Hours from the premiere of his MSNBC cable show Monday night, radio host Ed Schultz told listeners what they can expect on his television show (click here for audio) --
If it's successful then I think you win because I know what I'm going to be talking about, I know what kind of stories I'm going to be looking for. And I want to make sure that the Democrats don't get weak knees on the Employee Free Choice Act.
Yet it was Schultz whose knees grew wobbly after the Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed by Rush Limbaugh on the so-called Fairness Doctrine in February.
Not only did Limbaugh leave Schultz the most unhinged he'd been since McCain picked Palin, Schultz vowed to respond in print, telling his listeners he'd been in touch with a Wall Street Journal editor about writing an op-ed in the Journal.
Two months later, still no op-ed challenge to Limbaugh from the blustery Schultz.
Elaborating further on plans for his MSNBC show, Schultz said he would target Newt Gingrich for his first "Psycho Talk" segment after North Korea tested a long-range missile and Gingrich criticized Obama's policies for leaving the US vulnerable to attack (click here for audio clips) --
SCHULTZ: Newt, where the hell were you when they were shooting these things off before? Newt has now fallen into the category of psycho talk. He says there will be another 9/11 if we don't pay attention to North Korea right now. Newt, I didn't hear that from you when Bush was in there. I didn't hear that kind of talk from you when they fired off some other missiles. Here's the comment, here it is --
GINGRICH (in interview on "Fox News Sunday"): We've been talking about this since the Clinton administration and they have been building nuclear weapons and building better and better missiles while we keep talking. And one morning, just like 9/11, there's going to be a disaster and people are going to look around and say, gosh, why didn't anyone think of that? Well I'm telling you the time to think about it's before the disaster, not afterwards.
SCHULTZ: Oh Newt, I tell you, it's so insightful, I don't know what we're going to do with that audio. I mean, that's just, that's like God is speaking to us. Why didn't you talk like that when Bush was in office? You're a phony, Newt! And you're not a Catholic! You're just making everybody think you are! C'mon! Now tell me, Newt, how does the Pope feel about striking North Korea right early on, huh? Where does he stand on that? What a phony! What a complete phony! The Newtster's back at it! He's first up on Psycho Talk! He doesn't know what he is! He doesn't know who he's married to!
Also on Monday's radio show --
SCHULTZ: My oh my, what 77 days will do to America. I struggle with this. Hey look, he has the right to say what he wants to say, freedom of speech and everything else, but all this does is divide the camps. Because God forbid if we do get hit again, it'll be civil war in America. I mean that!
And later on, with beaten horse still showing signs of life --
SCHULTZ: Newt, why don't you just admit it that this is just your opinion. You don't know squat! Oh you had somebody who used to work somewhere at guessing and making think-tank assumption and now you're going to tell me that you got it from Brent Bozell and those nitwits over at Media Research Council (sic). This, this, this is their research! Just throw it up there and divide the country.
What's laughable about Schultz excoriating anyone for alleged "psycho talk" is that he so often engages in the real thing, as shown in devastating detail by Brian Maloney at The Radio Equalizer.
Watching Schultz weave from Democratic hall monitor to volcanic bellicosity toward Gingrich, it dawned on me who I was reminded of -- the late comedian Chris Farley, whose "motivational speaker" Matt Foley ranks among the best characters created on "Saturday Night Live."
Follow this link for what I believe is Foley's first and funniest appearance on "SNL" and see if you discern the parallels to Schultz. Enjoy!




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The only way a Democrat
April 10, 2009 - 08:54 ET by fitzfongThe only way a Democrat will succumb to "weak knees" is after he/she votes against Card Check...courtesy of a lead pipe assault delivered by one of Ed Schultz's SEIU goon friends.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
MSNBC is going to be needing
April 10, 2009 - 08:58 ET by SickofLibsMSNBC is going to be needing A LOT of coffee tables.
Coffee Tables
April 10, 2009 - 19:01 ET by DoktorFrankenTHAT'S Funny!! And don't forget, a lot of coffee dumped down his throat in the basement.
Any Wonder
April 10, 2009 - 09:11 ET by rightwingidiotAny wonder this guy doesn't have much of an audience.
Pretty hard to listen to for more than 8 minutes. Bought and paid for by the Democratic party. The bestest they could buy.
And, yet, he's not a pimple on Rush Limbaugh's ass.
It's the Bamster that has divided us!
April 10, 2009 - 09:34 ET by slickwillie2001Looking at the numbers, it's President Narcissus that has divided the country to a greater extent than ever seen. This fact is actively ignored by the liberal media, bcause when democratics are in power the message push is that at last, now the country is united behind a democratic!
Schultz vowed to respond in
April 10, 2009 - 12:17 ET by Chris NormanSchultz vowed to respond in print...writing an op-ed in the Journal."
Huh. Who would've thought that Ed Schultz knew how to write?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Ed, you are the epitome of what "air amerika" was all about...
April 10, 2009 - 10:56 ET by pahuberand that's why it failed.
This is exactly the type of person that people TRY to make Rush Limbaugh out to be... a fat, obnoxious wind bag full of swinging bluster swinging wildly in all directions.
Psycho talk certainly lives up to its name, but not how eddy imagines that it did...
Where is he??
April 10, 2009 - 11:58 ET by rockemsockemSchultz is on MSNBC? I thought he was in A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!!!!!
Shame on the rest of you for not thinking of that faster!!
Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain
Working as pundit at MSNBC ...
April 10, 2009 - 16:33 ET by Jack Coleman... is television equivalent of living in a van down by the river.
This guy is unhinged
April 10, 2009 - 15:20 ET by freecitizenEven just reading the transcripts you can practically hear his voice rising in a near breathless hysteria. His thoughts are all over the place.
Schults, do you know where Gingrich was
April 10, 2009 - 16:38 ET by TheHistorianWhen North Korea was shooting off these rockets before? He was telling fools like you that this country is part of the "axis of evil". Remember how you frothed when you heard President Bush say that? And how he got sandbagged by the liberals in the State Department?
How about not worrying about what anyone else did, and take up your microphone to tell your liberal buddies to fix it now. You have your vunderPrez, now let's see how he makes the world love us. Maybe he didn't "lean" over far enough with the King, and was facing the wrong side of him. And maybe Hillary didn't giggle enogh?
"What experience and history teach is
this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history,
or acted on principles deduced from it."
G. W. F. Hegel
The only Psycho here is the
April 10, 2009 - 16:40 ET by bigtimerThe only Psycho here is the creature spewing his leftist bullshite.
I have watched one segment with this feature/segment of his show...last I will watch too.
His bombastic screeching was a once is enough for me type of thing.
The guy has issues.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Ah
April 10, 2009 - 19:48 ET by someloudthunderThat picture of Foley. Nostalgia memories.
Sorry,
April 10, 2009 - 19:52 ET by RESTLESS 1But who is this ed schultz guy? I've never heard of him.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
There's still no WSJ
April 10, 2009 - 23:03 ET by ReaganRuledThere's still no WSJ article because the WSJ knows that an embittered Liberal doesn't sell newspapers. No one wants to hear (read) a purely emotional rant piece which, as is the modus of Lieberals, is lacking of any reason or economic logic whatsoever.
Weak Knees
April 11, 2009 - 14:19 ET by brain trustThe only thing weaker than their knees is their mind.
The liberals golden rule - We must all suffer equally!
Before we have a government that can supply us with everything we will have a government that can provide us with nothing.