MRC Study: Ed's Obsession, Anti-Scott Walker Guests Dominate The Ed Show by 237 to 1
Tuesday’s recall election in Wisconsin marks the end point of MSNBC’s Ed Schultz’s 15 month-long mission to destroy Scott Walker. The conservative Republican governor’s attempt to fix that state’s budget crisis, by reigning in the public unions’ influence, sent Schultz on a rampage. The liberal talk show host turned his self-titled program, The Ed Show, into a hyper-partisan platform from which union activists, liberal journalists and Wisconsin state Democrats could join Schultz in his drive to oust the “radical” Walker out office.
From February 14, 2011 through May 18, 2012 anti-Walker guests dominated by a count of 237 (99.6%) to 1 (less than .5%). In that same span Schultz devoted a portion or a majority of 128 episodes to attacks on Walker. (chart and video montage after the jump)
Critics of cable news often suggest that MSNBC and Fox News Channel (FNC) are carbon copies of each other with FNC catering to the conservative side. However, over that same time period, Shultz’s 8 PM EDT time slot competitor -- FNC’s The O’Reilly Factor -- spent only 19 shows discussing Walker and those displayed a more balanced guest list with a total of 12 pro-Walker advocates (44%) to 8 (30%) Walker opponents, with 7 (26%) neutral voices.
Schultz began his obsessive assault on Walker when he opened his February 14, 2011 program by warning his audience that “There is a war brewing, folks...American wage earners are under a ruthless attack by a new group of cold- hearted Republican governors around the country. In the state of Wisconsin, newly-elected Republican Governor Scott Walker is trying to balance the budget on the backs of school teachers, prison guards, and snowplow drivers...Walker is also on a mission to destroy basic human rights, union rights that is, for public employees.”
The next day Schultz brought on the lone voice of support for Walker, GOP state senator Glenn Grothman, but from then on it was a steady stream of union activists, liberal journalists and Democratic officeholders as Schultz operated more like the Wisconsin Democratic State party chair than just your average cable news talk show host.
Democratic Solidarity Now!
When a group of “brave” and “patriotic” Democratic state senators – or as Schultz “affectionately” called them the “Wisconsin 14” – went into hiding, in order to stall Walker’s legislation, Schultz managed to track them down when he took his show on the road to Madison, Wisconsin. On his February 17, 2011 show Schultz absurdly portrayed members of the Wisconsin 14 as heroic resistance fighters: “Joining me now from an undisclosed location is Wisconsin State Senators Frank Risser and Mark Miller and nine other Democratic state senators who are standing up in solidarity for the workers of Wisconsin.”
Look for the Union Label
Schultz liked to invite union activists to The Ed Show as well. Rick Badger from AFSCME Wisconsin, AFL-CIO Wisconsin president Phil Neuenfeldt and Professional Firefighter of Wisconsin president Mahlon Mitchell, who defiantly proclaimed on the August 8, 2011 show: “We didn’t ask for this fight, but I guarantee we will finish this fight,” were treated to warm receptions from Schultz. This isn’t surprising given that, according to the Labor Department, Schultz’s broadcast company received nearly $200,000 from unions.
Walker's 'Racist' Agenda Against Kids
Schultz also brought on his brothers-in-arms in the media. On the February 16, 2011 Ed Show, Sirius/XM liberal talk radio host Joe Madison said the fight against Walker reminded him of “Martin Luther King and the reason he went to Memphis, Tennessee” and compared the pro-Walker forces to “Dixiecrats.” On the March 3, 2011 Ed Show, Schultz railed that Walker’s budget was “racist” because it was “picking on inner city kids.” Fellow MSNBC talker Al Sharpton then came on to agree that the proposal would “pick on” children, “take collective bargaining away” from their parents and “give a tax break to the rich.” John Nichols of the ultra-leftist magazine The Nation was a regular who, on the June 8, 2011 program, joined Schultz in a cartoonish portrayal of the governor as a kid hater:
SCHULTZ: I want to get your take on Governor Scott Walker. He reportedly has removed a portrait of low- income children from the governor’s mansion. And he`s replaced it with a picture of a Bald Eagle. What details do you have on this? Why did he do this?
NICHOLS: Well, as I understand it -- and this is something that’s been reported a good deal -- when the Walkers came into the governor’s mansion, they made it quite clear to the staff that they didn’t want this picture of these kids from Milwaukee in a prominent place in the mansion.
And so they asked that it be removed and taken over and put in a public space in Milwaukee, so that they could put up other pictures. It’s caused a real stir in Wisconsin. The artist who did the painting has expressed a lot of concern.
And frankly, a lot of other folks have asked why doesn’t this governor want to have pictures of low-income kids in the governor’s mansion? Is it because his budget and his policies are doing so much damage to kids like that?
Defending the Little Big Labor Guy
The day before Wisconsin voters were to vote on whether to have a recall GOP state senators, Schultz brought his act back to Madison, which gave him an excuse to spout anti-Walker rhetoric while adoring fans cheered on. On the August 8, 2011 Ed Show, Schultz proclaimed: “This is the eye of the storm for the fight for the middle class in this country...For eight months, Wisconsinites have been under attack by the anti-worker policies of Republican rookie governor Scott Walker, and his minions in the State Senate. Ten hours from now, Wisconsin voters will have a chance to go to the polls and recall six Republican state senators who voted to strip collective bargaining and take money out of the pockets of hundreds of thousands of middle class state workers” and “send shock waves into every Republican state house and congressional office in the country.” Schultz then proceeded to introduce, to applause from his live audience, two Democratic state candidates (State Representatives Fred Clark and Sandy Pasch) challenging the incumbent Republicans.
By allowing Ed Schultz to pay back his union buddies with hours of programming to attack Scott Walker MSNBC has demonstrated its willingness to move just beyond opinion journalism into outright campaigning for Democrats and their causes.
- Geoffrey Dickens's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
So, let me get this straight . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:38am.
. . . According to Schultz, Walker had a portrait of Milwaukee children removed from his governor's mansion where hardly anyone will see it, and relocated to a public space in Milwaukee where everyone can see it.
So, tell me again why this is a bad thing?
because
Submitted by dmacleo on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:57am.
shut up :) :)
I think thats how the saying goes..
GOODBYE!!!...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:52am.
....Ed just blew you right off his radio show for exposing him as a chump. Facts are Forbidden...
Mr. Schultz will
Submitted by nolefan2 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:46am.
not have conservative guests on because he isn't mentally up to the challenge it would present.
Walker changed some artwork in the governor’s mansion?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:47am.
OMG, the horror!
I wonder if he also returned that bust of Lenin to Russia.
237 to 1?
Submitted by richflanj on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:53am.
Isn't that his guest to viewer ratio, too?
ZING!!!
Submitted by Geoffrey Dickens on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:54am.
ZING!!!
Agreed.
Submitted by needle on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:56am.
And just think, it would be even worse if NB were to stop monitoring his amateur hour.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Where will you be June 5th?
Submitted by Texndoc on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:02am.
I'll be front and center watching Special Ed, with popcorn.
More popcorn: he's furious with Obama because like gay marriage in North Carolina, Obama wouldn't be caught dead in the state knowing ahead the final outcome.
I wish for you a massive landslide
Submitted by needle on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:06am.
As for me, watching Ed Schultz puts me off my popcorn no matter what the circumstances.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Oh Boo Hoo the unions are losing
Submitted by ohio granny on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:08am.
Should we have a pity party for the unions because they are losing members because they act like thugs? Nah, we should all cheer that this is happening.
Public sector unions are a money laundering scam to take money from the taxpayers to hand over to the democrat party. Without the union money the democrats are in trouble.
Corrupt unions supporting the corrupt democrat party.
As the unions go,
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:15am.
so goes the democratic party. Shultz was right; their income and support is drying up because their positions are untenable. Voter fraud is being reined in, state by state. It will be a looooooong time before we see another liberal dem POTUS.
Add that is on top of how looooong it is going to take to forget
Submitted by needle on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:03am.
Obama
Big
A$$
Mistake
America
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
"Special Ed" is a far left
Submitted by John21 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:09am.
"Special Ed" is a far left liberal that is owned and operated by his union friends, they pay the best for him to "batsh*t crazy". I do not understand why anyone with a functional brain would listen to this know nothing? He is just a far left shill with a grating voice and no working braincells.
Pathetic
So where's the NYT story
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:19am.
on this flagrant campaigning by Schultz and MSNBC?
They wasted no time in jumping on Fox News for showing an anti-Obama video.....
I think you will find it at
Submitted by needle on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:11am.
I think you will find it at the bottom left side corner on page 1,217 of the Nov 20, 2012 edition.
Or maybe sooner in the Obits, if Ed has a heart attack in the next few months.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
This clown has taken hundreds
Submitted by cristo on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:33am.
This clown has taken hundreds of thousands of dollars from unions. His website, where he asks folks to pony up $2,500 (American funds) for a 3-day stay (double occupancy) at his fishing camp in Canada (Big Eddie's North Country Lodge) is bracketed by union adds - CWA, AFSCME, AFL-CIO - so this should come as no surprise. The baldy fat boy (someone ought to tell him the tan shorts and the white socks really make for bad video) is anti-American and it's not likely he's using American labor 192 miles north of Winnipeg.
Ed the Red....
Submitted by adamsmith on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 10:34am.
I tune into MSNBC all the time to watch how many lies and truth distortions they can fit into one hour. I keep hoping to see Eddie stroke out on air, and my wish may be granted Tuesday. It'll be like Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday in "Tombstone", "Poor devil was just too high strung, the pressure was just too much too bear". I was watching Rachel "Rugmuncher" Maddow the other night, she was choking back tears in that it looks like the whole country is becoming tired of Neo-Libs, commies, radical homos, socialists, crony capitalists, OWS terrorists, Muslim supporters, union leaders, etc..... Keynesian Economics is center stage in flames. These morons see the end coming. When the nation finally one day realizes they foisted a Communist fraud on the public, I can see the party in the wilderness for the next 5 election cycles. They're screwed and NewsBusters is playing a big role in this. Great work!!!!!!!
Big Ed is unbearably obnoxious and corrupt
Submitted by sl3_007 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:00am.
This guy is bought and paid for by the unions is a lot different than commentators on Fox. I guess Fox pays better with higher ratings and the hosts don't have to take money on the side, but I doubt Fox execs would allow what MSDNC allows.
Independent?
Submitted by SSix2 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 11:20am.
I dont watch Shultz and only know of him through NB. Does he claim to be independent or neutral?
If yes then I understand pointing out the bias.
If no then there is nothing wrong wtih his one sided attacks. I disagree with him but it is his right and MSNBC's right. He is no different than Hannity, giving his opinion on his show from his point of view.
I thought NB was to point out media bias, not document how liberal opinion shows are one sided. Newsbusters gives Shultz higher ratings by giving him attention.
Personally, I enjoy reading the cases of bias in the media outlets that claim to be neutral.
Watch MESSDNC for five minutes...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 12:06pm.
...and chances are you will see one of their "Independent, unbiased" show hosts doing one of their "Lean Forward, Grab Ankles" commercials where they plug one of the WH talking points...
Meanwhile - LAT's jumped on Fox News yesterday for it's bias
Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 12:05pm.
In all my years of reading the LAT's (I know - It's a painful sentence), I've never run across a single story, column, editorial, etc., which was about any sort of bias, hate speech, or other assorted vitriol in the paper. That would imply - not on Bill Maher, not on Ed Schultz, not on Keith Olbermann, not on Mike Molloy (or any of the AM hate spewing vitriolic hosts), not on Lawrence O'Donnell, and so on. There have been plenty on Fox - in general, on Rush, on O'Reilly, on Hannity, and of course overkill on Glen Beck. On rare occasion, in a piece on Fox or one of the others, there occasionally appears, buried in the piece, " . . some say that Keith Olbermann is known to be abrasive, as well." When we come back and question the paper on their blatant bias - they'll say, " oh no, we've covered the issues with Olbermann and Maher, etc., many times - and sure enough, they were mentioned buried deep into the headlined hit pieces on Fox or Beck.
Anyhow - yesterday, James Rainey (previously pointed out as the point man for MediaMatter's WH talkling points delivery system for the LAT's) did the usual in, Fox News accused of crossing the line in attack on Obama [video].
Hmmph.
It was a darn good video too - shucks.
(;~/ gary
If you can't trust a hypermaniac
Submitted by Russian55 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 12:36pm.
Look at it this way, if you can't trust a one-sided, hypermaniac, spittle-emitting whack job like Ed, who can you trust for biased information?
---
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will end up plowing for those who kept their swords in the first place!
I will watch MSNBC on 2 nights only
Submitted by ChrisNH on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 1:12pm.
1.) Next Tuesday, when Walker soundly survives violent, leg-breaking Leftist union-hack activists and their voter-fraud campaign.
2.) Later, when OBAMOCare is bludgeoned to death.
MSNBC will be 'must-see TV' on those nights!
Hey, how did that one
Submitted by Hero Squad on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 2:11pm.
Hey, how did that one pro-Walker speaker get on the show?
*
"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will
I understand the producer who let him slip through the net
Submitted by Jer on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:42pm.
is now fetching Big Ed's coffee and cleaning toilets at MSNBC.
Jer