On her cable show Tuesday night, Maddow informed viewers of "breaking news" that a terrorist suspect imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay had somehow called the Qatar-based Al Jazeera network on a cell phone.
Here's how Maddow described it --
We are pre-empting Ms. Information tonight to report a couple of late-breaking stories, both of which we have learned about late in the day today. The first, from Guantanamo, where apparently a prisoner has been able to surreptiously make a phone call to a TV network from inside the prison.
The Al Jazeera television network has posted on its Web site a transcript of the call. It's the first known interview with anyone imprisoned at Guantanamo. While journalists have been allowed to tour the prison, they have done so on the condition that they will not speak with prisoners there.
The prisoner who called out is apparently Mohammad El Gharani. You might recognize his name because a federal judge ordered him freed from Guantanamo back in January, about a week before President Obama took office. Despite the judge's order to free Mr. Gharani and send him to either Saudi Arabia where he was from or to Chad, he has not been freed. He is housed still at Guantanamo along with other prisoners who the courts have ordered freed, but who the US government cannot figure out what to do with.
Mr. Gharani's name may also be familiar to you because he is the prisoner who was locked up at Guantanamo when he was only 14 years old. He was picked up in Pakistan at age 14, he has been in Guantanmo ever since, he is now 21 years old.
In the call from Guantanamo, Mr. Gharani alleged that he had been beaten with batons and tear-gassed for refusing to leave his cell. An unnamed government official told the Reuters news agency that Mr. Gharani made the call to the Al Jazeera network under the guise of calling a family member. He was supposed to have called an uncle. It would be against Guantanamo's policy if Mr. Gharani dialed the number himself. That should have been done by a staff member or a guard there at the facility. Also, nobody knows why he had Al Jazeera's phone number.
We will keep you posted if there's any further information or response to this first breaking news story.
Unless "further information" converts sacred cow into hamburger. Perhaps this explains why Maddow, despite her vow to follow up, hasn't gone near the story ever since.
Where Maddow was genuinely dutiful, at least in service of her ideology, was in neglecting to mention when the alleged abuse took place. And it strains credulity that Maddow wasn't aware of this during her show Tuesday, since the time frame for the alleged abuse was mentioned prominently in the first source she cited -- the Al Jazeera story.
Even though the story linked above was updated on April 15, its first two paragraphs are identical to the story cited by Maddow the previous night. The third paragraph, only partially visible in the Maddow screenshot but fully so to her as a reader, was more than she was willing to share with viewers.
The paragraph reads --
"This treatment started about 20 days before Obama came into power, and since then I've been subjected to it almost every day," he told Al Jazeera.
Reuters posted a story on Gharani at 8:29 p.m. Tuesday, a half hour before the Maddow show was broadcast. Given time constraints, Maddow may have cited an earlier version of the story. If so, the story posted at 8:29 p.m. would presumably have been tagged as "updated". Here is the first paragraph of the Reuters story --
A young Guantanamo prisoner from Chad was given permission to telephone a relative but instead called the Al Jazeera television network and said he was being beaten and abused at the U.S. detention camp.
Al Jazeera and Reuters reported that Gharani claimed the alleged abuse began about 20 days before Obama took office -- and has continued ever since. In other words, during both the Bush junta and Obama criminal regime. Oops, sorry. A former leftist, I still lapse into occasional agitprop.
Maddow told viewers she was "pre-empting the Ms. Information" portion of her show to report on Gharani's phone call to Al Jazeera. If she continues her earnest brand of cherry-picked journalism, Maddow runs the risk of being renown for "misinformation" instead.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"Mr. Obama, resign, Sir.
April 17, 2009 - 11:18 ET by SickofLibs"Mr. Obama, resign, Sir. This shall not stand."
This is silly, though; all these terrorists know the Al Jaz phone number by heart: 1-800-DIE-INFIDELS.
Or visit them on the web at www.iBehead.com.
Terrorists are liars.
April 17, 2009 - 11:46 ET by TailgunnerThey're trained to lie. They're trained to make false and outrageous claims of torture and abuse, knowing that the anti-American left MSM will uncritically use them as headlines and lead stories.
Screw em.
If a terrorist leaves Gitmo with his head and all his fingers and toes, he shouldn't complain.
It's better treatment than we'd get if we were in their sandals.
NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE
Hmmmm
April 17, 2009 - 11:33 ET by DoktorFrankenI wonder who Maddow's barber is.
Maddow's Barber?
April 17, 2009 - 11:44 ET by ArcherBThat's easy. You can tell by looking that it's the same one that does Harry Potter's hair.
Unless Maddow IS Harry Potter... Hmmm.... Anyone see the two of them at the same place and time?
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."
--Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Maddow is the boy that
April 17, 2009 - 12:23 ET by Ruths husband BenMaddow is the boy that lived? Explains a lot.
Obama: "The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers." -Ed Mahmoud
Her dentist.
April 17, 2009 - 13:15 ET by NL207Her dentist.
She has a new word in
April 17, 2009 - 11:38 ET by kgShe has a new word in her report: alleged. We haven't seen that word in ...oh...about 8 years.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
NB Article Incomplete?
April 17, 2009 - 11:43 ET by BlueCat57It seems like this NB article just peters out. What is the "inconvenient truth" that Maddow missed?
Was it that a Gitmo inmate was allowed to make a phone call?
Was it that the inmate had Al Jezeera's phone number?
Was it that the abuse continues under Obama?
Was it that Saudi Arabia and the Chad have probably refused to take this terrorist?
Just what is the "inconvenient truth"?
It was of course the
April 17, 2009 - 11:53 ET by BDIt was of course the falsified notion that it was a breaking story, which it was not. This was done in a manner to HYPE the story rather than report on it.
I wonder if Madow would perofrm any logical analysis on the claims put forth by the detainee?
Or is it a story just toooo sexy to check out since it badmouths the dreaded DOD?
The "inconvenient element" ...
April 17, 2009 - 12:28 ET by Jack Coleman... not "inconvenient truth" is that the abuse being alleged took place during the Bush and Obama presidencies. Which Maddow must have been aware of, based on the sources she cited, yet conveniently neglected to tell her viewers.
Jack - thanks for petering
April 17, 2009 - 13:24 ET by SickofLibsJack - thanks for petering back in!
As Marge Gunderson would say ...
April 17, 2009 - 13:57 ET by Jack ColemanYou betcha!
Can You Hear Me Now?
April 17, 2009 - 13:01 ET by ConScottSort of puts a new spin on "rollover" minutes.
One Wonders . . .
April 17, 2009 - 15:39 ET by DirjjOne wonders . . . what was an "innoncent" 14-year from Chad / Saudi Arabia doing in Pakistan in the first place. Inquiring minds want to know.
ab
Teabagger
April 17, 2009 - 13:45 ET by JmerkleI wonder if she would be the recipient or the bagger.
Teabagger
April 17, 2009 - 14:37 ET by DoktorFrankenOoooooo! Snap!
Of this we can be sure
April 17, 2009 - 17:22 ET by Jack ColemanShe's not the one who hates onerous taxation
Obama resigning may not be a good idea.
April 21, 2009 - 03:44 ET by fastfoodIf O resigns then Biden would become President. And Biden
cannot keep from putting both feet in his mouth for four minutes much less four
years. Also, Pelosi would become VP and Biden would Pelosi's
"yes-man." Then we'd be totally screwed.
You would think so...
April 21, 2009 - 09:47 ET by Tailgunner...but most likely Biden and his talking heads would spend so much time in 'damage control' mode that the Dems' agenda could be stalled.
I'm not sure Pelosi would automatically become VP. Rules of succession only apply in catastrophes (no, this one doesn't count).
Remember Nixon lost Agnew and fought to get Ford confirmed as VP before his own resignation.
NOLI PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE