces on the storyboard.
Jer
The Big Sleep
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 02:25 ET by metaphorsbwithuNo one could totally capture Chandler's writing style, but aside from casting Bogart as Christopher Marlowe - Chandler's version was a "tall" (not a "not so tall are ya") blonde as I recall - in The Big Sleep, having to produce a movie about pornography trafficing in the forties (only vaguely suggested in the film), and working with a complex plot, I thought Hawks did a brilliant job. Much of that dialogue and most of the scenes are straight from the novel. It requires numerous viewings because there are so many threads (and loose threads) to absorb - as do the writings of Hammett and Chandler require numerous readings.
IMHO.
metaphorsbwithu
wait...
Mon, 05/11/2009 - 12:18 ET by candanceI must be missing something here.
My interpretation was that Hollywood actually made a film that took place on another continent. Like saying stuff that happens in Africa can be just as compelling as what happens in the West.
I didn't hear anything about Casablanca happening in America.
Am I reading the same thing as the rest of you?
The post is not what "Casablanca" is about ...
Thu, 05/14/2009 - 23:28 ET by Jack Coleman... but what Jones erroneously claims America represents in "Casablanca". Jones says the movie makes the "radical" claim that America is "just one part of the rest of the world." In other words, nothing exceptional or significant -- a claim belied by the fact that many of the significant figures in the film being desperate to escape to America.