MRC Study: Media Protecting 'Food Stamp President' Obama By Ignoring Growing Food Stamp Crisis
In the '80s the liberal media filled the airwaves with tales of woe from the homeless as a way to distract viewers from the runaway success of Reaganomics. In the 2000s, the same media chatted with one frustrated gas station customer after another to slam then-President George W. Bush.
However in 2011, with over 44 million Americans on food stamps, a new high according to the latest data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (See Table 2), the Big Three broadcast network news programs have been virtually devoid of anecdotal sob stories of moms and dads struggling to pay for their kids' box of Frosted Flakes, as a way to hammer Barack Obama's failed economic policies.
A new chart released by the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on May 31, according to a story by Examiner.com's Kenneth Schortgen, showed that "just under 14.5% of the American public received food stamp benefits." This startling statistic has so far failed to provoke a rash of food stamp horror stories that badger the Obama administration for its failed economic policies.
MRC analysts reviewed the evening and morning news shows for NBC, ABC and CBS from January 1 through June 6 and found only two examples (both on CBS) of someone having to pay a portion or all of their grocery bill with food stamps. In not one story were Obama administration policies blamed for an economy where so many have ended up on food stamps. Altogether there was a total of just six stories that even mentioned food stamps as an issue.

On NBC there was just one anchor brief, by Ann Curry on the February 3 Today show, that relayed a Department of Agriculture statistic that "Some 43.6 million Americans are currently relying on food stamps for groceries...and that's nearly 15 percent of the U.S. population." There was no mention of this bit of bad economic information on the NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams.
That Curry story was a lot more than what ABC had to offer, which has yet to mention the troubling statistic on either ABC World News with Diane Sawyer or Good Morning America.
As noted earlier, CBS News did manage to talk to two different people relying on the food stamp program. During a Wyatt Andrews "American Spirit" story about a single mom who took in eight children after her sister drowned, aired on the March 9 Evening News with Katie Couric, Andrews noted that the law firm clerk was aided by "food stamps and church donations" for "help with the impossible grocery bills."
On CBS's May 30 edition of The Early Show – as part of their Memorial Day coverage of unemployed veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars – did air a sound bite from Shannon Dodson, who admitted that it was "hard for me to now be on food stamps" after having served her country. Yet nowhere in the piece by Jeff Glor did Obama administration policies come under fire for the bad economy that possibly led to this Air Force vet's predicament.
There were only three other mentions of the food stamp program on either the CBS Evening News or The Early Show. On February 11, Bill Plante on CBS's morning show relayed that Obama had called for "$2.2 billion to be restored to the food stamp program" as part of his budget proposal, then later on the April 13 edition of the Early Show Plante relayed that part of Republican Congressman Paul Ryan's plan included "putting caps on Medicaid, food stamp assistance and housing assistance programs while reducing taxes for the very wealthy and for corporations."
On the April 5 CBS Evening News, Nancy Cordes also reported that "Republicans want to put a cap on Medicaid, food stamp assistance, and housing assistance programs, giving states a fixed amount of money each year to insure the poor instead of making payments that fluctuate based on need."
A Nexis search over the same period did reveal that the food stamp issue was brought up on programs other than the morning and evening news shows, but not in a way to blame Obama for any sort of economic mess but rather to use a blunt instrument to bash any Republican who dared bring up the issue as a racist. Which is precisely what happened with former GOP House speaker and current presidential candidate Newt Gingrich when he raised the topic.
On the May 15 edition of NBC's Meet the Press, that show's host, David Gregory, throttled Gingrich for daring to bring up the food stamp issue, going as far to accuse him of using "racially-tinged language," as seen in the following excerpt:
CLIP OF NEWT GINGRICH AT SPEECH: You want to be a country that creates food stamps, in which case frankly Obama's is an enormous success. The most successful food stamp president in American history. Or do you want to be a country that creates paychecks?
DAVID GREGORY TO GINGRICH: First of all, you gave a speech in Georgia with language a lot of people think could be coded racially-tinged language, calling the president, the first black president, a food stamp president.
NEWT GINGRICH: Oh, come on, David.
GREGORY: What did you mean? What was the point?
GINGRICH: That's, that's bizarre. That--this kind of automatic reference to racism, this is the president of the United States. The president of the United States has to be held accountable. Now, the idea that--and what I said is factually true. Forty-seven million Americans are on food stamps. One out of every six Americans is on food stamps. And to hide behind the charge of racism? I have--I have never said anything about President Obama which is racist.
GREGORY: Well, what did you mean?
REP. GINGRICH: Well, it's very simple. He has policies--and I used a very direct analogy. He follows the same destructive political model that destroyed the city of Detroit.
On that same program, in the roundtable discussion, the Washington Post's E.J. Dionne picked up on Gregory's "racially-tinged" line and ran with it: "But, you know, Newt has always wanted to run for president, so I'm actually glad he's doing it. And he seems to be trying to cast himself as a good-natured flamethrower, and he was very good at kind of fending off those questions. But he can never resist going a few steps over the top. Right during your interview, you asked him if this comment on food stamps is racially tinged. And he doubles down and says, 'Well, do we want the U.S. to become like Detroit,' aka Motown, you know?"
Also on that same day, over on ABC's Sunday roundtable show, This Week, Christiane Amanpour aired Gingrich's "food stamp president" quote before her interview with South Carolina's Republican Governor Nikki Haley in which she was asked about the former House Speaker's presidential chances.
ABC had one other mention of the food stamp issue, when John Quinones on the January 21 edition of Prime Time Live noted that "food stamp usage was up 20 percent from last year with a striking one in eight Americans needing assistance." Quinones uttered that statistic right before going into an ABC News hidden camera investigation where they hired an actress to pretend she was on assistance to see how fellow grocery store customers in line behind her would react to her inability to pay her bill.
A nation of 44 million Americans on food stamps and ABC couldn't find one actual person with a sad story to interview, so instead they hired a pretend victim of the Obama economy. Although, just like the other networks, Quinones didn't bother to tie even the fake victim story to Obama's polices as his name was never mentioned in the story.
If the number of Americans on food stamps had reached a record level under a Republican president it's likely that viewers of the Big Three network news programs would have been inundated with images of hungry Americans lining up to pay their grocery bill with food stamps, but with a Democrat in office the current crisis has gone virtually uncovered.
- Geoffrey Dickens's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Tell Them
Submitted by dan iroticiv on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 1:43pm.
I love newsbusters for pointing out yet another bias by omission by the mainstream media. However, I will say it again, why don't the republicans when asked to appear on these shill's airwaves bring the omission to their attention and confront them with obvious bias. They must read newsbusters, they are aware of the difference in covering dems and the GOP, but rarely do anyone of them call out the media. As long as republicans go on these liberal shows and pretend they are being treated fairly the media is not going to stop.
Media Bias and blog posts
Submitted by Cranky_Curmudgeon on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 3:24pm.
Food stamps are not the only thing these people do not want to talk about. My wife tried to post a reply to an article last week about Jeff Bridges and his work for American children needing food and clothing. The article was about shoes for Africa and elsewhere. My wife asked them about American kids and the blog flat refused to post it and refused to give her a reason why they didn't want it on their site.
If it isn't for somewhere else, these liberals do not want it posted as it reflects so poorly on their assertions that everyone in the U.S. has everything they need- unless they are a "minority", of course.
Speaking of Bridges. I read
Submitted by ricklail on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 4:40pm.
Speaking of Bridges. I read an article from Web MD about 16.7 million kids going hungry. He has made his mission to wipe out hunger. As long as food stamp recipients can get by with trading the EBT cards for dope, kids are going to do hungry.
rick, you have to look at
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 4:56pm.
rick, you have to look at these "studies" with a jaundiced eye.
Some of them define "hungry" as having missed a meal in the past week. They don't ask the reason; it could be because the kid got up too late to have breakfast before school, or someone missed their lunch break because of being busy at work....etc.
Then they use other terms like "food insecure" or "at risk" of hunger.
I'm not saying there aren't kids who are indeed hungry, but I think a lot has to do with the definition of "hunger."
what about adults?
Submitted by jon_torlin on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 11:21pm.
I remember seeing something along those lines about the same thing happening with adults and trying to lump them the same way.
Like you said about asking the reason, it's the same thing. Hell, this week, I've missed lunch three times, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday(today). Does that mean I went hungry? Well, yeah, but I had a snack later or I just waited until I left work and grabbed a Subway sandwich or made something at home. How many of us on here have days like that? I missed lunch by choice because I chose to try to take care of some stuff at work to get it done and out of the way and out of sight/out of mind.
I'm sure some moronic liberal would use that as some sort of lame-@ss example and say "see, this guy went hungry too!" No, it's called dealing with REALITY! Or better yet, life happens when you make plans.
I find it not a little bit insulting that Libs still insist on acting like everything that we do in life is not on choices, but fate or some sort of weird random thing out of our control and they want to step in to assert their form of control. The key word that they hate so much is "responsibility" that libs REFUSE to take, even pervs like Weiner, and blame everything else except themselves for the choice that they somehow don't realize that they make.
Ah hell, you get the idea.
-Jon
food stamps
Submitted by east tennessee john on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 3:40pm.
The increase in food stamps is directly related to unemployment, surprise surprise. When and if we ever have jobs available, food stamp use will go down. The Libtard media covers up food stamp use to simultaneously hide the lack of jobs and B.O.'s complete economic failure. But what do you expect from a guy whose most extensive lessons in economics were in a socialist church?
I thought Obama cured hunger
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 3:52pm.
I thought Obama cured hunger and poverty in America given the liberal media haven't run any sob stories of people suffering. However, I have seen plenty of sob stories from the liberal media about a few cuts being made to public employees.
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James MadisonHe told you
Submitted by John21 on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 3:57pm.
It is just a bump in the road (the size of the Alps) and that it is your fault that his economic recovery isn't working (the progressives told him it was a good plan). You people are just too dumb to appreiate the greatest of his ego. The peon must learn to obey the master, he told you in 2008 he would fix everything with "sweetness and light' (mirror), his unicorn and faerie dust (smoke) and you must trust in the scam.
Pamela Geller : Palin Documentary A 2012 Game Changer
Submitted by im41 on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 4:02pm.
Tip
If Obama's Plan for Amerika is ultimately successful...
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 06/08/2011 - 4:32pm.
...(and it looks more and more that it will be as each day passes, as the House repubes appear to be utterly paralyzed), half the country is going to be on food stamps.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Obama's reelection strategy
Submitted by aposematic on Thu, 06/09/2011 - 10:40am.
Make the economy so terribly bad everyone must use free Government handouts to survive in the hope they will vote to keep the free handouts by voting Democrat over improving their future by voting Republican. Having food for your family is a strong deceptive inducement as a Government strong enough to give you something is strong enough to take it away.