Media Consistently $30 Million Short on Soros Drug Funding
George Soros is up to his old tricks again. The “sugar daddy of the legalization movement,” as conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer described him, has given more than $31 million to the Drug Policy Alliance, which will host its biennial convention Nov. 2-5 in California to build support for the drug legalization movement. But when the media mention DPA, they either fail to note the Soros connection or fall $30 million short on how much he funded them.
Media coverage of DPA has left out Soros’s influence with the group. In the past two years, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and USA Today referenced DPA 58 times. Only 7 percent (4 of 58) of those stories labeled Soros as a backer of the organization. In those rare times he was mentioned, his contribution was never described as more than $1 million, again $30 million shy of his total donations for the past 10 years.
The broadcast networks also failed to highlight the connection between Soros and DPA. Between ABC, CBS, and NBC, the Alliance was only mentioned twice. In both cases, guests from the group were interviewed, but Soros was never mentioned.
The funding isn’t hard to find. Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated $31,394,572 to the Drug Policy Alliance from 2000-2009, with $29,166,927 going directly to DPA and another $2,227,645 going to the Drug Policy Foundation. The Open Society Institute is even an exhibitor at the November conference, along with Soros funding recipients like the ACLU and the Marijuana Policy Project.
This November, the biennial International Drug Policy Reform Conference will host more than 1,000 attendees from 30 countries that support reforming marijuana laws and decriminalize drug use. According its website, there will be “55 sessions over 3 days” on topics to include criminal justice, harm reduction, marijuana, and more.
Scorning the “taboo associated with drug use,” DPA claims it wants to end the drug war. Along with Soros, the Alliance has tried for years to change drug policy around the world, but particularly within the United States. They call marijuana laws “an utter failure” that have led to “unprecedented levels of violence and corruption.”
Drug laws are also blamed for “profoundly racist outcomes” and a “system of racial control as the Jim Crow laws were.” One of the group’s highest priorities is to reduce the drug stigma in favor of a “judgment-free” approach that is supposed to reduce overdose deaths and the spread of diseases such as HIV/AIDS through needle exchange programs and pharmacy sales.
The website even features a video starring key supporters to include Sting, George Soros, and former talk show host Montel Williams. In this video they explained their vision for lax drug policies and described the drug war as a “war on people.”
The anti-drug war message is also promoted by the Soros-funded lefty media. As the Business & Media Institute has reported, a study by the Media Consortium detailed how progressives had created an "echo chamber" of outlets "in which a message pushes the larger public or the mainstream media to acknowledge, respond, and give airtime to progressive ideas because it is repeated many times."
Media Constorium members have consistently done just that in regards to drug policy. Alternet described in 2009 that the Alliance’s last conference as coming at a “crucial time” and thanks “decades of grassroots activism” for turning the tide on the marijuana debate. Think Progress has also promoted the legalization of marijuana and proudly touted a legalization bill in Congress. Mother Jones posted a story that quoted President Obama as saying drug use “is an entirely legitimate topic for debate” but was “not in favor of legalization.” Obama’s statement, according to Mother Jones, went further than “any past president in questioning the wisdom of a drug policy based on arrests and incarceration.”
- Iris Somberg's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Not sure why
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 10:53am.
Soros would be in favor of legalizing pot. It would be that much harder to get "live" voters to the polls. I mean, there are only so many cemeteries to vote Democrat.
Win it
Submitted by permagrin on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 1:03pm.
And to think that if he had given that money to the drug war we would have won it by now.
He's right
Submitted by red eye repub on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 1:56pm.
The war on drugs is silly. It's just another way to waste the taxpayers money. Like education, we keep giving them more money, the results are the same.
Look at the Gallup poll that came out a few weeks ago. The truth is that people don't think Marijuana is a big deal. You know why? Because it's not a big deal.
Gary Johnson is the most sensible person on the Right in this debate. Stop wasting our money on a failed war with a false premise.
Loser advocacy
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 6:35pm.
The war on drugs is ONLY silly to those who think losers and loser behavior is something to be embraced.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Loser advocacy? Lol!
Submitted by red eye repub on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:20pm.
That's your argument? Hahaha! And who decides who is a loser? You? Next time try to make your point without resorting to ad hominom attacks. That means name calling.
The truth is you are just a little totalitarian, just another Liberal who wants to tailor the law to fit your ideals. The only difference is you're a republican totalitarian.
Well here's a news flash for you. America isn't about 'preventing Loser advocacy'. America is about freedom. Including freedom to become as big of a loser as any of us could hope to strive to be! So if someone wants to drink liquor, or smoke a cigarette, drink caffeinated beverages, or eat a dozen transfer fat filled donuts...
It's none of your business. Grow up.
Give me a frigging break!
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:36pm.
Please. I don't want to live next to a bunch of losers, and this makes me the most evil totalitarian bastard on the planet? I want to see an America that is moving world civilization forward in every possible way, not one which is going absolutely nowhere, and I'm an evil totalitarian. That's YOUR argument?
And then you go in this stupid "civil rights" mode, desperately trying to turn a public safety concern into a civil rights issue.
If anyone needs to grow up, it is you, not I. The problem is that you can't admit your desire to become a loser pothead, and that you want to get high legally. So you equate your cause of getting high without legal consequences with freedom and civil rights.
This is YOUR news flash: governments have, and will always, reflect society's values. It seems that you have a very serious problem with that, and I would submit that not being able to deal with that basic fact does not make you a libertarian; it makes you an anarchist. And society frowns upon people dropping out of society and becoming losers. I have yet to meet the unrepetant pothead that isn't a complete loser. Besides, if you REALLY need to smoke a joint at, say, a concert, to help you appreciate it, you HAVE to be a loser.
When a proposition went forward in the most pot-obsessed state in America (AK), the pro-pot crowd was busy using your silly argument, that it was ALL ABOUT freedom, liberty, and civil rights. But people in that state - as pot-obsessed as it is - saw straight through that BS. The one anti-pot spot I heard on the radio said it all: "It's not okay to tell our children to drop out of society and check out of their lives (or words to that effect)."
Time to get a life and stop being a loser.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Let me guess
Submitted by red eye repub on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 1:30pm.
You don't like your neighbors very much do you? That's the 2nd time you've brought them into this argument. Hahaha! I'm sorry if you have bad neighbors that apparently smoke pot. But I think you are confused between correlation and causation. Just because you have loser neighbors and they smoke pot, doesn't mean it was the pot that caused them to be loser neighbors. Do you understand that? This is basic logic.
Secondly, you really harp on this whole 'loser' thing. What is the definition of a loser to you? Is it merely someone who smokes pot? Or is it something else? If it's just someone who smokes marijuana, then call me a loser.
A loser that is an aerospace engineer that designs aircraft for the military and for commercial use. That means this loser not only helps protect you from foreign threats, but also is partially responsible for transporting you safely around the world when you fly. So please, next time you're in the TSA line, getting violated, think about this conversation we had. And know that your life might very well be in a loser's hands. Or maybe from now on you ought to just drive. For your own safety, of course.
Try a LOT HARDER
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 5:24pm.
Ah, so you think that loser potheads are GREAT and WONDERFUL and should be celebrated in society as model citizens.
You obviously don't know many potheads. I do, and they wouldn't become an aerospace engineer because that would require effort above and beyond making just enough money to get some weed. I knew plenty, especially in my HS and college days and they had no ambition whatsoever. That might explain why the neighborhood many of them lived in was so run down.
I know, you wholeheartedly endorse your kids dropping out of society and becoming a bunch of losers, and you firmly believe that is what America is all about. I don't. And I realize that your whole mission in life is to get high legally because somehow the gift of life just isn't enough for you. In fact, I'd argue you don't see life as a gift but rather as a hellish burden that has to be endured (and THAT is what makes the druggies and potheads of this world losers). But you are going to have to try a LOT harder to convince me of the virtues of legalizing drugs.
Because right about now, the only way I would is if you losers were all given an entire county - let's call it "Loser County" (since I know that word irritates you so) - in which you can get high and poison and kill yourselves to your heart's content. In this setup I envision, I'd see to it that once you enter this county, you can't come out unless you go through rehab. Otherwise, you can drop out of society all you want if life is too much of a burden for you. Drop all the acid and smoke all the pot you want in Loser County. Illegal everywhere else - permitted there, so that you losers CAN actually elect to drop out of society.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Drug War...
Submitted by adamsmith on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 3:27pm.
This is the biggest waste of money of all time. More importantly many of our rights regarding privacy and liberty are gone because of it. The only thing to come out of it is now banks need to report cash deposits of more than $10,000. It's no one's business how much money I have or what I decide to do with it. The current war on drugs has done the same thing prohibition did, make criminals rich. The government has the right to tell me I can't ingest marijuana or any other drug. What's next? Telling me I can't put salt on my food? Telling me I can't drink coffee because some people get the jitters? Telling school children they can't have soda or French Fries? I'm sick of the nanny state whether it comes from the Right or the Left. It's all about control, in a country that was founded on the concept of Individual Liberty.
Laughable
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 6:38pm.
This whole concept of turning a public safety issue into a civil rights issue failed, and failed miserably, in THE most pot-obsessed state of them all. And was it ever fun to watch.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Soros Not The Only Big Donor
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 10/31/2011 - 10:27pm.
Clevelander Peter B. Lewis, the eccentric billionaire founder of Progressive Insurance company, is a big time donor to legalize marijuana.
From Cleveland's The Plain Dealer newspaper:
"Lewis, whose company is based in Mayfield Village, is among the most wealthy, high-profile supporters of medical marijuana legalization. Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, estimates that Lewis has contributed between $40 million and $60 million to the cause since the 1980s.
"No person on the face of this Earth has donated more money to reform marijuana laws than Peter B. Lewis," St. Pierre said."